Free fatty acids: independent predictors of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Lipids in Health and Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1186/s12944-024-02332-5
Guang-Zhi Liao, Hui-Hui Liu, Chun-Hui He, Jia-Yu Feng, Xiao-Feng Zhuang, Jing-Xi Wang, Ping Zhou, Yan Huang, Qiong Zhou, Mei Zhai, Yu-Hui Zhang, Jian Zhang
{"title":"Free fatty acids: independent predictors of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients.","authors":"Guang-Zhi Liao, Hui-Hui Liu, Chun-Hui He, Jia-Yu Feng, Xiao-Feng Zhuang, Jing-Xi Wang, Ping Zhou, Yan Huang, Qiong Zhou, Mei Zhai, Yu-Hui Zhang, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12944-024-02332-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between plasma free fatty acid (FFA) and the outcomes in the heart failure (HF) patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study among HF patients was performed. Plasma FFA was analyzed as both a continuous and a categorical variable (grouped by tertiles) to assess its association with composite cardiovascular (CV) death and HF hospitalization (CV death & HHP), CV death alone, and all-cause mortality (ACM) using Cox regression models. Subgroup analyses of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and mildly reduced/reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFrEF) were performed. This work also assessed the effectiveness of combining FFA and NT-pro BNP biomarkers for risk stratification by calculating the concordance index (C-index).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4,109 HF patients, FFA levels exceeding 0.4-0.42 mmol/L were associated with increased risks of the three outcomes. Patients in the highest FFA tertile faced greater risks than those in the lowest tertile. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.11-1.58) for CV death & HHP, 1.45 (95% CI: 1.16-1.82) for CV death, and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.15-1.68) for ACM, with a maximum follow-up of 8 years (median: 25 months). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated FFA levels consistently predicted worse outcomes in both HFmrEF/HFrEF and HFpEF patients. The C-index for predicting outcomes was significantly greater when NT-pro BNP and FFA were combined than when NT-pro BNP was used alone (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased plasma FFA concentrations were independently associated with greater risks of CV death & HHP, CV death, and ACM among HF patients, irrespective of the ejection fraction. The combination of FFA and NT-pro BNP biomarkers significantly improved risk stratification in HF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18073,"journal":{"name":"Lipids in Health and Disease","volume":"23 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lipids in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02332-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between plasma free fatty acid (FFA) and the outcomes in the heart failure (HF) patients remains unclear.

Methods: A cohort study among HF patients was performed. Plasma FFA was analyzed as both a continuous and a categorical variable (grouped by tertiles) to assess its association with composite cardiovascular (CV) death and HF hospitalization (CV death & HHP), CV death alone, and all-cause mortality (ACM) using Cox regression models. Subgroup analyses of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and mildly reduced/reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFrEF) were performed. This work also assessed the effectiveness of combining FFA and NT-pro BNP biomarkers for risk stratification by calculating the concordance index (C-index).

Results: Among the 4,109 HF patients, FFA levels exceeding 0.4-0.42 mmol/L were associated with increased risks of the three outcomes. Patients in the highest FFA tertile faced greater risks than those in the lowest tertile. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.11-1.58) for CV death & HHP, 1.45 (95% CI: 1.16-1.82) for CV death, and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.15-1.68) for ACM, with a maximum follow-up of 8 years (median: 25 months). Subgroup analyses revealed that elevated FFA levels consistently predicted worse outcomes in both HFmrEF/HFrEF and HFpEF patients. The C-index for predicting outcomes was significantly greater when NT-pro BNP and FFA were combined than when NT-pro BNP was used alone (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Increased plasma FFA concentrations were independently associated with greater risks of CV death & HHP, CV death, and ACM among HF patients, irrespective of the ejection fraction. The combination of FFA and NT-pro BNP biomarkers significantly improved risk stratification in HF patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游离脂肪酸:心力衰竭患者心血管长期不良后果的独立预测因素。
背景:血浆游离脂肪酸(FFA)与心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后之间的关系仍不清楚:对心力衰竭患者进行了一项队列研究。血浆游离脂肪酸既是连续变量,也是分类变量(按三级分组),使用 Cox 回归模型评估其与心血管(CV)死亡和高血压住院(CV 死亡和高血压住院)、单纯 CV 死亡和全因死亡率(ACM)的关系。对射血分数保留(HFpEF)和射血分数轻度降低/减少(HFmrEF/HFrEF)的高血压患者进行了亚组分析。这项研究还通过计算一致性指数(C-index)评估了结合FFA和NT-pro BNP生物标记物进行风险分层的有效性:结果:在4109名心房颤动患者中,FFA水平超过0.4-0.42 mmol/L与三种结果的风险增加有关。FFA最高三分位数的患者比FFA最低三分位数的患者面临更大的风险。在最长随访 8 年(中位数:25 个月)的情况下,CV 死亡和 HHP 的调整危险比为 1.32(95% CI:1.11-1.58),CV 死亡为 1.45(95% CI:1.16-1.82),ACM 为 1.39(95% CI:1.15-1.68)。亚组分析显示,FFA水平升高始终预示着HFmrEF/HFrEF和HFpEF患者的预后较差。当合并使用 NT-pro BNP 和 FFA 时,预测预后的 C 指数明显高于单独使用 NT-pro BNP 时(P 结论:NT-pro BNP 和 FFA 预测预后的 C 指数明显高于单独使用 NT-pro BNP 预测预后的 C 指数):无论射血分数如何,血浆中 FFA 浓度的升高与心血管死亡和高血压、心血管死亡和 ACM 风险的升高独立相关。FFA和NT-pro BNP生物标志物的结合可显著改善高血压患者的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lipids in Health and Disease
Lipids in Health and Disease 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lipids in Health and Disease is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal that publishes articles on all aspects of lipids: their biochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, role in health and disease, and the synthesis of new lipid compounds. Lipids in Health and Disease is aimed at all scientists, health professionals and physicians interested in the area of lipids. Lipids are defined here in their broadest sense, to include: cholesterol, essential fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, phospholipids, inositol lipids, second messenger lipids, enzymes and synthetic machinery that is involved in the metabolism of various lipids in the cells and tissues, and also various aspects of lipid transport, etc. In addition, the journal also publishes research that investigates and defines the role of lipids in various physiological processes, pathology and disease. In particular, the journal aims to bridge the gap between the bench and the clinic by publishing articles that are particularly relevant to human diseases and the role of lipids in the management of various diseases.
期刊最新文献
Serum lipid profile abnormalities among beta-thalassemia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Correlation of the triglyceride-glucose index and heart rate with 28-day all-cause mortality in severely ill patients: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. The mediating role of inflammation in the association between cotinine levels and remnant cholesterol: a cross-sectional study. Omega-3 fatty acid regulation of lipoprotein lipase and FAT/CD36 and its impact on white adipose tissue lipid uptake. Associations of the fat-free mass index and the fat mass index with the risk of developing diabetes and prediabetes in US adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1