Accuracy of the 15.5-Day G7 iCGM in Adults with Diabetes.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1089/dia.2025.0139
Satish K Garg, Timothy S Bailey, Kristin Castorino, Mark P Christiansen, David R Liljenquist, Hernan Salazar, Halis Kaan Akturk, Sharon Gao, Matthew L Johnson, Stayce E Beck
{"title":"Accuracy of the 15.5-Day G7 iCGM in Adults with Diabetes.","authors":"Satish K Garg, Timothy S Bailey, Kristin Castorino, Mark P Christiansen, David R Liljenquist, Hernan Salazar, Halis Kaan Akturk, Sharon Gao, Matthew L Johnson, Stayce E Beck","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are increasingly being used to manage diabetes. We evaluated the performance and safety of an investigational 15-day G7 integrated CGM (iCGM; Dexcom) in adults with diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This prospective, multicenter study enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) at six clinical sites in the United States. Four in-clinic visits were conducted on days 1-3, 4-7, 9-12, and 13-15.5, with frequent arterialized venous blood draws for comparator measurements using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) 2300 Stat Plus glucose analyzer. Participants with T1D or T2D using intensive insulin therapy participated in clinic sessions with deliberate, closely monitored glucose manipulations. Accuracy evaluations included the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), proportion of CGM values within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <70 mg/dL or within 15% of YSI values ≥70 mg/dL (%15/15), as well as %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. Performance related to iCGM special controls, user experience, and device safety were also assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study enrolled 130 adults with diabetes (mean ± standard deviation age 43.0 ± 14.4 years, 53.1% female, 86.9% with T1D) and analyzed 20,310 CGM-YSI matched pairs from 130 15-day G7 CGM devices. The overall MARD was 8.0% and the %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates were 87.7%, 94.2%, 98.9%, and 99.8%, respectively. The device exceeded iCGM performance goals, and user experiences were broadly positive. No serious adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The 15-day G7 iCGM was accurate and safe in adults with diabetes throughout the 15.5-day wear period. <b><i>Clinicaltrials.gov:</i></b> NCT05263258.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"430-438"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are increasingly being used to manage diabetes. We evaluated the performance and safety of an investigational 15-day G7 integrated CGM (iCGM; Dexcom) in adults with diabetes. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) at six clinical sites in the United States. Four in-clinic visits were conducted on days 1-3, 4-7, 9-12, and 13-15.5, with frequent arterialized venous blood draws for comparator measurements using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) 2300 Stat Plus glucose analyzer. Participants with T1D or T2D using intensive insulin therapy participated in clinic sessions with deliberate, closely monitored glucose manipulations. Accuracy evaluations included the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), proportion of CGM values within 15 mg/dL of YSI values <70 mg/dL or within 15% of YSI values ≥70 mg/dL (%15/15), as well as %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates. Performance related to iCGM special controls, user experience, and device safety were also assessed. Results: The study enrolled 130 adults with diabetes (mean ± standard deviation age 43.0 ± 14.4 years, 53.1% female, 86.9% with T1D) and analyzed 20,310 CGM-YSI matched pairs from 130 15-day G7 CGM devices. The overall MARD was 8.0% and the %15/15, %20/20, %30/30, and %40/40 agreement rates were 87.7%, 94.2%, 98.9%, and 99.8%, respectively. The device exceeded iCGM performance goals, and user experiences were broadly positive. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The 15-day G7 iCGM was accurate and safe in adults with diabetes throughout the 15.5-day wear period. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263258.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人糖尿病患者15.5天G7 iCGM的准确性
背景:连续血糖监测仪(CGM)越来越多地用于糖尿病的治疗。我们评估了一项为期15天的试验性G7综合CGM (iCGM;Dexcom)在成人糖尿病患者中的应用。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心研究招募了美国6个临床站点的1型糖尿病(T1D)或2型糖尿病(T2D)成人(年龄≥18岁)。在第1-3天、第4-7天、第9-12天和第13-15.5天进行了4次门诊就诊,并使用Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) 2300 Stat Plus血糖分析仪频繁抽取动静脉血进行比较测量。接受胰岛素强化治疗的T1D或T2D患者参加了有意的、密切监测的血糖操作的临床会议。准确性评估包括平均绝对相对差(MARD), CGM值在YSI值15 mg/dL范围内的比例。结果:研究纳入130名糖尿病成人(平均±标准差年龄43.0±14.4岁,53.1%为女性,86.9%为T1D),分析了130个15天G7 CGM装置的20,310对CGM-YSI匹配。总体MARD为8.0%,%15/15、%20/20、%30/30和%40/40的符合率分别为87.7%、94.2%、98.9%和99.8%。该设备超出了iCGM的性能目标,用户体验也非常积极。无严重不良事件报告。结论:在15.5天的佩戴期间,成人糖尿病患者的15天G7 iCGM是准确和安全的。Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263258。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Early Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery at Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis in Children and Adolescents Is Associated with Improved Outcomes. Beyond the Coefficient of Variation: Reframing Glycemic Variability as Dispersion and Volatility. Corrigendum to: "The Virtual DCCT #3: Relationship of HbA1c and CGM Metrics with Cardiovascular Outcomes". Decision Support Tool for Self-Management of Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes with Multiple Daily Injections: A Proof-of-Concept Study. A Real-World Study Comparing Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems During Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1