Pub Date : 2026-02-05eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9836
Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L M Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Cristina Fernàndez-Fraguas, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Ana Criado, Simone Lunardi, Yi Liu
The food enzyme triacylglycerol lipase (triacylglycerol acylhydrolase, EC 3.1.1.3) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reseei strain AR-822 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 0.127 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 7874. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the triacylglycerol lipase to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but that the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.
{"title":"Safety evaluation of the food enzyme triacylglycerol lipase from the genetically modified <i>Trichoderma reseei</i> strain AR-822.","authors":"Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L M Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Cristina Fernàndez-Fraguas, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Ana Criado, Simone Lunardi, Yi Liu","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The food enzyme triacylglycerol lipase (triacylglycerol acylhydrolase, EC 3.1.1.3) is produced with the genetically modified <i>Trichoderma reseei</i> strain AR-822 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 0.127 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 7874. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the triacylglycerol lipase to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but that the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":"e9836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12873554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9872
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Silvia Mazzega, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza, Marija Blazevic
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Ireland and co-rapporteur Member State, Poland, for the pesticide active substance dichlorprop-P and the variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached based on the evaluation of the representative uses of dichlorprop-P as herbicide on cereals, grassland and grass seed crops and of the variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl as a plant growth regulator on citrus. MRLs were assessed in mandarin and lemon. The conclusions from 2018 were updated in 2024 following the request from the European Commission regarding the endocrine disruption properties. The conclusions were further updated in 2025 in the context of the peer review required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council for an amendment in approval conditions. The purpose of this application was to extend the existing approval to include the ester variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.
报告了欧洲食品安全局在报告成员国爱尔兰和联合报告成员国波兰的主管当局对农药活性物质二氯丙- p和变体二氯丙- p- 2-乙基已基进行初步风险评估的同行审查后得出的结论,以及对最大残留水平(MRLs)申请的评估。同行评审的背景是欧盟委员会实施条例(EU) No 844/2012所要求的。通过对二氯丙- p在谷物、草地和草籽作物上的代表性除草剂和二氯丙- p- 2-乙基己基在柑橘上的代表性植物生长调节剂的评价,得出了上述结论。评估了柑桔和柠檬的核磁共振成像。根据欧盟委员会关于内分泌干扰特性的要求,2018年的结论于2024年进行了更新。根据欧洲议会和理事会修订批准条件的法规(EC) No 1107/2009要求的同行评议,该结论于2025年进一步更新。本申请的目的是根据2009年10月21日欧洲议会和理事会关于将植物保护产品投放市场的法规(EC) No 1107/2009,将现有的酯变体二氯丙- p- 2-乙基己基批准扩展到二氯丙- p- 2-乙基己基。提出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点和建议的MRLs。列出了监管框架所要求的缺失信息。在确定的地方报告关注事项。
{"title":"Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dichlorprop-P and variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Silvia Mazzega, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza, Marija Blazevic","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9872","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9872","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Ireland and co-rapporteur Member State, Poland, for the pesticide active substance dichlorprop-P and the variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached based on the evaluation of the representative uses of dichlorprop-P as herbicide on cereals, grassland and grass seed crops and of the variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl as a plant growth regulator on citrus. MRLs were assessed in mandarin and lemon. The conclusions from 2018 were updated in 2024 following the request from the European Commission regarding the endocrine disruption properties. The conclusions were further updated in 2025 in the context of the peer review required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council for an amendment in approval conditions. The purpose of this application was to extend the existing approval to include the ester variant dichlorprop-P-2-ethylhexyl under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12869271/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9941
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Chantra Eskes, José Cortiñas-Abrahantes, Bernard Bottex, Jean-Lou C. M. Dorne, Bruno Dujardin, Rita Ferreira de Souza, Zsuzsanna Horvath, Eirini Kouloura, Luisa Ramos Bordajandi, Valentina Rizzi, Hans Steinkellner, Mary Gilsenan
EFSA has received a request for a rapid risk assessment for cereulide from the European Commission. Cereulide is a heat-stable emetic toxin produced by Bacillus cereus, recently detected in infant formulae from multiple manufacturers. This led to precautionary recalls across several countries. EFSA was requested to determine the acute reference dose (ARfD) for cereulide in infants, based on available toxicological data, and provide information on the acute consumption of infant formulae from EFSA's food consumption database. From the available toxicological data, emesis was considered as the critical endpoint for the acute effects of cereulide. A study in adult Asian house shrews was considered as the most appropriate for benchmark dose (BMD) modelling, and a BMDL10 of 4.2 μg/kg body weight (bw), corresponding to a 10% increased risk of emesis, was derived. An ARfD of 0.014 μg/kg bw was then derived by applying a default uncertainty factor (UF) of 100 and an additional UF of 3 for reduced xenobiotic metabolism and renal excretion in infants. Available consumption data confirmed EFSA's previous recommendation to use a high consumption value of 260 mL/kg bw for estimating acute exposure to cereulide via infant formulae. When assessing acute exposure from follow-on formulae, a P95 consumption value of 140 mL/kg bw was considered more appropriate. Cereulide concentrations above 0.054 μg/L and 0.1 μg/L in reconstituted infant formulae and follow-on formulae, respectively, may therefore exceed the derived ARfD.
{"title":"Rapid risk assessment on acute reference dose (ARfD) of cereulide in infants and information on acute consumption of infant formulae","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Chantra Eskes, José Cortiñas-Abrahantes, Bernard Bottex, Jean-Lou C. M. Dorne, Bruno Dujardin, Rita Ferreira de Souza, Zsuzsanna Horvath, Eirini Kouloura, Luisa Ramos Bordajandi, Valentina Rizzi, Hans Steinkellner, Mary Gilsenan","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9941","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9941","url":null,"abstract":"<p>EFSA has received a request for a rapid risk assessment for cereulide from the European Commission. Cereulide is a heat-stable emetic toxin produced by <i>Bacillus cereus</i>, recently detected in infant formulae from multiple manufacturers. This led to precautionary recalls across several countries. EFSA was requested to determine the acute reference dose (ARfD) for cereulide in infants, based on available toxicological data, and provide information on the acute consumption of infant formulae from EFSA's food consumption database. From the available toxicological data, emesis was considered as the critical endpoint for the acute effects of cereulide. A study in adult Asian house shrews was considered as the most appropriate for benchmark dose (BMD) modelling, and a BMDL<sub>10</sub> of 4.2 μg/kg body weight (bw), corresponding to a 10% increased risk of emesis, was derived. An ARfD of 0.014 μg/kg bw was then derived by applying a default uncertainty factor (UF) of 100 and an additional UF of 3 for reduced xenobiotic metabolism and renal excretion in infants. Available consumption data confirmed EFSA's previous recommendation to use a high consumption value of 260 mL/kg bw for estimating acute exposure to cereulide via infant formulae. When assessing acute exposure from follow-on formulae, a P95 consumption value of 140 mL/kg bw was considered more appropriate. Cereulide concentrations above 0.054 μg/L and 0.1 μg/L in reconstituted infant formulae and follow-on formulae, respectively, may therefore exceed the derived ARfD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12871449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9868
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Amarela Becirovic, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Greece and co-rapporteur Member State France for the pesticide active substance paraffin oil CAS 64742-46-7 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of paraffin oil CAS 64742-46-7 as an insecticide on citrus trees. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在报告成员国希腊和联合报告成员国法国主管当局对农药活性物质石蜡油CAS 64742-46-7进行初步风险评估的同行审查后得出的结论。同行评议的背景是委员会实施条例(EU) No 844/2012所要求的,并经委员会实施条例(EU) No 2018/1659修订。通过对石蜡油CAS 64742-46-7在柑桔上的代表性应用进行评价,得出上述结论。提出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架所要求的缺失信息。确定关注点。
{"title":"Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance paraffin oil (CAS 64742-46-7, chain lengths C16–C25)","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Amarela Becirovic, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9868","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Greece and co-rapporteur Member State France for the pesticide active substance paraffin oil CAS 64742-46-7 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of paraffin oil CAS 64742-46-7 as an insecticide on citrus trees. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9868","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146135967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851
EFSA Panel Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Anette Boklund, Sabine Dippel, Fernanda Dorea, Jordi Figuerola, Mette S. Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Eleonora Nannoni, Romolo Nonno, Karl Stahl, Jutta Berk, Joanna Marchewka, Nienke van Staaveren, Oana Maria Balmos, Chiara Fabris, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali, Cristina Rojo Gimeno, Antonio Velarde, Anja Brinch Riber
This Scientific Opinion assesses the welfare of turkeys of all ages (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm in relation to the type and condition of the litter, type and availability of enrichment (including covered veranda and outdoor range), space allowance, concentrations of ammonia and carbon dioxide, effective environmental temperature, group size, nest conditions, lighting conditions and hatchery conditions, by using 19 welfare consequences and associated animal-based measures (ABMs) for their assessment. In addition, the risks posed by the practices of flock thinning and removal of hens, mutilations (i.e. beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming), artificial insemination (including semen collection) and feed restriction are assessed, with the latter two practices only in turkey breeders. The welfare consequences of breeding is assessed. Recommendations to prevent and/or mitigate relevant welfare consequences in fattening and breeder turkeys include increasing space allowance compared to the currently provided space, avoiding feed and water deprivation of newly-hatched poults for more than 48 h, and providing enrichment such as elevated platforms, straw-bales and a covered veranda. It is recommended to maintain dry litter conditions, i.e. below a threshold of 35%–40% humidity. Beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming as well as the associated welfare consequences can be avoided if the recommended housing and management practices are implemented, e.g. increasing space allowance and providing suitable enrichment. It is recommended to discontinue flock thinning and avoid quantitative feed restriction, the latter currently practised in breeder toms. Also, it is recommended to place more emphasis on leg health and less on weight gain in genetic selection. The selected ABMs to monitor relevant welfare consequences at the slaughterhouse are total mortality, plumage damage, carcass condemnation, wounds, breast blisters and footpad dermatitis.
{"title":"Welfare assessment of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) on farm","authors":"EFSA Panel Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Anette Boklund, Sabine Dippel, Fernanda Dorea, Jordi Figuerola, Mette S. Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Eleonora Nannoni, Romolo Nonno, Karl Stahl, Jutta Berk, Joanna Marchewka, Nienke van Staaveren, Oana Maria Balmos, Chiara Fabris, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali, Cristina Rojo Gimeno, Antonio Velarde, Anja Brinch Riber","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9851","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Scientific Opinion assesses the welfare of turkeys of all ages (<i>Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo</i>) on farm in relation to the type and condition of the litter, type and availability of enrichment (including covered veranda and outdoor range), space allowance, concentrations of ammonia and carbon dioxide, effective environmental temperature, group size, nest conditions, lighting conditions and hatchery conditions, by using 19 welfare consequences and associated animal-based measures (ABMs) for their assessment. In addition, the risks posed by the practices of flock thinning and removal of hens, mutilations (i.e. beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming), artificial insemination (including semen collection) and feed restriction are assessed, with the latter two practices only in turkey breeders. The welfare consequences of breeding is assessed. Recommendations to prevent and/or mitigate relevant welfare consequences in fattening and breeder turkeys include increasing space allowance compared to the currently provided space, avoiding feed and water deprivation of newly-hatched poults for more than 48 h, and providing enrichment such as elevated platforms, straw-bales and a covered veranda. It is recommended to maintain dry litter conditions, i.e. below a threshold of 35%–40% humidity. Beak trimming, desnooding and toe trimming as well as the associated welfare consequences can be avoided if the recommended housing and management practices are implemented, e.g. increasing space allowance and providing suitable enrichment. It is recommended to discontinue flock thinning and avoid quantitative feed restriction, the latter currently practised in breeder toms. Also, it is recommended to place more emphasis on leg health and less on weight gain in genetic selection. The selected ABMs to monitor relevant welfare consequences at the slaughterhouse are total mortality, plumage damage, carcass condemnation, wounds, breast blisters and footpad dermatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.p240201
{"title":"Plain language summary of the scientific opinion on Welfare assessment of turkeys on farm","authors":"","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.p240201","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.p240201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865496/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9867
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Amarela Becirovic, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co-rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0) as an insecticide on seed potatoes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国希腊和联合报告成员国法国的主管当局对农药活性物质石蜡油(CAS 72623-86-0)进行的初步风险评估进行同行审查后得出的结论。同行评议的背景是委员会实施条例(EU) No 844/2012所要求的,并经委员会实施条例(EU) No 2018/1659修订。通过对石蜡油(CAS 72623-86-0)在种薯上的代表性应用进行评价,得出上述结论。提出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架所要求的缺失信息。确定关注点。
{"title":"Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0, chain lengths C19–C28)","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Fernando Álvarez, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Sofia Batista Leite, Amarela Becirovic, Marco Binaglia, Anna Federica Castoldi, Arianna Chiusolo, Angelo Colagiorgi, Mathilde Colas, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Isabella De Magistris, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Franco Ferilli, German Giner Santonja, Varvara Gouliarmou, Katrin Halling, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Dimitra Kardassi, Aude Kienzler, Anna Lanzoni, Roberto Lava, Renata Leuschner, Alberto Linguadoca, Mariano Lopez Romano, Jochem Louisse, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Andrea Mioč, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Vincenzo Padricello, Martina Panzarea, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Simone Rizzuto, Miguel Santos, Rositsa Serafimova, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Giorgia Vianello, Laura Villamar-Bouza","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9867","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9867","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co-rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0) as an insecticide on seed potatoes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12865500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9877
Giulia Bellisai, Giovanni Bernasconi, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Irene Castellan, Monica Del Aguila, Lucien Ferreira, Luna Greco, Renata Leuschner, Andrea Mioč, Stefanie Nave, Hermine Reich, Silvia Ruocco, Alessia Pia Scarlato, Marta Szot, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Alessia Verani, Elena Zioga
In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the applicant Certis Belchim BV submitted a request to the competent national authority in the Netherlands to modify the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for the active substance cyflumetofen in sweet peppers/bell peppers. The data submitted in support of the request were found to be sufficient to derive an MRL proposal for sweet peppers/bell peppers. Adequate analytical methods for enforcement are available to control the residues of cyflumetofen (sum of isomers) in plant matrices at the validated limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01 mg/kg. Based on the risk assessment results, EFSA concluded that the short-term and long-term intake of residues resulting from the uses of cyflumetofen according to the reported agricultural practices is unlikely to present a risk to consumer health.
根据法规(EC) No 396/2005第6条,申请人Certis Belchim BV向荷兰国家主管当局提交了一份请求,要求修改甜椒/甜椒中活性物质氟甲醚的现有最大残留限量(MRL)。为支持该要求而提交的数据被认为足以得出甜椒/灯笼椒的MRL建议。有足够的分析方法来控制氟甲醚在植物基质中的残留(同分异构体的总和)在0.01 mg/kg的有效定量限(LOQ)。根据风险评估结果,欧洲食品安全局得出结论,根据报告的农业做法,短期和长期摄入使用氟甲氧芬产生的残留物不太可能对消费者健康构成风险。
{"title":"Modification of the existing maximum residue level for cyflumetofen in sweet peppers/bell peppers.","authors":"Giulia Bellisai, Giovanni Bernasconi, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Irene Castellan, Monica Del Aguila, Lucien Ferreira, Luna Greco, Renata Leuschner, Andrea Mioč, Stefanie Nave, Hermine Reich, Silvia Ruocco, Alessia Pia Scarlato, Marta Szot, Anne Theobald, Manuela Tiramani, Alessia Verani, Elena Zioga","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9877","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the applicant Certis Belchim BV submitted a request to the competent national authority in the Netherlands to modify the existing maximum residue level (MRL) for the active substance cyflumetofen in sweet peppers/bell peppers. The data submitted in support of the request were found to be sufficient to derive an MRL proposal for sweet peppers/bell peppers. Adequate analytical methods for enforcement are available to control the residues of cyflumetofen (sum of isomers) in plant matrices at the validated limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01 mg/kg. Based on the risk assessment results, EFSA concluded that the short-term and long-term intake of residues resulting from the uses of cyflumetofen according to the reported agricultural practices is unlikely to present a risk to consumer health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"e9877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9856
EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Montaña Cámara, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Ángeles Jos, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Breige McNulty, Androniki Naska, Kristina Pentieva, Alfonso Siani, Frank Thies, Margarita Aguilera-Gómez, Thomas Frenzel, Harry J. McArdle, Peter Moldeus, Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold, Josef Rudolf Schlatter, Henk van Loveren, Estefanía Noriega Fernández, Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst