Update of the risk assessment of brominated phenols and their derivatives in food

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9034
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Helle Katrine Knutsen, Agneta Åkesson, Vasileios Bampidis, Margherita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Gisela Degen, Antonio Hernández-Jerez, Tim Hofer, Stefano Landi, Jean-Charles Leblanc, Kyriaki Machera, Evangelia Ntzani, Guido Rychen, Salomon Sand, Tanja Schwerdtle, Katharina Vejdovszky, Barbara Viviani, Diane Benford, Andy Hart, Martin Rose, Henri Schroeder, Christiane Vleminckx, Martine Vrijheid, Eleni Gkimprixi, Eirini Kouloura, Francesca Riolo, Luisa Ramos Bordajandi, Christer Hogstrand
{"title":"Update of the risk assessment of brominated phenols and their derivatives in food","authors":"EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM),&nbsp;Helle Katrine Knutsen,&nbsp;Agneta Åkesson,&nbsp;Vasileios Bampidis,&nbsp;Margherita Bignami,&nbsp;Laurent Bodin,&nbsp;James Kevin Chipman,&nbsp;Gisela Degen,&nbsp;Antonio Hernández-Jerez,&nbsp;Tim Hofer,&nbsp;Stefano Landi,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Kyriaki Machera,&nbsp;Evangelia Ntzani,&nbsp;Guido Rychen,&nbsp;Salomon Sand,&nbsp;Tanja Schwerdtle,&nbsp;Katharina Vejdovszky,&nbsp;Barbara Viviani,&nbsp;Diane Benford,&nbsp;Andy Hart,&nbsp;Martin Rose,&nbsp;Henri Schroeder,&nbsp;Christiane Vleminckx,&nbsp;Martine Vrijheid,&nbsp;Eleni Gkimprixi,&nbsp;Eirini Kouloura,&nbsp;Francesca Riolo,&nbsp;Luisa Ramos Bordajandi,&nbsp;Christer Hogstrand","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2012 risk assessment on brominated phenols and their derivatives in food, focusing on five bromophenols and one derivative: 2,4,6-tribromophenol (<b>2,4,6-TBP</b>), 2,4-dibromophenol (<b>2,4-DBP</b>), 4-bromophenol (<b>4-BP</b>), 2,6-dibromophenol (<b>2,6-DBP</b>), tetrabrominated bisphenol S (<b>TBBPS</b>), tetrabromobisphenol S bismethyl ether (<b>TBBPS-BME</b>). Based on the overall evidence, the CONTAM Panel considered in vivo genotoxicity of <b>2,4,6-TBP</b> to be unlikely. Effects in liver and kidney were considered as the critical effects of 2,4,6-tribromophenol (<b>2,4,6-TBP</b>) in studies in rats. A BMDL<sub>10</sub> of 353 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for kidney papillary necrosis in male rats was identified and was selected as the reference point for the risk characterisation. The derivation of a health-based guidance value was not considered appropriate due to major limitations in the toxicological database. Instead, the margin of exposure (MOE) approach was applied to assess possible health concerns. Around 78,200 analytical results for <b>2,4,6-TBP</b> in food were used to estimate dietary exposure for the European population. Considering the resulting MOE values, all far above an MOE of 6000 that does not raise a health concern, and accounting for the uncertainties affecting the exposure and hazard assessments, the CONTAM Panel concluded with at least 95% probability that the current dietary exposure to <b>2,4,6-TBP</b> does not raise a health concern. Due to lack of occurrence data, no risk assessment could be performed for breastfed or formula-fed infants. No risk characterisation could be performed for any of the other brominated phenols and derivatives included in the assessment, due to lack of data both on the toxicity and occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"22 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2012 risk assessment on brominated phenols and their derivatives in food, focusing on five bromophenols and one derivative: 2,4,6-tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP), 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP), 4-bromophenol (4-BP), 2,6-dibromophenol (2,6-DBP), tetrabrominated bisphenol S (TBBPS), tetrabromobisphenol S bismethyl ether (TBBPS-BME). Based on the overall evidence, the CONTAM Panel considered in vivo genotoxicity of 2,4,6-TBP to be unlikely. Effects in liver and kidney were considered as the critical effects of 2,4,6-tribromophenol (2,4,6-TBP) in studies in rats. A BMDL10 of 353 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for kidney papillary necrosis in male rats was identified and was selected as the reference point for the risk characterisation. The derivation of a health-based guidance value was not considered appropriate due to major limitations in the toxicological database. Instead, the margin of exposure (MOE) approach was applied to assess possible health concerns. Around 78,200 analytical results for 2,4,6-TBP in food were used to estimate dietary exposure for the European population. Considering the resulting MOE values, all far above an MOE of 6000 that does not raise a health concern, and accounting for the uncertainties affecting the exposure and hazard assessments, the CONTAM Panel concluded with at least 95% probability that the current dietary exposure to 2,4,6-TBP does not raise a health concern. Due to lack of occurrence data, no risk assessment could be performed for breastfed or formula-fed infants. No risk characterisation could be performed for any of the other brominated phenols and derivatives included in the assessment, due to lack of data both on the toxicity and occurrence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新食品中溴化酚及其衍生物的风险评估。
欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局更新其 2012 年对食品中溴化酚及其衍生物的风险评估,重点关注五种溴化酚和一种衍生物:2,4,6-三溴苯酚(2,4,6-TBP)、2,4-二溴苯酚(2,4-DBP)、4-溴苯酚(4-BP)、2,6-二溴苯酚(2,6-DBP)、四溴双酚 S(TBBPS)、四溴双酚 S 双甲基醚(TBBPS-BME)。根据总体证据,CONTAM 小组认为 2,4,6-三丁基苯酚的体内遗传毒性可能性不大。在对大鼠的研究中,2,4,6-三溴酚(2,4,6-TBP)对肝脏和肾脏的影响被认为是关键影响。雄性大鼠肾乳头坏死的基准剂量 可信限值10 为每天 353 毫克/千克体重(bw),并被选为风险特征描述的参考点。由于毒理学数据库的重大局限性,推导以健康为基础的指导值被认为是不合适的。取而代之的是采用暴露限值(MOE)方法来评估可能存在的健康问题。利用食品中约 78,200 项 2,4,6-TBP 分析结果来估算欧洲人口的膳食暴露量。考虑到得出的暴露限值(均远高于不会引起健康问题的暴露限值 6000),并考虑到影响暴露和危害评估的不确定性,CONTAM 专家小组得出结论认为,目前从膳食中暴露于 2,4,6-TBP 的可能性至少为 95%,不会引起健康问题。由于缺乏发生数据,无法对母乳喂养或配方奶喂养的婴儿进行风险评估。由于缺乏有关毒性和发生率的数据,因此无法对评估中包括的任何其他溴化酚及其衍生物进行风险定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Commodity risk assessment of Prunus cerasus × Prunus canescens hybrid plants from Ukraine Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei NCIMB 30151 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Microferm ltd.) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance gibberellic acid (GA3) Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance gibberellins (GA4/GA7) Creatine and improvement in cognitive function: Evaluation of a health claim pursuant to article 13(5) of regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1