Midface Projection Using Biostimulatory Poly-l-Lactic Acid Injectable Implant: A Subgroup Analysis of the Cheek Wrinkle Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004434
Sabrina G Fabi, Jennifer Htd Le, Inna Prygova, Daniel Bråsäter
{"title":"Midface Projection Using Biostimulatory Poly-l-Lactic Acid Injectable Implant: A Subgroup Analysis of the Cheek Wrinkle Trial.","authors":"Sabrina G Fabi, Jennifer Htd Le, Inna Prygova, Daniel Bråsäter","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correction of cheek wrinkles using poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) was demonstrated in a 12-month study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This analysis assessed change from baseline in lifting effect of PLLA-SCA using a 3D camera to provide additional quantified data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects received PLLA-SCA (reconstituted in 8 mL of sterile water + 1 mL of 2% lidocaine) in both cheeks or no treatment (control). Assessments included the Galderma Cheek Wrinkle Scale (GCWS), aesthetic improvement, and 3D photography. In subjects with severe GCWS at baseline, Canfield software analyzed 3D images for change from baseline in midface volume projection and volume change of both cheeks at Month 9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary study showed a statistically significant higher at-rest GCWS responder rate at Month 12 for PLLA-SCA, 71.6%, versus control, 26.1% (p < .0001). In this Month 9 analysis, mean midface volume projection demonstrated a positive volume shift for PLLA-SCA (left: 0.45 mm; right: 0.34 mm; n = 46) versus control (left: 0.25 mm; right: -0.01 mm; n = 21). Midface volume and max projection changes for PLLA-SCA were +4.88 mL/+1.62 mm (left), +2.84 mL/+1.12 mm (right) versus +0.26 mL/+0.34 mm (left), +0.68 mL/+0.37 mm (right) for control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poly-l-lactic acid-treatment of subjects with severe GCWS had a clinically meaningful lifting effect in both cheeks (positive volume shift, positive volume change, and max projection) in the midface.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number: </strong>NCT04124692.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Correction of cheek wrinkles using poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) was demonstrated in a 12-month study.

Objective: This analysis assessed change from baseline in lifting effect of PLLA-SCA using a 3D camera to provide additional quantified data.

Methods: Subjects received PLLA-SCA (reconstituted in 8 mL of sterile water + 1 mL of 2% lidocaine) in both cheeks or no treatment (control). Assessments included the Galderma Cheek Wrinkle Scale (GCWS), aesthetic improvement, and 3D photography. In subjects with severe GCWS at baseline, Canfield software analyzed 3D images for change from baseline in midface volume projection and volume change of both cheeks at Month 9.

Results: The primary study showed a statistically significant higher at-rest GCWS responder rate at Month 12 for PLLA-SCA, 71.6%, versus control, 26.1% (p < .0001). In this Month 9 analysis, mean midface volume projection demonstrated a positive volume shift for PLLA-SCA (left: 0.45 mm; right: 0.34 mm; n = 46) versus control (left: 0.25 mm; right: -0.01 mm; n = 21). Midface volume and max projection changes for PLLA-SCA were +4.88 mL/+1.62 mm (left), +2.84 mL/+1.12 mm (right) versus +0.26 mL/+0.34 mm (left), +0.68 mL/+0.37 mm (right) for control.

Conclusion: Poly-l-lactic acid-treatment of subjects with severe GCWS had a clinically meaningful lifting effect in both cheeks (positive volume shift, positive volume change, and max projection) in the midface.

Clinical trial registry number: NCT04124692.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用生物刺激性聚乳酸注射植入物进行面中部投影:面颊皱纹试验的分组分析。
背景:一项为期 12 个月的研究显示,使用聚乳酸(PLLA-SCA)可矫正脸颊皱纹:一项为期12个月的研究显示,使用聚乳酸(PLLA-SCA)可矫正面颊皱纹:本分析使用三维照相机评估PLLA-SCA的提升效果与基线相比的变化,以提供更多量化数据:受试者双颊接受 PLLA-SCA(用 8 mL 无菌水+1 mL 2% 利多卡因重组)或不接受治疗(对照组)。评估包括Galderma面颊皱纹量表(GCWS)、美学改善和3D摄影。对于基线值为严重 GCWS 的受试者,Canfield 软件会分析三维图像,以确定与基线值相比,受试者在第 9 个月时的中面部容积投影和双颊容积变化:主要研究结果显示,在第 12 个月时,PLLA-SCA 的静息 GCWS 回复率为 71.6%,而对照组为 26.1%,差异有统计学意义(P < .0001)。在第 9 个月的分析中,PLLA-SCA(左:0.45 毫米;右:0.34 毫米;n = 46)与对照组(左:0.25 毫米;右:-0.01 毫米;n = 21)相比,平均中面部体积投影显示出正的体积移动。PLLA-SCA的中面体积和最大投影变化分别为+4.88 mL/+1.62 mm(左)、+2.84 mL/+1.12 mm(右),而对照组为+0.26 mL/+0.34 mm(左)、+0.68 mL/+0.37 mm(右):临床试验登记号:NCT04124692:临床试验登记号:NCT04124692。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
期刊最新文献
Granulomatous Reactions From Microneedling: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How We Do It: A Systematic Approach to Reapproximating the Terminal Medial Brow During Forehead Flap Reconstruction. Microneedling in Localized Acquired Hypomelanosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Temple Volumization: A Review of Anatomy and Optimal Injection Techniques. Unveiling Patient Expectations: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study on Facial Aesthetic Treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1