Improving midwives' management of occiput-posterior fetal positions: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000473
Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin, Yolanda Del Campo-Sanz, Almudena Conde-Sanz, Maria Montserrat Fernadez-Gamazo, Virginia Garcimartin-Galica, Maria Eugenia Gomez De Enterria-Cuesta, Maria Gonzalez-Hernandez, Ernesto Lobo-Perez, Maria Inmaculada Sanchez-Peña
{"title":"Improving midwives' management of occiput-posterior fetal positions: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin, Yolanda Del Campo-Sanz, Almudena Conde-Sanz, Maria Montserrat Fernadez-Gamazo, Virginia Garcimartin-Galica, Maria Eugenia Gomez De Enterria-Cuesta, Maria Gonzalez-Hernandez, Ernesto Lobo-Perez, Maria Inmaculada Sanchez-Peña","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The occiput-posterior (OP) fetal position is the most frequent form of labor dystocia. This position has been associated with delaying the second stage of labor and adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project aimed to improve the quality of intrapartum care provided by midwives for OP fetal positions during the second stage of labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This best practice implementation project was conducted at the Río Hortega University Hospital in Valladolid, Spain. The project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is based on an audit, feedback, and re-audit process. Current practices were compared against best practices in a baseline audit using 13 audit criteria. Barriers to compliance with best practices were identified and improvement strategies were implemented. An initial follow-up audit was carried out after 4 months to avoid secondary bias. After another 4 months, a second follow-up audit was conducted. Data were collected and compared using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed an improvement in all structure criteria (1-3), five of the process criteria (4-6, 8, 10), and all results criteria (11-13). One process criterion (8) reached maximum compliance in all audits. A key finding was the inadequate recording of upright positions (criterion 7) and the interpretation of cardiotocography (criterion 9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence-based interventions for managing OP labor improved the quality of care and underlined the importance of ongoing training for midwives. Additional studies are required on positions and fetal monitoring during labor.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A279.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The occiput-posterior (OP) fetal position is the most frequent form of labor dystocia. This position has been associated with delaying the second stage of labor and adverse outcomes.

Objectives: This project aimed to improve the quality of intrapartum care provided by midwives for OP fetal positions during the second stage of labor.

Methods: This best practice implementation project was conducted at the Río Hortega University Hospital in Valladolid, Spain. The project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is based on an audit, feedback, and re-audit process. Current practices were compared against best practices in a baseline audit using 13 audit criteria. Barriers to compliance with best practices were identified and improvement strategies were implemented. An initial follow-up audit was carried out after 4 months to avoid secondary bias. After another 4 months, a second follow-up audit was conducted. Data were collected and compared using the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES).

Results: The results revealed an improvement in all structure criteria (1-3), five of the process criteria (4-6, 8, 10), and all results criteria (11-13). One process criterion (8) reached maximum compliance in all audits. A key finding was the inadequate recording of upright positions (criterion 7) and the interpretation of cardiotocography (criterion 9).

Conclusions: Evidence-based interventions for managing OP labor improved the quality of care and underlined the importance of ongoing training for midwives. Additional studies are required on positions and fetal monitoring during labor.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A279.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善助产士对枕后位胎位的管理:最佳实践实施项目。
引言枕后位(OP)胎位是最常见的难产形式。这种胎位与第二产程延迟和不良结局有关:该项目旨在提高助产士在第二产程中对 OP 胎位的产前护理质量:该最佳实践实施项目在西班牙巴利亚多利德的 Río Hortega 大学医院开展。该项目遵循 JBI 证据实施框架,该框架基于审核、反馈和再审核流程。在基线审计中,使用 13 项审计标准将当前实践与最佳实践进行比较。确定了遵守最佳做法的障碍,并实施了改进战略。4 个月后进行首次跟踪审计,以避免二次偏差。4 个月后,又进行了第二次跟踪审计。使用 JBI 临床证据实际应用系统(JBI PACES)收集数据并进行比较:结果显示,所有结构标准(1-3)、五项过程标准(4-6、8、10)和所有结果标准(11-13)都有所改善。有一项过程标准(8)在所有审核中都达到了最高标准。一个重要发现是直立体位记录(标准 7)和心动图解释(标准 9)不充分:以证据为基础的助产干预提高了护理质量,并强调了助产士持续培训的重要性。需要对分娩过程中的体位和胎儿监护进行更多研究。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A279。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the risk of postnatal depression in mothers receiving the health visiting service: a best practice implementation project. SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it. Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1