Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010109
Haixiang Lv, Jianye Yang, Ruofan Yu, Qin Liu, Xiaohong Liu
Background: Vibrio harveyi is a major bacterial pathogen threatening turbot aquaculture, necessitating the development of more effective vaccines. Bacterial ghosts (BGs), which are empty bacterial envelopes with preserved surface antigens, offer a promising alternative to traditional formaldehyde-killed vaccines that often suffer from reduced immunogenicity.
Methods: We developed an optimized BGs vaccine for V. harveyi by combining the nonionic surfactant NP-40 with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). This NP-40/NaOH combination demonstrated a synergistic lytic effect, halving the minimum inhibitory concentration of NaOH required for complete inactivation.
Results: The resulting BGs exhibited intact cellular morphology with transmembrane pores, efficient removal of cytoplasmic contents, and significantly better preservation of lipopolysaccharide structure compared to NaOH-alone treatment. Vaccination trials in turbot demonstrated that the NP-40/NaOH BGs provided the highest relative percent survival (RPS = 58.8%) upon challenge, outperforming both NaOH-alone BGs (RPS = 55.0%) and a traditional formaldehyde-killed vaccine (RPS = 34.8%). The superior protection was correlated with the induction of a more robust and sustained immune response, characterized by significantly higher levels of specific IgM antibodies, elevated lysozyme activity, and increased total serum protein.
Conclusions: This study establishes the NP-40/NaOH protocol as an effective strategy for producing high-quality BGs with enhanced immunogenicity, presenting a potent vaccine candidate for controlling vibriosis in aquaculture.
{"title":"A Chemically Induced <i>Vibrio harveyi</i> Bacterial Ghost Vaccine Confers Enhanced Protection in Turbot (<i>Scophthalmus maximus</i>).","authors":"Haixiang Lv, Jianye Yang, Ruofan Yu, Qin Liu, Xiaohong Liu","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010109","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Vibrio harveyi</i> is a major bacterial pathogen threatening turbot aquaculture, necessitating the development of more effective vaccines. Bacterial ghosts (BGs), which are empty bacterial envelopes with preserved surface antigens, offer a promising alternative to traditional formaldehyde-killed vaccines that often suffer from reduced immunogenicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an optimized BGs vaccine for <i>V. harveyi</i> by combining the nonionic surfactant NP-40 with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). This NP-40/NaOH combination demonstrated a synergistic lytic effect, halving the minimum inhibitory concentration of NaOH required for complete inactivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting BGs exhibited intact cellular morphology with transmembrane pores, efficient removal of cytoplasmic contents, and significantly better preservation of lipopolysaccharide structure compared to NaOH-alone treatment. Vaccination trials in turbot demonstrated that the NP-40/NaOH BGs provided the highest relative percent survival (RPS = 58.8%) upon challenge, outperforming both NaOH-alone BGs (RPS = 55.0%) and a traditional formaldehyde-killed vaccine (RPS = 34.8%). The superior protection was correlated with the induction of a more robust and sustained immune response, characterized by significantly higher levels of specific IgM antibodies, elevated lysozyme activity, and increased total serum protein.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes the NP-40/NaOH protocol as an effective strategy for producing high-quality BGs with enhanced immunogenicity, presenting a potent vaccine candidate for controlling vibriosis in aquaculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010108
Laura Colombo, Abraham Palache, Sanjay Hadigal
Annual influenza vaccination remains critical for mitigating severe illness and reducing healthcare strain, particularly among high-risk populations. Despite advancements in vaccine platforms, the comparative efficacy of novel vaccines-such as high-dose (HD-IIV), recombinant (rIV), cell-based (cIV), and adjuvanted (aIV) influenza vaccines-versus standard-dose non-adjuvanted (SD-IIV) vaccines remains a public health concern. Traditional Relative Vaccine Efficacy (rVE) metrics, though robust, may overestimate population-level benefits. This short communication explores alternative comparative efficacy measures: risk difference (ΔRD) and number needed to vaccinate (ΔNNV). Analysis of data derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or robust pragmatic trials, shows that while rVE values for newer vaccines often indicate superior efficacy, ΔRD and ΔNNV highlight the limits in incremental protection at the population level, with ΔRD generally below 10 cases per 1000 vaccinated. These findings underline the sustained relevance of SD-IIV in immunization programs and emphasize the need for broader vaccine coverage to highlight the benefits of vaccination and enhance population health outcomes.
{"title":"Shifting Perspective in Influenza Vaccines Efficacy: How Risk Difference Shows an Alternative View of the Comparative Efficacy Profile of Newer and Enhanced Influenza Vaccines Compared to Standard, Egg-Based Vaccines.","authors":"Laura Colombo, Abraham Palache, Sanjay Hadigal","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010108","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Annual influenza vaccination remains critical for mitigating severe illness and reducing healthcare strain, particularly among high-risk populations. Despite advancements in vaccine platforms, the comparative efficacy of novel vaccines-such as high-dose (HD-IIV), recombinant (rIV), cell-based (cIV), and adjuvanted (aIV) influenza vaccines-versus standard-dose non-adjuvanted (SD-IIV) vaccines remains a public health concern. Traditional Relative Vaccine Efficacy (rVE) metrics, though robust, may overestimate population-level benefits. This short communication explores alternative comparative efficacy measures: risk difference (ΔRD) and number needed to vaccinate (ΔNNV). Analysis of data derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or robust pragmatic trials, shows that while rVE values for newer vaccines often indicate superior efficacy, ΔRD and ΔNNV highlight the limits in incremental protection at the population level, with ΔRD generally below 10 cases per 1000 vaccinated. These findings underline the sustained relevance of SD-IIV in immunization programs and emphasize the need for broader vaccine coverage to highlight the benefits of vaccination and enhance population health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010103
Naoko Uno, Matthew H Thomas, Camila Caetano, Ted M Ross
Background/Objectives: While new vaccines are in development; one strategy to increase influenza vaccine coverage is to repurpose current influenza vaccines for intranasal delivery. Methods: To address this goal; mice were vaccinated intranasally with either a split inactivated virus vaccine (Fluzone) or a recombinant HA vaccine (Flublok) at one of two doses (1 μg high dose or 0.1 μg low dose). Both vaccines were adjuvanted with either a STING agonist; c-di-AMP (CDA); or a combination of a synthetic toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR7/8 agonist (TRAC478). Results: Mice vaccinated with either vaccine plus adjuvant had higher hemagglutination-inhibition titers than mice administered unadjuvanted vaccines. Mice vaccinated with either vaccine plus CDA had on average higher numbers of H3 and influenza B hemagglutinin (HA)-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs); whereas mice vaccinated with vaccine plus TRAC478 had on average higher number of H1 HA-specific ASCs. All vaccinated mice challenged with the H1N1 influenza virus were protected against both morbidity and mortality with no detectable virus in their lungs. Mice challenged with the H3N2 influenza virus all lost weight over the first 5 days of infection. Adding TRAC478 with either a high or low dose vaccine resulted in 80-100% survival following challenge. Almost all mice vaccinated with Flublok plus CDA died from H3N2 influenza virus challenged with ~2 logs higher viral lung titers than mice administered Flublok only or Flublok plus TRAC478. Conclusions: Overall; Fluzone and Flublok can effectively be used for intranasal vaccination.
{"title":"Elicitation of Protective Immune Responses Against Influenza Virus Following Intranasal Delivery of Fluzone or Flublok Vaccines.","authors":"Naoko Uno, Matthew H Thomas, Camila Caetano, Ted M Ross","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010103","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> While new vaccines are in development; one strategy to increase influenza vaccine coverage is to repurpose current influenza vaccines for intranasal delivery. <b>Methods:</b> To address this goal; mice were vaccinated intranasally with either a split inactivated virus vaccine (Fluzone) or a recombinant HA vaccine (Flublok) at one of two doses (1 μg high dose or 0.1 μg low dose). Both vaccines were adjuvanted with either a STING agonist; c-di-AMP (CDA); or a combination of a synthetic toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR7/8 agonist (TRAC478). <b>Results:</b> Mice vaccinated with either vaccine plus adjuvant had higher hemagglutination-inhibition titers than mice administered unadjuvanted vaccines. Mice vaccinated with either vaccine plus CDA had on average higher numbers of H3 and influenza B hemagglutinin (HA)-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs); whereas mice vaccinated with vaccine plus TRAC478 had on average higher number of H1 HA-specific ASCs. All vaccinated mice challenged with the H1N1 influenza virus were protected against both morbidity and mortality with no detectable virus in their lungs. Mice challenged with the H3N2 influenza virus all lost weight over the first 5 days of infection. Adding TRAC478 with either a high or low dose vaccine resulted in 80-100% survival following challenge. Almost all mice vaccinated with Flublok plus CDA died from H3N2 influenza virus challenged with ~2 logs higher viral lung titers than mice administered Flublok only or Flublok plus TRAC478. <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall; Fluzone and Flublok can effectively be used for intranasal vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010105
Kay Choong See
Global cancer incidence reached 20 million new cases across 185 countries in 2022, with approximately 10 million cancer-related deaths annually. Among adults with solid tumors and hematological malignancies, infections are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, with respiratory infections playing a particularly significant role. These infections not only reduce life expectancy but can also delay cancer therapy, negatively affect treatment outcomes, and increase healthcare costs. In recent years, the burden of respiratory infections in this population has been driven by influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Effective vaccines are available for all these pathogens and are recommended for adults with cancer, yet vaccination uptake remains suboptimal despite their heightened vulnerability. This review provides practical guidance for healthcare professionals on vaccinating adults with cancer against respiratory infections, summarizing key information to help clinicians address vaccination-related complacency, confidence, and convenience. Evidence from studies in both the general population and cancer patients consistently shows that vaccination benefits outweigh potential risks, with adverse event rates comparable to those seen in individuals without cancer. Early vaccination is encouraged, as there is limited justification for delaying immunization even when immune responses may be reduced. Vaccine dosing aligns with recommendations for the general population, with important exceptions. Live attenuated vaccines should be avoided because of the risk of replication and disease in immunocompromised patients, and selected groups may require booster doses to achieve adequate protection. Notably, cancer immunotherapy does not appear to impair vaccine-induced immune responses.
{"title":"Vaccination Against Respiratory Infections in Adults with Cancer: A Concise Guide for Clinicians.","authors":"Kay Choong See","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010105","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global cancer incidence reached 20 million new cases across 185 countries in 2022, with approximately 10 million cancer-related deaths annually. Among adults with solid tumors and hematological malignancies, infections are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, with respiratory infections playing a particularly significant role. These infections not only reduce life expectancy but can also delay cancer therapy, negatively affect treatment outcomes, and increase healthcare costs. In recent years, the burden of respiratory infections in this population has been driven by influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Bordetella pertussis</i>. Effective vaccines are available for all these pathogens and are recommended for adults with cancer, yet vaccination uptake remains suboptimal despite their heightened vulnerability. This review provides practical guidance for healthcare professionals on vaccinating adults with cancer against respiratory infections, summarizing key information to help clinicians address vaccination-related complacency, confidence, and convenience. Evidence from studies in both the general population and cancer patients consistently shows that vaccination benefits outweigh potential risks, with adverse event rates comparable to those seen in individuals without cancer. Early vaccination is encouraged, as there is limited justification for delaying immunization even when immune responses may be reduced. Vaccine dosing aligns with recommendations for the general population, with important exceptions. Live attenuated vaccines should be avoided because of the risk of replication and disease in immunocompromised patients, and selected groups may require booster doses to achieve adequate protection. Notably, cancer immunotherapy does not appear to impair vaccine-induced immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010107
Maria A Nikiforova, Vladimir A Gushchin, Denis A Kleymenov, Anastasia M Kocherzhenko, Evgeniia N Bykonia, Elena P Mazunina, Sofia R Kozlova, Leonid I Russu, Nadezhda A Kuznetsova, Elena V Shidlovskaya, Elizaveta V Marchuk, Evgeny V Usachev, Olga V Usacheva, Dmitry V Shcheblyakov, Irina V Kozlova, Sergei E Tkachev, Andrei A Pochtovyi, Vladimir I Zlobin, Denis Y Logunov, Alexander L Gintsburg
Background/Objectives: While tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is genetically relatively conserved, the significant antigenic divergence between its main circulating subtypes hinders the development of broadly effective antiviral treatments and vaccines. Current inactivated TBEV vaccines offer limited cross-protection against heterologous strains, as evidenced by cases among vaccinated individuals in endemic regions. The aim of this study was to design a candidate mRNA vaccine and evaluate the breadth of protective immunity it elicits. Methods: Ten candidate mRNA-PrM/E-LNP vaccines were comparatively evaluated for immunogenicity and protective efficacy in BALB/c mice. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring antigen-specific IgG titers via ELISA and neutralizing antibody titers against a panel of TBEV strains using a virus-neutralization test. Protective efficiency was determined in a lethal challenge model, where immunized mice were challenged with one of seven distinct TBEV strains. Results: Vaccination with all tested mRNA-PrM/E-LNP candidates conferred 100% survival in mice following a lethal challenge with each of the seven TBEV strains (100 LD50). The construct mRNA-PrM/E-Krasny Yar-8 demonstrated the highest immunogenicity, inducing antigen-specific antibodies with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 1:6625, as well as the broadest virus-neutralizing activity against both homologous and heterologous TBEV strains in vitro. Conclusions: The mRNA platform represents a promising strategy for developing TBEV vaccines, demonstrating high immunogenicity and cross-protective efficacy against diverse viral strains.
{"title":"Development of an mRNA Vaccine for Tick-Borne Encephalitis: Selection of a Prototype Virus Strain.","authors":"Maria A Nikiforova, Vladimir A Gushchin, Denis A Kleymenov, Anastasia M Kocherzhenko, Evgeniia N Bykonia, Elena P Mazunina, Sofia R Kozlova, Leonid I Russu, Nadezhda A Kuznetsova, Elena V Shidlovskaya, Elizaveta V Marchuk, Evgeny V Usachev, Olga V Usacheva, Dmitry V Shcheblyakov, Irina V Kozlova, Sergei E Tkachev, Andrei A Pochtovyi, Vladimir I Zlobin, Denis Y Logunov, Alexander L Gintsburg","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010107","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: While tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is genetically relatively conserved, the significant antigenic divergence between its main circulating subtypes hinders the development of broadly effective antiviral treatments and vaccines. Current inactivated TBEV vaccines offer limited cross-protection against heterologous strains, as evidenced by cases among vaccinated individuals in endemic regions. The aim of this study was to design a candidate mRNA vaccine and evaluate the breadth of protective immunity it elicits. <b>Methods</b>: Ten candidate mRNA-PrM/E-LNP vaccines were comparatively evaluated for immunogenicity and protective efficacy in BALB/c mice. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring antigen-specific IgG titers via ELISA and neutralizing antibody titers against a panel of TBEV strains using a virus-neutralization test. Protective efficiency was determined in a lethal challenge model, where immunized mice were challenged with one of seven distinct TBEV strains. <b>Results</b>: Vaccination with all tested mRNA-PrM/E-LNP candidates conferred 100% survival in mice following a lethal challenge with each of the seven TBEV strains (100 LD<sub>50</sub>). The construct mRNA-PrM/E-Krasny Yar-8 demonstrated the highest immunogenicity, inducing antigen-specific antibodies with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 1:6625, as well as the broadest virus-neutralizing activity against both homologous and heterologous TBEV strains in vitro. <b>Conclusions</b>: The mRNA platform represents a promising strategy for developing TBEV vaccines, demonstrating high immunogenicity and cross-protective efficacy against diverse viral strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010102
Yu Jung Choi, Jungmin Lee, Joon Young Song, Seong-Heon Wie, Jacob Lee, Jin-Soo Lee, Hye Won Jeong, Joong Sik Eom, Jang Wook Sohn, Young Kyung Yoon, Won Suk Choi, Eliel Nham, Jin Gu Yoon, Ji Yun Noh, Man-Seong Park, Hee Jin Cheong
Background/Objectives: Despite high vaccination coverage, influenza remains a public health concern in South Korea, particularly in older adults. Continuous evaluation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is essential to optimize immunization strategies. Methods: This study evaluated seasonal influenza VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza using a test-negative design through a hospital-based influenza surveillance system in South Korea from 1 November 2024, to 30 April 2025. Demographic and clinical information was collected through questionnaire surveys and electronic medical records. Influenza was diagnosed using rapid antigen tests (RATs) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and vaccine effectiveness was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 3954 participants were included, with 1977 influenza-positive cases and 1977 test-negative controls. Influenza A and B accounted for 93.1% and 7.0% of cases, respectively. The adjusted overall VE was 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-30.9; p = 0.002). VE was higher in adults aged 50-64 years (46.8%) than in those aged ≥65 years (18.8%). VE was 19.9% against influenza A and 45.7% against A/H3N2. VE was higher among individuals tested using RT-qPCR than among those tested using RATs (21.5% vs. 15.7%), and was also greater during the early period than during the late period (20.5% vs. 11.4%). Vaccination did not reduce influenza-associated hospitalization risk (VE, 17.3%; 95% CI, -9.3 to 37.4). A significant reduction in hospitalization risk was observed in adults aged 50-64 years (VE, 46.8%), with no significant benefit in those aged ≥65 years. Conclusions: The 2024-2025 seasonal influenza vaccine provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults, with higher effectiveness in those aged 50-64 years.
{"title":"Real-World Effectiveness of Seasonal Influenza Vaccines During the 2024-2025 Season: Subgroup Analyses by Virus Subtype, Time Since Vaccination, and Diagnostic Method.","authors":"Yu Jung Choi, Jungmin Lee, Joon Young Song, Seong-Heon Wie, Jacob Lee, Jin-Soo Lee, Hye Won Jeong, Joong Sik Eom, Jang Wook Sohn, Young Kyung Yoon, Won Suk Choi, Eliel Nham, Jin Gu Yoon, Ji Yun Noh, Man-Seong Park, Hee Jin Cheong","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010102","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite high vaccination coverage, influenza remains a public health concern in South Korea, particularly in older adults. Continuous evaluation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is essential to optimize immunization strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluated seasonal influenza VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza using a test-negative design through a hospital-based influenza surveillance system in South Korea from 1 November 2024, to 30 April 2025. Demographic and clinical information was collected through questionnaire surveys and electronic medical records. Influenza was diagnosed using rapid antigen tests (RATs) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and vaccine effectiveness was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results</b>: In total, 3954 participants were included, with 1977 influenza-positive cases and 1977 test-negative controls. Influenza A and B accounted for 93.1% and 7.0% of cases, respectively. The adjusted overall VE was 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-30.9; <i>p</i> = 0.002). VE was higher in adults aged 50-64 years (46.8%) than in those aged ≥65 years (18.8%). VE was 19.9% against influenza A and 45.7% against A/H3N2. VE was higher among individuals tested using RT-qPCR than among those tested using RATs (21.5% vs. 15.7%), and was also greater during the early period than during the late period (20.5% vs. 11.4%). Vaccination did not reduce influenza-associated hospitalization risk (VE, 17.3%; 95% CI, -9.3 to 37.4). A significant reduction in hospitalization risk was observed in adults aged 50-64 years (VE, 46.8%), with no significant benefit in those aged ≥65 years. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 2024-2025 seasonal influenza vaccine provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults, with higher effectiveness in those aged 50-64 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010104
Francois Xavier Rwandamuriye, Alec J Redwood, Jenette Creaney, Bruce W S Robinson
The development of cancer immunotherapies has transformed cancer treatment paradigms, yet durable and tumour-specific responses remain elusive for many patients. Neoantigens, immunogenic peptides arising from tumour-specific genomic alterations, have emerged as promising cancer vaccine targets. Early-phase clinical trials using different vaccine platforms, including mRNA, peptide, DNA, and viral vector-based personalised cancer vaccines, have demonstrated the feasibility of targeting neoantigens, with early signals of prolonged survival in some patients. Most current vaccine strategies focus on canonical neoantigens, typically derived from exonic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (INDELs), yet this represents only a fraction of the potential neoantigen repertoire. Evidence now shows that non-canonical neoantigens, arising mostly from alternative splicing, intron retention, translation of non-coding RNAs, gene fusions, and retroelement activation, broaden the antigenic landscape, with the potential for increasing tumour specificity and immunogenicity. In this review, we explore the biology of non-canonical neoantigens, the technological advances that now enable their systematic detection, and their potential to inform next-generation personalised cancer vaccines.
{"title":"Hidden Targets in Cancer Immunotherapy: The Potential of \"Dark Matter\" Neoantigens.","authors":"Francois Xavier Rwandamuriye, Alec J Redwood, Jenette Creaney, Bruce W S Robinson","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010104","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of cancer immunotherapies has transformed cancer treatment paradigms, yet durable and tumour-specific responses remain elusive for many patients. Neoantigens, immunogenic peptides arising from tumour-specific genomic alterations, have emerged as promising cancer vaccine targets. Early-phase clinical trials using different vaccine platforms, including mRNA, peptide, DNA, and viral vector-based personalised cancer vaccines, have demonstrated the feasibility of targeting neoantigens, with early signals of prolonged survival in some patients. Most current vaccine strategies focus on canonical neoantigens, typically derived from exonic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (INDELs), yet this represents only a fraction of the potential neoantigen repertoire. Evidence now shows that non-canonical neoantigens, arising mostly from alternative splicing, intron retention, translation of non-coding RNAs, gene fusions, and retroelement activation, broaden the antigenic landscape, with the potential for increasing tumour specificity and immunogenicity. In this review, we explore the biology of non-canonical neoantigens, the technological advances that now enable their systematic detection, and their potential to inform next-generation personalised cancer vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146066655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a significant public health problem due to their impact. Knowledge about them, perceptions of the risk of contracting them, and adherence to prevention strategies such as HPV vaccination are, at various levels, key factors in preventing the spread of STIs. The study therefore aimed to investigate and evaluate, in a group of young Italians, the level of knowledge, perception of risk and propensity to adhere to preventive strategies, including vaccination against papillomavirus. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a questionnaire to young people aged between 16 and 30, residing in four macro-geographical areas, collecting socio-demographic, behavioral and knowledge data. Levels of knowledge about STIs and HPV were classified into four categories (low, medium without awareness, medium with awareness, high). Risk perception was assessed on a scale of 1 to 10. Results: A total of 2576 questionnaires were collected, revealing that general knowledge about STIs is limited: only 12.5% of participants demonstrated a high level of knowledge, while 27.1% demonstrated a low level; with regard to HPV, 41.3% of the sample demonstrated a low level of knowledge. The perception of the risk of contracting HIV and HPV was low in most subjects (average score of approximately 2.9 out of 10), with no significant differences related to levels of knowledge about HPV. Potential adherence to HPV vaccination was high (83.0% considered vaccination useful), but among unvaccinated subjects, almost half expressed concerns about vaccination, related to poor knowledge and mistrust of vaccines in general. Factors associated with a higher frequency of self-reported STIs included older age, transgender identity, non-heterosexual orientation, and risky sexual behavior. Conclusions: The results emerging from the study highlight the urgent need to strengthen educational and preventive interventions aimed at young people. Raising awareness of the risk of contracting STIs and the importance of vaccination are key targets for health promotion interventions.
{"title":"HPV and HIV Among Youth: Exploring the Role of Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Attitude to Vaccination in Prevention Strategies.","authors":"Silvia Cocchio, Andrea Cozza, Matilde Obici, Elisabetta Conte, Claudia Cozzolino Cangiano, Nicoletta Parise, Patrizia Furlan, Vincenzo Baldo","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010101","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a significant public health problem due to their impact. Knowledge about them, perceptions of the risk of contracting them, and adherence to prevention strategies such as HPV vaccination are, at various levels, key factors in preventing the spread of STIs. The study therefore aimed to investigate and evaluate, in a group of young Italians, the level of knowledge, perception of risk and propensity to adhere to preventive strategies, including vaccination against papillomavirus. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a questionnaire to young people aged between 16 and 30, residing in four macro-geographical areas, collecting socio-demographic, behavioral and knowledge data. Levels of knowledge about STIs and HPV were classified into four categories (low, medium without awareness, medium with awareness, high). Risk perception was assessed on a scale of 1 to 10. <b>Results</b>: A total of 2576 questionnaires were collected, revealing that general knowledge about STIs is limited: only 12.5% of participants demonstrated a high level of knowledge, while 27.1% demonstrated a low level; with regard to HPV, 41.3% of the sample demonstrated a low level of knowledge. The perception of the risk of contracting HIV and HPV was low in most subjects (average score of approximately 2.9 out of 10), with no significant differences related to levels of knowledge about HPV. Potential adherence to HPV vaccination was high (83.0% considered vaccination useful), but among unvaccinated subjects, almost half expressed concerns about vaccination, related to poor knowledge and mistrust of vaccines in general. Factors associated with a higher frequency of self-reported STIs included older age, transgender identity, non-heterosexual orientation, and risky sexual behavior. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results emerging from the study highlight the urgent need to strengthen educational and preventive interventions aimed at young people. Raising awareness of the risk of contracting STIs and the importance of vaccination are key targets for health promotion interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146066761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/objectives: An attenuated strain of Micropterus salmoides rhabdovirus (MSRV) 0509 with good immunogenicity has been isolated, showing potential as a candidate for live vaccine development.
Methods: To improve the shelf life of attenuated strain of MSRV0509, the virus was formulated using three distinct single-protectant formulations and twelve thermostable protective agent formulations (designated T1-T12). Following lyophilization, the thermostability of each formulation was evaluated.
Results: Results indicated that formulations T1, T9, and T10 maintained stable viral titers after storage at 25 °C and 37 °C. Moreover, these formulations retained high viral viability after 12 months at 4 °C, with a titer reduction of less than 0.5 log10. Immunological analyses revealed that the freeze-dried MSRV vaccine elicited both humoral and immune factors responses in largemouth bass. Immersion immunization provided effective protection, yielding a survival rate exceeding 80%. Freeze-dried vaccines maintained their immunogenicity (i.e., the ability to induce antibodies) following 12 months of storage at 4 °C. Additionally, expression of IFN-γ and IL-12 was significantly upregulated in fish post-vaccination.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the lyophilized MSRV vaccine developed in this study not only exhibits improved thermostability and extended shelf life, but also effectively preserves its immunogenic properties, supporting its potential for practical aquaculture applications.
{"title":"Preparation and Efficacy Evaluation of Heat-Resistant Freeze-Dried Live-Attenuated Vaccine Formulation of <i>Micropterus salmoides</i> Rhabdovirus.","authors":"Hongru Liang, Guangwei Hu, Xia Luo, Qiang Lin, Xiaozhe Fu, Yinjie Niu, Baofu Ma, Wenwen Xiao, Zhengwei Cui, Ningqiu Li","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010106","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>An attenuated strain of <i>Micropterus salmoides</i> rhabdovirus (MSRV) 0509 with good immunogenicity has been isolated, showing potential as a candidate for live vaccine development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To improve the shelf life of attenuated strain of MSRV0509, the virus was formulated using three distinct single-protectant formulations and twelve thermostable protective agent formulations (designated T1-T12). Following lyophilization, the thermostability of each formulation was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that formulations T1, T9, and T10 maintained stable viral titers after storage at 25 °C and 37 °C. Moreover, these formulations retained high viral viability after 12 months at 4 °C, with a titer reduction of less than 0.5 log<sub>10</sub>. Immunological analyses revealed that the freeze-dried MSRV vaccine elicited both humoral and immune factors responses in largemouth bass. Immersion immunization provided effective protection, yielding a survival rate exceeding 80%. Freeze-dried vaccines maintained their immunogenicity (i.e., the ability to induce antibodies) following 12 months of storage at 4 °C. Additionally, expression of IFN-γ and IL-12 was significantly upregulated in fish post-vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the lyophilized MSRV vaccine developed in this study not only exhibits improved thermostability and extended shelf life, but also effectively preserves its immunogenic properties, supporting its potential for practical aquaculture applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846406/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.3390/vaccines14010096
Bryson T Staley, Michael E DeWitt, Jennifer J Wenner, John W Sanders, Thomas F Wierzba, Katherine Poehling
Background/objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted rural areas across the United States, including rural North Carolina (NC). Consistent with national patterns, COVID-19 vaccination coverage as of December 2022 was higher for non-rural (72%) than rural (58%) NC counties. The role of trusted sources of vaccine information used by rural and non-rural residents is unknown.
Methods: Using data from two surveys distributed by the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership from 8 June 2021 through 21 December 2021, we compared self-reported sources of trusted COVID-19 vaccine information by non-rural and rural counties and by county-level predominant political vote in the 2020 Presidential election.
Results: While NC respondents were highly vaccinated (94%), fewer residents from rural counties self-reported COVID-19 vaccination than those from non-rural counties (91% versus 95%). The most common reported source of trusted vaccine information was federal health agencies. The proportion citing a federal health agency was higher for respondents from non-rural (80%) than rural (72%) counties and was higher for vaccinated (75%) than unvaccinated (42%) rural respondents. The next two most trusted sources of vaccine information were state/local health officials (48%) and health care providers (42%). Among trusted resources reported by 10-15% of respondents, those from rural counties were less likely to use hospital websites, employers, or news sources than those from non-rural counties. More respondents from counties with >60% vote for the 2020 Democratic Presidential candidate cited federal health agencies, state and local officials, and new sources than respondents from counties with >60% vote for the 2020 Republican Presidential candidate.
Conclusions: By identifying the trusted sources of vaccine information for residents in non-rural and rural NC counties, future vaccine implementation efforts can tailor communication efforts to increase vaccine uptake and potentially reduce the rates of hospitalizations and death from vaccine-preventable diseases such as COVID-19 or other future pandemics.
{"title":"Trusted Sources of COVID-19 Vaccine Information by County Characteristics in North Carolina.","authors":"Bryson T Staley, Michael E DeWitt, Jennifer J Wenner, John W Sanders, Thomas F Wierzba, Katherine Poehling","doi":"10.3390/vaccines14010096","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vaccines14010096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted rural areas across the United States, including rural North Carolina (NC). Consistent with national patterns, COVID-19 vaccination coverage as of December 2022 was higher for non-rural (72%) than rural (58%) NC counties. The role of trusted sources of vaccine information used by rural and non-rural residents is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from two surveys distributed by the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership from 8 June 2021 through 21 December 2021, we compared self-reported sources of trusted COVID-19 vaccine information by non-rural and rural counties and by county-level predominant political vote in the 2020 Presidential election.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While NC respondents were highly vaccinated (94%), fewer residents from rural counties self-reported COVID-19 vaccination than those from non-rural counties (91% versus 95%). The most common reported source of trusted vaccine information was federal health agencies. The proportion citing a federal health agency was higher for respondents from non-rural (80%) than rural (72%) counties and was higher for vaccinated (75%) than unvaccinated (42%) rural respondents. The next two most trusted sources of vaccine information were state/local health officials (48%) and health care providers (42%). Among trusted resources reported by 10-15% of respondents, those from rural counties were less likely to use hospital websites, employers, or news sources than those from non-rural counties. More respondents from counties with >60% vote for the 2020 Democratic Presidential candidate cited federal health agencies, state and local officials, and new sources than respondents from counties with >60% vote for the 2020 Republican Presidential candidate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By identifying the trusted sources of vaccine information for residents in non-rural and rural NC counties, future vaccine implementation efforts can tailor communication efforts to increase vaccine uptake and potentially reduce the rates of hospitalizations and death from vaccine-preventable diseases such as COVID-19 or other future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}