An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.2196/66699
Juliane Andrea Düvel, David Lampe, Maren Kirchner, Svenja Elkenkamp, Philipp Cimiano, Christoph Düsing, Hannah Marchi, Sophie Schmiegel, Christiane Fuchs, Simon Claßen, Kirsten-Laura Meier, Rainer Borgstedt, Sebastian Rehberg, Wolfgang Greiner
{"title":"An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.","authors":"Juliane Andrea Düvel, David Lampe, Maren Kirchner, Svenja Elkenkamp, Philipp Cimiano, Christoph Düsing, Hannah Marchi, Sophie Schmiegel, Christiane Fuchs, Simon Claßen, Kirsten-Laura Meier, Rainer Borgstedt, Sebastian Rehberg, Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"10.2196/66699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistances pose significant challenges in health care systems. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) represent a potential strategy for promoting a more targeted and guideline-based use of antibiotics. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into these systems has the potential to support physicians in selecting the most effective drug therapy for a given patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of an AI-based CDSS pilot version for antibiotic therapy in sepsis patients and identify facilitating and inhibiting conditions for its implementation in intensive care medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation was conducted in 2 steps, using a qualitative methodology. Initially, expert interviews were conducted, in which intensive care physicians were asked to assess the AI-based recommendations for antibiotic therapy in terms of plausibility, layout, and design. Subsequently, focus group interviews were conducted to examine the technology acceptance of the AI-based CDSS. The interviews were anonymized and evaluated using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of the feasibility, barriers included variability in previous antibiotic administration practices, which affected the predictive ability of AI recommendations, and the increased effort required to justify deviations from these recommendations. Physicians' confidence in accepting or rejecting recommendations depended on their level of professional experience. The ability to re-evaluate CDSS recommendations and an intuitive, user-friendly system design were identified as factors that enhanced acceptance and usability. Overall, barriers included low levels of digitization in clinical practice, limited availability of cross-sectoral data, and negative previous experiences with CDSSs. Conversely, facilitators to CDSS implementation were potential time savings, physicians' openness to adopting new technologies, and positive previous experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early integration of users is beneficial for both the identification of relevant context factors and the further development of an effective CDSS. Overall, the potential of AI-based CDSSs is offset by inhibiting contextual conditions that impede its acceptance and implementation. The advancement of AI-based CDSSs and the mitigation of these inhibiting conditions are crucial for the realization of its full potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e66699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistances pose significant challenges in health care systems. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) represent a potential strategy for promoting a more targeted and guideline-based use of antibiotics. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into these systems has the potential to support physicians in selecting the most effective drug therapy for a given patient.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of an AI-based CDSS pilot version for antibiotic therapy in sepsis patients and identify facilitating and inhibiting conditions for its implementation in intensive care medicine.

Methods: The evaluation was conducted in 2 steps, using a qualitative methodology. Initially, expert interviews were conducted, in which intensive care physicians were asked to assess the AI-based recommendations for antibiotic therapy in terms of plausibility, layout, and design. Subsequently, focus group interviews were conducted to examine the technology acceptance of the AI-based CDSS. The interviews were anonymized and evaluated using content analysis.

Results: In terms of the feasibility, barriers included variability in previous antibiotic administration practices, which affected the predictive ability of AI recommendations, and the increased effort required to justify deviations from these recommendations. Physicians' confidence in accepting or rejecting recommendations depended on their level of professional experience. The ability to re-evaluate CDSS recommendations and an intuitive, user-friendly system design were identified as factors that enhanced acceptance and usability. Overall, barriers included low levels of digitization in clinical practice, limited availability of cross-sectoral data, and negative previous experiences with CDSSs. Conversely, facilitators to CDSS implementation were potential time savings, physicians' openness to adopting new technologies, and positive previous experiences.

Conclusions: Early integration of users is beneficial for both the identification of relevant context factors and the further development of an effective CDSS. Overall, the potential of AI-based CDSSs is offset by inhibiting contextual conditions that impede its acceptance and implementation. The advancement of AI-based CDSSs and the mitigation of these inhibiting conditions are crucial for the realization of its full potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis. Development and Testing of the Kids Hurt App, a Web-Based, Pain Self-Report App for First Nations Youths: Mixed Methods Study. Understanding Appropriation of Digital Self-Monitoring Tools in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Analysis. The mChoice App, an mHealth Tool for the Monitoring of Preexposure Prophylaxis Adherence and Sexual Behaviors in Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: Usability Evaluation. Challenges to Rehabilitation Services in Sub-Saharan Africa From a User, Health System, and Service Provider Perspective: Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1