Surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion on single-shade composite resins: A comparative in vitro study of one-step versus multi-step polishing techniques.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental materials journal Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.4012/dmj.2024-041
Sevde Gül Batmaz, Seda Nur Karakaş, Cihan Küden
{"title":"Surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion on single-shade composite resins: A comparative in vitro study of one-step versus multi-step polishing techniques.","authors":"Sevde Gül Batmaz, Seda Nur Karakaş, Cihan Küden","doi":"10.4012/dmj.2024-041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effects of two polishing systems, OptraGloss (G; one-step) and OptiDisc (D; multi-step), on surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion on three single-shade composite resins: Omnichroma (O), ZenChroma (Z), and Charisma Diamond One (C). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α=0.05). Multi-step polishing groups (OD, ZD, and CD) exhibited significantly lower SR (0.18, 0.18, and 0.29 µm, respectively) compared to OG (0.46 µm), ZG (0.30 µm), and CG (0.44 µm) (p<0.05). The highest CA was observed in ZG (91.6º). S. mitis adhesion was greater than S. mutans in all groups except OG. A significant correlation was observed between SR and the adhesion of S. mutans (r=0.693, p<0.001). Polishing systems applied to single-shade composite resins did not impact the SFE but affected SR, and bacterial adhesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11065,"journal":{"name":"Dental materials journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental materials journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2024-041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of two polishing systems, OptraGloss (G; one-step) and OptiDisc (D; multi-step), on surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion on three single-shade composite resins: Omnichroma (O), ZenChroma (Z), and Charisma Diamond One (C). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α=0.05). Multi-step polishing groups (OD, ZD, and CD) exhibited significantly lower SR (0.18, 0.18, and 0.29 µm, respectively) compared to OG (0.46 µm), ZG (0.30 µm), and CG (0.44 µm) (p<0.05). The highest CA was observed in ZG (91.6º). S. mitis adhesion was greater than S. mutans in all groups except OG. A significant correlation was observed between SR and the adhesion of S. mutans (r=0.693, p<0.001). Polishing systems applied to single-shade composite resins did not impact the SFE but affected SR, and bacterial adhesion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单色复合树脂的表面特性和细菌附着力:单步抛光技术与多步抛光技术的体外对比研究。
本研究评估了 OptraGloss(G;一步法)和 OptiDisc(D;多步法)这两种抛光系统对三种单色复合树脂的表面粗糙度(SR)、接触角(CA)、表面自由能(SFE)和细菌附着力的影响:Omnichroma (O)、ZenChroma (Z) 和 Charisma Diamond One (C)。SR、CA、SFE 和变异链球菌(S. mutans)和米氏链球菌(S. mitis)粘附的数据采用单因素方差分析、Tukey 后检验和皮尔逊相关性(α=0.05)进行分析。与 OG(0.46 微米)、ZG(0.30 微米)和 CG(0.44 微米)相比,多步抛光组(OD、ZD 和 CD)的 SR(分别为 0.18、0.18 和 0.29 微米)明显较低(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dental materials journal
Dental materials journal 医学-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dental Materials Journal is a peer review journal published by the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devises aiming to introduce the progress of the basic and applied sciences in dental materials and biomaterials. The dental materials-related clinical science and instrumental technologies are also within the scope of this journal. The materials dealt include synthetic polymers, ceramics, metals and tissue-derived biomaterials. Forefront dental materials and biomaterials used in developing filed, such as tissue engineering, bioengineering and artificial intelligence, are positively considered for the review as well. Recent acceptance rate of the submitted manuscript in the journal is around 30%.
期刊最新文献
Shape reproducibility of retentive devices made of cast titanium. Bond strength of 4META-MMA-TBB resin to a CAD/CAM composite resin block and analysis of acetone-insoluble cured resin residues at adhesive interfaces. Effect of rosmarinic acid on microtensile bond strength of 1-step self-etch adhesive on artificial caries-affected dentine with or without NaOCl treatment: An in-vitro study. Rheological properties and handling characteristics of four injectable calcium hydroxide pastes. Surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion on single-shade composite resins: A comparative in vitro study of one-step versus multi-step polishing techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1