Comparative Clinical Characteristics of Frail Older Adults in the Emergency Department: Long-Term Care Hospital versus Community Residence.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.3390/jpm14101026
Yunhyung Choi, Hosub Chung, Jiyeon Lim, Keon Kim, Sungjin Bae, Yoonhee Choi, Donghoon Lee
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Characteristics of Frail Older Adults in the Emergency Department: Long-Term Care Hospital versus Community Residence.","authors":"Yunhyung Choi, Hosub Chung, Jiyeon Lim, Keon Kim, Sungjin Bae, Yoonhee Choi, Donghoon Lee","doi":"10.3390/jpm14101026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Older patients from long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) presenting to emergency departments (EDs) exhibit a higher prevalence of frailty than those from the community. However, no study has examined frailty in patients from LTCHs in the ED. This study compared frailty in older patients from LTCHs and the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from the EDs of three university hospitals between 1 August and 31 October 2023, involving 5908 patients (515 from LTCHs and 5393 from the community). The Korean version of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-K) was used to assess individuals aged 65 and older. We compared clinical characteristics, frailty, length of stay (LOS), and diagnosis between patients from LTCHs (LTCH group) and the community (community group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among ED patients, 55.0% and 35.2% in the LTCH and the community groups, respectively, were frail (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Of these, 71.7% in the LTCH group were hospitalized compared with 53.1% in the community group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 4.910 (95% CI 1.458-16.534, <i>p</i> = 0.010) for frail LTCH patients and 3.748 (95% CI 2.599-5.405, <i>p</i> < 0.001) for frail community patients, compared to non-frail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients from LTCHs with frailty had higher hospital admission rates and increased in-hospital mortality compared to those in the community at the same frailty level. This study offers essential insights into the characteristics of older patients in LTCHs for healthcare administrators and medical staff worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14101026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Older patients from long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) presenting to emergency departments (EDs) exhibit a higher prevalence of frailty than those from the community. However, no study has examined frailty in patients from LTCHs in the ED. This study compared frailty in older patients from LTCHs and the community.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the EDs of three university hospitals between 1 August and 31 October 2023, involving 5908 patients (515 from LTCHs and 5393 from the community). The Korean version of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-K) was used to assess individuals aged 65 and older. We compared clinical characteristics, frailty, length of stay (LOS), and diagnosis between patients from LTCHs (LTCH group) and the community (community group).

Results: Among ED patients, 55.0% and 35.2% in the LTCH and the community groups, respectively, were frail (p < 0.001). Of these, 71.7% in the LTCH group were hospitalized compared with 53.1% in the community group (p = 0.001). The odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 4.910 (95% CI 1.458-16.534, p = 0.010) for frail LTCH patients and 3.748 (95% CI 2.599-5.405, p < 0.001) for frail community patients, compared to non-frail patients.

Conclusions: Patients from LTCHs with frailty had higher hospital admission rates and increased in-hospital mortality compared to those in the community at the same frailty level. This study offers essential insights into the characteristics of older patients in LTCHs for healthcare administrators and medical staff worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科年老体弱者的临床特征比较:长期护理医院与社区住宅的临床特征比较。
背景/目的:从长期护理医院(LTCH)到急诊科(ED)就诊的老年患者比社区患者的体弱患病率更高。然而,还没有研究对来自长期护理医院的急诊科病人的虚弱情况进行过调查。本研究比较了来自长期住院病院和社区的老年患者的虚弱情况:我们回顾性分析了三所大学医院急诊室在 2023 年 8 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日期间的数据,共涉及 5908 名患者(其中 515 名来自长期护理院,5393 名来自社区)。采用韩国版临床虚弱量表(CFS-K)对 65 岁及以上的患者进行评估。我们比较了长期治疗医院(长期治疗医院组)和社区(社区组)患者的临床特征、虚弱程度、住院时间(LOS)和诊断:在急诊室患者中,长期住院治疗组和社区组分别有 55.0% 和 35.2% 的患者体质虚弱(p < 0.001)。其中,LTCH 组有 71.7% 的患者住院治疗,而社区组只有 53.1% 的患者住院治疗(p = 0.001)。与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱的LTCH患者院内死亡率的几率比为4.910(95% CI 1.458-16.534,p = 0.010),虚弱的社区患者院内死亡率的几率比为3.748(95% CI 2.599-5.405,p < 0.001):与同等虚弱程度的社区患者相比,虚弱的长期住院患者的入院率更高,院内死亡率也更高。这项研究为世界各地的医疗管理人员和医务人员提供了关于长期住院病区老年患者特征的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Electrophysiologic Considerations in Adult Patients with Ebstein's Anomaly. Exploring the Structural and Functional Consequences of Deleterious Missense Nonsynonymous SNPs in the EPOR Gene: A Computational Approach. The Effects of Mepolizumab on CRSwNP: Real-Life Evidence. Clinical Implication of Brain Metastases En-Bloc Resection: Surgical Technique Description and Literature Review. Limits in the Perception of Facial Symmetry-A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1