Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland.

Q2 Social Sciences Medical Law International Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1177/09685332241269583
Andrea Martani, Nathalie Neeser, Nicolas Vulliemoz, Guido Pennings
{"title":"Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland.","authors":"Andrea Martani, Nathalie Neeser, Nicolas Vulliemoz, Guido Pennings","doi":"10.1177/09685332241269583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Switzerland is one of the most restrictive countries in Europe when it comes to the regulation of egg donation in medically assisted reproduction (MAR). Indeed, even after the introduction of modifications to the law regulating reproductive medicine allowing embryo culture, embryo freezing, and preimplantation genetic testing, egg donation has remained completely forbidden. The absolute ban on egg donation is heavily discussed in academia, society, and politics. After many failed attempts, this prohibition is now on its way to be lifted, after agreement was reached in the legislative institutions. The forthcoming legalisation of egg donation raises, however, several questions on how some aspects of this practice will be regulated. In this contribution, we briefly review the reasons why a ban on egg donation has been present for so long in Switzerland, to then analyse two issues raised by the commitment to lift this ban. First, we reflect on the question of whether the new legislation should introduce chronological age limits for access to heterologous MAR. Second, we consider how the practice of egg sharing could be regulated once egg donation is legal.</p>","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"24 3","pages":"192-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332241269583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Switzerland is one of the most restrictive countries in Europe when it comes to the regulation of egg donation in medically assisted reproduction (MAR). Indeed, even after the introduction of modifications to the law regulating reproductive medicine allowing embryo culture, embryo freezing, and preimplantation genetic testing, egg donation has remained completely forbidden. The absolute ban on egg donation is heavily discussed in academia, society, and politics. After many failed attempts, this prohibition is now on its way to be lifted, after agreement was reached in the legislative institutions. The forthcoming legalisation of egg donation raises, however, several questions on how some aspects of this practice will be regulated. In this contribution, we briefly review the reasons why a ban on egg donation has been present for so long in Switzerland, to then analyse two issues raised by the commitment to lift this ban. First, we reflect on the question of whether the new legislation should introduce chronological age limits for access to heterologous MAR. Second, we consider how the practice of egg sharing could be regulated once egg donation is legal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士卵子捐赠立法面临的挑战。
瑞士是欧洲对医学辅助生殖(MAR)中卵子捐赠管理最严格的国家之一。事实上,即使在对生殖医学法律进行修改,允许胚胎培养、胚胎冷冻和胚胎植入前基因检测后,卵子捐赠仍被完全禁止。学术界、社会和政界对绝对禁止捐卵进行了大量讨论。经过多次尝试失败后,在立法机构达成一致意见后,这一禁令即将被取消。然而,即将到来的捐卵合法化引发了一些问题,即如何对这一做法的某些方面进行监管。在本文中,我们将简要回顾瑞士长期以来禁止捐献卵子的原因,然后分析承诺取消这一禁令所引发的两个问题。首先,我们思考了新立法是否应引入获取异源 MAR 的年龄限制问题。其次,我们考虑一旦卵子捐赠合法化,如何规范共享卵子的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
期刊最新文献
Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland. Book review: Not What the Bus Promised: Health Governance After Brexit Accessing third-party research databases for criminal investigations: Enhancing legal protections and safeguarding public interests Book review: The Disability Bioethics Reader Book review: The Right to Be Protected From Committing Suicide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1