Bing-Yan Cai M.D. , Shu-Ting He M.D. , Yan Zhang M.D. , Jia-Hui Ma Ph.D , Dong-Liang Mu M.D. , Dong-Xin Wang M.D., Ph.D
{"title":"Impact of emergence delirium on long-term survival in older patients after major noncardiac surgery: A longitudinal prospective observational study","authors":"Bing-Yan Cai M.D. , Shu-Ting He M.D. , Yan Zhang M.D. , Jia-Hui Ma Ph.D , Dong-Liang Mu M.D. , Dong-Xin Wang M.D., Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To test the hypothesis that emergence delirium might be associated with worse long-term survival.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A longitudinal prospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>A total of 942 patients aged 65–90 years who were admitted to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Exposures</h3><div>Emergence delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit during PACU stay.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Patients were followed up once a year for at least 3 years. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survivals. Associations between emergence delirium and long-term survivals were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard models.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Among enrolled patients, 915 completed perioperative assessments; 906 completed long-term follow-up (mean age 72 years; 60 % [545/906] male; 73 % [660/906] cancer surgery). At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 69 deaths in 331 patients (21 %) with emergence delirium versus 114 deaths in 575 patients (20 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.48); <em>P</em> = 0.547; adjusted hazard ratio 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.70 to 1.32); <em>P</em> = 0.797. Recurrence-free survival was 73/331 (22 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 121/575 (21 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.45); <em>P</em> = 0.598; adjusted hazard ratio 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.28); <em>P</em> = 0.695. Event-free survival was 159/331 (48 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 268/575 (47 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.06 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 1.29); <em>P</em> = 0.563; adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.80 to 1.21); <em>P</em> = 0.875.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We did not find significant association between emergence delirium and worse long-term survival in older patients after general anesthesia and major surgery mainly for cancer. The effects of emergence delirium on long-term outcomes deserve further investigation.</div><div><strong>Clinical trial registrations</strong>: <span><span>www.chictr.org.cn</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; ChiCTR-OOC-17012734.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111663"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective
To test the hypothesis that emergence delirium might be associated with worse long-term survival.
Design
A longitudinal prospective observational study.
Setting
A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.
Patients
A total of 942 patients aged 65–90 years who were admitted to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia.
Exposures
Emergence delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit during PACU stay.
Measurements
Patients were followed up once a year for at least 3 years. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survivals. Associations between emergence delirium and long-term survivals were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard models.
Main results
Among enrolled patients, 915 completed perioperative assessments; 906 completed long-term follow-up (mean age 72 years; 60 % [545/906] male; 73 % [660/906] cancer surgery). At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 69 deaths in 331 patients (21 %) with emergence delirium versus 114 deaths in 575 patients (20 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.48); P = 0.547; adjusted hazard ratio 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.70 to 1.32); P = 0.797. Recurrence-free survival was 73/331 (22 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 121/575 (21 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.45); P = 0.598; adjusted hazard ratio 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.28); P = 0.695. Event-free survival was 159/331 (48 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 268/575 (47 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.06 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 1.29); P = 0.563; adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.80 to 1.21); P = 0.875.
Conclusions
We did not find significant association between emergence delirium and worse long-term survival in older patients after general anesthesia and major surgery mainly for cancer. The effects of emergence delirium on long-term outcomes deserve further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.