The Global Burden of Absenteeism Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.3390/vaccines12101196
Marios Politis, Georgios Rachiotis, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Christos Hadjichristodoulou
{"title":"The Global Burden of Absenteeism Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marios Politis, Georgios Rachiotis, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Christos Hadjichristodoulou","doi":"10.3390/vaccines12101196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A rise in absenteeism among healthcare workers (HCWs) was recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects may have also contributed to absenteeism during this period. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects among HCWs. <b>Methods:</b> The inclusion criteria for this review were original quantitative studies of any design, written in English, that addressed absenteeism related to the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science) were searched for eligible articles on 7 June 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were used to synthesize the evidence. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen observational studies with 96,786 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects was 17% (95% CI: 13-20%), while 83% (95% CI: 80-87%) of the vaccination events did not lead in any absenteeism. Study design, sex, vaccination dose, region, and vaccine type were identified as significant sources of heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions:</b> A non-negligible proportion of HCWs were absent from work after reporting side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Various demographic factors should be considered in future vaccination schedules for HCWs to potentially decrease the burden of absenteeism related to vaccine side effects. As most studies included self-reported questionnaire data, our results may be limited due to a recall bias. <b>Other:</b> The protocol of the study was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024552517).</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A rise in absenteeism among healthcare workers (HCWs) was recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects may have also contributed to absenteeism during this period. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects among HCWs. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this review were original quantitative studies of any design, written in English, that addressed absenteeism related to the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science) were searched for eligible articles on 7 June 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were used to synthesize the evidence. Results: Nineteen observational studies with 96,786 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects was 17% (95% CI: 13-20%), while 83% (95% CI: 80-87%) of the vaccination events did not lead in any absenteeism. Study design, sex, vaccination dose, region, and vaccine type were identified as significant sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: A non-negligible proportion of HCWs were absent from work after reporting side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Various demographic factors should be considered in future vaccination schedules for HCWs to potentially decrease the burden of absenteeism related to vaccine side effects. As most studies included self-reported questionnaire data, our results may be limited due to a recall bias. Other: The protocol of the study was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024552517).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球医护人员因 COVID-19 疫苗副作用而缺勤的负担:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员(HCWs)的缺勤率有所上升,主要原因是 SARS-CoV-2 感染。然而,有证据表明,与 COVID-19 疫苗相关的副作用也可能是造成这一时期缺勤的原因之一。本研究旨在综合人机工程人员中与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤发生率的证据。方法:本综述的纳入标准是以英语撰写的任何设计的原始定量研究,这些研究涉及高危工作者中与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤问题。2024 年 6 月 7 日,我们在四个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science)中搜索了符合条件的文章。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行了评估。采用叙事综合法和荟萃分析法对证据进行综合。结果:共纳入 19 项观察性研究,96,786 人参与。与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤率为 17%(95% CI:13-20%),而 83%(95% CI:80-87%)的接种事件未导致任何缺勤。研究设计、性别、接种剂量、地区和疫苗类型被认为是异质性的重要来源。研究结论在报告 COVID-19 疫苗副作用后,有一定比例的医护人员缺勤。在未来的高危行业工人疫苗接种计划中应考虑各种人口统计学因素,以减少与疫苗副作用相关的缺勤负担。由于大多数研究包括自我报告的问卷数据,我们的结果可能会因回忆偏差而受到限制。其他:研究方案已在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42024552517)中预先注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Infections During Pregnancy on Transplacental Antibody Transfer. Interferon Epsilon-Mediated Antiviral Activity Against Human Metapneumovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Comparative Analysis of the Neutralizing Capacity of Monovalent and Bivalent Formulations of Betuvax-CoV-2, a Subunit Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine, Against Various Strains of SARS-CoV-2. Identifying System-Level Strategies to Engage in HPV Prevention Across Oral Health and Primary Care Settings. Comparative Efficacy of Parenteral and Mucosal Recombinant Probiotic Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 and S. pneumoniae Infections in Animal Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1