Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01373-y
Emily Y He, Guy A van Hazel, Andrew M Sloss, Stephen Pianko, Gregor J Brown, Philip R Clingan, Rajvinder Singh, Ann C Solterbeck, Robert Traficante, Louise Formby-Miller, Trevor Lockett, Finlay Macrae
Purpose: Earlier detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) can improve survival rates. A simple, effective blood test may help improve screening participation. The multi-target blood protein (MTBP; ColoSTAT®) test and algorithm uses concentrations of five protein biomarkers of CRC and patient's sex and age to generate a CRC likelihood score. We compared the performance of the MTBP test in detecting CRC to colonoscopy, the 'gold standard'.
Methods: This cross-sectional, multicenter study enrolled participants into two cohorts: participants recently colonoscopically diagnosed with CRC and progressing to surgery or neoadjuvant treatment (Cohort 1), and participants with no CRC history who were scheduled for colonoscopy (Cohort 2). Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related recruitment delays, Cohort 1 was supplemented with bio-banked blood samples (BBS) from patients with clinically confirmed CRC. Performance goals for sensitivity and specificity of the MTBP test compared to colonoscopy were ≥ 73% (lower 95% confidence limit [LCL] > 60%) and ≥ 90% (LCL > 80%), respectively.
Results: Cohort 1 included 29 patients, Cohort 2 enrolled 768 patients and 192 BBS were included. Median age when providing samples was 64 years (range, 40-85 years); 53.4% were female. Definitive MTBP test results were obtained from 657 samples. 112 and 389 samples met the criteria for inclusion in the primary sensitivity and specificity analyses, respectively. The sensitivity of ColoSTAT® for detection of all-stage CRC compared to colonoscopy was 81.3% (95%CL 73.0%-87.4%) and the specificity, 91.0% (95%CL 87.7%-93.5%).
Conclusions: The MTBP test met pre-specified primary performance endpoints and warrants further evaluation in clinical populations at elevated risk of CRC.
{"title":"A Prospective, Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study Evaluating a Multi-Target Blood Protein in Vitro Diagnostic Test for Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Emily Y He, Guy A van Hazel, Andrew M Sloss, Stephen Pianko, Gregor J Brown, Philip R Clingan, Rajvinder Singh, Ann C Solterbeck, Robert Traficante, Louise Formby-Miller, Trevor Lockett, Finlay Macrae","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01373-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01373-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Earlier detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) can improve survival rates. A simple, effective blood test may help improve screening participation. The multi-target blood protein (MTBP; ColoSTAT<sup>®</sup>) test and algorithm uses concentrations of five protein biomarkers of CRC and patient's sex and age to generate a CRC likelihood score. We compared the performance of the MTBP test in detecting CRC to colonoscopy, the 'gold standard'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, multicenter study enrolled participants into two cohorts: participants recently colonoscopically diagnosed with CRC and progressing to surgery or neoadjuvant treatment (Cohort 1), and participants with no CRC history who were scheduled for colonoscopy (Cohort 2). Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related recruitment delays, Cohort 1 was supplemented with bio-banked blood samples (BBS) from patients with clinically confirmed CRC. Performance goals for sensitivity and specificity of the MTBP test compared to colonoscopy were ≥ 73% (lower 95% confidence limit [LCL] > 60%) and ≥ 90% (LCL > 80%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort 1 included 29 patients, Cohort 2 enrolled 768 patients and 192 BBS were included. Median age when providing samples was 64 years (range, 40-85 years); 53.4% were female. Definitive MTBP test results were obtained from 657 samples. 112 and 389 samples met the criteria for inclusion in the primary sensitivity and specificity analyses, respectively. The sensitivity of ColoSTAT<sup>®</sup> for detection of all-stage CRC compared to colonoscopy was 81.3% (95%CL 73.0%-87.4%) and the specificity, 91.0% (95%CL 87.7%-93.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MTBP test met pre-specified primary performance endpoints and warrants further evaluation in clinical populations at elevated risk of CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01387-6
Yingge He, Mengzhe Wang, Changqing Gao, Yonghui Hao, Shuning He, Liqi Li
Background: Radiotherapy is essential for rectoanal cancer, but pelvic anatomy and high radiation doses increase radiodermatitis risk, potentially compromising treatment efficacy. No specific meta-analysis exists for this group.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to September 2025. Pooled meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and dose-effect meta-analysis were performed on 50 included studies (n = 4,892).
Results: The overall radiodermatitis incidence was 58.7% (95% CI: 55.2%-62.1%), including severe (Grade ≥ 3, 12.3%) and moist desquamation (34.5%). Key independent risk factors (P < 0.05) were tumor distance ≤ 5 cm from anal verge (OR = 2.86), stoma absence (OR = 3.12), total dose > 50 Gy (OR = 2.59), concurrent chemotherapy (OR = 2.73), HIV infection (OR = 5.82), 3D-CRT vs. IMRT (OR = 8.76), and tumor skin invasion (OR = 36.0). Effective interventions included spray-type skin protectants (SUCRA = 92.3%), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; OR = 0.29 vs. 3D-CRT), recombinant human epidermal growth factor, and amifostine. A dose inflection point occurred at 50 Gy, with a 29% increased risk of severe dermatitis per additional 5 Gy above this threshold.
Conclusions: Skin toxicity is common in rectoanal cancer radiotherapy and linked to tumor, treatment, and patient factors. Optimized techniques (e.g., VMAT) combined with spray-type protectants enable precision management, improving outcomes.
背景:放疗是治疗直肠癌的必要手段,但骨盆解剖和高剂量放疗会增加放射性皮炎的风险,可能影响治疗效果。没有针对这一群体的具体荟萃分析。方法:系统检索到2025年9月的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science。对纳入的50项研究(n = 4,892)进行了汇总荟萃分析、网络荟萃分析和剂量效应荟萃分析。结果:放射性皮炎总发病率为58.7% (95% CI: 55.2% ~ 62.1%),其中重度(≥3级)12.3%,湿性脱屑34.5%。关键独立危险因素(p50 Gy (OR = 2.59)、同期化疗(OR = 2.73)、HIV感染(OR = 5.82)、3D-CRT vs. IMRT (OR = 8.76)、肿瘤皮肤侵袭(OR = 36.0)。有效的干预措施包括喷雾型皮肤保护剂(SUCRA = 92.3%)、体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT; OR = 0.29 vs. 3D-CRT)、重组人表皮生长因子和氨磷汀。剂量拐点出现在50戈瑞,在此阈值之上每增加5戈瑞,严重皮炎的风险增加29%。结论:皮肤毒性在直肠肿瘤放疗中很常见,并与肿瘤、治疗和患者因素有关。优化的技术(如VMAT)与喷雾型保护剂相结合,实现了精确管理,改善了结果。
{"title":"Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management of Radiotherapy-Related Skin Toxicity in Rectoanal Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yingge He, Mengzhe Wang, Changqing Gao, Yonghui Hao, Shuning He, Liqi Li","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01387-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01387-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy is essential for rectoanal cancer, but pelvic anatomy and high radiation doses increase radiodermatitis risk, potentially compromising treatment efficacy. No specific meta-analysis exists for this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to September 2025. Pooled meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and dose-effect meta-analysis were performed on 50 included studies (n = 4,892).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall radiodermatitis incidence was 58.7% (95% CI: 55.2%-62.1%), including severe (Grade ≥ 3, 12.3%) and moist desquamation (34.5%). Key independent risk factors (P < 0.05) were tumor distance ≤ 5 cm from anal verge (OR = 2.86), stoma absence (OR = 3.12), total dose > 50 Gy (OR = 2.59), concurrent chemotherapy (OR = 2.73), HIV infection (OR = 5.82), 3D-CRT vs. IMRT (OR = 8.76), and tumor skin invasion (OR = 36.0). Effective interventions included spray-type skin protectants (SUCRA = 92.3%), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; OR = 0.29 vs. 3D-CRT), recombinant human epidermal growth factor, and amifostine. A dose inflection point occurred at 50 Gy, with a 29% increased risk of severe dermatitis per additional 5 Gy above this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Skin toxicity is common in rectoanal cancer radiotherapy and linked to tumor, treatment, and patient factors. Optimized techniques (e.g., VMAT) combined with spray-type protectants enable precision management, improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1007/s12029-026-01397-y
Maryam Barsch, Elaine-Pashupati Dopfer, Anne Maria Schultheis, Michael Quante
Purpose: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents a biologically heterogeneous subgroup of biliary tract cancer (BTC) with a 5-year survival below 20%. Delayed diagnosis, intrinsic aggressiveness, and extensive intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity at the clinical, histopathological, and genomic level all contribute to this dismal outcome. Increasingly, treatment decisions in advanced iCCA depend on the identification of actionable molecular alterations, including FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, IDH1 mutations, HER2 amplifications, NTRK fusions, and microsatellite instability (MSI-high) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).
Methods: A narrative review of the current literature was conducted, focusing on (i) what molecular alterations are clinically relevant today, (ii) when molecular profiling should be performed, and (iii) how testing should be technically implemented in routine clinical practice. Results iCCA, particularly the small-duct subtype, harbors a high prevalence of therapeutically actionable molecular alterations, in contrast to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Early and comprehensive molecular profiling enables access to approved targeted therapies, molecularly stratified second-line treatments, and clinical trials. Combined DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing, complemented by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, provides the most reliable diagnostic framework.
Conclusion: Molecular testing has become an essential component of modern iCCA management. Broad, early, and technically integrated molecular profiling-ideally performed at initial diagnosis and interpreted in an interdisciplinary (molecular) tumor board-is critical to fully realize the potential of precision oncology in BTC.
{"title":"Molecular Testing for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: What, When, How?","authors":"Maryam Barsch, Elaine-Pashupati Dopfer, Anne Maria Schultheis, Michael Quante","doi":"10.1007/s12029-026-01397-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-026-01397-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents a biologically heterogeneous subgroup of biliary tract cancer (BTC) with a 5-year survival below 20%. Delayed diagnosis, intrinsic aggressiveness, and extensive intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity at the clinical, histopathological, and genomic level all contribute to this dismal outcome. Increasingly, treatment decisions in advanced iCCA depend on the identification of actionable molecular alterations, including FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, IDH1 mutations, HER2 amplifications, NTRK fusions, and microsatellite instability (MSI-high) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of the current literature was conducted, focusing on (i) what molecular alterations are clinically relevant today, (ii) when molecular profiling should be performed, and (iii) how testing should be technically implemented in routine clinical practice. Results iCCA, particularly the small-duct subtype, harbors a high prevalence of therapeutically actionable molecular alterations, in contrast to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Early and comprehensive molecular profiling enables access to approved targeted therapies, molecularly stratified second-line treatments, and clinical trials. Combined DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing, complemented by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, provides the most reliable diagnostic framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Molecular testing has become an essential component of modern iCCA management. Broad, early, and technically integrated molecular profiling-ideally performed at initial diagnosis and interpreted in an interdisciplinary (molecular) tumor board-is critical to fully realize the potential of precision oncology in BTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145970809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant health burden worldwide. Although some clinicopathological factors have been identified in stage I-III CRCs, there is a need to identify new prognostic factors. This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation analysis in predicting the prognosis of stage I-III CRCs.
Methods: Methylation analyses were performed on 273 preoperative plasma samples from CRC patients who underwent surgery at Juntendo University Hospital between 2011 and 2019. The methylation levels of three tumor suppressor genes (CHFR, SOX11 and CDO1) were analyzed as relative methylation value (RMV).
Results: There were no significant differences in the methylation levels of each gene among different stages of CRC. However, multivariate analysis revealed that the methylation level of SOX11 was an independent prognostic factor (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.37 (1.20-4.67), p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis of stage III CRC also showed methylation levels of SOX11 and CDO1 were independent prognostic factors (HR = 2.66 (1.16-6.07), p = 0.02 and HR = 2.51 (1.06-5.94), p = 0.04, respectively). In cases with high CHFR and CDO1-RMV, the use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) was related to significantly higher RFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, no significant effect of POAC was seen in high SOX11-RMV cases (p = 0.24).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the clinical utility of ctDNA methylation analysis for predicting prognosis in stage I-III CRCs. Furthermore, the ctDNA methylation status might be a biomarker for identifying the patients who can benefit from POAC.
目的:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是世界范围内一个重要的健康负担。尽管在I-III期crc中已经确定了一些临床病理因素,但仍需要确定新的预后因素。本研究旨在探讨循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)甲基化分析在预测I-III期crc预后中的临床应用。方法:对2011年至2019年在顺天都大学医院接受手术的CRC患者的273份术前血浆样本进行甲基化分析。以相对甲基化值(RMV)分析3种肿瘤抑制基因(CHFR、SOX11和CDO1)的甲基化水平。结果:各基因甲基化水平在结直肠癌不同分期间无显著差异。然而,多因素分析显示,SOX11甲基化水平是一个独立的预后因素(危险比(HR) = 2.37 (1.20-4.67), p = 0.01)。III期CRC的亚组分析也显示SOX11和CDO1甲基化水平是独立的预后因素(HR = 2.66 (1.16-6.07), p = 0.02; HR = 2.51 (1.06-5.94), p = 0.04)。在CHFR和CDO1-RMV较高的病例中,术后辅助化疗(POAC)的使用与较高的RFS相关(p = 0.006和p = 0.001)。然而,在SOX11-RMV高的病例中,POAC没有显著的影响(p = 0.24)。结论:本研究证明了ctDNA甲基化分析在预测I-III期crc预后方面的临床应用。此外,ctDNA甲基化状态可能是识别可以从POAC获益的患者的生物标志物。
{"title":"The Methylation Level of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Prognosis for Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Takahiro Irie, Kiichi Sugimoto, Hirotaka Momose, Yuki Tsuchiya, Ryoichi Tsukamoto, Kumpei Honjo, Hisashi Ro, Shun Ishiyama, Makoto Takahashi, Thomas Pisanic, Akio Saiura, Kazuhiro Sakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01365-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01365-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant health burden worldwide. Although some clinicopathological factors have been identified in stage I-III CRCs, there is a need to identify new prognostic factors. This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation analysis in predicting the prognosis of stage I-III CRCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methylation analyses were performed on 273 preoperative plasma samples from CRC patients who underwent surgery at Juntendo University Hospital between 2011 and 2019. The methylation levels of three tumor suppressor genes (CHFR, SOX11 and CDO1) were analyzed as relative methylation value (RMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the methylation levels of each gene among different stages of CRC. However, multivariate analysis revealed that the methylation level of SOX11 was an independent prognostic factor (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.37 (1.20-4.67), p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis of stage III CRC also showed methylation levels of SOX11 and CDO1 were independent prognostic factors (HR = 2.66 (1.16-6.07), p = 0.02 and HR = 2.51 (1.06-5.94), p = 0.04, respectively). In cases with high CHFR and CDO1-RMV, the use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) was related to significantly higher RFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, no significant effect of POAC was seen in high SOX11-RMV cases (p = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the clinical utility of ctDNA methylation analysis for predicting prognosis in stage I-III CRCs. Furthermore, the ctDNA methylation status might be a biomarker for identifying the patients who can benefit from POAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01379-6
Hitoshi Kawazoe, Kenro Hirata, Hisakazu Ohtani
{"title":"Comment on \"Proton Pump Inhibitors Attenuate the Effectiveness of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study\".","authors":"Hitoshi Kawazoe, Kenro Hirata, Hisakazu Ohtani","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01379-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01379-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is considered a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Identifying patients with poor survival outcomes and factors related to prognosis are crucial measures in patient care. In addition to the existing prognostic markers, new markers need to be introduced to overcome their limitations and improve risk stratification. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to assess the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade as a novel prognostic marker in patients with GC.
Method: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to April 4, 2025. Studies investigating the prognostic value of the ALBI grade in GC were included. The prognostic efficacy was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.5.1.
Result: The meta-analysis included 3,459 patients in the univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and 2,503 in the multivariate analysis. A higher ALBI grade was associated with worse OS in both univariate (HR = 3.05; 95%CI, 1.74-5.33; P ˂ 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.89; 95%CI, 1.30-2.76; P = 0.0010). A meta-analysis of 888 patients also showed that a higher ALBI grade was associated with worse recurrence-free survival/disease-free survival (RFS/DFS) in both univariate (HR = 2.23; 95%CI, 1.74-2.85; P ˂ 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.86; 95%CI, 1.42-2.43; P ˂ 0.0001).
Conclusion: A higher ALBI grade is associated with worse OS and RFS/DFS. This novel marker could be used to complement the existing prognostic markers and enhance survival prediction in patients with GC.
{"title":"Prognostic Value of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) Grade in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mahyaar Omouri-Kharashtomi, Hamed Ghoshouni, Ariyan Ayati Firoozabadi, Faraz Mahdizadeh, Amir Anushiravani","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01370-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01370-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) is considered a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Identifying patients with poor survival outcomes and factors related to prognosis are crucial measures in patient care. In addition to the existing prognostic markers, new markers need to be introduced to overcome their limitations and improve risk stratification. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to assess the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade as a novel prognostic marker in patients with GC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to April 4, 2025. Studies investigating the prognostic value of the ALBI grade in GC were included. The prognostic efficacy was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.5.1.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The meta-analysis included 3,459 patients in the univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and 2,503 in the multivariate analysis. A higher ALBI grade was associated with worse OS in both univariate (HR = 3.05; 95%CI, 1.74-5.33; P ˂ 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.89; 95%CI, 1.30-2.76; P = 0.0010). A meta-analysis of 888 patients also showed that a higher ALBI grade was associated with worse recurrence-free survival/disease-free survival (RFS/DFS) in both univariate (HR = 2.23; 95%CI, 1.74-2.85; P ˂ 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.86; 95%CI, 1.42-2.43; P ˂ 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher ALBI grade is associated with worse OS and RFS/DFS. This novel marker could be used to complement the existing prognostic markers and enhance survival prediction in patients with GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01383-w
Muhammad Hassaan Arif Maan, Soban Maan, Muhammad Mursaleen Ahmad, Ritik Mahaveer Goyal, Sunnia Khan, Muhammad Waleed, Imran Qureshi, Kaveh Hajifathalian, Ahmed Al-Khazraji
Background: Cannabis use is increasing globally, with a parallel rise in Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD). Chronic pancreatitis (CP), a progressive inflammatory condition, is associated with acute pancreatitis (AP) flares and an elevated risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Although cannabis is often used for pain management in CP, its impact on PC risk and AP flare frequency is unclear.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to identify adults with CP, stratified by CUD status. Patients with pre-existing PC were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied for demographics, behavioral factors, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was PC incidence; the secondary was AP flare frequency. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Sensitivity analysis adjusted for opioid use disorder.
Results: Before matching, the CUD cohort (n = 10,864) had higher rates of alcohol and nicotine use than controls (n = 42,160). After matching, 6,858 patients per group remained with balanced covariates (SMD < 0.1). Mean follow-up was shorter in the CUD cohort (736 ± 422 vs. 896 ± 368 days). CUD was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PC (67 vs. 274 cases; HR: 0.263, 95% CI: 0.202-0.344; p < 0.001) but a modest increase in AP flare risk (HR: 1.102, 95% CI: 1.043-1.166; p = 0.001). Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.
Conclusions: Among patients with CP, CUD was associated with lower rates of PC detection during available follow-up, but a slightly increased risk of AP flares. These findings warrant further prospective and mechanistic studies to clarify cannabis's role in pancreatic disease.
{"title":"Cannabis Use Disorder and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Muhammad Hassaan Arif Maan, Soban Maan, Muhammad Mursaleen Ahmad, Ritik Mahaveer Goyal, Sunnia Khan, Muhammad Waleed, Imran Qureshi, Kaveh Hajifathalian, Ahmed Al-Khazraji","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01383-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01383-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use is increasing globally, with a parallel rise in Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD). Chronic pancreatitis (CP), a progressive inflammatory condition, is associated with acute pancreatitis (AP) flares and an elevated risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Although cannabis is often used for pain management in CP, its impact on PC risk and AP flare frequency is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to identify adults with CP, stratified by CUD status. Patients with pre-existing PC were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied for demographics, behavioral factors, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was PC incidence; the secondary was AP flare frequency. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Sensitivity analysis adjusted for opioid use disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, the CUD cohort (n = 10,864) had higher rates of alcohol and nicotine use than controls (n = 42,160). After matching, 6,858 patients per group remained with balanced covariates (SMD < 0.1). Mean follow-up was shorter in the CUD cohort (736 ± 422 vs. 896 ± 368 days). CUD was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PC (67 vs. 274 cases; HR: 0.263, 95% CI: 0.202-0.344; p < 0.001) but a modest increase in AP flare risk (HR: 1.102, 95% CI: 1.043-1.166; p = 0.001). Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with CP, CUD was associated with lower rates of PC detection during available follow-up, but a slightly increased risk of AP flares. These findings warrant further prospective and mechanistic studies to clarify cannabis's role in pancreatic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804313/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of sintilimab, nanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel (NPMP) and S-1 in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
Method: In this real-world study, patients with HER2-negative AGC received first-line sintilimab plus NPMP and S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), while objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated as secondary endpoints.
Results: Among 33 enrolled patients, 14 patients (42.4%) achieved partial response (PR), 17 (51.5%) maintained stable disease (SD), 2 (6.1%) showed progressive disease (PD). ORR and DCR were 42.4% and 93.9%. Median OS reached 15.4 months (95%CI: 13.0-17.6), median PFS was 7.8 months (95%CI: 5.8-9.3). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in OS and PFS according to PD-L1 expression and cycles of treatment. Observed adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (60.6%), leukopenia (54.5%),anemia (51.5%),thrombocytopenia (36.4%),nausea (30.3%) and vomiting (15.1%). Most toxicities were manageable and predominantly grade 1-2.
Conclusions: The combination of sintilimab, NPMP and S-1 demonstrates promising antitumor effects and controllable toxicity as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative with AGC.
{"title":"Sintilimab Plus Nanoparticle Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and S-1 as First-Line Treatment in HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Yu-Qing Cao, Meng Song, Xiang-Ming Huang, Fei-Yu Wang, Ying Peng, Jie Cao, Ai-Guo Cao, Xin-En Huang","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01390-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01390-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of sintilimab, nanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel (NPMP) and S-1 in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this real-world study, patients with HER2-negative AGC received first-line sintilimab plus NPMP and S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), while objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33 enrolled patients, 14 patients (42.4%) achieved partial response (PR), 17 (51.5%) maintained stable disease (SD), 2 (6.1%) showed progressive disease (PD). ORR and DCR were 42.4% and 93.9%. Median OS reached 15.4 months (95%CI: 13.0-17.6), median PFS was 7.8 months (95%CI: 5.8-9.3). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in OS and PFS according to PD-L1 expression and cycles of treatment. Observed adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (60.6%), leukopenia (54.5%),anemia (51.5%),thrombocytopenia (36.4%),nausea (30.3%) and vomiting (15.1%). Most toxicities were manageable and predominantly grade 1-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of sintilimab, NPMP and S-1 demonstrates promising antitumor effects and controllable toxicity as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative with AGC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799754/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1007/s12029-025-01388-5
Abhishek Anand, T R Dilip, Leone Craig, Manish Bhandare, Sara MacLennan, Aravinda Meera Guntupalli
{"title":"Effect of Dietary Interventions on Body Composition and Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Survivors after Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Abhishek Anand, T R Dilip, Leone Craig, Manish Bhandare, Sara MacLennan, Aravinda Meera Guntupalli","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01388-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12029-025-01388-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The REGARD trial resulted in insurance approval for ramucirumab monotherapy; however, it did not include Japanese patients. Subsequent phase II trials and retrospective studies have examined Japanese cohorts, but reports identifying prognostic factors remain limited.
Methods: A total of 27 patients across six institutions received ramucirumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment for gastric cancer between September 2017 and December 2019.
Results: The median age of 27 patients was 74 years (range: 36-90). Eighteen patients were male, and ten had intestinal-type gastric cancer. Metastases were observed in 6 patients in the liver, 3 in the lung, 18 in lymph nodes, and 14 in the peritoneum. Third-line chemotherapy was administered to 6 patients. The response rate was 3.7%, and the disease control rate was 18.5%. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months, and the median overall survival was 3.0 months. Of the 27 patients, 6 received third-line treatment and 4 received nivolumab alone. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who received third-line treatment and those who did not. The median progression-free survival showed no significant differences based on tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9), age, histology, or metastases in the lung, lymph nodes, or peritoneum. In contrast, liver metastases were associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR:4.735 (95% CI: 1.508-14.86) and overall survival HR:2.906 (95% CI: 1.031-8.189).
Conclusions: Ramucirumab monotherapy is selected for patients with poor general condition, but it is suggested to have a poor prognosis, particularly in cases with liver metastases.
{"title":"Outcomes of Ramucirumab Monotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in a Multi-institutional Cohort Study in Japan.","authors":"Yoshinori Kikuchi, Sakae Nagaoka, Nobue Futawatari, Muneharu Fujisaki, Hidejiro Urakami, Mao Tsuru, Satoshi Yajima, Yoko Oshima, Hideaki Shimada","doi":"10.1007/s12029-026-01396-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01396-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The REGARD trial resulted in insurance approval for ramucirumab monotherapy; however, it did not include Japanese patients. Subsequent phase II trials and retrospective studies have examined Japanese cohorts, but reports identifying prognostic factors remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 27 patients across six institutions received ramucirumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment for gastric cancer between September 2017 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of 27 patients was 74 years (range: 36-90). Eighteen patients were male, and ten had intestinal-type gastric cancer. Metastases were observed in 6 patients in the liver, 3 in the lung, 18 in lymph nodes, and 14 in the peritoneum. Third-line chemotherapy was administered to 6 patients. The response rate was 3.7%, and the disease control rate was 18.5%. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months, and the median overall survival was 3.0 months. Of the 27 patients, 6 received third-line treatment and 4 received nivolumab alone. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who received third-line treatment and those who did not. The median progression-free survival showed no significant differences based on tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9), age, histology, or metastases in the lung, lymph nodes, or peritoneum. In contrast, liver metastases were associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR:4.735 (95% CI: 1.508-14.86) and overall survival HR:2.906 (95% CI: 1.031-8.189).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ramucirumab monotherapy is selected for patients with poor general condition, but it is suggested to have a poor prognosis, particularly in cases with liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}