Development of a Digital Health Intervention for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (INTERCEPT): Co-Design and Usability Testing Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.2196/63707
Irene Gibson, Lis Neubeck, Marissa Corcoran, Chris Morland, Steve Donovan, Jennifer Jones, Caroline Costello, Lisa Hynes, Aisling Harris, Mary Harrahill, Mary Lillis, Alison Atrey, Chantal F Ski, Vilius Savickas, Molly Byrne, Andrew W Murphy, John William McEvoy, David Wood, Catriona Jennings
{"title":"Development of a Digital Health Intervention for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (INTERCEPT): Co-Design and Usability Testing Study.","authors":"Irene Gibson, Lis Neubeck, Marissa Corcoran, Chris Morland, Steve Donovan, Jennifer Jones, Caroline Costello, Lisa Hynes, Aisling Harris, Mary Harrahill, Mary Lillis, Alison Atrey, Chantal F Ski, Vilius Savickas, Molly Byrne, Andrew W Murphy, John William McEvoy, David Wood, Catriona Jennings","doi":"10.2196/63707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secondary prevention is an important strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the growing evidence for the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for the secondary prevention of CVD, the majority are designed with minimal input from target end users, resulting in poor uptake and usage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to optimize the acceptance and effectiveness of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD through co-design, integrating end users' perspectives throughout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A theory-driven, person-based approach using co-design was adopted for the development of the DHI, known as INTERCEPT. This involved a 4-phase iterative process using online workshops. In phase 1, a stakeholder team of health care professionals, software developers, and public and patient involvement members was established. Phase 2 involved identification of the guiding principles, content, and design features of the DHI. In phase 3, DHI prototypes were reviewed for clarity of language, ease of navigation, and functionality. To anticipate and interpret DHI usage, phase 4 involved usability testing with participants who had a recent cardiac event (<2 years). To assess the potential impact of usability testing, the System Usability Scale was administered before and after testing. The GUIDED (Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development Studies in Health Research) checklist was used to report the development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key design principles were identified: simplicity and ease of use, behavioral change through goal setting and self-monitoring, personalization, system credibility, and social support. Usability testing resulted in 64 recommendations for the app, of which 51 were implemented. Improvements in System Usability Scale scores were observed when comparing the results before and after implementing the recommendations (61 vs 83; P=.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining behavior change theory with a person-based, co-design approach facilitated the development of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD that optimized responsiveness to end users' needs and preferences, thereby potentially improving future engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e63707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Secondary prevention is an important strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the growing evidence for the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for the secondary prevention of CVD, the majority are designed with minimal input from target end users, resulting in poor uptake and usage.

Objective: This study aimed to optimize the acceptance and effectiveness of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD through co-design, integrating end users' perspectives throughout.

Methods: A theory-driven, person-based approach using co-design was adopted for the development of the DHI, known as INTERCEPT. This involved a 4-phase iterative process using online workshops. In phase 1, a stakeholder team of health care professionals, software developers, and public and patient involvement members was established. Phase 2 involved identification of the guiding principles, content, and design features of the DHI. In phase 3, DHI prototypes were reviewed for clarity of language, ease of navigation, and functionality. To anticipate and interpret DHI usage, phase 4 involved usability testing with participants who had a recent cardiac event (<2 years). To assess the potential impact of usability testing, the System Usability Scale was administered before and after testing. The GUIDED (Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development Studies in Health Research) checklist was used to report the development process.

Results: Five key design principles were identified: simplicity and ease of use, behavioral change through goal setting and self-monitoring, personalization, system credibility, and social support. Usability testing resulted in 64 recommendations for the app, of which 51 were implemented. Improvements in System Usability Scale scores were observed when comparing the results before and after implementing the recommendations (61 vs 83; P=.02).

Conclusions: Combining behavior change theory with a person-based, co-design approach facilitated the development of a DHI for the secondary prevention of CVD that optimized responsiveness to end users' needs and preferences, thereby potentially improving future engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发用于心血管疾病二级预防的数字健康干预措施(INTERCEPT):共同设计和可用性测试研究。
背景:二级预防是减轻心血管疾病(CVD)负担的一项重要战略,而心血管疾病是导致全球死亡的主要原因。尽管越来越多的证据表明数字健康干预措施(DHIs)对心血管疾病二级预防的有效性,但大多数数字健康干预措施在设计时只听取了目标终端用户的极少意见,因此其接受度和使用率都很低:本研究旨在通过共同设计优化用于心血管疾病二级预防的数字健康干预措施的接受度和有效性,并将最终用户的观点贯穿始终:在开发名为 INTERCEPT 的 DHI 时,采用了一种以理论为驱动、以人为本的共同设计方法。这包括一个使用在线研讨会的四阶段迭代过程。在第 1 阶段,成立了一个由医疗保健专业人员、软件开发人员以及公众和患者参与成员组成的利益相关者团队。第 2 阶段包括确定 DHI 的指导原则、内容和设计特点。在第 3 阶段,对 DHI 原型进行了审查,以确保语言清晰、导航方便和功能完善。为了预测和解释 DHI 的使用情况,第 4 阶段对近期发生过心脏事件的参与者进行了可用性测试(结果:测试结果显示,DHI 的使用率为 99%:确定了五项关键设计原则:简单易用、通过设定目标和自我监控改变行为、个性化、系统可信度和社会支持。可用性测试为应用程序提出了 64 项建议,其中 51 项已经实施。在比较实施建议前后的结果时,发现系统可用性量表得分有所提高(61 分 vs 83 分;P=.02):将行为改变理论与以人为本的共同设计方法相结合,有助于开发用于心血管疾病二级预防的 DHI,优化对最终用户需求和偏好的响应,从而提高未来的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study. The Promise of AI for Image-Driven Medicine: Qualitative Interview Study of Radiologists' and Pathologists' Perspectives. Mobile App for Improving the Mental Health of Youth in Out-of-Home Care: Development Study Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study. Exploring Patient, Proxy, and Clinician Perspectives on the Value and Impact of an Inpatient Portal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1