The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009
Delbert G. Robinson , Majnu John , Alexander L. Miller , Nina R. Schooler , John M. Kane
{"title":"The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders","authors":"Delbert G. Robinson ,&nbsp;Majnu John ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Miller ,&nbsp;Nina R. Schooler ,&nbsp;John M. Kane","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"274 ","pages":"Pages 307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996424004511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.

Study design

The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.

Study results

3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.

Conclusions

The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估初发精神病患者的 COMPASS 量表。
背景:精神病症状评估工具在美国精神卫生社区的临床实践中很少使用,尽管基于测量的护理具有优势。研究设计:12 项 COMPASS 症状评估是为 RAISE-ETP 早期精神病研究而设计的。评分由社区机构的临床医生完成。COMPASS 的心理测量特性通过莫肯量表分析进行检验。随后,对来自ESPRITO学习健康系统的10项COMPASS数据进行了莫肯分析:研究结果:共检查了 3600 份 RAISE-ETP COMPASS 评估。COMPASS 的 12 个项目版本符合莫肯量表的单维性标准(H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)),衍生的 10 个项目精简版本(H = 0.359 (SE:0.007))和 5 个项目版本(H = 0.396 (SE=0.009))也是如此。12 个条目版本出现了一次明显的单调性违规现象;在减少条目的版本中没有发现明显的违规现象。在缩减后的项目版本中,临床医生更喜欢 10 个项目的版本,而不是 5 个项目的版本。在 ESPRITO 数据中,10 个条目和 5 个条目版本均符合单维性标准(H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) 和 0.478 (0.034)),且无单调性违规:COMPASS量表为临床医生提供了不同长度的量表版本,可用于评估社区环境中的初发精神病患者。COMPASS量表还可以为大规模项目的数据收集提供便利;在美国全国性的EPINET项目中,COMPASS量表的10个项目版本是一个症状评估选项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of functional outcomes in psychotic disorders. Ambient coarse particulate matter pollution and hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Positive mental health interventions for people with schizophrenia: A scoping review. Systematic review and meta-analysis of family-based interventions for early psychosis: Carer and patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1