[Role of the Pharmacotherapeutic Monitoring Service (PMS) of the Community Pharmacy in the detection and resolution of adverse reactions to statins linked to possible diagnostic errors in elderly patients].

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Farmaceuticos Comunitarios Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2024).21
Diana Laura García Martín
{"title":"[Role of the Pharmacotherapeutic Monitoring Service (PMS) of the Community Pharmacy in the detection and resolution of adverse reactions to statins linked to possible diagnostic errors in elderly patients].","authors":"Diana Laura García Martín","doi":"10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2024).21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Medication Review in the Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-up Service (PFS) seems to be an effective method to study long-term drug safety in the outpatient setting. The adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are not immediately obvious are difficult to identify and sometimes can be confused with a more common condition. Misdiagnosis by not associating the symptoms of AMR to its pharmacological cause causes its masking and hinders its detection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Detect in the SFT service the diagnostic errors related to the non-detection of adverse reactions to statins.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The data obtained from the medication review at the Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-up Service (PFS) were pooled for analysis. The patients who received the service were selected with the \"DLGM screening\" tool, an acronym \"Diagnosis load Generated by Medications\", that allows us to describe adverse drug reactions (ADRs), when their symptoms are attributed to a pathology, without considering medication as a possible underlying cause.Only the results of patients over 60 years of age, who after a prolonged period of statin use gradually presented musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and other symptoms theoretically described as possible ADRs, are shown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 66 % of the cases, corresponding to 14 patients out of a total of 21 studied, the physician modified the treatment and in 92% of these cases there was improvement and a decrease of the consumption of analgesics drug, anti-inflammatory and other drugs used to treat ADR symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLGM screening identified hidden AMRs in 62 % of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40648,"journal":{"name":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","volume":"16 4","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmaceuticos Comunitarios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2024).21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Medication Review in the Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-up Service (PFS) seems to be an effective method to study long-term drug safety in the outpatient setting. The adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are not immediately obvious are difficult to identify and sometimes can be confused with a more common condition. Misdiagnosis by not associating the symptoms of AMR to its pharmacological cause causes its masking and hinders its detection.

Objective: Detect in the SFT service the diagnostic errors related to the non-detection of adverse reactions to statins.

Material and methods: The data obtained from the medication review at the Pharmacotherapeutic Follow-up Service (PFS) were pooled for analysis. The patients who received the service were selected with the "DLGM screening" tool, an acronym "Diagnosis load Generated by Medications", that allows us to describe adverse drug reactions (ADRs), when their symptoms are attributed to a pathology, without considering medication as a possible underlying cause.Only the results of patients over 60 years of age, who after a prolonged period of statin use gradually presented musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and other symptoms theoretically described as possible ADRs, are shown.

Results: In 66 % of the cases, corresponding to 14 patients out of a total of 21 studied, the physician modified the treatment and in 92% of these cases there was improvement and a decrease of the consumption of analgesics drug, anti-inflammatory and other drugs used to treat ADR symptoms.

Conclusion: DLGM screening identified hidden AMRs in 62 % of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[社区药房的药物治疗监测服务(PMS)在发现和解决与老年患者可能的诊断错误有关的他汀类药物不良反应中的作用]。
简介药物治疗随访服务(PFS)的用药回顾似乎是在门诊环境中研究长期用药安全性的有效方法。不明显的药物不良反应(ADRs)很难识别,有时会与更常见的疾病相混淆。由于没有将药物不良反应的症状与其药理原因联系起来,导致误诊,从而掩盖了药物不良反应,阻碍了药物不良反应的检测:材料与方法:汇总分析药物治疗随访服务(PFS)的药物审查数据。接受该服务的患者是通过 "DLGM 筛选 "工具筛选出来的。"DLGM "是 "Diagnosis load generated by Medications"(由药物产生的诊断负荷)的首字母缩写,它允许我们描述药物不良反应(ADRs),当患者的症状被归因于病理,而不将药物视为可能的根本原因时。结果显示,只有 60 岁以上的患者在长期服用他汀类药物后逐渐出现肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)和其他理论上可能被描述为药物不良反应的症状:结果:在研究的 21 名患者中,有 66% 的患者(即 14 名患者)接受了医生的治疗,其中 92% 的患者病情有所改善,并减少了镇痛药、消炎药和其他用于治疗 ADR 症状的药物的用量:结论:DLGM 筛查发现了 62% 的患者体内隐藏的 AMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios
Farmaceuticos Comunitarios HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
351
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
[SEFAC 2025 Conference: Community pharmacy facing the challenge of specialisation and change]. [Impact of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring on patient health in remote areas: the role of Community Pharmacy]. [Strong Professional identity construction as a change lever]. [Role of Community Pharmacies in the Secondary Prevention of Skin Cancer]. [MUR and MCA: allies to guarantee therapeutic success].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1