Effect of Probiotics Supplementation on Cortisol Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.3390/nu16203564
Manav Jain, Aishwarya Anand, Nisha Sharma, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Elena Y Enioutina
{"title":"Effect of Probiotics Supplementation on Cortisol Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Manav Jain, Aishwarya Anand, Nisha Sharma, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Elena Y Enioutina","doi":"10.3390/nu16203564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown conflicting results on cortisol levels following probiotic administration in healthy and diseased populations. Previous analyses were inconclusive due to limited studies, and evidence is lacking on how these effects vary by health status; region; therapy duration; medications, and use of single or multiple strains. <b>Methods</b>: In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO [CRD42024538539]), we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Web of Science Preprints until 13 August 2024, for RCTs on probiotic administration, either alone or combined, across all age groups and without specific medical condition requirements. We applied random-effects meta-analysis, assessed bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and evaluated evidence certainty with GRADE. <b>Findings</b>: We screened 1739 records and retrieved 46 RCTs (3516 participants). Probiotics supplementation decreased cortisol levels compared to the control arm [46 RCTs; SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.83; -0.07; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 92.5%, low certainty]. Among various subgroups; probiotics supplementation decreased the cortisol levels in the subgroups without concomitant medications [37 RCTs; SMD: -0.30; 95% CI [-0.58; -0.03], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 88.7%] with a single probiotic strain [30 RCTs; SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.63; -0.028; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 88.8%], in a healthy population [35 RCTs; SMD:-0.3; 95% CI: -0.58; -0.03; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 88.7] and in the Asia region [21 RCTs; SMD: -0.83; 95% CI: -1.58; -0.07; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 95%]. <b>Interpretation</b>: A low level of evidence suggests probiotics might reduce cortisol levels, but more targeted studies are needed to identify variables affecting the response in specific subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16203564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown conflicting results on cortisol levels following probiotic administration in healthy and diseased populations. Previous analyses were inconclusive due to limited studies, and evidence is lacking on how these effects vary by health status; region; therapy duration; medications, and use of single or multiple strains. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO [CRD42024538539]), we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Web of Science Preprints until 13 August 2024, for RCTs on probiotic administration, either alone or combined, across all age groups and without specific medical condition requirements. We applied random-effects meta-analysis, assessed bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and evaluated evidence certainty with GRADE. Findings: We screened 1739 records and retrieved 46 RCTs (3516 participants). Probiotics supplementation decreased cortisol levels compared to the control arm [46 RCTs; SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.83; -0.07; I2: 92.5%, low certainty]. Among various subgroups; probiotics supplementation decreased the cortisol levels in the subgroups without concomitant medications [37 RCTs; SMD: -0.30; 95% CI [-0.58; -0.03], I2: 88.7%] with a single probiotic strain [30 RCTs; SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.63; -0.028; I2: 88.8%], in a healthy population [35 RCTs; SMD:-0.3; 95% CI: -0.58; -0.03; I2: 88.7] and in the Asia region [21 RCTs; SMD: -0.83; 95% CI: -1.58; -0.07; I2: 95%]. Interpretation: A low level of evidence suggests probiotics might reduce cortisol levels, but more targeted studies are needed to identify variables affecting the response in specific subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充益生菌对皮质醇水平的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:几项随机对照试验(RCT)显示,在健康和患病人群中服用益生菌后,皮质醇水平的变化结果相互矛盾。由于研究有限,以往的分析并无定论,而且缺乏证据表明这些影响会因健康状况、地区、疗程、药物以及使用单一或多种菌株而有所不同。方法:在本系统综述和荟萃分析(PROSPERO [CRD42024538539])中,我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、ProQuest 和 Web of Science Preprints(截至 2024 年 8 月 13 日)中关于益生菌单独或联合应用的 RCT,这些研究涉及所有年龄组且无特定医疗条件要求。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析法,使用 Cochrane RoB 2 工具评估偏倚,并使用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性。研究结果我们筛选了 1739 条记录,检索到 46 项 RCT(3516 名参与者)。与对照组相比,补充益生菌可降低皮质醇水平[46 项 RCT;SMD:-0.45;95% CI:-0.83;-0.07;I2:92.5%,确定性低]。在各亚组中,补充益生菌可降低不同时服用药物的亚组的皮质醇水平[37 项研究;SMD:-0.30;95% CI [-0.58;-0.03],I2:88.7%],单一益生菌菌株[30 项研究;SMD:-0.33;95% CI:-0.63;-0.028;I2:88.8%]、健康人群[35 项 RCT;SMD:-0.3;95% CI:-0.58;-0.03;I2:88.7]和亚洲地区[21 项 RCT;SMD:-0.83;95% CI:-1.58;-0.07;I2:95%]。解释:低水平的证据表明,益生菌可降低皮质醇水平,但需要进行更有针对性的研究,以确定影响特定亚组反应的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Microbiota and Nutrition with Cognitive Impairment in Diseases. Beneficial Effects of Ginger Root Extract on Pain Behaviors, Inflammation, and Mitochondrial Function in the Colon and Different Brain Regions of Male and Female Neuropathic Rats: A Gut-Brain Axis Study. Hydroxyprolyl-Glycine in 24 H Urine Shows Higher Correlation with Meat Consumption than Prolyl-Hydroxyproline, a Major Collagen Peptide in Urine and Blood. Dietary Habits of Young Poles and Their Selected Determinants: A Review and Implications for Public Health. Effect of Consuming Salmon Products on Vitamin D Status of Young Caucasian Women in Autumn-A Randomized 8-Week Dietary VISA 2 (Vitamin D in Salmon Part 2) Intervention Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1