Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8955970
Arvinder S Soin, Kamal S Yadav, Fysal Valappil, Nikhitha Shetty, Raghav Bansal, Suchet Chaudhary, Ankur Gupta, Amit Rastogi, Prashant Bhangui
{"title":"Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques.","authors":"Arvinder S Soin, Kamal S Yadav, Fysal Valappil, Nikhitha Shetty, Raghav Bansal, Suchet Chaudhary, Ankur Gupta, Amit Rastogi, Prashant Bhangui","doi":"10.1155/2024/8955970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH), hepatic duct division (HDD) and its stump closure technique are of paramount importance in avoiding postoperative biliary complications in both donors and recipients. We describe our novel triple C (\"clip-clamp-cut\") technique of HDD. <b>Methods:</b> Out of 4016 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) (2004-October 2023), we have performed 208 RDH cases since December 2019. This study is a retrospective analysis of the first 160 RDH cases. After excluding the first 20 RDH cases (learning curve) and 3 left-sided RDH cases, 137 cases with no exclusion criteria were included. We divided these 137 donors into the \"cut and suture\" (CS) group (<i>n</i> = 33) and the \"triple C\" technique group (<i>n</i> = 104). We compared intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes. <b>Results:</b> All 137 robotic donors and 128/137 recipients are currently well. Donor biliary leak rate was significantly lower among the triple C group (<i>n</i> = 3, 2.9%) compared to the CS group (<i>n</i> = 5, 15.2%) (<i>p</i>=0.009). No other differences in postdonation morbidity were observed among the two groups. Recipient biliary complication rate was lower in the triple C group than in the CS group although not statistically significant (10.6% vs. 15.1%; <i>p</i>=0.537), despite more multiple biliary anastomoses in the former. No significant differences in post-transplant recipient morbidity and mortality were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our simple yet novel triple C technique enables clean, precise, bloodless HDD resulting in lower donor and potentially recipient biliary complication rates. The ease and reproducibility make it ideal for widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8955970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH), hepatic duct division (HDD) and its stump closure technique are of paramount importance in avoiding postoperative biliary complications in both donors and recipients. We describe our novel triple C ("clip-clamp-cut") technique of HDD. Methods: Out of 4016 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) (2004-October 2023), we have performed 208 RDH cases since December 2019. This study is a retrospective analysis of the first 160 RDH cases. After excluding the first 20 RDH cases (learning curve) and 3 left-sided RDH cases, 137 cases with no exclusion criteria were included. We divided these 137 donors into the "cut and suture" (CS) group (n = 33) and the "triple C" technique group (n = 104). We compared intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes. Results: All 137 robotic donors and 128/137 recipients are currently well. Donor biliary leak rate was significantly lower among the triple C group (n = 3, 2.9%) compared to the CS group (n = 5, 15.2%) (p=0.009). No other differences in postdonation morbidity were observed among the two groups. Recipient biliary complication rate was lower in the triple C group than in the CS group although not statistically significant (10.6% vs. 15.1%; p=0.537), despite more multiple biliary anastomoses in the former. No significant differences in post-transplant recipient morbidity and mortality were observed. Conclusions: Our simple yet novel triple C technique enables clean, precise, bloodless HDD resulting in lower donor and potentially recipient biliary complication rates. The ease and reproducibility make it ideal for widespread adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人活体供体肝切除术中的肝管分割:新型三C(夹钳-钳子-切割)技术与切割-缝合技术的比较
背景:在机器人供体肝切除术(RDH)中,肝管分割(HDD)及其残端闭合技术对于避免供体和受体术后胆道并发症至关重要。我们介绍了新颖的三C("夹-钳-切")肝管分割技术。方法:在 4016 例活体肝移植(LDLT)(2004 年至 2023 年 10 月)中,我们自 2019 年 12 月以来已完成 208 例 RDH。本研究是对前 160 例 RDH 的回顾性分析。在排除了前20例RDH病例(学习曲线)和3例左侧RDH病例后,纳入了137例无排除标准的病例。我们将这 137 例供体分为 "切开缝合"(CS)组(33 例)和 "三C "技术组(104 例)。我们比较了术中细节和术后结果。结果137例机器人供体和128/137例受体目前状况良好。与CS组(5人,15.2%)相比,三C组的供体胆漏率(3人,2.9%)明显较低(P=0.009)。两组在捐献后发病率方面没有其他差异。三联 C 组的受者胆道并发症发生率低于 CS 组,但无统计学意义(10.6% vs. 15.1%;P=0.537),尽管前者多处胆道吻合。移植后受者的发病率和死亡率无明显差异。结论:我们简单而新颖的三重 C 技术实现了干净、精确、无血的 HDD,从而降低了供体和潜在受体的胆道并发症发生率。该技术的简便性和可重复性使其成为广泛采用的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Pneumoperitoneum After Lung Transplantation: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques. Psychosocial Trauma History Negatively Impacts Liver Transplant Access in Women with Chronic Liver Disease. Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet. Addressing Kidney Transplant Shortage: The Potential of Kidney Paired Exchanges in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1