Intra-individual Variability in Lipoprotein(a) Levels: Findings from a Large Academic Health System Population.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae341
Kamal Awad, Ahmed K Mahmoud, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Said Alsidawi, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani, Juan M Farina
{"title":"Intra-individual Variability in Lipoprotein(a) Levels: Findings from a Large Academic Health System Population.","authors":"Kamal Awad, Ahmed K Mahmoud, Mohammed Tiseer Abbas, Said Alsidawi, Chadi Ayoub, Reza Arsanjani, Juan M Farina","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are known to be mainly genetically determined. However, only scarce data are available on the intra-individual variability of Lp(a) levels across time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included adult patients (≥18 years old) who had baseline and follow-up Lp(a) measurements (between 1997 and 2024) with a minimum of one year apart. Patients were categorized into three groups as follows: normal (<30 mg/dL), borderline (30 to 50 mg/dL) and high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the predictors of the intra-individual changes in Lp(a) ≥10 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,669 individuals (median age: 54 years, 60% males) were included in our analysis, with median time between measurements of 4.5 years (IQR: 2.2, 10.6). The median Lp(a) was 16 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at baseline, compared with 15 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at follow-up. At follow-up, 96.4% of individuals with normal Lp(a) and 89.9% with high Lp(a) remained in their categories, while 51.2% with borderline Lp(a) changed their category. Of the included population, 24.9% had an intra-individual Lp(a) change ≥10 mg/dL. Female sex (p <0.001), history of ASCVD (p=0.003), statin therapy (p=0.003) and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥100 mg/dL (p <0.001) were significantly associated with higher odds of intra-individual Lp(a) changes ≥10 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) levels were generally stable over time; however, patients with borderline levels may require more than one Lp(a) measurement, especially if they are females, have a history of ASCVD, have elevated LDL-C levels or are on statins therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are known to be mainly genetically determined. However, only scarce data are available on the intra-individual variability of Lp(a) levels across time.

Methods: We included adult patients (≥18 years old) who had baseline and follow-up Lp(a) measurements (between 1997 and 2024) with a minimum of one year apart. Patients were categorized into three groups as follows: normal (<30 mg/dL), borderline (30 to 50 mg/dL) and high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the predictors of the intra-individual changes in Lp(a) ≥10 mg/dL.

Results: A total of 11,669 individuals (median age: 54 years, 60% males) were included in our analysis, with median time between measurements of 4.5 years (IQR: 2.2, 10.6). The median Lp(a) was 16 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at baseline, compared with 15 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at follow-up. At follow-up, 96.4% of individuals with normal Lp(a) and 89.9% with high Lp(a) remained in their categories, while 51.2% with borderline Lp(a) changed their category. Of the included population, 24.9% had an intra-individual Lp(a) change ≥10 mg/dL. Female sex (p <0.001), history of ASCVD (p=0.003), statin therapy (p=0.003) and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥100 mg/dL (p <0.001) were significantly associated with higher odds of intra-individual Lp(a) changes ≥10 mg/dL.

Conclusions: Lipoprotein(a) levels were generally stable over time; however, patients with borderline levels may require more than one Lp(a) measurement, especially if they are females, have a history of ASCVD, have elevated LDL-C levels or are on statins therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)水平的个体内变异性:大型学术卫生系统人群的研究结果。
目的:众所周知,脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]水平主要由基因决定。然而,关于脂蛋白(a)水平在不同时期的个体内变异性的数据却很少:我们纳入了对脂蛋白(a)进行基线和随访测量(1997 年至 2024 年)的成年患者(≥18 岁),测量时间至少间隔一年。患者被分为以下三组:正常组(结果:共有 11,669 人(中位年龄:54 岁,60% 为男性)被纳入我们的分析,两次测量之间的中位时间为 4.5 年(IQR:2.2,10.6)。基线时脂蛋白(a)的中位数为 16 毫克/分升(IQR:7,52),而随访时为 15 毫克/分升(IQR:7,52)。随访时,96.4% 的脂蛋白(a)正常者和 89.9% 的脂蛋白(a)偏高者仍保持其类别,而 51.2% 的脂蛋白(a)边缘者改变了类别。在纳入的人群中,24.9%的人体内脂蛋白(a)的变化≥10 mg/dL。女性随着时间的推移,脂蛋白(a)水平基本保持稳定;但是,脂蛋白(a)水平处于边缘的患者可能需要进行一次以上的脂蛋白(a)测量,尤其是女性、有 ASCVD 病史、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平升高或正在接受他汀类药物治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
REDUCE-IT, biomarkers, and confirmation bias: are we missing the forest for the trees? Strike early-strike strong lipid-lowering strategy with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome patients: real-world evidence from the AT-TARGET-IT registry. Eligibility for lipid-lowering therapy when applying systemic coronary risk estimation 2 according to guidelines on apparently healthy middle-aged individuals. Use of combination therapy is associated with improved LDL cholesterol management: 1-year follow-up results from the European observational SANTORINI study. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1