Generalized Evolutionary Classifier for Evolutionary Guided Precision Medicine.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1200/PO.23.00714
Matthew McCoy, Chen-Hsiang Yeang, Shaymaa Bahnassy, Stanley Tam, Rebecca B Riggins, Deepak Parashar, Robert A Beckman
{"title":"Generalized Evolutionary Classifier for Evolutionary Guided Precision Medicine.","authors":"Matthew McCoy, Chen-Hsiang Yeang, Shaymaa Bahnassy, Stanley Tam, Rebecca B Riggins, Deepak Parashar, Robert A Beckman","doi":"10.1200/PO.23.00714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current precision medicine (CPM) matches patients to therapies using traditional biomarkers, but inevitably resistance develops. Dynamic precision medicine (DPM) is a new evolutionary guided precision medicine (EGPM) approach undergoing translational development. It tracks intratumoral genetic heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics, adapts as frequently as every 6 weeks, plans proactively for future resistance development, and incorporates multiple therapeutic agents. Simulations indicated DPM can significantly improve long-term survival and cure rates in a cohort of 3 million virtual patients representing a variety of clinical scenarios. Given the cost and invasiveness of monitoring subclones frequently, we sought to determine the value of a short DPM window of only two 6-week adaptations (moves).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a new simulation, nearly 3 million virtual patients, differing in DPM input parameters of initial subclone compositions, drug sensitivities, and growth and mutational kinetics, were simulated as previously described. Each virtual patient was treated with CPM, DPM, and DPM for two moves followed by CPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first two DPM moves provide similar average benefit to a 5-year, 40-move sequence in the full virtual population. If the first two moves are identical for DPM and CPM, patients will not benefit from DPM (65% negative predictive value). A patient subset (20%) in which 2-move DPM and 40-move DPM provide closely similar outcomes has extraordinary predicted benefit (hazard ratio of DPM/CPM 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The first two DPM moves provide most of the clinical benefit of DPM, reducing the duration required for subclone monitoring. This also leads to an evolutionary classifier selecting patients who will benefit: those in whom DPM and CPM recommendations differ early. These advances bring DPM (and potentially other EGPM approaches) closer to potential clinical testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2300714"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current precision medicine (CPM) matches patients to therapies using traditional biomarkers, but inevitably resistance develops. Dynamic precision medicine (DPM) is a new evolutionary guided precision medicine (EGPM) approach undergoing translational development. It tracks intratumoral genetic heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics, adapts as frequently as every 6 weeks, plans proactively for future resistance development, and incorporates multiple therapeutic agents. Simulations indicated DPM can significantly improve long-term survival and cure rates in a cohort of 3 million virtual patients representing a variety of clinical scenarios. Given the cost and invasiveness of monitoring subclones frequently, we sought to determine the value of a short DPM window of only two 6-week adaptations (moves).

Methods: In a new simulation, nearly 3 million virtual patients, differing in DPM input parameters of initial subclone compositions, drug sensitivities, and growth and mutational kinetics, were simulated as previously described. Each virtual patient was treated with CPM, DPM, and DPM for two moves followed by CPM.

Results: The first two DPM moves provide similar average benefit to a 5-year, 40-move sequence in the full virtual population. If the first two moves are identical for DPM and CPM, patients will not benefit from DPM (65% negative predictive value). A patient subset (20%) in which 2-move DPM and 40-move DPM provide closely similar outcomes has extraordinary predicted benefit (hazard ratio of DPM/CPM 0.03).

Conclusion: The first two DPM moves provide most of the clinical benefit of DPM, reducing the duration required for subclone monitoring. This also leads to an evolutionary classifier selecting patients who will benefit: those in whom DPM and CPM recommendations differ early. These advances bring DPM (and potentially other EGPM approaches) closer to potential clinical testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Into Clinical Trials: A Position Paper by the National Cancer Institute GI Oncology Circulating Tumor DNA Working Group. Association Between Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Status and Time to Development of Brain Metastases Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Generalized Evolutionary Classifier for Evolutionary Guided Precision Medicine. Multiomics Identifies Potential Molecular Profiles Associated With Outcomes After BRAF-Targeted Therapy in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutated Advanced Solid Tumors. Time to Benefit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1