Dual-energy CT angiography in detecting underlying causes of intracerebral hemorrhage: an observational cohort study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03473-1
Michaël T J Peeters, Alida A Postma, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wouter J P Henneman, Julie Staals
{"title":"Dual-energy CT angiography in detecting underlying causes of intracerebral hemorrhage: an observational cohort study.","authors":"Michaël T J Peeters, Alida A Postma, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wouter J P Henneman, Julie Staals","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03473-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CT angiography (CTA) is often used to detect underlying causes of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Dual-energy CT (DECT) is able to distinguish materials with similar attenuation but different compositions, such as hemorrhage and contrast. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of DECT angiography (DECTA), compared to conventional CTA in detecting underlying ICH causes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All non-traumatic ICH patients who underwent DECTA (both arterial as well as delayed venous phase) at our center between January 2014 and February 2020 were analyzed. Conventional CTA acquisitions were reconstructed ('merged') from DECTA data. Structural ICH causes were assessed on both reconstructed conventional CTA and DECTA. The final diagnosis was based on all available diagnostic and clinical findings during one-year follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 206 included ICH patients, 30 (14.6%) had an underlying cause as final diagnosis. Conventional CTA showed a cause in 24 patients (11.7%), DECTA in 32 (15.5%). Both false positive and false negative findings occurred more frequently on conventional CTA. DECTA detected neoplastic ICH in all seven patients with a definite neoplastic ICH diagnosis, whereas conventional CTA only detected four of these cases. Both developmental venous anomalies (DVA) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) were more frequently seen on DECTA. Arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms were detected equally on both imaging modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing DECTA at clinical presentation of ICH may be of additional diagnostic value in the early detection of underlying causes, especially neoplasms, CVST and DVAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03473-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CT angiography (CTA) is often used to detect underlying causes of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Dual-energy CT (DECT) is able to distinguish materials with similar attenuation but different compositions, such as hemorrhage and contrast. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of DECT angiography (DECTA), compared to conventional CTA in detecting underlying ICH causes.

Methods: All non-traumatic ICH patients who underwent DECTA (both arterial as well as delayed venous phase) at our center between January 2014 and February 2020 were analyzed. Conventional CTA acquisitions were reconstructed ('merged') from DECTA data. Structural ICH causes were assessed on both reconstructed conventional CTA and DECTA. The final diagnosis was based on all available diagnostic and clinical findings during one-year follow up.

Results: Of 206 included ICH patients, 30 (14.6%) had an underlying cause as final diagnosis. Conventional CTA showed a cause in 24 patients (11.7%), DECTA in 32 (15.5%). Both false positive and false negative findings occurred more frequently on conventional CTA. DECTA detected neoplastic ICH in all seven patients with a definite neoplastic ICH diagnosis, whereas conventional CTA only detected four of these cases. Both developmental venous anomalies (DVA) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) were more frequently seen on DECTA. Arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms were detected equally on both imaging modalities.

Conclusions: Performing DECTA at clinical presentation of ICH may be of additional diagnostic value in the early detection of underlying causes, especially neoplasms, CVST and DVAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双能 CT 血管造影在检测脑出血潜在病因中的应用:一项观察性队列研究。
背景:CT 血管造影(CTA)通常用于检测急性脑内出血(ICH)的潜在病因。双能 CT(DECT)能区分衰减相似但成分不同的物质,如出血和造影剂。我们的目的是评估 DECT 血管造影(DECTA)与传统 CTA 相比在检测 ICH 潜在病因方面的诊断率:分析2014年1月至2020年2月期间在本中心接受DECTA(动脉期和延迟静脉期)检查的所有非创伤性ICH患者。根据 DECTA 数据重建("合并")传统 CTA 采集结果。结构性 ICH 的病因通过重建的常规 CTA 和 DECTA 进行评估。最终诊断基于一年随访期间所有可用的诊断和临床结果:结果:在纳入的 206 例 ICH 患者中,有 30 例(14.6%)的最终诊断有潜在病因。传统 CTA 显示 24 例患者(11.7%)有潜在病因,DECTA 显示 32 例患者(15.5%)有潜在病因。假阳性和假阴性结果在常规 CTA 中出现的频率更高。DECTA 在 7 例确诊为肿瘤性 ICH 的患者中均检测出肿瘤性 ICH,而传统 CTA 仅检测出其中的 4 例。发育性静脉畸形(DVA)和脑静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)在 DECTA 中出现的频率更高。动静脉畸形和动脉瘤在两种成像模式下的检出率相同:结论:在 ICH 临床表现时进行 DECTA 可能对早期发现潜在病因(尤其是肿瘤、CVST 和 DVA)有额外的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1