Armaun D. Rouhi BA , Sebastian Leon MD , Jeffrey L. Roberson MD, MBA , Lauren A. Shreve MD, MBA , Gregory J. Nadolski MD , Noel N. Williams MD , Kristoffel R. Dumon MD
{"title":"Comparison of Gastrostomy Techniques in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia: An Entropy-Balanced Analysis","authors":"Armaun D. Rouhi BA , Sebastian Leon MD , Jeffrey L. Roberson MD, MBA , Lauren A. Shreve MD, MBA , Gregory J. Nadolski MD , Noel N. Williams MD , Kristoffel R. Dumon MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Enteral nutrition is commonly placed via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) techniques. This study compared perioperative outcomes of PEG and RIG in adults with dysphagia caused by cerebral infarction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult stroke patients who underwent either PEG or RIG between 2018 and 2020 at a tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in baseline characteristics between PEG and RIG patients were adjusted using entropy-balanced weights. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regressions were subsequently developed to evaluate the independent association between RIG and outcomes of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>217 stroke patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 37 (17.0%) received PEG and 180 (83.0%) received RIG. Compared to PEG, patients with RIG were more commonly Medicare beneficiaries and had a higher burden of comorbidities as measured by the Charlson comorbidity index. Time to achieve goal feeds was comparable between PEG and RIG (3 d [interquartile range 2-5] vs 4 d [interquartile range 3-5], respectively, <em>P</em> = 0.059). After multivariate adjustment, RIG was associated with significantly lower odds of reoperation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.50, <em>P</em> = 0.005), cerebrovascular accident (AOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-0.74, <em>P</em> = 0.030), and intensive care unit admission (AOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.70, <em>P</em> = 0.017). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality among RIG included arrhythmia (AOR 6.54, 95% CI 1.67-15.48, <em>P</em> = 0.009), myocardial infarction (AOR 4.78, 95% CI 2.25-10.23, <em>P</em> = 0.009), and obesity (AOR 4.48, 95% CI 1.03-9.61, <em>P</em> = 0.047).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While both techniques are effective methods of enteral feeding in stroke patients, RIG may confer lower perioperative morbidity. Local referral patterns and individual patient comorbidities could influence outcomes following PEG or RIG, necessitating careful patient selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 579-586"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Enteral nutrition is commonly placed via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) techniques. This study compared perioperative outcomes of PEG and RIG in adults with dysphagia caused by cerebral infarction.
Methods
Adult stroke patients who underwent either PEG or RIG between 2018 and 2020 at a tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in baseline characteristics between PEG and RIG patients were adjusted using entropy-balanced weights. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regressions were subsequently developed to evaluate the independent association between RIG and outcomes of interest.
Results
217 stroke patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 37 (17.0%) received PEG and 180 (83.0%) received RIG. Compared to PEG, patients with RIG were more commonly Medicare beneficiaries and had a higher burden of comorbidities as measured by the Charlson comorbidity index. Time to achieve goal feeds was comparable between PEG and RIG (3 d [interquartile range 2-5] vs 4 d [interquartile range 3-5], respectively, P = 0.059). After multivariate adjustment, RIG was associated with significantly lower odds of reoperation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.50, P = 0.005), cerebrovascular accident (AOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-0.74, P = 0.030), and intensive care unit admission (AOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.70, P = 0.017). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality among RIG included arrhythmia (AOR 6.54, 95% CI 1.67-15.48, P = 0.009), myocardial infarction (AOR 4.78, 95% CI 2.25-10.23, P = 0.009), and obesity (AOR 4.48, 95% CI 1.03-9.61, P = 0.047).
Conclusions
While both techniques are effective methods of enteral feeding in stroke patients, RIG may confer lower perioperative morbidity. Local referral patterns and individual patient comorbidities could influence outcomes following PEG or RIG, necessitating careful patient selection.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.