Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparisons Involving Ramucirumab.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8
Yulia D'yachkova, Astra M Liepa, Rajat Goel, Veronika Earley-Valovic, Abby Paine, Palvi Gupta, Kaisa Taipale
{"title":"Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Comparisons Involving Ramucirumab.","authors":"Yulia D'yachkova, Astra M Liepa, Rajat Goel, Veronika Earley-Valovic, Abby Paine, Palvi Gupta, Kaisa Taipale","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With relatively few direct comparisons among treatment options for previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, network meta-analysis (NMA) may inform evidence-based decision-making. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM + PTX) is a preferred regimen in guideline recommendations. NMA of key outcomes may further characterize the relative clinical value of RAM + PTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials of adult patients with previously treated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer informed a NMA which compared overall survival, progression-free survival, and discontinuations due to adverse events. Comparisons were reported relative to placebo/best supportive care (BSC) when possible, otherwise relative to RAM + PTX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case NMA focused on second-line treatment only, from 19 of 28 studies identified. For overall survival, seven of 16 regimens were favorable relative to placebo/BSC, with RAM + PTX as the most favorable. For progression-free survival, five of 14 regimens were unfavorable relative to RAM + PTX. For discontinuations due to adverse events, two of 13 regimens were similar to placebo/BSC: ramucirumab monotherapy and fluorouracil; relative to RAM-PTX, all regimens were similar except ramucirumab monotherapy which was favorable and irinotecan + cisplatin which was unfavorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NMA of trials of previously treated gastric/GEJ cancer suggests that RAM + PTX has one of the more favorable clinical profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01121-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With relatively few direct comparisons among treatment options for previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, network meta-analysis (NMA) may inform evidence-based decision-making. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM + PTX) is a preferred regimen in guideline recommendations. NMA of key outcomes may further characterize the relative clinical value of RAM + PTX.

Methods: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials of adult patients with previously treated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer informed a NMA which compared overall survival, progression-free survival, and discontinuations due to adverse events. Comparisons were reported relative to placebo/best supportive care (BSC) when possible, otherwise relative to RAM + PTX.

Results: The base-case NMA focused on second-line treatment only, from 19 of 28 studies identified. For overall survival, seven of 16 regimens were favorable relative to placebo/BSC, with RAM + PTX as the most favorable. For progression-free survival, five of 14 regimens were unfavorable relative to RAM + PTX. For discontinuations due to adverse events, two of 13 regimens were similar to placebo/BSC: ramucirumab monotherapy and fluorouracil; relative to RAM-PTX, all regimens were similar except ramucirumab monotherapy which was favorable and irinotecan + cisplatin which was unfavorable.

Conclusion: This NMA of trials of previously treated gastric/GEJ cancer suggests that RAM + PTX has one of the more favorable clinical profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对曾接受过治疗的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界癌患者的随机对照试验网络 Meta 分析:涉及雷莫芦单抗的比较。
目的:对于既往接受过治疗的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界处癌(GEJ),各种治疗方案之间的直接比较相对较少,网络荟萃分析(NMA)可为循证决策提供依据。拉莫单抗加紫杉醇(RAM + PTX)是指南推荐的首选方案。对关键结果进行 NMA 分析可进一步确定 RAM + PTX 的相对临床价值:对曾接受过治疗的晚期胃癌/GEJ 癌成年患者的随机对照试验进行了系统性文献综述,并对总生存期、无进展生存期和因不良反应而停药的情况进行了 NMA 比较。在可能的情况下,与安慰剂/最佳支持治疗(BSC)进行比较,否则与 RAM + PTX 进行比较:基础案例 NMA 仅关注二线治疗,来自 28 项已确定研究中的 19 项。在总生存期方面,16 个方案中有 7 个方案优于安慰剂/BSC,其中 RAM + PTX 方案的生存期最长。在无进展生存期方面,14 个方案中有 5 个方案相对于 RAM + PTX 是不利的。在不良反应导致的停药方面,13种方案中有两种与安慰剂/BSC相似:拉穆单抗单药疗法和氟尿嘧啶;相对于RAM-PTX,除了拉穆单抗单药疗法有利和伊立替康+顺铂不利外,其他方案均相似:对既往接受过治疗的胃癌/胃癌患者进行的 NMA 试验表明,RAM + PTX 是临床疗效较好的方案之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
期刊最新文献
Primary Intrahepatic Mesothelioma: Case Series and Systematic Review of Literature. Liver Oligometastasis in Biliary Tract Cancer and Impact on Survival Outcomes. Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Immunotherapy- Versus Chemotherapy-Based Regimens: Systematic Review and Pooled Analyses. Advanced Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Current and Novel Techniques. Both Th1 and Th2 CD4 + T-Cell Lineage Infiltrations Decrease in Post-hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Colon Adenoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1