Anh Thi Ngoc Toan, Toi Lam Phung, Thao Thi Dang, Matthew James Alcusky, Daniel J Amante, Hoa L Nguyen, Robert J Goldberg
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Anh Thi Ngoc Toan, Toi Lam Phung, Thao Thi Dang, Matthew James Alcusky, Daniel J Amante, Hoa L Nguyen, Robert J Goldberg","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), Canagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 3), and Dapagliflozin (<i>n</i> = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2420654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.
Results: Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (n = 3), Canagliflozin (n = 3), and Dapagliflozin (n = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.
Conclusion: Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.
Registration: The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.