首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development最新文献

英文 中文
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Mufemilast, a PDE4 Inhibitor, in Healthy Participants: A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study 一种PDE4抑制剂Mufemilast在健康参与者中的安全性、耐受性和药代动力学:一项首次在人体进行的1期研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70005
Xiuqi Li, Xiaofei Wu, Aihong Huo, Guanghuai Zeng, Richard Jones, Rui Chen, Hongyun Wang

Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a branch of the phosphodiesterase isoenzyme family and plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular cAMP homeostasis. Mufemilast, a novel PDE4 inhibitor, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical studies and holds promise for treating inflammatory diseases. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles of mufemilast were evaluated in healthy participants. In the single ascending dose study, 68 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive single oral doses of mufemilast ranging from 10 to 125 mg. In the multiple ascending dose study, 24 healthy subjects received mufemilast at doses of 15, 30, and 60 mg twice daily for 7 consecutive days. In the two-period, crossover food effect study, 12 healthy subjects were administered a 52.5-mg dose of mufemilast both in the fasted and fed state. The results showed that mufemilast was rapidly absorbed and the exposure increased with dose. Following multiple doses, the mean accumulation ratios indicated some accumulations of mufemilast. The Tmax was 3 and 5 h under fasted and fed conditions, while the geometric mean ratio and 90% CIs for AUClast, AUCinf, and Cmax were 105.76 [92.69%,120.66%], 105.60 [92.52%,120.52%], and 92.85 [78.60%,109.68%], respectively. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with positive occult blood test as the most common. Mufemilast was safe and tolerated by healthy participants across all dose groups (10–125 mg). PK analysis revealed that mufemilast exhibited linear PK characteristics. These results support the further evaluation of its efficacy.

磷酸二酯酶4 (PDE4)是磷酸二酯酶同工酶家族的一个分支,在维持细胞内cAMP稳态中起关键作用。Mufemilast是一种新型PDE4抑制剂,在临床前研究中显示出抗炎作用,有望治疗炎症性疾病。在健康参与者中评估了穆伐司特的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。在单次递增剂量研究中,68名健康男性受试者随机接受单次口服剂量从10到125毫克不等的穆伐司特。在多次递增剂量研究中,24名健康受试者接受mufemilast,剂量分别为15、30和60 mg,每日两次,连续7天。在为期两期的交叉食物效应研究中,12名健康受试者在禁食和进食状态下分别服用52.5 mg的mufemilast。结果表明,抑螨司特吸收迅速,且暴露量随剂量增加而增加。在多次给药后,平均积累比表明有一些穆伐司特的积累。禁食和饲喂条件下的Tmax分别为3和5 h, AUClast、AUCinf和Cmax的几何平均比值和90% ci分别为105.76[92.69%、120.66%]、105.60[92.52%、120.52%]和92.85[78.60%、109.68%]。ae多为1级或2级,以潜血试验阳性最为常见。所有剂量组(10-125 mg)的健康参与者都是安全且耐受的。PK分析表明,穆伐司特具有线性PK特性。这些结果为进一步评价其疗效提供了依据。
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Mufemilast, a PDE4 Inhibitor, in Healthy Participants: A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study","authors":"Xiuqi Li,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wu,&nbsp;Aihong Huo,&nbsp;Guanghuai Zeng,&nbsp;Richard Jones,&nbsp;Rui Chen,&nbsp;Hongyun Wang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a branch of the phosphodiesterase isoenzyme family and plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular cAMP homeostasis. Mufemilast, a novel PDE4 inhibitor, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical studies and holds promise for treating inflammatory diseases. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles of mufemilast were evaluated in healthy participants. In the single ascending dose study, 68 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive single oral doses of mufemilast ranging from 10 to 125 mg. In the multiple ascending dose study, 24 healthy subjects received mufemilast at doses of 15, 30, and 60 mg twice daily for 7 consecutive days. In the two-period, crossover food effect study, 12 healthy subjects were administered a 52.5-mg dose of mufemilast both in the fasted and fed state. The results showed that mufemilast was rapidly absorbed and the exposure increased with dose. Following multiple doses, the mean accumulation ratios indicated some accumulations of mufemilast. The T<sub>max</sub> was 3 and 5 h under fasted and fed conditions, while the geometric mean ratio and 90% CIs for AUC<sub>last</sub>, AUC<sub>inf</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub> were 105.76 [92.69%,120.66%], 105.60 [92.52%,120.52%], and 92.85 [78.60%,109.68%], respectively. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with positive occult blood test as the most common. Mufemilast was safe and tolerated by healthy participants across all dose groups (10–125 mg). PK analysis revealed that mufemilast exhibited linear PK characteristics. These results support the further evaluation of its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Triple-Agonist Revolution: Retatrutide and the Paradigm Shift in Multi-Hormonal Pharmacotherapy for Obesity and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities 三重激动剂革命:利特鲁肽和多激素药物治疗肥胖和心脏代谢合并症的范式转变
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70001
Nila Ganamurali, Sarvesh Sabarathinam

Obesity has emerged as a global health crisis requiring innovative therapeutic strategies beyond conventional approaches. While glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists have redefined pharmacological management, their limitations necessitate further innovation. Retatrutide (LY3437943), a novel triple agonist targeting GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon receptors, represents a transformative advance in obesity pharmacotherapy. Phase 2 trials report unprecedented weight reductions, comparable to bariatric surgery, with additional benefits for metabolic comorbidities such as NASH and cardiovascular disease. Retatrutide exemplifies rational multi-agonist peptide engineering and signals a paradigm shift in systems pharmacology. This perspective underscores the urgent need for scientific engagement, equity considerations, and policy preparedness, positioning retatrutide as a watershed in obesity treatment and a blueprint for future poly-agonist therapies.

肥胖已经成为一种全球性的健康危机,需要超越传统方法的创新治疗策略。虽然胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)和双GIP/GLP-1受体激动剂已经重新定义了药理学管理,但它们的局限性需要进一步的创新。利特鲁肽(LY3437943)是一种新型的三重激动剂,靶向GLP-1、葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素性多肽(GIP)和胰高血糖素受体,代表了肥胖药物治疗的革命性进步。二期试验报告了前所未有的体重减轻,与减肥手术相当,并对代谢合并症(如NASH和心血管疾病)有额外的益处。利特鲁肽是合理的多激动剂肽工程的例证,标志着系统药理学的范式转变。这一观点强调了科学参与、公平考虑和政策准备的迫切需要,将利妥鲁肽定位为肥胖治疗的分水岭和未来多激动剂治疗的蓝图。
{"title":"The Triple-Agonist Revolution: Retatrutide and the Paradigm Shift in Multi-Hormonal Pharmacotherapy for Obesity and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities","authors":"Nila Ganamurali,&nbsp;Sarvesh Sabarathinam","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Obesity has emerged as a global health crisis requiring innovative therapeutic strategies beyond conventional approaches. While glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists have redefined pharmacological management, their limitations necessitate further innovation. Retatrutide (LY3437943), a novel triple agonist targeting GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon receptors, represents a transformative advance in obesity pharmacotherapy. Phase 2 trials report unprecedented weight reductions, comparable to bariatric surgery, with additional benefits for metabolic comorbidities such as NASH and cardiovascular disease. Retatrutide exemplifies rational multi-agonist peptide engineering and signals a paradigm shift in systems pharmacology. This perspective underscores the urgent need for scientific engagement, equity considerations, and policy preparedness, positioning retatrutide as a watershed in obesity treatment and a blueprint for future poly-agonist therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145983715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase 1 Bioequivalence Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Guselkumab After a Single-Dose Administration via Two Subcutaneous Injection Devices in Healthy Volunteers 在健康志愿者中通过两种皮下注射装置单剂量给药后评估Guselkumab药代动力学、安全性和耐受性的1期生物等效性研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70007
Angela Jeong, Kathleen Weisel, Dessislava Dimitrova, Brianna Donnelly, Daniel Wang, An Vermeulen, Zhenhua Xu

Guselkumab is approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, as well as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Two delivery devices for subcutaneous (SC) injection previously had been approved for the administration of 100 mg guselkumab. This study was designed to demonstrate the bioequivalence and tolerability of guselkumab following a single-dose SC administration of 100 mg guselkumab using a 1 mL prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled with an Ypsomate autoinjector (i.e., 1 mL PFS-Y, Test device) as compared to the approved 1 mL PFS assembled with the UltraSafe Plus needle safety guard (i.e., 1 mL PFS-U, Reference device). Mean serum guselkumab concentration–time profiles were nearly superimposable for both devices following a single SC injection. The geometric mean ratios and the corresponding 90% confidence interval [CI] for Cmax and AUCinf were 102.28% (94.85%–110.30%) and 102.10% (95.19%–109.51%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between the two treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was low and comparable between the two groups. Overall, these results suggest that the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and immunogenicity of guselkumab are comparable when administered via the 1 mL PFS-Y and 1 mL PFS-U.

Guselkumab被批准用于治疗银屑病、银屑病关节炎、溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病。两种皮下注射给药装置先前已被批准用于100mg guselkumab的给药。本研究旨在证明guselkumab的生物等效性和耐受性,使用1ml预充注射器(PFS)与Ypsomate自动注射器(即1ml PFS- y,测试装置)组装100 mg guselkumab单剂量SC给药,与批准的1ml PFS与UltraSafe Plus针头安全防护(即1ml PFS- u,参考装置)组装。单次SC注射后,两种设备的平均血清guselkumab浓度-时间谱几乎重合。Cmax和AUCinf的几何平均比值和相应的90%置信区间[CI]分别为102.28%(94.85% ~ 110.30%)和102.10%(95.19% ~ 109.51%)。两组治疗后出现的不良事件发生率无显著差异,两组治疗后出现的抗药物抗体发生率较低,具有可比性。总的来说,这些结果表明,通过1ml PFS-Y和1ml PFS-U给药时,guselkumab的药代动力学、安全性/耐受性和免疫原性是相当的。
{"title":"A Phase 1 Bioequivalence Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Guselkumab After a Single-Dose Administration via Two Subcutaneous Injection Devices in Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Angela Jeong,&nbsp;Kathleen Weisel,&nbsp;Dessislava Dimitrova,&nbsp;Brianna Donnelly,&nbsp;Daniel Wang,&nbsp;An Vermeulen,&nbsp;Zhenhua Xu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Guselkumab is approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, as well as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Two delivery devices for subcutaneous (SC) injection previously had been approved for the administration of 100 mg guselkumab. This study was designed to demonstrate the bioequivalence and tolerability of guselkumab following a single-dose SC administration of 100 mg guselkumab using a 1 mL prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled with an Ypsomate autoinjector (i.e., 1 mL PFS-Y, Test device) as compared to the approved 1 mL PFS assembled with the UltraSafe Plus needle safety guard (i.e., 1 mL PFS-U, Reference device). Mean serum guselkumab concentration–time profiles were nearly superimposable for both devices following a single SC injection. The geometric mean ratios and the corresponding 90% confidence interval [CI] for C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> were 102.28% (94.85%–110.30%) and 102.10% (95.19%–109.51%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between the two treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was low and comparable between the two groups. Overall, these results suggest that the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and immunogenicity of guselkumab are comparable when administered via the 1 mL PFS-Y and 1 mL PFS-U.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145983689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Sampling Window Variability on Pharmacokinetic Parameters Estimated by Non-Compartmental Analysis: Case Studies of Various Types of Drugs 抽样窗口变异性对非区隔分析估计的药代动力学参数的影响:不同类型药物的案例研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70004
Kyosuke Takahashi, Kazuhiko Asari, Kazuhiko Hanada

Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) is commonly used to estimate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in individual participants during Phase 1 studies. PK sampling schedules are important for accurately characterizing a drug's PK profile. However, collecting blood samples on time is often challenging, even in Phase 1 studies involving healthy participants, due to tightly scheduled study activities. To address these constraints, sampling windows—defined as permissible time intervals for blood sample collection—are often implemented. These windows provide operational flexibility at clinical study sites while maintaining a reasonable level of accuracy in parameter estimation. To date, no published literature has described the construction of sampling windows for NCA, and the general practice of constructing sampling windows remains unstandardized. In this study, we evaluated the impact of varying sampling window lengths on NCA-derived PK parameters, leveraging bioequivalence criteria as an indicator to assess the effects and provide insights into the construction of sampling windows for NCA. As a result, we were able to quantitatively evaluate how changes in sampling window length affect NCA-based PK parameters. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for appropriate sampling windows.

非区室分析(NCA)通常用于估计1期研究中个体参与者的药代动力学(PK)参数。药代动力学抽样计划对于准确地描述药物的药代动力学特征是很重要的。然而,由于研究活动安排得很紧,即使在涉及健康参与者的第一阶段研究中,按时收集血液样本也常常具有挑战性。为了解决这些限制,采样窗口——定义为血液样本采集的允许时间间隔——经常被实现。这些窗口在临床研究地点提供操作灵活性,同时保持参数估计的合理准确性。迄今为止,没有发表的文献描述了NCA采样窗的构建,构建采样窗的一般做法仍然不标准化。在本研究中,我们评估了不同采样窗口长度对NCA衍生的PK参数的影响,利用生物等效性标准作为评估影响的指标,并为NCA采样窗口的构建提供了见解。因此,我们能够定量地评估采样窗口长度的变化如何影响基于nca的PK参数。基于这些发现,我们提供了适当的采样窗口的建议。
{"title":"Impact of Sampling Window Variability on Pharmacokinetic Parameters Estimated by Non-Compartmental Analysis: Case Studies of Various Types of Drugs","authors":"Kyosuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Asari,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Hanada","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) is commonly used to estimate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in individual participants during Phase 1 studies. PK sampling schedules are important for accurately characterizing a drug's PK profile. However, collecting blood samples on time is often challenging, even in Phase 1 studies involving healthy participants, due to tightly scheduled study activities. To address these constraints, sampling windows—defined as permissible time intervals for blood sample collection—are often implemented. These windows provide operational flexibility at clinical study sites while maintaining a reasonable level of accuracy in parameter estimation. To date, no published literature has described the construction of sampling windows for NCA, and the general practice of constructing sampling windows remains unstandardized. In this study, we evaluated the impact of varying sampling window lengths on NCA-derived PK parameters, leveraging bioequivalence criteria as an indicator to assess the effects and provide insights into the construction of sampling windows for NCA. As a result, we were able to quantitatively evaluate how changes in sampling window length affect NCA-based PK parameters. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for appropriate sampling windows.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Gastric Acid Suppression, Cytochrome P4503A Inhibition and Induction, and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Tinlarebant in Healthy Adults 胃酸抑制、细胞色素P4503A抑制和诱导以及食物对Tinlarebant在健康成人体内药代动力学的影响
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70009
Thomas M. Polasek, Kushal J. Paneliya, Tom Lin, Nathan L. Mata, Irene Wang, Hendrik P. Scholl, Jessyca Lin

Tinlarebant is an oral retinol binding protein 4 antagonist in clinical development for geographic atrophy, an advanced stage of dry age-related macular degeneration, and Stargardt disease, an inherited juvenile-onset macular degeneration. A randomized, open-label, two-period, interaction study in healthy adults was conducted in four parts to determine the effects of gastric acid suppression (omeprazole 40 mg QD), cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) inhibition (itraconazole 200 mg BD) and induction (rifampin 600 mg QD), and food on the pharmacokinetics of tinlarebant (5 mg single dose). The effects on tinlarebant exposure were quantified by geometric least squares (GLS) mean Cmax and AUCinf ratios, where GLS mean Cmax or AUCinf with potential perpetrator is divided by GLS mean Cmax or AUCinf without potential perpetrator. Steady-state dosing of omeprazole had no effect on tinlarebant exposure (Cmax ratio = 1.16 and AUCinf ratio = 1.03). The Cmax and AUCinf ratios of tinlarebant following itraconazole dosing were 1.29 and 2.42, respectively. Rifampin co-administration decreased tinlarebant Cmax and AUCinf ratios to 0.53 and 0.19, respectively. Compared with the fasting state, taking tinlarebant with food gave Cmax and AUCinf ratios in the range 1.08–1.22. No unexpected safety signals occurred and tinlarebant was well tolerated in all participants. These data show that the pharmacokinetics of tinlarebant is not significantly altered by gastric acid suppression or food. Dosing patients with tinlarebant and strong CYP3A inhibitors is unlikely to compromise safety based on its pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationships, but tinlarebant should be contraindicated with strong CYP3A inducers due to potential treatment failure.

Tinlarebant是一种口服视黄醇结合蛋白4拮抗剂,目前正处于临床开发阶段,用于治疗地理性萎缩(干性年龄相关性黄斑变性的晚期)和Stargardt病(一种遗传性青少年黄斑变性)。在健康成人中进行随机、开放标签、两期相互作用研究,分为四部分,研究抑制胃酸(奥美拉唑40 mg QD)、抑制细胞色素P4503A (CYP3A)(伊曲康唑200 mg BD)和诱导(利福平600 mg QD)以及食物对tinlarebant(单次剂量5 mg)药代动力学的影响。通过几何最小二乘(GLS)平均Cmax和AUCinf比率来量化对辐射剂暴露的影响,其中GLS平均Cmax或有潜在犯罪者的AUCinf除以GLS平均Cmax或没有潜在犯罪者的AUCinf。稳态剂量奥美拉唑对tinlarebant暴露无影响(Cmax比值= 1.16,AUCinf比值= 1.03)。伊曲康唑给药后,tinlarebant的Cmax和AUCinf比值分别为1.29和2.42。利福平联合用药可使tlabrant Cmax和AUCinf比值分别降至0.53和0.19。与空腹相比,与食物同时服用可使Cmax和aucin比值在1.08 ~ 1.22之间。没有意外的安全信号发生,所有参与者对tinlarebant的耐受性良好。这些数据表明,丁雷班的药代动力学不受胃酸抑制或食物的显著影响。基于药代动力学-药效学关系,tinlarebant和强CYP3A抑制剂给药不太可能影响安全性,但由于潜在的治疗失败,tinlarebant应禁用强CYP3A诱导剂。
{"title":"Effects of Gastric Acid Suppression, Cytochrome P4503A Inhibition and Induction, and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Tinlarebant in Healthy Adults","authors":"Thomas M. Polasek,&nbsp;Kushal J. Paneliya,&nbsp;Tom Lin,&nbsp;Nathan L. Mata,&nbsp;Irene Wang,&nbsp;Hendrik P. Scholl,&nbsp;Jessyca Lin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tinlarebant is an oral retinol binding protein 4 antagonist in clinical development for geographic atrophy, an advanced stage of dry age-related macular degeneration, and Stargardt disease, an inherited juvenile-onset macular degeneration. A randomized, open-label, two-period, interaction study in healthy adults was conducted in four parts to determine the effects of gastric acid suppression (omeprazole 40 mg QD), cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) inhibition (itraconazole 200 mg BD) and induction (rifampin 600 mg QD), and food on the pharmacokinetics of tinlarebant (5 mg single dose). The effects on tinlarebant exposure were quantified by geometric least squares (GLS) mean C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ratios, where GLS mean C<sub>max</sub> or AUC<sub>inf</sub> with potential perpetrator is divided by GLS mean C<sub>max</sub> or AUC<sub>inf</sub> without potential perpetrator. Steady-state dosing of omeprazole had no effect on tinlarebant exposure (C<sub>max</sub> ratio = 1.16 and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ratio = 1.03). The C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ratios of tinlarebant following itraconazole dosing were 1.29 and 2.42, respectively. Rifampin co-administration decreased tinlarebant C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ratios to 0.53 and 0.19, respectively. Compared with the fasting state, taking tinlarebant with food gave C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> ratios in the range 1.08–1.22. No unexpected safety signals occurred and tinlarebant was well tolerated in all participants. These data show that the pharmacokinetics of tinlarebant is not significantly altered by gastric acid suppression or food. Dosing patients with tinlarebant and strong CYP3A inhibitors is unlikely to compromise safety based on its pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationships, but tinlarebant should be contraindicated with strong CYP3A inducers due to potential treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145983687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Different Aildenafil Citrate Tablet Formulations in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions. 两种不同枸橼酸艾地那非制剂在中国健康男性受试者空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学及生物等效性评价
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1571
Hegui Yan, Yu Peng, Zhixiang Pan, Yiyi Wang, Quan Li, Guan Liu

Aildenafil citrate is a novel and potent phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of aildenafil citrate tablets (30 and 60 mg) in healthy Chinese male subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. A single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover design was employed, with 78 participants enrolled, including 30 in the fasting condition and 48 in the fed condition. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points for pharmacokinetic analysis, which included Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ as the primary parameters. The results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic profiles of the test and reference formulations were comparable in both the fasting and fed states, with 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ falling within the 80%-125% range, confirming bioequivalence. Although food intake slightly delayed the time to peak concentration and reduced the absorption rate, it did not significantly affect the overall bioavailability. Both formulations were well tolerated, with adverse events being mild and resolving spontaneously. This study provides evidence supporting the bioequivalence of the 2 aildenafil citrate formulations and their interchangeability for clinical use in treating ED.

柠檬酸艾地那非是一种治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的新型有效磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂。本研究评价了两种制剂(30mg和60mg)柠檬酸艾地那非在中国健康男性受试者空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学和生物等效性。采用单中心、随机、开放标签、2期交叉设计,共纳入78名受试者,其中禁食组30人,进食组48人。在多个时间点采集血样进行药代动力学分析,以Cmax、AUC0-t、AUC0-∞为主要参数。结果表明,试验制剂和参比制剂在空腹和饲喂状态下的药代动力学特征具有可比性,Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞几何平均比值的90%置信区间在80% ~ 125%范围内,证实了生物等效性。虽然食物摄入稍微延迟了达到浓度峰值的时间,降低了吸收率,但对总体生物利用度没有显著影响。两种制剂耐受性良好,不良事件轻微,自行消退。本研究提供了支持两种柠檬酸艾地那非制剂的生物等效性及其在治疗ED临床应用中的互换性的证据。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Different Aildenafil Citrate Tablet Formulations in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Hegui Yan, Yu Peng, Zhixiang Pan, Yiyi Wang, Quan Li, Guan Liu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1571","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1571","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aildenafil citrate is a novel and potent phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of aildenafil citrate tablets (30 and 60 mg) in healthy Chinese male subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. A single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover design was employed, with 78 participants enrolled, including 30 in the fasting condition and 48 in the fed condition. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points for pharmacokinetic analysis, which included C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> as the primary parameters. The results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic profiles of the test and reference formulations were comparable in both the fasting and fed states, with 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> falling within the 80%-125% range, confirming bioequivalence. Although food intake slightly delayed the time to peak concentration and reduced the absorption rate, it did not significantly affect the overall bioavailability. Both formulations were well tolerated, with adverse events being mild and resolving spontaneously. This study provides evidence supporting the bioequivalence of the 2 aildenafil citrate formulations and their interchangeability for clinical use in treating ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":"e1571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144552508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single-Dose Apraglutide in Individuals with Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function: A Phase 1, Open-Label Trial. 单剂量阿普鲁肽在肝功能正常和受损患者中的药代动力学和安全性:1期开放标签试验
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70006
Gerard Greig, Justin Hay, Patricia Valencia, Mena Boules, Tomasz Masior

Intestinal failure-associated liver disease occurs in 20% to 30% of patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Apraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog in clinical development for the treatment of patients with SBS-IF. This study assessed the potential for changes in exposure of apraglutide in individuals with impaired hepatic function versus healthy volunteers. In this Phase 1, open-label, nonrandomized, single-dose trial, apraglutide 3.5 mg was administered to participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) or normal hepatic function. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) or AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) if AUCinf could not be reliably estimated, AUC0-168 h, and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. Each group comprised eight participants. No increased apraglutide exposure was observed in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment. A lower Cmax and AUCinf of apraglutide was observed in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function (Cmax = 58.7 vs 71.3 ng/mL; AUCinf = 4086 vs 5351 h ng/mL, respectively). The respective geometric mean ratios were 0.835 and 0.936 for Cmax and AUCinf, and the upper bounds of their 90% confidence intervals indicate that participants with moderate hepatic impairment were not overexposed to apraglutide versus those with normal hepatic function. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. The results of this trial suggest that apraglutide does not require dose alteration in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment.

20%至30%的短肠综合征和肠衰竭(SBS-IF)患者发生肠衰竭相关肝病。Apraglutide是临床开发用于治疗SBS-IF患者的胰高血糖素样肽-2 (GLP-2)类似物。本研究评估了肝功能受损个体与健康志愿者在阿普鲁肽暴露方面的潜在变化。在这项开放标签、非随机、单剂量的1期临床试验中,阿普鲁肽3.5 mg被给予中度肝功能损害(Child-Pugh B)或肝功能正常的参与者。主要药代动力学终点为0-∞时间血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC) (AUCinf)或0-∞时间至最后可量化浓度(AUClast)(如果AUCinf不能可靠估计)、AUC0-168 h和最大观察血浆浓度(Cmax)。次要终点包括安全性和耐受性。每组由8名参与者组成。中度肝功能损害患者未观察到阿普鲁肽暴露增加。中度肝功能损害患者与肝功能正常者相比,阿普拉鲁肽的Cmax和AUCinf较低(Cmax = 58.7 vs 71.3 ng/mL; AUCinf = 4086 vs 5351 h ng/mL)。Cmax和AUCinf的几何平均比值分别为0.835和0.936,其90%置信区间的上界表明,中度肝功能损害的参与者与肝功能正常的参与者相比,并未过度暴露于阿拉格鲁肽。不良事件的严重程度为轻度或中度。该试验的结果表明,阿普鲁肽在轻度和中度肝功能损害患者中不需要改变剂量。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single-Dose Apraglutide in Individuals with Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function: A Phase 1, Open-Label Trial.","authors":"Gerard Greig, Justin Hay, Patricia Valencia, Mena Boules, Tomasz Masior","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intestinal failure-associated liver disease occurs in 20% to 30% of patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Apraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog in clinical development for the treatment of patients with SBS-IF. This study assessed the potential for changes in exposure of apraglutide in individuals with impaired hepatic function versus healthy volunteers. In this Phase 1, open-label, nonrandomized, single-dose trial, apraglutide 3.5 mg was administered to participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) or normal hepatic function. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) or AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) if AUC<sub>inf</sub> could not be reliably estimated, AUC<sub>0-168 h</sub>, and maximum observed plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. Each group comprised eight participants. No increased apraglutide exposure was observed in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment. A lower C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> of apraglutide was observed in individuals with moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function (C<sub>max</sub> = 58.7 vs 71.3 ng/mL; AUC<sub>inf</sub> = 4086 vs 5351 h ng/mL, respectively). The respective geometric mean ratios were 0.835 and 0.936 for C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub>, and the upper bounds of their 90% confidence intervals indicate that participants with moderate hepatic impairment were not overexposed to apraglutide versus those with normal hepatic function. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. The results of this trial suggest that apraglutide does not require dose alteration in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Intranasal Dose of Zavegepant in Healthy Chinese Adults. 一项评估健康中国成人单次鼻内给药zavegegent的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性的1期开放标签研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1617
Qiong Wei, Jufang Wu, Yangyi Dai, Jiaye Lin, Beikang Ge, Yanhui Sun, Jing Zhang, Jing Wang, Chen Li, Ding Ding, Jing Liu, Mohamed H Shahin

Zavegepant is the only calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist approved as a nasal spray in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura. This Phase 1, open-label study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg in 12 healthy Chinese adults. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment prior to dosing and from 5 min to 24 h post dose. Geometric mean values for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were 53.53 ng h/mL for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, 44.25 ng h/mL for AUC from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration, and 20.32 ng/mL for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Secondary parameters included time to Cmax (median, 0.58 h), apparent clearance (geometric mean, 186.8 L/h), apparent volume of distribution (geometric mean, 2943 L), and terminal half-life (arithmetic mean, 11.0 h). Results were comparable to exposures observed previously in non-Asian healthy participants following a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg. Zavegepant demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious or severe adverse events and no clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms observed.

Zavegepant是唯一一种降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂,在美国被批准作为鼻喷雾剂用于有或无先兆的成人偏头痛的急性治疗。这项1期开放标签研究评估了12名健康中国成年人单次鼻内给药10mg zavegepent的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。在给药前和给药后5分钟至24小时采集血样进行药代动力学评估。主要药代动力学参数从时间0到无穷远的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)几何平均值为53.53 ng h/mL,从时间0到最后可量化浓度时间(AUC)几何平均值为44.25 ng h/mL,最大血药浓度(Cmax)几何平均值为20.32 ng/mL。次要参数包括到达Cmax的时间(中位数,0.58 h)、表观间隙(几何平均值,186.8 L/h)、表观分布体积(几何平均值,2943 L)和终末半衰期(算术平均值,11.0 h)。结果与先前在非亚洲健康参与者中观察到的单次鼻内给药10mg zavegepent的暴露相当。Zavegepant显示出良好的安全性,没有严重或严重的不良事件,也没有在实验室检查、生命体征或心电图方面观察到临床相关发现。
{"title":"A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Intranasal Dose of Zavegepant in Healthy Chinese Adults.","authors":"Qiong Wei, Jufang Wu, Yangyi Dai, Jiaye Lin, Beikang Ge, Yanhui Sun, Jing Zhang, Jing Wang, Chen Li, Ding Ding, Jing Liu, Mohamed H Shahin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1617","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zavegepant is the only calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist approved as a nasal spray in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura. This Phase 1, open-label study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg in 12 healthy Chinese adults. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment prior to dosing and from 5 min to 24 h post dose. Geometric mean values for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were 53.53 ng h/mL for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, 44.25 ng h/mL for AUC from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration, and 20.32 ng/mL for maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Secondary parameters included time to C<sub>max</sub> (median, 0.58 h), apparent clearance (geometric mean, 186.8 L/h), apparent volume of distribution (geometric mean, 2943 L), and terminal half-life (arithmetic mean, 11.0 h). Results were comparable to exposures observed previously in non-Asian healthy participants following a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg. Zavegepant demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious or severe adverse events and no clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":"e1617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
It Is Time to Re-Think the Limit of Quantitation 是时候重新思考量化的极限了
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70000
Michael J. Fossler, Brian Smith
<p>There are some beliefs in science that, as practicing pharmacokineticists and statisticians, we do not question too much. This is particularly true if those beliefs are written in a guidance.<span><sup>1</sup></span> We are busy, there are not enough hours in the working day to tilt at windmills, and no one else seems to be complaining, so we accept that belief. If that belief is codified in a guidance, then we must accept it, even though there are times when a fleeting doubt as to that belief's validity enters our minds.</p><p>One of these beliefs that we, the authors, would like to challenge is how the limit of quantitation (LOQ) is currently used for the reporting of drug concentration data. The LOQ is the lowest concentration in a validated drug assay with acceptable accuracy and precision (typically within ±15%–20% of the nominal concentration)<span><sup>1</sup></span>. On its face, this does not seem too unreasonable. But it is the way that the LOQ is subsequently used to report data that is the real problem.</p><p>Let us look at an example. Suppose we have an assay with an LOQ of 0.05 ng/mL. The CV% at this concentration is 15%, so this is a reasonable LOQ. Figure 1 shows the distribution of many repeated measurements (>30) from a spiked QC sample of 0.05 ng/mL. Because of the 15% variability, each measured sample will differ from the nominal concentration—it will either be above 0.05 or below, and if normally distributed (as we have assumed) these measurements will be distributed 50:50 above and below the mean. The problem comes when the analytical chemist reports these values. Those values ≥0.05 ng/mL are reported (Figure 1 in green), but any values <0.05 ng/mL are not reported (Figure 1 in red), even though they come from the exact same distribution! The samples <LOQ are given the designation “BQL” (below quantitation limit), and the actual values will never be reported no matter how much one pleads, upon threat of receiving a Form 483 from the FDA. In effect, the analytical chemist censors all data <LOQ, even though an acceptable LOQ accuracy is <b><i>plus or minus</i></b> 15%–20% of the nominal concentration.</p><p>It gets worse when we pharmacokineticists receive the data. If we are performing a non-compartmental analysis, we change all the BQLs to zeros as we are instructed,<span><sup>2</sup></span> even though we know that there are actual values lurking there somewhere. We know this because “real” zero concentrations are reported as such. But we pretend that the BQLs are zero anyway because the guidance or white paper tells us to do so. If we are performing a population PK analysis, and there are enough BQLs to concern us (typically 10% or more of the total number of samples<span><sup>3</sup></span>), then we use a sophisticated imputation method for those BQLs. We sleep well at night knowing that our data are safe from any sordid contamination by BQL samples, and we (secretly) pat ourselves on the back for knowing
在科学中有一些信念,作为执业药物动力学家和统计学家,我们不会质疑太多。如果这些信念被写在指南中,那就更是如此了我们很忙,工作日里没有足够的时间去研究风车,而且似乎没有其他人在抱怨,所以我们接受了这种信念。如果这种信念被写入了指南,那么我们必须接受它,即使有时我们会对这种信念的有效性产生短暂的怀疑。我们这些作者想要挑战的其中一个信念是,目前如何将定量限(LOQ)用于报告药物浓度数据。定量限是经过验证的药物测定中具有可接受的准确度和精密度的最低浓度(通常在标称浓度的±15%-20%范围内)1。从表面上看,这似乎并不太不合理。但真正的问题是LOQ随后用于报告数据的方式。让我们来看一个例子。假设定量限为0.05 ng/mL。这个浓度下的CV%是15%,所以这是一个合理的定量限。图1显示了在添加0.05 ng/mL的QC样品中多次重复测量的分布(&gt;30)。由于15%的可变性,每个测量的样本将不同于标称浓度-它将高于0.05或低于0.05,如果正态分布(如我们所假设的),这些测量值将分布在平均值上下的50:50。当分析化学家报告这些值时,问题就来了。报告了≥0.05 ng/mL的值(图1为绿色),但没有报告0.05 ng/mL的值(图1为红色),即使它们来自完全相同的分布!样品的定量限被指定为“BQL”(低于定量限制),而实际值将永远不会被报告,无论一个人如何恳求,在收到来自FDA的表格483的威胁下。实际上,分析化学家审查所有数据的定量限,即使可接受的定量限精度是正负15%-20%的标称浓度。当我们药物动力学家收到数据时,情况就更糟了。如果我们正在执行非分区分析,我们将按照指示将所有bql更改为零,即使我们知道在某个地方隐藏着实际值。我们知道这一点,因为“真正的”零浓度是这样被报道的。但无论如何,我们都假装bql是零,因为指南或白皮书告诉我们这样做。如果我们正在进行总体PK分析,并且有足够多的bql需要我们关注(通常是样本总数的10%或更多),那么我们对这些bql使用复杂的imputation方法。我们晚上睡得很好,因为我们知道我们的数据是安全的,不会受到BQL样本的任何肮脏污染,我们(偷偷地)为自己知道如何在分析中实现imputation而感到自豪,即使,作为一种技术,非线性混合效应建模完全能够模拟这种可变性,如果给定实际数据。每天,世界各地的PK科学家都在采集完美的样本(顺便说一下,每个样本的分析成本都是数百美元),然后要么假装它们是零,要么用一种复杂的估算方法来估算它们,如果我们能同时得到LOQ分布的一半,这种方法就完全没有必要了。这有点像根据一个人的影子来测量他的身高。当然,这是可以做到的,但如果这个人就站在你面前,你为什么要这样做呢?我们相信这个问题有一个简单的解决办法。我们建议将LOQ的可报告范围重新定义为具有可接受的准确度和精度的标称浓度下的1 -α预测区间的下界。α的选择在这一点上是不清楚的,可能是一个监管决定,但为了我们的例子,我们将使用α = 0.025,从而形成95%的预测区间。在我们的例子中,标称浓度为0.05 ng/mL的平均测量浓度为0.0493 ng/mL。标准差为0.00735。预测区间的下界为0.0493 ~ 1.96*0.00735,即0.0349 ng/mL。图2显示了此更改的实际含义。现在,我们将只排除2.5%的样品作为BQL,而不是在LOQ上排除50%的样品。这表明效率有了很大的提高。虽然几十年来处理LOQ的方式一直没有改变,但我们认为现在是重新评估这一进程的时候了。目前的方法是不科学的,因为它将LOQ视为一个确定性的数量,而不是它实际上是一个随机变量。这种不正确处理的结果是,该LOQ附近的描述性统计数据可能会向上偏置,导致昂贵的数据被丢弃,然后经常用零替换,或者使用复杂的估算方法进行估算,如果提供了实际数据,则不需要这种方法。 我们对LOQ的想法的一个简单的改变应该可以解决向上的偏见问题,并将简化我们的日常工作。两位作者都是制药行业的顾问。
{"title":"It Is Time to Re-Think the Limit of Quantitation","authors":"Michael J. Fossler,&nbsp;Brian Smith","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70000","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;There are some beliefs in science that, as practicing pharmacokineticists and statisticians, we do not question too much. This is particularly true if those beliefs are written in a guidance.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; We are busy, there are not enough hours in the working day to tilt at windmills, and no one else seems to be complaining, so we accept that belief. If that belief is codified in a guidance, then we must accept it, even though there are times when a fleeting doubt as to that belief's validity enters our minds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of these beliefs that we, the authors, would like to challenge is how the limit of quantitation (LOQ) is currently used for the reporting of drug concentration data. The LOQ is the lowest concentration in a validated drug assay with acceptable accuracy and precision (typically within ±15%–20% of the nominal concentration)&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. On its face, this does not seem too unreasonable. But it is the way that the LOQ is subsequently used to report data that is the real problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let us look at an example. Suppose we have an assay with an LOQ of 0.05 ng/mL. The CV% at this concentration is 15%, so this is a reasonable LOQ. Figure 1 shows the distribution of many repeated measurements (&gt;30) from a spiked QC sample of 0.05 ng/mL. Because of the 15% variability, each measured sample will differ from the nominal concentration—it will either be above 0.05 or below, and if normally distributed (as we have assumed) these measurements will be distributed 50:50 above and below the mean. The problem comes when the analytical chemist reports these values. Those values ≥0.05 ng/mL are reported (Figure 1 in green), but any values &lt;0.05 ng/mL are not reported (Figure 1 in red), even though they come from the exact same distribution! The samples &lt;LOQ are given the designation “BQL” (below quantitation limit), and the actual values will never be reported no matter how much one pleads, upon threat of receiving a Form 483 from the FDA. In effect, the analytical chemist censors all data &lt;LOQ, even though an acceptable LOQ accuracy is &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;plus or minus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 15%–20% of the nominal concentration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It gets worse when we pharmacokineticists receive the data. If we are performing a non-compartmental analysis, we change all the BQLs to zeros as we are instructed,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; even though we know that there are actual values lurking there somewhere. We know this because “real” zero concentrations are reported as such. But we pretend that the BQLs are zero anyway because the guidance or white paper tells us to do so. If we are performing a population PK analysis, and there are enough BQLs to concern us (typically 10% or more of the total number of samples&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), then we use a sophisticated imputation method for those BQLs. We sleep well at night knowing that our data are safe from any sordid contamination by BQL samples, and we (secretly) pat ourselves on the back for knowing ","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 12","pages":"900-902"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145652416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of High- and Low-Fat Meals on the Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Votoplam, a HTT Gene Splicing Modifier. 高脂和低脂膳食对HTT基因剪接修饰剂Votoplam生物利用度和药代动力学的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-30 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1626
Lucy Lee, Amy-Lee Richards, Nageswara Reddy, Brian Beers, Lee Golden, Ronald Kong

Votoplam is a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule HTT gene splicing modifier that is being developed for the treatment of Huntington's disease. This was a single dose, open-label, two-period, crossover food effect study that evaluated the effect of high- and low-fat meals on 20 mg votoplam in healthy participants. There was a washout of 21 days between the two periods. Twenty-six participants completed the study. There were minimal changes in the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of votoplam following administration of a single dose of 20 mg votoplam when taken with low-fat and high-fat meals relative to fasted condition. The mean Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf for votoplam following administration of a single dose of 20 mg votoplam were 1.4-fold, 1.2-fold, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in high-fat fed conditions, and were 1.3-fold, 1.1-fold, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in the low-fat fed conditions, when compared to fasted conditions. There were no relevant safety findings in any of the treatment groups. Votoplam can be administered with or without food in patients.

Votoplam是一种新型的口服生物可利用的小分子HTT基因剪接修饰剂,正在开发用于治疗亨廷顿氏病。这是一项单剂量、开放标签、两期、交叉食物效应研究,评估了高脂和低脂饮食对健康参与者20毫克伏托普仑的影响。两期之间有21天的洗脱期。26名参与者完成了这项研究。与禁食相比,低脂和高脂膳食同时服用单剂量20mg votoplam后,votoplam的生物利用度和药代动力学变化极小。与禁食相比,单剂量20mg votoplam后votoplam的平均Cmax、AUC0-last和AUC0-inf在高脂肪喂养条件下分别高出1.4倍、1.2倍和1.1倍,在低脂肪喂养条件下分别高出1.3倍、1.1倍和1.1倍。在任何治疗组中都没有相关的安全性发现。伏托普仑可伴餐或不伴餐给药。
{"title":"Effects of High- and Low-Fat Meals on the Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Votoplam, a HTT Gene Splicing Modifier.","authors":"Lucy Lee, Amy-Lee Richards, Nageswara Reddy, Brian Beers, Lee Golden, Ronald Kong","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Votoplam is a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule HTT gene splicing modifier that is being developed for the treatment of Huntington's disease. This was a single dose, open-label, two-period, crossover food effect study that evaluated the effect of high- and low-fat meals on 20 mg votoplam in healthy participants. There was a washout of 21 days between the two periods. Twenty-six participants completed the study. There were minimal changes in the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of votoplam following administration of a single dose of 20 mg votoplam when taken with low-fat and high-fat meals relative to fasted condition. The mean C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-last</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> for votoplam following administration of a single dose of 20 mg votoplam were 1.4-fold, 1.2-fold, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in high-fat fed conditions, and were 1.3-fold, 1.1-fold, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in the low-fat fed conditions, when compared to fasted conditions. There were no relevant safety findings in any of the treatment groups. Votoplam can be administered with or without food in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145647661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1