Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6908005
Mohammed Ageel
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.","authors":"Mohammed Ageel","doi":"10.1155/2024/6908005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Simulation-based learning (SBL) is increasingly used in medical education to prepare students for clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction and self-confidence of final-year medical students after attending SBL in critical care medicine. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted among 117 final-year medical students at Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. Participants attended SBL sessions focusing on critical care skills and scenarios. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic information and the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. Statistical analyses included descriptive and inferential statistics. <b>Results:</b> The study population comprised 61.54% females and 38.46% males, with a majority aged 24 years. Students who rated their overall learning experience as \"Good\" showed significantly higher satisfaction (4.20 ± 0.77) and self-confidence (4.20 ± 0.69) scores. The overall mean scores for satisfaction and self-confidence were 3.71 ± 0.88 and 3.70 ± 0.87, respectively. A strong positive correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) was found between satisfaction and self-confidence levels. The highest satisfaction and self-confidence scores were associated with the variety of learning materials and the instructors' helpfulness. <b>Conclusion:</b> The SBL intervention was effective in enhancing student satisfaction and self-confidence in critical care medicine. The strong correlation between satisfaction and self-confidence highlights the importance of well-designed SBL programs in preparing medical students for clinical practice in critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6908005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning (SBL) is increasingly used in medical education to prepare students for clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction and self-confidence of final-year medical students after attending SBL in critical care medicine. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 117 final-year medical students at Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. Participants attended SBL sessions focusing on critical care skills and scenarios. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic information and the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. Statistical analyses included descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The study population comprised 61.54% females and 38.46% males, with a majority aged 24 years. Students who rated their overall learning experience as "Good" showed significantly higher satisfaction (4.20 ± 0.77) and self-confidence (4.20 ± 0.69) scores. The overall mean scores for satisfaction and self-confidence were 3.71 ± 0.88 and 3.70 ± 0.87, respectively. A strong positive correlation (p < 0.001) was found between satisfaction and self-confidence levels. The highest satisfaction and self-confidence scores were associated with the variety of learning materials and the instructors' helpfulness. Conclusion: The SBL intervention was effective in enhancing student satisfaction and self-confidence in critical care medicine. The strong correlation between satisfaction and self-confidence highlights the importance of well-designed SBL programs in preparing medical students for clinical practice in critical care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估模拟学习对重症医学专业学生满意度和自信心的影响。
背景:医学教育中越来越多地使用模拟学习(SBL)来帮助学生为临床实践做好准备。本研究旨在评估重症医学专业应届医学生参加 SBL 后的满意度和自信心。研究方法在沙特阿拉伯贾赞大学的 117 名应届医学生中开展了一项横断面研究。参与者参加了以重症监护技能和情景为重点的 SBL 课程。研究采用自填式问卷收集数据,其中包括人口统计学信息和学生满意度与学习自信心量表。统计分析包括描述性统计和推论性统计。研究结果研究对象中女性占 61.54%,男性占 38.46%,年龄大多为 24 岁。总体学习体验被评为 "好 "的学生的满意度(4.20 ± 0.77)和自信心(4.20 ± 0.69)得分明显更高。满意度和自信心的总平均分分别为 3.71 ± 0.88 和 3.70 ± 0.87。满意度和自信心水平之间存在很强的正相关性(p < 0.001)。满意度和自信心得分最高的是学习材料的多样性和教师的乐于助人。结论SBL 干预能有效提高重症医学专业学生的满意度和自信心。满意度和自信心之间的强相关性凸显了精心设计的 SBL 课程在帮助医学生为重症医学临床实践做好准备方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine. A Comparison of the Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a Low-Middle-Income Country. Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study: Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1