Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in NRG Oncology Phase III Randomized Trials Using Multimodal Deep Learning With Digital Histopathology.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00145
Jonathan David Tward, Huei-Chung Huang, Andre Esteva, Osama Mohamad, Douwe van der Wal, Jeffry P Simko, Sandy DeVries, Jingbin Zhang, Songwan Joun, Timothy N Showalter, Edward M Schaeffer, Todd M Morgan, Jedidiah M Monson, James A Wallace, Jean-Paul Bahary, Howard M Sandler, Daniel E Spratt, Joseph P Rodgers, Felix Y Feng, Phuoc T Tran
{"title":"Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in NRG Oncology Phase III Randomized Trials Using Multimodal Deep Learning With Digital Histopathology.","authors":"Jonathan David Tward, Huei-Chung Huang, Andre Esteva, Osama Mohamad, Douwe van der Wal, Jeffry P Simko, Sandy DeVries, Jingbin Zhang, Songwan Joun, Timothy N Showalter, Edward M Schaeffer, Todd M Morgan, Jedidiah M Monson, James A Wallace, Jean-Paul Bahary, Howard M Sandler, Daniel E Spratt, Joseph P Rodgers, Felix Y Feng, Phuoc T Tran","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current clinical risk stratification methods for localized prostate cancer are suboptimal, leading to over- and undertreatment. Recently, machine learning approaches using digital histopathology have shown superior prognostic ability in phase III trials. This study aims to develop a clinically usable risk grouping system using multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) models that outperform current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The cohort comprised 9,787 patients with localized prostate cancer from eight NRG Oncology randomized phase III trials, treated with radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. Locked MMAI models, which used digital histopathology images and clinical data, were applied to each patient. Expert consensus on cut points defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis rates of 3% and 10%, respectively. The MMAI's reclassification and prognostic performance were compared with the three-tier NCCN risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up for censored patients was 7.9 years. According to NCCN risk categories, 30.4% of patients were low-risk, 25.5% intermediate-risk, and 44.1% high-risk. The MMAI risk classification identified 43.5% of patients as low-risk, 34.6% as intermediate-risk, and 21.8% as high-risk. MMAI reclassified 1,039 (42.0%) patients initially categorized by NCCN. Despite the MMAI low-risk group being larger than the NCCN low-risk group, the 10-year metastasis risks were comparable: 1.7% (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) for NCCN and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.7) for MMAI. The overall 10-year metastasis risk for NCCN high-risk patients was 16.6%, with MMAI further stratifying this group into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, showing metastasis rates of 3.4%, 8.2%, and 26.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MMAI risk grouping system expands the population of men identified as having low metastatic risk and accurately pinpoints a high-risk subset with elevated metastasis rates. This approach aims to prevent both overtreatment and undertreatment in localized prostate cancer, facilitating shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current clinical risk stratification methods for localized prostate cancer are suboptimal, leading to over- and undertreatment. Recently, machine learning approaches using digital histopathology have shown superior prognostic ability in phase III trials. This study aims to develop a clinically usable risk grouping system using multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) models that outperform current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups.

Materials and methods: The cohort comprised 9,787 patients with localized prostate cancer from eight NRG Oncology randomized phase III trials, treated with radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. Locked MMAI models, which used digital histopathology images and clinical data, were applied to each patient. Expert consensus on cut points defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis rates of 3% and 10%, respectively. The MMAI's reclassification and prognostic performance were compared with the three-tier NCCN risk groups.

Results: The median follow-up for censored patients was 7.9 years. According to NCCN risk categories, 30.4% of patients were low-risk, 25.5% intermediate-risk, and 44.1% high-risk. The MMAI risk classification identified 43.5% of patients as low-risk, 34.6% as intermediate-risk, and 21.8% as high-risk. MMAI reclassified 1,039 (42.0%) patients initially categorized by NCCN. Despite the MMAI low-risk group being larger than the NCCN low-risk group, the 10-year metastasis risks were comparable: 1.7% (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) for NCCN and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.7) for MMAI. The overall 10-year metastasis risk for NCCN high-risk patients was 16.6%, with MMAI further stratifying this group into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, showing metastasis rates of 3.4%, 8.2%, and 26.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: The MMAI risk grouping system expands the population of men identified as having low metastatic risk and accurately pinpoints a high-risk subset with elevated metastasis rates. This approach aims to prevent both overtreatment and undertreatment in localized prostate cancer, facilitating shared decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数字组织病理学进行多模态深度学习,在 NRG 肿瘤学 III 期随机试验中进行前列腺癌风险分层。
目的:目前针对局部前列腺癌的临床风险分层方法不够理想,导致过度治疗或治疗不足。最近,利用数字组织病理学的机器学习方法在 III 期试验中显示出了卓越的预后能力。本研究旨在利用多模态人工智能(MMAI)模型开发一种临床可用的风险分组系统,该系统优于当前的美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)风险分组:研究对象包括来自八项NRG肿瘤学随机III期试验的9787名局部前列腺癌患者,这些患者接受了放疗、雄激素剥夺疗法和/或化疗。锁定的 MMAI 模型使用数字组织病理学图像和临床数据,适用于每位患者。专家就切点达成共识,根据 10 年远处转移率分别为 3% 和 10% 的标准定义了低危、中危和高危组。MMAI的重新分类和预后效果与NCCN三级风险组进行了比较:筛查出的患者的中位随访时间为 7.9 年。根据 NCCN 风险分类,30.4% 的患者为低风险,25.5% 为中风险,44.1% 为高风险。MMAI风险分类将43.5%的患者确定为低风险,34.6%为中风险,21.8%为高风险。MMAI 对 1,039 名(42.0%)最初由 NCCN 分类的患者进行了重新分类。尽管 MMAI 低风险组的人数多于 NCCN 低风险组,但 10 年转移风险却相当:NCCN为1.7%(95% CI,0.2至3.2),MMAI为3.2%(95% CI,1.7至4.7)。NCCN高危患者的10年总体转移风险为16.6%,MMAI将这一群体进一步分为低危、中危和高危,转移率分别为3.4%、8.2%和26.3%:MMAI风险分组系统扩大了被确定为低转移风险的男性人群,并准确定位了转移率较高的高风险亚群。这种方法旨在防止局部前列腺癌的过度治疗和治疗不足,促进共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
DNA Damage Response Alterations Predict for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the SWOG S1314 Trial. Erratum: Tumor Characteristics Associated With Preoperatively Detectable Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Renal Masses Suspicious for Renal Cell Carcinoma. DNA Methylation Classes of Stage II and III Primary Melanomas and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance. KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration. Neo-wt-RAS in ctDNA: Is It Worth Using Anti-EGFR Therapies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1