Fast feature- and category-related parafoveal previewing support free visual exploration.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0841-24.2024
Camille Fakche, Clayton Hickey, Ole Jensen
{"title":"Fast feature- and category-related parafoveal previewing support free visual exploration.","authors":"Camille Fakche, Clayton Hickey, Ole Jensen","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0841-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While humans typically saccade every ∼250 ms in natural settings, studies on vision tend to prevent or restrict eye movements. As it takes ∼50 ms to initiate and execute a saccade, this leaves only ∼200 ms to identify the fixated object and select the next saccade goal. How much detail can be derived about parafoveal objects in this short time interval, during which foveal processing and saccade planning both occur? Here, we had male and female human participants freely explore a set of natural images while we recorded magnetoencephalography and eye movements. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we demonstrate that future parafoveal images could be decoded at the feature and category level with peak decoding at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, while the decoding of fixated objects at the feature and category level peaked at ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. The decoding of features and categories was contingent on the objects being saccade goals. In sum, we provide insight on the neuronal mechanism of pre-saccadic attention by demonstrating that feature and category specific information of foveal and parafoveal objects can be extracted in succession within a ∼200 ms intersaccadic interval. These findings rule out strict serial or parallel processing accounts but are consistent with a pipeline mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.<b>Significance Statement</b> We provide neural evidence that future parafoveal saccade goals are processed surprisingly quickly at the feature and the category level before we saccade to them. Specifically, using multivariate pattern analysis applied to magnetoencephalography and eye-tracking data, we found that information about the colour and the category of parafoveal objects emerged at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, with the same information about foveal objects emerging ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. Our findings provide novel insight into the neuronal dynamics of parafoveal previewing during free visual exploration. The dynamics rule out strict serial or parallel processing, but are consistent with a pipelining mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0841-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While humans typically saccade every ∼250 ms in natural settings, studies on vision tend to prevent or restrict eye movements. As it takes ∼50 ms to initiate and execute a saccade, this leaves only ∼200 ms to identify the fixated object and select the next saccade goal. How much detail can be derived about parafoveal objects in this short time interval, during which foveal processing and saccade planning both occur? Here, we had male and female human participants freely explore a set of natural images while we recorded magnetoencephalography and eye movements. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we demonstrate that future parafoveal images could be decoded at the feature and category level with peak decoding at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, while the decoding of fixated objects at the feature and category level peaked at ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. The decoding of features and categories was contingent on the objects being saccade goals. In sum, we provide insight on the neuronal mechanism of pre-saccadic attention by demonstrating that feature and category specific information of foveal and parafoveal objects can be extracted in succession within a ∼200 ms intersaccadic interval. These findings rule out strict serial or parallel processing accounts but are consistent with a pipeline mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.Significance Statement We provide neural evidence that future parafoveal saccade goals are processed surprisingly quickly at the feature and the category level before we saccade to them. Specifically, using multivariate pattern analysis applied to magnetoencephalography and eye-tracking data, we found that information about the colour and the category of parafoveal objects emerged at ∼110 ms and ∼165 ms respectively, with the same information about foveal objects emerging ∼100 ms and ∼145 ms. Our findings provide novel insight into the neuronal dynamics of parafoveal previewing during free visual exploration. The dynamics rule out strict serial or parallel processing, but are consistent with a pipelining mechanism in which foveal and parafoveal objects are processed in parallel but at different levels in the visual hierarchy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与特征和类别相关的快速视网膜旁预览支持自由视觉探索。
在自然环境中,人类通常每隔 ∼250 毫秒就会进行一次眼跳,但视觉研究往往会阻止或限制眼球运动。由于启动和执行一个囊回需要 50 毫秒,因此只有 200 毫秒的时间来识别固定物体和选择下一个囊回目标。在眼窝处理和囊状动作计划同时进行的这一短暂时间间隔内,能获得多少关于视网膜旁物体的细节呢?在这里,我们让男女人类参与者自由探索一组自然图像,同时记录脑磁图和眼球运动。通过多变量模式分析,我们证明了未来的视网膜旁图像可以在特征和类别水平上解码,解码峰值分别为 ∼110 ms 和 ∼165 ms,而固定物体在特征和类别水平上的解码峰值分别为 ∼100 ms 和 ∼145 ms。对特征和类别的解码取决于物体是否是囊泡目标。总之,我们通过证明在∼200 ms的囊回间隔内可以连续提取眼窝和眼旁物体的特征和类别信息,对囊回前注意的神经元机制进行了深入研究。这些发现排除了严格的串行或并行处理的说法,但与一种流水线机制相一致,在这种机制中,眼窝和视网膜旁的物体是并行处理的,但在视觉层次结构中处于不同的水平。 意义声明 我们提供的神经证据表明,未来视网膜旁的囊状视线目标在我们向其进行囊状视线前,在特征和类别水平上的处理速度之快令人惊讶。具体来说,通过对脑磁图和眼动跟踪数据进行多变量模式分析,我们发现视网膜旁物体的颜色和类别信息分别在 110 毫秒和 165 毫秒时出现,而视网膜物体的相同信息则分别在 100 毫秒和 145 毫秒时出现。我们的研究结果为自由视觉探索过程中眼窝旁预览的神经元动力学提供了新的见解。这些动态变化排除了严格的串行或并行处理,但与流水线机制相一致,即在视觉层次结构的不同层次上并行处理视网膜和视网膜旁的物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response. Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Face-Specific Attention during Goal-Directed Visual Search. Monosynaptic Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Glutamate and GABA Co-transmitting Neurons. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field. Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1