Laparoscopic colon surgery: time to leave the urinary catheter in the operating room?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-02023-x
Christophe Riquoir, Javier Vela, Raquel Lascano, Gonzalo Urrejola, Felipe Bellolio, María Elena Molina, Rodrigo Miguieles, José Tomás Larach
{"title":"Laparoscopic colon surgery: time to leave the urinary catheter in the operating room?","authors":"Christophe Riquoir, Javier Vela, Raquel Lascano, Gonzalo Urrejola, Felipe Bellolio, María Elena Molina, Rodrigo Miguieles, José Tomás Larach","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02023-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>'Fast track' guidelines have incorporated multimodal measures to optimize perioperative outcomes in surgery, with laparoscopy being a pivotal component for its advantages in early recovery. In this setting, current recommendations regarding the use of a urinary catheter suggest its removal within the first 24-hours postoperatively.  However, few studies have assessed the feasibility of leaving the operating room without it. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections leaving the operating room with and without a urinary catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted utilizing prospectively collected data from patients undergoing elective colon resections over a 17-month period. The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of a urinary catheter upon leaving the operating room, and subsequently, their perioperative outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 with a urinary catheter and n = 79 without). Cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (83.2%), and right hemicolectomy the most frequently performed surgery (32.7%). Two events of urinary catheter reinsertions were reported, both in the no-catheter group (0% vs 2.53%, p = 0.969), and there were no cases of urinary tract infections. The overall and severe complications rates exhibited no significant differences (25% vs. 26.6%, p = 1, and 7.14% vs. 5.06%, p = 1) and the length of stay was similar (p = 0.220).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Removing the urinary catheter before leaving the operating room appears to be safe and associated with very low rates of urinary retention in selected patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic or upper rectal resections.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2655-2661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02023-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: 'Fast track' guidelines have incorporated multimodal measures to optimize perioperative outcomes in surgery, with laparoscopy being a pivotal component for its advantages in early recovery. In this setting, current recommendations regarding the use of a urinary catheter suggest its removal within the first 24-hours postoperatively.  However, few studies have assessed the feasibility of leaving the operating room without it. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections leaving the operating room with and without a urinary catheter.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted utilizing prospectively collected data from patients undergoing elective colon resections over a 17-month period. The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of a urinary catheter upon leaving the operating room, and subsequently, their perioperative outcomes were compared.

Results: A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 with a urinary catheter and n = 79 without). Cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (83.2%), and right hemicolectomy the most frequently performed surgery (32.7%). Two events of urinary catheter reinsertions were reported, both in the no-catheter group (0% vs 2.53%, p = 0.969), and there were no cases of urinary tract infections. The overall and severe complications rates exhibited no significant differences (25% vs. 26.6%, p = 1, and 7.14% vs. 5.06%, p = 1) and the length of stay was similar (p = 0.220).

Conclusion: Removing the urinary catheter before leaving the operating room appears to be safe and associated with very low rates of urinary retention in selected patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic or upper rectal resections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜结肠手术:该把导尿管留在手术室了吗?
导言:"快速通道 "指南纳入了多模式措施,以优化外科手术的围手术期效果,其中腹腔镜手术因其在早期恢复方面的优势而成为关键组成部分。在这种情况下,目前关于使用导尿管的建议是在术后 24 小时内拔除导尿管。 然而,很少有研究对离开手术室时不使用导尿管的可行性进行评估。本研究的目的是比较接受择期腹腔镜结肠切除术的患者在有导尿管和没有导尿管的情况下离开手术室的围手术期结果:利用前瞻性收集到的 17 个月内接受择期结肠切除术患者的数据进行了一项回顾性研究。根据患者离开手术室时是否使用导尿管将他们分为两组,然后比较他们的围手术期结果:共有 107 名患者符合纳入标准(有导尿管的患者为 28 人,无导尿管的患者为 79 人)。癌症是最常见的诊断(83.2%),右半结肠切除术是最常见的手术(32.7%)。有两例导尿管重新插入的报告,均发生在无导尿管组(0% vs 2.53%,P = 0.969),无尿路感染病例。总并发症率和严重并发症率无明显差异(25% vs. 26.6%,p = 1;7.14% vs. 5.06%,p = 1),住院时间相似(p = 0.220):结论:在离开手术室前拔除导尿管似乎是安全的,而且在接受腹腔镜结肠或直肠上段切除术的特定患者中,发生尿潴留的几率非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with apatinib and camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a protocol for a single-arm phase II trial. Reducing the positive margins rate for anal melanoma in the modern era: a national propensity score matched study. Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Full-robotic liver resection of segment V-Vi using the harmonic ace curved shears and the hanging technique: an easy way to do it. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic, retro-muscular, and open mesh repair techniques for ventral and incisional hernias: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1