Association Between Nursing Home Five-Star Ratings and Consumer Satisfaction

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105322
{"title":"Association Between Nursing Home Five-Star Ratings and Consumer Satisfaction","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Consumers can currently access the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality Rating System when they choose a nursing home (NH). However, the system does not incorporate NH consumers’ opinions. Without having access to satisfaction or quality-of-life measures, consumers could make uninformed decisions. This study aims to investigate the association between five-star ratings and family/resident satisfaction scores.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Secondary data analysis was used.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>A unique, NH-level dataset of Ohio NHs that contains star ratings, satisfaction scores, and NH characteristics was constructed (<em>N</em> = 701). Data were drawn from the 2018 star rating data, 2018 Ohio Nursing Home Family Satisfaction Survey, 2017 Ohio Nursing Home Resident Satisfaction Survey, 2017 Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities, and the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted controlling other NH characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Chi-square results showed consumer satisfaction and star ratings were correlated, but imperfectly related. Regression results found that NHs with higher family satisfaction score received significantly higher star ratings across all domains except the quality-measure star rating. For each 1% point increase in the family satisfaction score, the probability of being a 4 or 5 overall star NH increases by 1.1% point (<em>P</em> &lt; .01), and being a 4 or 5 health inspection star NH increases by 1.2% points (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). NHs with higher resident satisfaction score received significantly higher star ratings. For every 1% point increase in the resident satisfaction score, the probability of being a 4 or 5 star NH increases by 0.7% point (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) across all star ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Early studies found little relationship between five-star ratings and consumer satisfaction scores. This study found consumer satisfaction is associated, although imperfectly, with star ratings. This highlights the need to publicly report NH consumer perspectives to help them make informed care decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024007448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Consumers can currently access the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Five-Star Quality Rating System when they choose a nursing home (NH). However, the system does not incorporate NH consumers’ opinions. Without having access to satisfaction or quality-of-life measures, consumers could make uninformed decisions. This study aims to investigate the association between five-star ratings and family/resident satisfaction scores.

Design

Secondary data analysis was used.

Setting and Participants

A unique, NH-level dataset of Ohio NHs that contains star ratings, satisfaction scores, and NH characteristics was constructed (N = 701). Data were drawn from the 2018 star rating data, 2018 Ohio Nursing Home Family Satisfaction Survey, 2017 Ohio Nursing Home Resident Satisfaction Survey, 2017 Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities, and the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports.

Methods

Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted controlling other NH characteristics.

Results

Chi-square results showed consumer satisfaction and star ratings were correlated, but imperfectly related. Regression results found that NHs with higher family satisfaction score received significantly higher star ratings across all domains except the quality-measure star rating. For each 1% point increase in the family satisfaction score, the probability of being a 4 or 5 overall star NH increases by 1.1% point (P < .01), and being a 4 or 5 health inspection star NH increases by 1.2% points (P < .01). NHs with higher resident satisfaction score received significantly higher star ratings. For every 1% point increase in the resident satisfaction score, the probability of being a 4 or 5 star NH increases by 0.7% point (P < .05) across all star ratings.

Conclusions and Implications

Early studies found little relationship between five-star ratings and consumer satisfaction scores. This study found consumer satisfaction is associated, although imperfectly, with star ratings. This highlights the need to publicly report NH consumer perspectives to help them make informed care decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养老院五星评级与消费者满意度之间的关系。
目标:目前,消费者在选择养老院(NH)时,可以访问医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的五星级质量评级系统。然而,该系统并不包含 NH 消费者的意见。由于无法获得满意度或生活质量的衡量标准,消费者可能会在不知情的情况下做出决定。本研究旨在调查五星评级与家庭/住户满意度得分之间的关联:设计:采用二级数据分析:构建了一个独特的俄亥俄州 NH 级数据集,其中包含星级评定、满意度评分和 NH 特征(N = 701)。数据来自 2018 年星级评定数据、2018 年俄亥俄州养老院家庭满意度调查、2017 年俄亥俄州养老院居民满意度调查、2017 年俄亥俄州两年一次的长期护理机构调查以及认证和调查提供方增强报告:方法:在控制其他 NH 特征的基础上进行卡方分析和逻辑回归分析:卡方分析结果显示,消费者满意度与星级评定存在相关性,但并非完全相关。回归结果发现,家庭满意度得分较高的 NH 在除质量测量星级评定外的所有领域获得的星级评定都明显较高。家庭满意度得分每增加 1%,成为 4 至 5 级综合星级 NH 的概率就会增加 1.1%(P < .01),成为 4 至 5 级健康检查星级 NH 的概率就会增加 1.2%(P < .01)。居民满意度较高的养老院获得的星级评分明显更高。在所有星级评定中,居民满意度得分每增加 1%,成为 4 至 5 星级 NH 的概率就会增加 0.7% 点(P < .05):早期研究发现,五星评级与消费者满意度得分之间关系不大。本研究发现消费者满意度与星级评定之间存在关联,尽管这种关联并不完美。这凸显了公开报道NH消费者观点的必要性,以帮助他们做出明智的医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Higher Magnesium Intake Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Frailty in Older Adults. Emerging Digital Technologies Used for Fall Detection in Older Adults in Aged Care: A Scoping Review. Association Between Time Since Smoking Cessation and Frailty Trajectory Among Community-Dwelling Older People: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. ORIENT Diet: A Potential Neuroprotective Dietary Pattern for Chinese Stroke High-Risk Population. Designing LTC Physical Work Environments to Support Worker Well-being: A Review and Recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1