Possible Glycemic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Diabetes and Autonomic Neuropathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1089/dia.2024.0175
Huda Kufaishi, Davide Bertoli, Ditte Smed Kornum, Ajenthen Gayathri Ranjan, Kirsten Nørgaard, Klaus Krogh, Birgitte Brock, Tina Okdahl, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Christina Brock, Filip Krag Knop, Tine Willum Hansen, Christian Stevns Hansen, Peter Rossing
{"title":"Possible Glycemic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Diabetes and Autonomic Neuropathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Huda Kufaishi, Davide Bertoli, Ditte Smed Kornum, Ajenthen Gayathri Ranjan, Kirsten Nørgaard, Klaus Krogh, Birgitte Brock, Tina Okdahl, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Christina Brock, Filip Krag Knop, Tine Willum Hansen, Christian Stevns Hansen, Peter Rossing","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Autonomic neuropathy is associated with dysglycemia that is difficult to control. We investigated if transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) could improve glycemic levels. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We randomized 145 individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (<i>n</i> = 70) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) (<i>n</i> = 75) and diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) to self-administered treatment with active cervical tVNS (<i>n</i> = 68) or sham (<i>n</i> = 77) for 1 week (4 daily stimulations) and 8 weeks (2 daily stimulations), separated by a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) indices were measured for 104 participants starting 5 days prior to intervention periods, during the 1-week period, and at end of the 8-week period. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in changes in coefficient of variation (CV) and in time in range (TIR 3.9-10 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes were other metrics of CGM and HbA1c. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For the 1-week period, median [interquartile range] changes of CV from baseline to follow-up were -1.1 [-4.3;2.0] % in active and -1.5 [-4.4;2.5] % in sham, with no significance between groups (<i>P</i> = 0.54). For TIR, the corresponding changes were 2.4 [-2.1;7.4] % in active and 5.1 [-2.6;8.8] in sham group (<i>P</i> = 0.84). For the 8-week treatment period, changes in CV and TIR between groups were also nonsignificant. However, in the subgroup analysis, persons with T1D receiving active tVNS for 8 weeks had a significant reduction in CV compared with the T1D group receiving sham stimulation (estimated treatment effect: -11.6 [95% confidence interval -20.2;-2.0] %, <i>P</i> = 0.009). None of the changes in secondary outcomes between treatment groups were significantly different. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Overall, no significant changes were observed in CGM metrics between treatment arms, while individuals with T1D and DAN decreased their CV after 8 weeks of tVNS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Autonomic neuropathy is associated with dysglycemia that is difficult to control. We investigated if transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) could improve glycemic levels. Methods: We randomized 145 individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (n = 70) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 75) and diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) to self-administered treatment with active cervical tVNS (n = 68) or sham (n = 77) for 1 week (4 daily stimulations) and 8 weeks (2 daily stimulations), separated by a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) indices were measured for 104 participants starting 5 days prior to intervention periods, during the 1-week period, and at end of the 8-week period. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in changes in coefficient of variation (CV) and in time in range (TIR 3.9-10 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes were other metrics of CGM and HbA1c. Results: For the 1-week period, median [interquartile range] changes of CV from baseline to follow-up were -1.1 [-4.3;2.0] % in active and -1.5 [-4.4;2.5] % in sham, with no significance between groups (P = 0.54). For TIR, the corresponding changes were 2.4 [-2.1;7.4] % in active and 5.1 [-2.6;8.8] in sham group (P = 0.84). For the 8-week treatment period, changes in CV and TIR between groups were also nonsignificant. However, in the subgroup analysis, persons with T1D receiving active tVNS for 8 weeks had a significant reduction in CV compared with the T1D group receiving sham stimulation (estimated treatment effect: -11.6 [95% confidence interval -20.2;-2.0] %, P = 0.009). None of the changes in secondary outcomes between treatment groups were significantly different. Conclusions: Overall, no significant changes were observed in CGM metrics between treatment arms, while individuals with T1D and DAN decreased their CV after 8 weeks of tVNS treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过连续血糖监测评估迷走神经刺激对糖尿病和自主神经病变患者可能产生的降糖效果:随机、假对照试验。
目的:自主神经病变与难以控制的血糖异常有关。我们研究了经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)能否改善血糖水平。研究方法我们将 145 名 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 患者(n = 70)或 2 型糖尿病 (T2D) 患者(n = 75)和糖尿病自主神经病变 (DAN) 患者随机分组,让他们自行接受主动颈部经皮迷走神经刺激 (tVNS) 治疗(n = 68)或假治疗(n = 77),治疗时间分别为 1 周(每天刺激 4 次)和 8 周(每天刺激 2 次),中间至少间隔 2 周。在干预期开始前 5 天、1 周期间和 8 周结束时,对 104 名参与者的连续血糖监测 (CGM) 指数进行了测量。主要结果是变异系数(CV)和时间范围(TIR 3.9-10 mmol/L)变化的组间差异。次要结果是 CGM 和 HbA1c 的其他指标。结果:在一周时间内,从基线到随访的变异系数变化中位数[四分位数间距]为:主动组-1.1 [-4.3;2.0] %,假动组为-1.5 [-4.4;2.5] %,组间差异不显著(P = 0.54)。就 TIR 而言,活性组的相应变化为 2.4 [-2.1;7.4] %,假体组为 5.1 [-2.6;8.8] %(P = 0.84)。在 8 周的治疗期间,各组之间的 CV 和 TIR 变化也不显著。然而,在亚组分析中,与接受假刺激的 T1D 组相比,接受 8 周活性 tVNS 治疗的 T1D 患者的 CV 显著下降(估计治疗效果:-11.6 [95% 置信区间 -20.2;-2.0]%,P = 0.009)。治疗组之间次要结果的变化均无明显差异。结论总体而言,治疗组之间的 CGM 指标未见明显变化,而 T1D 和 DAN 患者在接受 8 周的 tVNS 治疗后,其 CV 有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Comparison of Computational Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data with a Reference Software, "Ambulatory Glucose Profile," in Type 1 Diabetes. Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. Evaluation of an Automated Priming Bolus for Improving Prandial Glucose Control in Full Closed Loop Delivery. Safe Options for the Treatment of Mothers and Babies with Pregestational Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1