Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development最新文献

Deutenzalutamide is a new molecular entity androgen receptor antagonist. The primary aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of deutenzalutamide and evaluate effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on pharmacokinetics. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was performed to develop the population pharmacokinetic of deutenzalutamide using data from 1 Phase I trial of deutenzalutamide. Goodness-of-fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive check, and bootstrap analysis were carried out to evaluate the final model. Simulation for the developed model was used to evaluate the covariate effects on the pharmacokinetics of deutenzalutamide. A 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination from the central compartment was established for deutenzalutamide. The final covariate included body weight on peripheral compartment volume. This is the first research developing the population pharmacokinetic model of deutenzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and it is expected to support the future clinical administration of deutenzalutamide.

Abrocitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. It is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 (approximately 53%) and CYP2C9 (approximately 30%), which form 2 active metabolites. The pharmacologic activity of abrocitinib is attributable to the unbound exposures of abrocitinib and those metabolites with active moiety area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) considered the best measure of the total pharmacological effect. The effect of CYP2C19 and/or CYP2C9 genotypes on abrocitinib and active moiety exposures were evaluated using a meta-analysis of the noncompartmental estimates of exposure pooled from 10 clinical studies. A linear mixed-effects model was developed on the basis of the power model to evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 and/or CYP2C9 genotypes on exposure (i.e., abrocitinib AUC and peak plasma concentration, active moiety AUC and peak plasma concentration). The genotypes were evaluated individually and as a combined phenotype effect. When evaluating the poor metabolizers of CYP2C19 or CYP2C9 individually, the estimated increases were 44.9% and 42.0% in active moiety AUC, respectively. The combined phenotype models showed a 0.6% decrease, and 25.1% and 10.5% increases in the active moiety AUC for "elevated," "mixed," and "reduced" metabolizers, respectively. Overall, the active moiety exposures did not appear to be affected to a clinically meaningful extent by different genotypes of CYP2C19 and/or CYP2C9.

Dihydroxyaluminum aminoacetate, heavy magnesium carbonate, and aspirin tablets is a new combined aspirin preparation, each containing aspirin (81 mg), dihydroxyaluminum aminoacetate (11 mg), and heavy magnesium carbonate (22 mg). This study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and bioequivalence in healthy Chinese subjects. This randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, and 2-period crossover study included 78 healthy volunteers (fasting, n = 36; postprandial, n = 42). Blood samples were collected for PK analysis. Aspirin and salicylic acid concentrations in human plasma were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety and tolerability were monitored. There were no significant differences between the test and reference formulations in maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to time t, or AUC from time 0 to infinity. The 90% confidence intervals of the test and reference formulations of maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to time t, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were within the acceptable range (80%-125%) under fasting and postprandial conditions. All adverse events were mild and no serious adverse events were observed in the study. Both compounds were well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Somatrogon-ghla is a long-acting, recombinant human growth hormone approved for the treatment of pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency. Forty-nine healthy, adult males were enrolled in a randomized, crossover study to compare somatrogon exposure after subcutaneous doses administered using a frozen vial presentation or a prefilled, multiple dose pen. Somatrogon, insulin-like growth factor-I, and IGF-1 binding protein-3 concentrations were collected for up to 240 hours post dose to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses. There was a 2-week washout between administration of the doses. Seven participants did not complete the study due to withdrawal of consent (n = 2) or loss to follow-up. Two treatment-emergent adverse events, headaches, were judged by the investigator as possibly related to study drug administration. Both were mild. Injection site reactions were observed in 6/48 participants after administration with the pen and 12/46 after administration using the vial. Drug and biomarker concentrations were assessed using validated assays and noncompartmental methods were used to determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for somatrogon area under the concentration-time curve, but not for the peak somatrogon concentration, where the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of pen/vial was 74.2%, which is less than the lower limit, 80.0%, dictated by bioequivalence criteria. The IGF-1 responses were largely within bioequivalence limits. It was concluded that the 2 formulations are comparable.

Erdafitinib, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is used in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma for adults with FGFR3 genetic alterations and whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy. This drug-drug interaction substudy evaluated the effect of erdafitinib on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate), and metformin (organic cation transporter 2 substrate). Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR gene alterations received pretreatment with single doses of midazolam and metformin, followed by a daily dose of erdafitinib. Drug-drug interaction assessments were performed at erdafitinib steady state following coadministration of single doses of midazolam and metformin, respectively. Geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were estimated using linear mixed-effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity of midazolam (86.3%, 88.5%, and 82.1%), 1-OH midazolam (99.8%, 97.4%, and 101.5%), and metformin (108.7%, 119.0%, and 113.9%) were either contained or slightly outside the 80%-125% interval and not considered clinically meaningful. Adverse events were consistent with the known erdafitinib safety profile; no new safety signals emerged. Thus, repeated dosing of erdafitinib had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or metformin.

Anaprazole is a proton pump inhibitor. This study aims to elucidate absorption, metabolism, and excretion pathways of anaprazole sodium in the human body. A total of 4 healthy Chinese male subjects were administered a single oral dose of 20 mg/100 µCi of [¹⁴C]-anaprazole sodium enteric-coated capsules. The whole blood, plasma, and excreta were analyzed for a total radioactivity (TRA) and metabolite profile. The cumulative radioactivity excretion rate was 93.2%, with 53.3% and 39.9% of the radioactive dose excreted in urine and feces, respectively, and 91.6% of dose recovered within 96 hours after dosing. The parent drug, anaprazole, showed good absorption and was extensively metabolized majorly to thioether M8-1 via nonenzymatic metabolism. Overall, 35 metabolites were identified in plasma, urine, and fecal samples. Anaprazole was the most abundant component in plasma followed by the thioether M8-1, accounting for 28.3% and 16.6%, respectively, of the plasma TRA. Thioether carboxylic acid XZP-3409 (26.3% of urine TRA) and XZP-3409 oxidation and dehydrogenation product M417a (15.1% of fecal TRA) were the major metabolites present in urine and feces, respectively. Anaprazole was undetectable in urine, while fecal samples showed traces (0.07% dose). Blood/plasma ratios of the radioactivity (approximately 0.60) remained consistent over time. Anaprazole showed good absorption and was extensively metabolized majorly to thioether M8-1 via nonenzymatic metabolism, and cytochrome P450 3A4 also contributed to its metabolism in healthy individuals.

The objective of this phase 1 single-dose study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of mirikizumab in Chinese healthy adults. Sixty participants were randomized within 5 planned dose cohorts: intravenous (IV) 300 mg, IV 600 mg, IV 1200 mg, subcutaneous (SC) 200 mg, and SC 400 mg to receive mirikizumab (10 participants in each cohort) or placebo (2 participants in each cohort). No death or serious adverse events occurred. Twenty-eight (56.0%) participants who received mirikizumab reported 49 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and 8 (80.0%) participants who received placebo reported 18 TEAEs. The majority of TEAEs were mild in severity. Following IV 300-1200 mg mirikizumab, the arithmetic mean of both area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_0-∞) and maximum observed drug concentration (C_max) increased by approximately 3.5-fold, and the arithmetic mean half-life (t_1/2) ranged from 9.64 to 12.0 days. Following SC 200 and 400 mg mirikizumab, the arithmetic mean of both AUC_0-∞ and C_max increased by approximately 1.6-fold, the median time to C_max (t_max) was 2.98 days for both, and the arithmetic mean t_1/2 was 10.6 and 10.5 days, respectively. Absolute bioavailability based on pooled SC and IV dose data was 38.2%. In this study, the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of mirikizumab were consistent with what has been reported in other studies.

ASP8302 is an orally administered positive allosteric modulator of the muscarinic M₃ receptor. Two Phase 1 studies were conducted, a first-in-human study in Europe and a Japanese phase 1 study. Both were randomized, participant- and investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending oral doses, parallel group, clinical studies in healthy volunteers. Both studies evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics and also included salivary secretion and pupil diameter as pharmacodynamic assessments. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or treatment-emergent adverse events reported leading to study discontinuation. There were no clinically relevant findings in any of the laboratory, vital signs, electrocardiogram assessments, or photosensitivity testing following multiple administration of up to 150 mg or up to 140 mg once daily for 14 days in the European first-in-human and Japanese Phase 1 study, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of ASP8302 were approximately linear over the dose range studied. There was no evidence of drug accumulation upon repeated dosing. In both studies, ASP8302 showed a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect on saliva production at doses from 100 mg onward, which was maintained during repeated dosing. No effect was observed on pupil diameter. These data supported progression of ASP8302 into Phase 2 clinical trials for further clinical development.

This study was conducted as a single-site, open-label, randomized, replicated crossover trial with 4 treatment periods. The aim was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic test drug containing velpatasvir and sofosbuvir compared to an established brand-name medication in healthy White subjects under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals up to 72 hours after dosing to measure the concentrations of velpatasvir and sofosbuvir using a certified high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations was confirmed when statistical analysis showed that confidence intervals for the log-transformed peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample were within an acceptable range from 80% to 125%. Criteria for bioequivalence were met for both area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 until the last quantifiable sample and peak concentration parameters. No adverse effects were reported during this trial in both groups.

A single-center, randomized, open, 2-period, self-crossover, single-dose trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of the test (T) and reference (R) preparations in healthy adult female subjects under fasting conditions. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled in the study, and subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio and were administered once per period, with a 4-day washout period. In each period, plasma drug concentrations, blood calcium changes, and antibodies were determined for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity analysis, respectively, and adverse events were recorded for safety analysis. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were within the predefined bioequivalence criterion of 80%-125%, indicating bioequivalence between the T and R preparations under fasting conditions. Comparable serum calcium levels demonstrated pharmacodynamics similarity, and no differences were found in immunogenicity profiles. Additionally, the incidence of adverse reactions to the T preparation was 18.4% lower than that of the R preparation (31.6%). This study confirmed the bioequivalence of the T and R preparations under fasting conditions, along with comparable immunogenicity profiles and good safety.