首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development最新文献

英文 中文
Pharmacokinetic Comparability of ABP 654, a Biosimilar to Ustekinumab, Administered Either via Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: Results from a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study ABP 654 (Ustekinumab的生物类似药)在健康成人中通过预充式注射器或自动注射器给药的药代动力学可比性:一项随机、开放标签、平行组研究的结果
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70031
Vincent Chow, Peter J. Winkle, Daniel T. Mytych, Jia Cao, Carolina Barragan, Alexander Colbert, Shalini Gupta, Waldemar Radziszewski, Janet Franklin

ABP 654, a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product, is available in a prefilled syringe (PFS) for subcutaneous (SC) use. The ABP 654 autoinjector pen (AIP) has recently been developed with an aim to improve the injection experience for patients and caregivers. This study was designed to assess the similarity of pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of a 90-mg SC injection of ABP 654 administered via PFS or AIP in healthy volunteers. A total of 156 adults were randomized at a ratio of 1:1. PK bioequivalence was established between the PFS and AIP groups based on the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary PK endpoints of maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) being contained within the prespecified margin of 0.8 to 1.25. The frequency, type, and severity of adverse events as well as the incidence of antidrug antibodies were similar between the PFS and AIP groups. Overall, the results support a conclusion of PK bioequivalency as well as comparable safety and immunogenicity of ABP 654 administered via PFS and AIP.

ABP 654是ustekinumab参考产品的生物类似药,可在预充注射器(PFS)中用于皮下(SC)使用。ABP 654自动注射笔(AIP)最近开发的目的是改善患者和护理人员的注射体验。本研究旨在评估通过PFS或AIP给药的90 mg SC注射ABP 654在健康志愿者体内的药代动力学(PK)、安全性和免疫原性的相似性。按1:1的比例随机选取156名成年人。根据最大观察血清浓度(Cmax)的主要PK终点的几何平均比率(90% ci)和从0时间推断到无限远的血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCinf)在预先设定的0.8 - 1.25范围内,PFS组和AIP组之间的PK生物等效性建立。PFS组和AIP组不良事件发生的频率、类型、严重程度以及抗药抗体的发生率相似。综上所述,实验结果支持通过PFS和AIP给药abp654的PK生物等效性、安全性和免疫原性相当的结论。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Comparability of ABP 654, a Biosimilar to Ustekinumab, Administered Either via Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: Results from a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study","authors":"Vincent Chow,&nbsp;Peter J. Winkle,&nbsp;Daniel T. Mytych,&nbsp;Jia Cao,&nbsp;Carolina Barragan,&nbsp;Alexander Colbert,&nbsp;Shalini Gupta,&nbsp;Waldemar Radziszewski,&nbsp;Janet Franklin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>ABP 654, a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product, is available in a prefilled syringe (PFS) for subcutaneous (SC) use. The ABP 654 autoinjector pen (AIP) has recently been developed with an aim to improve the injection experience for patients and caregivers. This study was designed to assess the similarity of pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of a 90-mg SC injection of ABP 654 administered via PFS or AIP in healthy volunteers. A total of 156 adults were randomized at a ratio of 1:1. PK bioequivalence was established between the PFS and AIP groups based on the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary PK endpoints of maximum observed serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) being contained within the prespecified margin of 0.8 to 1.25. The frequency, type, and severity of adverse events as well as the incidence of antidrug antibodies were similar between the PFS and AIP groups. Overall, the results support a conclusion of PK bioequivalency as well as comparable safety and immunogenicity of ABP 654 administered via PFS and AIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two aqueous progesterone 25 mg injections in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions: An open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover bioequivalence study 健康绝经后妇女空腹条件下两种25 mg黄体酮水溶液注射的比较药代动力学评价:一项开放标签、平衡、随机、两种治疗、两期、两序列、单剂量、交叉生物等效性研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70025
Noopur Vyas, Amaresh Chakra, Prashant Sarode, Shruti Dharmadhikari, Gaurav Puppalwar, Chintan Khandhedia, Amey Mane, Alpesh Goyani, Ajay Jaysingh Khopade

The growing demand for assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased the need for effective luteal phase support. Progesterone, essential for maintaining early pregnancy, is a critical component of ART. This open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, crossover, single-dose study compared the bioequivalence of aqueous progesterone 25 mg injection (AqSusten® [Test, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited]), compared to the innovator's aqueous progesterone 25 mg injection (Lubion® [Reference, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl]), in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions. Forty-eight subjects received either treatment in Period 1, followed by alternate treatment in Period 2, with a 14-day washout period. Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, AUC0–t, AUC0-∞) and mean plasma concentration–time profiles were assessed. Forty-five subjects completed the study. Pharmacokinetic data for both products were comparable, with percentage ratios for AUC0–t, AUC0−∞, and Cmax of 99.16%, 98.78%, and 103.36%, respectively, within the acceptable bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Plasma concentration–time profiles were similar, and no serious adverse events were reported. Mild adverse events with Lubion® included increased white blood cell count and blood glucose. AqSusten® demonstrated bioequivalence to Lubion® in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions. Both formulations exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles, with favorable safety and tolerability, suggesting AqSusten® as a viable alternative in ART treatments.

对辅助生殖技术(ART)日益增长的需求增加了对有效黄体期支持的需求。黄体酮对维持早期妊娠至关重要,是抗逆转录病毒治疗的重要组成部分。这项开放标签、平衡、随机、双治疗、交叉、单剂量的研究比较了25 mg黄体酮水溶液注射液(AqSusten®[Test, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited])与创新的25 mg黄体酮水溶液注射液(Lubion®[Reference, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl])在禁食条件下健康绝经后妇女中的生物等效性。48名受试者在第一阶段接受任意一种治疗,随后在第二阶段进行交替治疗,洗脱期为14天。评估药代动力学(Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞)和平均血浆浓度-时间曲线。45名受试者完成了这项研究。两种产品的药代动力学数据具有可比性,AUC0-t、AUC0-∞和Cmax的百分比分别为99.16%、98.78%和103.36%,均在80%-125%的可接受生物等效性范围内。血浆浓度-时间谱相似,无严重不良事件报道。Lubion®的轻度不良事件包括白细胞计数和血糖升高。AqSusten®在健康绝经后妇女禁食条件下显示与Lubion®生物等效性。两种制剂具有相似的药代动力学特征,具有良好的安全性和耐受性,表明AqSusten®是抗逆转录病毒治疗的可行替代方案。
{"title":"A comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two aqueous progesterone 25 mg injections in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions: An open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover bioequivalence study","authors":"Noopur Vyas,&nbsp;Amaresh Chakra,&nbsp;Prashant Sarode,&nbsp;Shruti Dharmadhikari,&nbsp;Gaurav Puppalwar,&nbsp;Chintan Khandhedia,&nbsp;Amey Mane,&nbsp;Alpesh Goyani,&nbsp;Ajay Jaysingh Khopade","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing demand for assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased the need for effective luteal phase support. Progesterone, essential for maintaining early pregnancy, is a critical component of ART. This open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, crossover, single-dose study compared the bioequivalence of aqueous progesterone 25 mg injection (AqSusten<sup>®</sup> [Test, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited]), compared to the innovator's aqueous progesterone 25 mg injection (Lubion<sup>®</sup> [Reference, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl]), in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions. Forty-eight subjects received either treatment in Period 1, followed by alternate treatment in Period 2, with a 14-day washout period. Pharmacokinetics (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) and mean plasma concentration–time profiles were assessed. Forty-five subjects completed the study. Pharmacokinetic data for both products were comparable, with percentage ratios for AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, AUC<sub>0−∞</sub>, and <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> of 99.16%, 98.78%, and 103.36%, respectively, within the acceptable bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Plasma concentration–time profiles were similar, and no serious adverse events were reported. Mild adverse events with Lubion<sup>®</sup> included increased white blood cell count and blood glucose. AqSusten<sup>®</sup> demonstrated bioequivalence to Lubion<sup>®</sup> in healthy postmenopausal women under fasting conditions. Both formulations exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles, with favorable safety and tolerability, suggesting AqSusten<sup>®</sup> as a viable alternative in ART treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Makes an Early-Phase Study Worth Publishing? A View from the Editor's Desk 什么让早期研究值得发表?从编辑的办公桌上看。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70026
Amalia M. Issa
<p>As we are now in the first quarter of 2026, with renewed strategic plans and operational goals across pharmaceutical clinical pharmacology functions, it is worth pausing to reflect on a central question that many clinical pharmacologists confront repeatedly: <b>what makes an early-phase study worth publishing?</b> In an era where accelerated timelines, complex modalities, and model-informed approaches challenge traditional development paradigms, this is an opportune moment to clarify the editorial value for <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> of early-phase study reporting and advance community expectations accordingly.</p><p>Early-phase studies, whether first-in-human (FIH), dose–range explorations, or integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and biomarker investigations, are not merely organizational milestones on the path to registrational decision points. They are critical generators of knowledge that inform dose selection, safety profiling, translational hypotheses, and risk mitigation strategies. Yet, despite their central role in decision making, early-phase studies are generally under-reported in the peer-reviewed literature or published only selectively, particularly when results are neutral or do not lead to further development. This practice diminishes community learning and can slow the cumulative scientific progress that clinical pharmacologists seek to achieve.</p><p>These criteria align with broader scientific values including rigorous methods, transparent reporting, and clear impact on drug development. Manuscripts that thoughtfully explain both what was learned and what remains uncertain serve the industry and regulators alike.</p><p>Regulatory expectations underscore that early-phase data are not transient artifacts of internal decision making; they are evidence that shapes dose rationale, informs benefit–risk assessments, and supports labeling claims. Journals provide the conduit by which these data enter the public scientific domain, enabling cross-program rationalization and cumulative learning.</p><p>As we advance through 2026, we encourage clinical pharmacologists to approach manuscript preparation proactively. Early consideration of publication beginning at protocol design can shape data collection, endpoint selection, and analysis strategies that enhance both regulatory readiness and scientific value.</p><p>Publication is not merely an academic exercise; it is a strategic contribution to the discipline of clinical pharmacology, informing how early-phase insights translate into safer, more efficacious therapies. When a study meaningfully informs a decision, extends understanding, or helps others avoid pitfalls, it deserves to be part of the published record.</p><p>Ultimately, our goal is to build a cumulative, transparent, and actionable body of evidence that advances clinical pharmacology and accelerates the delivery of better medicines to patients worldwide.</p><p>AMI declares no conflict of int
现在是2026年第一季度,我们有了新的战略计划和跨药物临床药理学功能的运营目标,有必要停下来反思许多临床药理学家反复面临的一个中心问题:什么使早期研究值得发表?在一个加速的时间线、复杂的模式和模型知情方法挑战传统发展范式的时代,这是一个时机,可以阐明早期研究报告在药物开发中的临床药理学编辑价值,并相应地提高社区期望。早期阶段的研究,无论是首次人体试验(FIH)、剂量范围探索,还是综合药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)和生物标志物研究,都不仅仅是通往注册决策点的组织里程碑。它们是为剂量选择、安全性分析、转化假设和风险缓解策略提供信息的关键知识来源。然而,尽管早期研究在决策中起着核心作用,但它们在同行评议的文献中通常被低估,或者只是有选择地发表,特别是当结果是中立的或不能导致进一步发展的时候。这种做法削弱了社区学习,并可能减缓临床药理学家寻求实现的累积科学进步。这些标准符合更广泛的科学价值,包括严格的方法、透明的报告和对药物开发的明确影响。手稿仔细地解释了已经学到的和仍然不确定的东西,为行业和监管机构服务。监管期望强调,早期阶段的数据不是内部决策的短暂产物;它们是形成剂量基本原理的证据,为利益风险评估提供信息,并支持标签声明。期刊为这些数据进入公共科学领域提供了渠道,使跨项目合理化和累积学习成为可能。随着我们推进到2026年,我们鼓励临床药理学家积极主动地进行手稿准备。从方案设计开始就对出版物进行早期考虑,可以形成数据收集、终点选择和分析策略,从而增强监管准备和科学价值。出版不仅仅是一种学术活动;这是对临床药理学学科的战略性贡献,告知早期阶段的见解如何转化为更安全,更有效的治疗方法。当一项研究有意义地为决策提供信息,扩展理解,或帮助他人避免陷阱时,它就应该成为发表记录的一部分。最终,我们的目标是建立一个累积的、透明的和可操作的证据体系,以推进临床药理学并加速向全球患者提供更好的药物。AMI声明不存在利益冲突。这项工作没有获得资金。
{"title":"What Makes an Early-Phase Study Worth Publishing? A View from the Editor's Desk","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70026","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;As we are now in the first quarter of 2026, with renewed strategic plans and operational goals across pharmaceutical clinical pharmacology functions, it is worth pausing to reflect on a central question that many clinical pharmacologists confront repeatedly: &lt;b&gt;what makes an early-phase study worth publishing?&lt;/b&gt; In an era where accelerated timelines, complex modalities, and model-informed approaches challenge traditional development paradigms, this is an opportune moment to clarify the editorial value for &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development&lt;/i&gt; of early-phase study reporting and advance community expectations accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Early-phase studies, whether first-in-human (FIH), dose–range explorations, or integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and biomarker investigations, are not merely organizational milestones on the path to registrational decision points. They are critical generators of knowledge that inform dose selection, safety profiling, translational hypotheses, and risk mitigation strategies. Yet, despite their central role in decision making, early-phase studies are generally under-reported in the peer-reviewed literature or published only selectively, particularly when results are neutral or do not lead to further development. This practice diminishes community learning and can slow the cumulative scientific progress that clinical pharmacologists seek to achieve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These criteria align with broader scientific values including rigorous methods, transparent reporting, and clear impact on drug development. Manuscripts that thoughtfully explain both what was learned and what remains uncertain serve the industry and regulators alike.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regulatory expectations underscore that early-phase data are not transient artifacts of internal decision making; they are evidence that shapes dose rationale, informs benefit–risk assessments, and supports labeling claims. Journals provide the conduit by which these data enter the public scientific domain, enabling cross-program rationalization and cumulative learning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As we advance through 2026, we encourage clinical pharmacologists to approach manuscript preparation proactively. Early consideration of publication beginning at protocol design can shape data collection, endpoint selection, and analysis strategies that enhance both regulatory readiness and scientific value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Publication is not merely an academic exercise; it is a strategic contribution to the discipline of clinical pharmacology, informing how early-phase insights translate into safer, more efficacious therapies. When a study meaningfully informs a decision, extends understanding, or helps others avoid pitfalls, it deserves to be part of the published record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ultimately, our goal is to build a cumulative, transparent, and actionable body of evidence that advances clinical pharmacology and accelerates the delivery of better medicines to patients worldwide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AMI declares no conflict of int","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Importance of the Peer Review Process to Safeguard Scientific Integrity 同行评议过程对维护科学诚信的重要性。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70032
Kenneth T. Moore
<p>In an era defined by information overload, limited time, and competing professional demands, the role of the peer reviewer often comes at the expense of personal or free time. Yet, despite these challenges, performing this role remains an essential contribution to maintaining trustworthy science. I realize as I write this, I'm also proclaiming “Do as I say, not as I do,” as I have fallen victim to continually declining requests to act as a peer reviewer because of an ever-increasing workload from my employer, or important commitments I have made to my family and friends. However, today, where misinformation about science and medicine spreads rapidly across social media platforms, where political agendas often distort evidence-based discourse, and where questionable ‘science’ circulates without scrutiny, the peer review process, more than ever, serves as a critical safeguard for ensuring the credibility and rigor of science. Thus, if one identifies as a proponent of the scientific method and values a logical, data driven, and evidence-based foundation for scientific and medical dialogue, then active participation as a peer reviewer is less of an option and more of an ethical and professional responsibility. We cannot passively stand by and watch the ongoing deterioration of public trust in the professions we devoted our lives to. Rather, we must collectively reaffirm our commitment to credible research and the mechanisms by which knowledge remains verifiable, reproducible, and transparent.</p><p>At its core, peer review is a process that brings scientific and medical manuscripts to evaluation by independent experts within the same field of study. This process helps to ensure that the research being published meets the standards of validity, originality, and methodological soundness, while also safeguarding ethical integrity.<span><sup>1</sup></span> By filtering out research that doesn't meet these standards, the peer review process serves as a quality assurance mechanism that helps not only protect the academic record on the subject, but ultimately the public welfare.</p><p>Moreover, the peer review process plays an important role in advancing knowledge and fostering innovation. It can facilitate intellectual exchange by encouraging researchers to refine their methods, clarify findings or interpretations, question assumptions, and even explore potential new directions not previously considered.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In this way, peer review is more than just a gatekeeping function, it acts as a source of collaboration, accountability, and innovation that sustains the continuous evolution of science.</p><p>The integrity of this process depends fundamentally on the ethical conduct and professional responsibility of reviewers. Reviewers must approach their task with impartiality, confidentiality, and respect for the intellectual property of others. Declaring conflicts of interest, whether financial, personal, or professional, is not merely a f
在这个信息超载、时间有限、职业需求竞争激烈的时代,同行审稿人的角色往往是以牺牲个人或自由时间为代价的。然而,尽管存在这些挑战,履行这一角色仍然是维护可信赖科学的重要贡献。我意识到,当我写这篇文章时,我也在宣告“照我说的做,而不是照我做的做”,因为我已经成为了不断拒绝同行评议请求的受害者,因为我的雇主的工作量不断增加,或者我对家人和朋友做出了重要的承诺。然而,今天,关于科学和医学的错误信息在社交媒体平台上迅速传播,政治议程经常扭曲基于证据的话语,有问题的“科学”在未经审查的情况下传播,同行评议过程比以往任何时候都更能成为确保科学可信度和严谨性的关键保障。因此,如果一个人认为自己是科学方法的支持者,并重视科学和医学对话的逻辑、数据驱动和循证基础,那么作为同行审稿人的积极参与就不是一种选择,而是一种道德和职业责任。我们不能被动地袖手旁观,眼睁睁地看着公众对我们为之献身的职业的信任不断恶化。相反,我们必须共同重申我们对可信研究的承诺,以及保持知识可验证、可复制和透明的机制。同行评议的核心是将科学和医学手稿交由同一研究领域内的独立专家进行评估。这一过程有助于确保所发表的研究符合有效性、原创性和方法合理性的标准,同时也维护了伦理的完整性通过过滤掉不符合这些标准的研究,同行评议过程作为一种质量保证机制,不仅有助于保护该学科的学术记录,而且最终有助于保护公共福利。此外,同行评审过程在推进知识和促进创新方面发挥着重要作用。它可以鼓励研究人员改进他们的方法,澄清发现或解释,质疑假设,甚至探索以前没有考虑到的潜在新方向,从而促进知识交流通过这种方式,同行评审不仅仅是一个把关的功能,它是合作、责任和创新的来源,维持着科学的不断发展。这一过程的完整性从根本上取决于审稿人的道德行为和职业责任。审稿人必须公正、保密、尊重他人的知识产权。宣布利益冲突,无论是经济上的、个人的还是职业上的,都不仅仅是一种形式,而且是反对偏见和不当行为的必要措施同样重要的是认识到审稿人同时为科学界和公众服务。他们的评估不仅可以影响学术生涯(基于工作的批准或拒绝),还可以影响政策,指导方针和实践,医疗或其他方面,最终会影响生活。审稿人有道德义务提供周到的、建设性的反馈,以提高稿件的质量,促进作者的专业发展。评论应该是基于证据的,平衡的,不存在与作者身份、机构归属或原籍国有关的偏见此外,审稿人应该抵制“发表或消亡”文化的压力,这种文化会扭曲判断,导致不可复制的研究,或培养不道德的行为,如拒绝或推迟竞争对手的研究,或将未发表的想法用于自己的用途坚持这些原则有助于确保同行评审是一个公平和透明的过程,优先考虑知识进步而不是个人利益。尽管同行评议制度有其优势,但它也面临着一些可能削弱其有效性的挑战。目前,一个关键问题是投稿数量的增加和合格审稿人数量的有限之间的不平衡。随着科学和医学出版物的数量呈指数增长,有限的合格审稿人的负担加剧了。这反过来又会导致审查过程的倦怠和严重的延误,在某些情况下,还会导致不令人满意的评估。其他的问题包括评审的质量参差不齐,这通常是评审人员培训不足的结果,特别是在他们职业生涯的早期,他们经常在没有适当指导或正式培训的情况下承担评审的角色。这可能使他们不知道道德期望或关于如何正确执行关键和平衡审查的知识。 另一个问题是对审稿人缺乏切实的激励,他们通常是自愿从事这种密集的工作,很少得到认可或奖励。最后,传统同行评议模式的匿名性虽然旨在保护评议者免受报复,但可能存在道德缺陷。有时,审稿人匿名可能会助长非建设性的批评或偏见,因为审稿人可能会觉得不需要承担责任。相反,在公开的同行评议制度下,审稿人被确定,所有的评论都被充分披露,虽然促进了透明度和问责制,但也会带来阻碍坦率批评的压力。因此,挑战在于找到一个平衡的模型,既保持完整性和开放性,又尊重审稿人和作者的需求。为了保持同行评议过程的完整性,必须有更多的研究人员为这一重要过程做出贡献,并将参与视为一种职业责任,而不是一项可选的服务。受益于同行评议的作者应该反过来作为评议者做出贡献各院校应支持这种参与,正式承认同行评议是业绩评估、晋升和终身任职审查期间学术和专业服务的重要组成部分。期刊和专业协会应该考虑投资于审稿人教育,如果还没有这样做的话。有组织的培训项目,无论是在线模块、大会现场研讨会还是指导计划,都可以使下一代审稿人具备批判性评估和道德判断所需的技能。这种培训还应该强调文化能力和对无意识偏见的认识,确保评审在不同的研究群体中是平衡和包容的。科学诚信依赖于同行评议制度的力量。这是一项共同的责任,需要积极参与、道德警惕和制度承诺。审稿人必须勤勉、公正;期刊应该提供培训、认可和适当的监督;学术和专业机构应该重视同行评议,将其视为员工职业生涯中不可或缺的一部分。因此,美国临床药理学学院(ACCP)呼吁其成员和更广泛的科学和医学界通过积极参与同行评审过程来承担这一责任。通过这样做,我们共同维护科学话语的完整性,加强临床和科学数据证据基础的可靠性,最终支持科学严谨性、医学指南、政策决定,并保护公众对医学和科学的信任所依赖的基础。
{"title":"The Importance of the Peer Review Process to Safeguard Scientific Integrity","authors":"Kenneth T. Moore","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70032","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In an era defined by information overload, limited time, and competing professional demands, the role of the peer reviewer often comes at the expense of personal or free time. Yet, despite these challenges, performing this role remains an essential contribution to maintaining trustworthy science. I realize as I write this, I'm also proclaiming “Do as I say, not as I do,” as I have fallen victim to continually declining requests to act as a peer reviewer because of an ever-increasing workload from my employer, or important commitments I have made to my family and friends. However, today, where misinformation about science and medicine spreads rapidly across social media platforms, where political agendas often distort evidence-based discourse, and where questionable ‘science’ circulates without scrutiny, the peer review process, more than ever, serves as a critical safeguard for ensuring the credibility and rigor of science. Thus, if one identifies as a proponent of the scientific method and values a logical, data driven, and evidence-based foundation for scientific and medical dialogue, then active participation as a peer reviewer is less of an option and more of an ethical and professional responsibility. We cannot passively stand by and watch the ongoing deterioration of public trust in the professions we devoted our lives to. Rather, we must collectively reaffirm our commitment to credible research and the mechanisms by which knowledge remains verifiable, reproducible, and transparent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At its core, peer review is a process that brings scientific and medical manuscripts to evaluation by independent experts within the same field of study. This process helps to ensure that the research being published meets the standards of validity, originality, and methodological soundness, while also safeguarding ethical integrity.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; By filtering out research that doesn't meet these standards, the peer review process serves as a quality assurance mechanism that helps not only protect the academic record on the subject, but ultimately the public welfare.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the peer review process plays an important role in advancing knowledge and fostering innovation. It can facilitate intellectual exchange by encouraging researchers to refine their methods, clarify findings or interpretations, question assumptions, and even explore potential new directions not previously considered.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In this way, peer review is more than just a gatekeeping function, it acts as a source of collaboration, accountability, and innovation that sustains the continuous evolution of science.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The integrity of this process depends fundamentally on the ethical conduct and professional responsibility of reviewers. Reviewers must approach their task with impartiality, confidentiality, and respect for the intellectual property of others. Declaring conflicts of interest, whether financial, personal, or professional, is not merely a f","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Gliclazide Modified-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers 格列齐特缓释片在中国健康志愿者体内的生物等效性及药动学评价。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70021
Kejia Fu, Chengcan Lu, Yuping Zhang, He Pan, Zhaoyu Wang, Xijing Chen, Yi Liang

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-formulation, and two-cycle crossover trial conducted in 52 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (gliclazide modified-release tablets) and reference formulation (30 mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 72 h after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ for gliclazide were as follows: 93.9%, 99.2%, and 101.8%, respectively (under fasting conditions); 99.0%, 94.6%, and 98.8%, respectively (under fed conditions). The 90% confidence intervals for the GMRs were within the 80%–125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods accelerate the absorption rate of gliclazide, does not meaningfully alter the extent of absorption. The safety profiles of the two preparations were similar.

这是一项单中心、随机、开放标签、双配方、双周期的交叉试验,在52名健康的中国志愿者中进行,在禁食和喂养条件下进行。在每个研究期间,参与者接受口服剂量的试验制剂(格列齐特缓释片)和参考制剂(30mg)。在给药前和给药后72小时内采集血液样本,以确定药代动力学参数和不良反应的变化,然后用于评估生物等效性和安全性。格列齐特的Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的几何平均比(GMRs)分别为:93.9%、99.2%和101.8%(禁食条件下);分别为99.0%、94.6%和98.8%(饲喂条件下)。在禁食和喂养试验中,gmr的90%置信区间都在80%-125%的等效区间内。摄入高脂肪和高热量的食物会加速格列齐特的吸收速度,但不会显著改变吸收程度。两种制剂的安全性相似。
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Gliclazide Modified-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers","authors":"Kejia Fu,&nbsp;Chengcan Lu,&nbsp;Yuping Zhang,&nbsp;He Pan,&nbsp;Zhaoyu Wang,&nbsp;Xijing Chen,&nbsp;Yi Liang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70021","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-formulation, and two-cycle crossover trial conducted in 52 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (gliclazide modified-release tablets) and reference formulation (30 mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 72 h after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> for gliclazide were as follows: 93.9%, 99.2%, and 101.8%, respectively (under fasting conditions); 99.0%, 94.6%, and 98.8%, respectively (under fed conditions). The 90% confidence intervals for the GMRs were within the 80%–125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods accelerate the absorption rate of gliclazide, does not meaningfully alter the extent of absorption. The safety profiles of the two preparations were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Significance of IL-4 and IL-21 Concurrent Elevation in Predicting Disease Activity Score and Antihistamine Treatment Response in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. IL-4和IL-21同时升高预测慢性自发性荨麻疹疾病活动度评分及抗组胺治疗反应的临床意义
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70027
Shining Wang, Xiaojing Yang, Xuming Zhao, Leigang Chen, Jiayao Li, Guozhi An

To investigate the predictive value of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-21 levels in assessing disease activity score and antihistamine treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients. One hundred and twenty CSU patients treated at our hospital between January 2023 and January 2025 were retrospectively selected as the study group. Eighty healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations during the same period were included as the control group. Serum IL-4 and IL-21 levels, and the proportion of peripheral blood follicular helper T (Tfh) cells within CD4+ T cells were retrieved from the hospital information system. Based on the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), CSU patients were divided into three subgroups: mild (UAS7 < 16, n = 43), moderate (UAS7 16-27, n = 52), and severe (UAS7 ≥ 28, n = 25). All patients received standard antihistamine therapy for 4 weeks. According to treatment response, patients were categorized into four groups: complete remission, marked improvement, partial remission, and no response. The correlations of IL-4, IL-21, and Tfh cell levels with disease severity were analyzed, and their predictive value for CSU diagnosis and antihistamine treatment response was evaluated. IL-4 and IL-21 are co-upregulated in CSU patients, and their levels increase with disease activity and are positively correlated with UAS7 score (r = .603, 0.314, P < .001). These biomarkers have a certain reference value for diagnosis and severity assessment of CSU. Baseline levels of IL-4 and IL-21 may serve as predictive biomarkers for antihistamine treatment response, providing a potential reference for individualized treatment strategies.

探讨白细胞介素(IL)-4和IL-21水平在评估慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)患者疾病活动性评分和抗组胺治疗反应中的预测价值。回顾性选择2023年1月至2025年1月在我院治疗的120例CSU患者作为研究组。同期进行常规体检的健康个体80人作为对照组。从医院信息系统中检索血清IL-4、IL-21水平及外周血滤泡辅助T细胞(Tfh)占CD4+ T细胞的比例。根据7天以上荨麻疹活动评分(UAS7),将CSU患者分为轻度(UAS7 < 16, n = 43)、中度(UAS7 16-27, n = 52)和重度(UAS7≥28,n = 25)三个亚组。所有患者均接受标准抗组胺治疗4周。根据治疗反应,将患者分为完全缓解、显著改善、部分缓解和无反应四组。分析IL-4、IL-21和Tfh细胞水平与疾病严重程度的相关性,并评估其对CSU诊断和抗组胺治疗反应的预测价值。IL-4和IL-21在CSU患者中共上调,且随疾病活动度升高而升高,且与UAS7评分呈正相关(r = 0.603, 0.314, P < 0.001)。这些生物标志物对CSU的诊断和严重程度评估具有一定的参考价值。IL-4和IL-21的基线水平可作为抗组胺治疗反应的预测性生物标志物,为个性化治疗策略提供潜在参考。
{"title":"Clinical Significance of IL-4 and IL-21 Concurrent Elevation in Predicting Disease Activity Score and Antihistamine Treatment Response in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.","authors":"Shining Wang, Xiaojing Yang, Xuming Zhao, Leigang Chen, Jiayao Li, Guozhi An","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the predictive value of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-21 levels in assessing disease activity score and antihistamine treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients. One hundred and twenty CSU patients treated at our hospital between January 2023 and January 2025 were retrospectively selected as the study group. Eighty healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations during the same period were included as the control group. Serum IL-4 and IL-21 levels, and the proportion of peripheral blood follicular helper T (Tfh) cells within CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells were retrieved from the hospital information system. Based on the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), CSU patients were divided into three subgroups: mild (UAS7 < 16, n = 43), moderate (UAS7 16-27, n = 52), and severe (UAS7 ≥ 28, n = 25). All patients received standard antihistamine therapy for 4 weeks. According to treatment response, patients were categorized into four groups: complete remission, marked improvement, partial remission, and no response. The correlations of IL-4, IL-21, and Tfh cell levels with disease severity were analyzed, and their predictive value for CSU diagnosis and antihistamine treatment response was evaluated. IL-4 and IL-21 are co-upregulated in CSU patients, and their levels increase with disease activity and are positively correlated with UAS7 score (r = .603, 0.314, P < .001). These biomarkers have a certain reference value for diagnosis and severity assessment of CSU. Baseline levels of IL-4 and IL-21 may serve as predictive biomarkers for antihistamine treatment response, providing a potential reference for individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study 两种二甲双胍/恩格列净固定剂量联合片在空腹和进食条件下的生物等效性评价:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70029
Yuyan Lei, Qin Yi, Shan Ji, Juli Lu, Zhenya Yang

This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the Cmax of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC0−∞) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.

本研究评价了二甲双胍/恩帕列净(1000 mg/5 mg)两种固定剂量联合片剂在中国健康人体内的生物等效性和安全性。进行了一项单中心、开放标签、随机、两期、两治疗、两序列的交叉研究,纳入56名受试者,他们按1:1的比例被分配到禁食或进食状态。每位受试者同时服用测试配方和参考配方,两次给药之间有7天的洗脱期。给药后48 h采集血液样本,采用经验证的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法测定血浆中二甲双胍和恩格列净的浓度。根据关键药代动力学参数cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞评估生物等效性,在禁食和喂养状态下,试验与参考制剂的几何最小二乘平均比值在所有90%置信区间内均在80.00%至125.00%的可接受生物等效性范围内。高脂肪饮食显著降低二甲双胍和恩格列净的Cmax分别约47%和28%,其总暴露量(AUC0-∞)分别约29%和15%。无严重不良事件报告。综上所述,二甲双胍/恩帕列净FDC片的试验处方和参考处方在禁食和喂养条件下均具有生物等效性和良好的耐受性。
{"title":"Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study","authors":"Yuyan Lei,&nbsp;Qin Yi,&nbsp;Shan Ji,&nbsp;Juli Lu,&nbsp;Zhenya Yang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the C<sub>max</sub> of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC<sub>0−∞</sub>) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Human Mass Balance and Metabolism Study of [14C]-Ubrogepant in Healthy Male Adults [14C]-生长因子在健康男性体内的质量平衡与代谢研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70010
Ramesh R. Boinpally, Joshua Rowe, Pushpa Chandrasekar, Rebecca B. White, Eugene E. Marcantonio, Nicole Trainor, Yuexia Liang, Cheri Maciolek, James H. Small, Robert Houle, Michael J. Hafey, Huizhi Xie, Jocelyn Yabut, Christine Fandozzi

Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [14C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.

Ubrogepant是一种降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂,被批准用于有或无先兆偏头痛的急性治疗。研究人员对6名健康成年男性进行了肥壮剂的质量平衡和代谢评估,这些男性服用单次口服[14C]肥壮剂50 mg(~ 200µCi)。总体而言,平均总放射性回收率为给药剂量的92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%),其中粪便中为82.9% (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%),尿液中为9.52% (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%)。膨填充物主要通过代谢消除,主要通过胆汁/粪便排泄。约42%和6%的剂量分别作为未改变的母药随粪便和尿液排出体外。血浆样品中药物相关物质(DRM)的主要循环成分为增稠剂(55%)、M15(13%)和M20(3.5%)。M15(甲基化儿茶酚的葡萄糖醛酸盐)和M20(单氧增殖剂的葡萄糖醛酸盐[M8])也是尿液中的主要代谢物,约占DRM的2%。粪便中主要代谢物为氧化代谢物M6(二氧增殖剂)和M8,约占DRM的29%。体外实验表明,肥胖代谢主要通过CYP3A4发生。
{"title":"A Human Mass Balance and Metabolism Study of [14C]-Ubrogepant in Healthy Male Adults","authors":"Ramesh R. Boinpally,&nbsp;Joshua Rowe,&nbsp;Pushpa Chandrasekar,&nbsp;Rebecca B. White,&nbsp;Eugene E. Marcantonio,&nbsp;Nicole Trainor,&nbsp;Yuexia Liang,&nbsp;Cheri Maciolek,&nbsp;James H. Small,&nbsp;Robert Houle,&nbsp;Michael J. Hafey,&nbsp;Huizhi Xie,&nbsp;Jocelyn Yabut,&nbsp;Christine Fandozzi","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [<sup>14</sup>C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-In-Human Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DS-6016a After Single Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Japanese Adults 日本健康成人单次皮下注射DS-6016a的药代动力学和安全性的首次人体研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70023
Kei Okita, Hidetoshi Furuie, Akifumi Kurata, Yasuko Owada, Satoshi Yoshiba, Kei Furihata, Takaaki Oka, Yushi Kashihara, Hitoshi Ishizuka, Kazutaka Yoshihara

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.

进行性骨化纤维发育不良是一种罕见的进行性常染色体显性遗传病,由激活素受体样激酶2 (ALK2)突变引起,需要有效的预防治疗。这项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究评估了DS-6016a(一种新型人源化单克隆抗alk2抗体)在健康日本成年人中的药代动力学和安全性。在每组5-1000 mg DS-6016a或安慰剂单次皮下剂量组中,8名男性受试者按3:1的比例随机分配。DS-6016a的最大血药浓度中位时间为144-240小时,消除半衰期为391-844小时。在5-1000 mg剂量范围内,DS-6016a暴露的增加大于剂量正比。研究药物相关治疗不良事件(teae)的发生率在安慰剂组为17%,所有DS-6016a组为11%;所有病例均为轻度,无需治疗即可痊愈。没有死亡、严重或严重teae或teae导致研究中止的报告。铁蛋白从基线开始呈剂量依赖性下降,而血清铁没有明显的剂量依赖性。DS-6016a剂量与抗药物抗体的产生没有关系。DS-6016a单次皮下剂量为5- 1000mg时具有可接受的安全性。
{"title":"First-In-Human Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DS-6016a After Single Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Japanese Adults","authors":"Kei Okita,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Furuie,&nbsp;Akifumi Kurata,&nbsp;Yasuko Owada,&nbsp;Satoshi Yoshiba,&nbsp;Kei Furihata,&nbsp;Takaaki Oka,&nbsp;Yushi Kashihara,&nbsp;Hitoshi Ishizuka,&nbsp;Kazutaka Yoshihara","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Amlodipine, Losartan, and Chlorthalidone after a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects 健康男性单次口服氨氯地平、氯沙坦和氯噻酮的药代动力学相互作用
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70024
Seol Ju Moon, Sung Hee Hong, Yirang Lim, Jae-Yong Chung

Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUClast, respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan Cmax, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.

当两种或三种不同类别的药物联合使用时,降压药的效果更强。本研究的目的是评价氨氯地平、氯沙坦和氯噻酮之间的药代动力学相互作用。在健康的韩国男性受试者中进行了一项随机、开放标签、四顺序、四周期、四治疗、单剂量的研究,口服2片氨氯地平(5mg)、1片氯沙坦(100mg)、1片氯噻酮(25mg),或同时给药所有3种研究产品。采用液相色谱/串联质谱法测定血浆药物浓度。26名受试者完成了这项研究。氨氯地平的Cmax和AUClast的几何平均比值和90%置信区间分别为1.0928(1.0412 ~ 1.1469)和1.0360 (0.9958 ~ 1.0778);氯沙坦为1.1016(0.9136-1.3284)、1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375);EXP3174(氯沙坦活性代谢物)的1.0720(1.0119-1.1356)和1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148);氯噻酮为0.9462(0.8626-1.0379)、1.0266(0.9752-1.0807)。所有的治疗总体上耐受良好。除了氯沙坦Cmax略有增加外,联合治疗在全身药物暴露方面没有表现出临床显著的药代动力学相互作用。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Amlodipine, Losartan, and Chlorthalidone after a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects","authors":"Seol Ju Moon,&nbsp;Sung Hee Hong,&nbsp;Yirang Lim,&nbsp;Jae-Yong Chung","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last,</sub> respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan C<sub>max</sub>, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1