{"title":"Vocal control and speech production in cochlear implant listeners: A review within auditory-motor processing framework","authors":"Samin Ashjaei , Roozbeh Behroozmand , Shaivee Fozdar , Reed Farrar , Meisam Arjmandi","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comprehensive literature review is conducted to summarize and discuss prior findings on how cochlear implants (CI) affect the users’ abilities to produce and control vocal and articulatory movements within the auditory-motor integration framework of speech. Patterns of speech production pre- versus post-implantation, post-implantation adjustments, deviations from the typical ranges of speakers with normal hearing (NH), the effects of switching the CI on and off, as well as the impact of altered auditory feedback on vocal and articulatory speech control are discussed. Overall, findings indicate that CIs enhance the vocal and articulatory control aspects of speech production at both segmental and suprasegmental levels. While many CI users achieve speech quality comparable to NH individuals, some features still deviate in a group of CI users even years post-implantation. More specifically, contracted vowel space, increased vocal jitter and shimmer, longer phoneme and utterance durations, shorter voice onset time, decreased contrast in fricative production, limited prosodic patterns, and reduced intelligibility have been reported in subgroups of CI users compared to NH individuals. Significant individual variations among CI users have been observed in both the pace of speech production adjustments and long-term speech outcomes. Few controlled studies have explored how the implantation age and the duration of CI use influence speech features, leaving substantial gaps in our understanding about the effects of spectral resolution, auditory rehabilitation, and individual auditory-motor processing abilities on vocal and articulatory speech outcomes in CI users. Future studies under the auditory-motor integration framework are warranted to determine how suboptimal CI auditory feedback impacts auditory-motor processing and precise vocal and articulatory control in CI users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"453 ","pages":"Article 109132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524001850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A comprehensive literature review is conducted to summarize and discuss prior findings on how cochlear implants (CI) affect the users’ abilities to produce and control vocal and articulatory movements within the auditory-motor integration framework of speech. Patterns of speech production pre- versus post-implantation, post-implantation adjustments, deviations from the typical ranges of speakers with normal hearing (NH), the effects of switching the CI on and off, as well as the impact of altered auditory feedback on vocal and articulatory speech control are discussed. Overall, findings indicate that CIs enhance the vocal and articulatory control aspects of speech production at both segmental and suprasegmental levels. While many CI users achieve speech quality comparable to NH individuals, some features still deviate in a group of CI users even years post-implantation. More specifically, contracted vowel space, increased vocal jitter and shimmer, longer phoneme and utterance durations, shorter voice onset time, decreased contrast in fricative production, limited prosodic patterns, and reduced intelligibility have been reported in subgroups of CI users compared to NH individuals. Significant individual variations among CI users have been observed in both the pace of speech production adjustments and long-term speech outcomes. Few controlled studies have explored how the implantation age and the duration of CI use influence speech features, leaving substantial gaps in our understanding about the effects of spectral resolution, auditory rehabilitation, and individual auditory-motor processing abilities on vocal and articulatory speech outcomes in CI users. Future studies under the auditory-motor integration framework are warranted to determine how suboptimal CI auditory feedback impacts auditory-motor processing and precise vocal and articulatory control in CI users.
本文通过全面的文献综述,总结并讨论了以前关于人工耳蜗(CI)如何影响使用者在听觉-运动整合语音框架内产生和控制发声和发音动作能力的研究结果。本文讨论了植入前与植入后的言语生成模式、植入后的调整、与听力正常(NH)的说话者典型范围的偏差、CI 开关的影响以及听觉反馈改变对发声和发音言语控制的影响。总之,研究结果表明,人工耳蜗在分段和超分段水平上增强了语音制作的发声和发音控制方面。虽然许多 CI 用户的语音质量可与正常人媲美,但即使在植入 CI 多年后,一些 CI 用户的某些特征仍会出现偏差。更具体地说,据报道,与正常人相比,CI 使用者的子群体中存在元音空间收缩、发声抖动和颤动增加、音素和话语持续时间延长、发声时间缩短、摩擦音产生的对比度降低、前奏模式受限以及可懂度降低等问题。在语音生成调整的速度和长期语音效果方面,CI 使用者之间存在显著的个体差异。很少有对照研究探讨植入年龄和使用 CI 的持续时间如何影响言语特征,这使我们对频谱分辨率、听觉康复和个人听觉运动处理能力对 CI 使用者发声和发音言语结果的影响的理解存在很大差距。未来有必要在听觉-运动整合框架下进行研究,以确定不理想的 CI 听觉反馈如何影响 CI 用户的听觉-运动处理以及精确的发声和发音控制。
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.