Utopia of Safe Air: How Soviet Research Challenged Western Air Quality Norms, 1950s-1960s.

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1093/jhmas/jrae035
Janne Mäkiranta
{"title":"Utopia of Safe Air: How Soviet Research Challenged Western Air Quality Norms, 1950s-1960s.","authors":"Janne Mäkiranta","doi":"10.1093/jhmas/jrae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the mid-twentieth century, the Soviet Union developed ambitious hygiene standards for clean air that were grounded in extremely sensitive methods of physiological research. As Western experts sought to develop universal standards for environmental regulation, Soviet hygiene research posed a challenge. This article examines the discussions surrounding the Soviet approach at international conferences on air pollution and industrial hygiene during the mid-twentieth century. The article shows that although the Soviet approach was rejected especially by United States experts, many of its qualities resonated with the ongoing discussions about environmental health in the US. The sensitive and holistic methods of the Soviets were compelling in the effort to reveal the most subtle effects environments had on human health. This article shows how the rejection of Soviet standards stemmed not from different scientific methods but from the differences in the overall ideals of environmental regulation. I argue that Soviet hygiene can be seen as an extreme version of technocratic expertise, and its failure highlights the limits of scientific expertise in managing environmental pollution.</p>","PeriodicalId":49998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrae035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the mid-twentieth century, the Soviet Union developed ambitious hygiene standards for clean air that were grounded in extremely sensitive methods of physiological research. As Western experts sought to develop universal standards for environmental regulation, Soviet hygiene research posed a challenge. This article examines the discussions surrounding the Soviet approach at international conferences on air pollution and industrial hygiene during the mid-twentieth century. The article shows that although the Soviet approach was rejected especially by United States experts, many of its qualities resonated with the ongoing discussions about environmental health in the US. The sensitive and holistic methods of the Soviets were compelling in the effort to reveal the most subtle effects environments had on human health. This article shows how the rejection of Soviet standards stemmed not from different scientific methods but from the differences in the overall ideals of environmental regulation. I argue that Soviet hygiene can be seen as an extreme version of technocratic expertise, and its failure highlights the limits of scientific expertise in managing environmental pollution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全空气的乌托邦:20 世纪 50 年代至 60 年代苏联研究如何挑战西方空气质量标准》(Utopia of Safe Air: How Soviet Research Challenged Western Air Quality Norms, 1950s-1960s.
二十世纪中期,苏联制定了雄心勃勃的清洁空气卫生标准,这些标准以极其敏感的生理研究方法为基础。当西方专家试图制定环境监管的通用标准时,苏联的卫生研究提出了挑战。本文研究了二十世纪中期在有关空气污染和工业卫生的国际会议上围绕苏联方法展开的讨论。文章表明,尽管苏联的方法尤其遭到美国专家的反对,但它的许多特质与美国正在进行的有关环境卫生的讨论产生了共鸣。在揭示环境对人类健康最微妙影响的努力中,苏联人敏感而全面的方法令人信服。本文阐述了苏联标准遭到拒绝的原因,不是因为科学方法不同,而是因为环境监管的总体理想不同。我认为,苏联的卫生标准可以被视为技术官僚专业知识的极端版本,它的失败凸显了科学专业知识在管理环境污染方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Started in 1946, the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences is internationally recognized as one of the top publications in its field. The journal''s coverage is broad, publishing the latest original research on the written beginnings of medicine in all its aspects. When possible and appropriate, it focuses on what practitioners of the healing arts did or taught, and how their peers, as well as patients, received and interpreted their efforts. Subscribers include clinicians and hospital libraries, as well as academic and public historians.
期刊最新文献
Utopia of Safe Air: How Soviet Research Challenged Western Air Quality Norms, 1950s-1960s. "Nerves Need Nourishment": Advertising Phospho-Energon Pills in Early Twentieth-Century Sweden. Prescribing Information: Elizabeth B. Connell, the Pill, and the (Woman) Patient's Peace of Mind. The End of the Beginning? Temporality and Bioagency in Pandemic Research. Re-Writing Pandemic Histories: Introduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1