Oculomotor contributions to foveal crowding.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0594-24.2024
Ashley M Clark, Aaron Huynh, Martina Poletti
{"title":"Oculomotor contributions to foveal crowding.","authors":"Ashley M Clark, Aaron Huynh, Martina Poletti","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0594-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crowding, the phenomenon of impaired visual discrimination due to nearby objects, has been extensively studied and linked to cortical mechanisms. Traditionally, crowding has been studied extrafoveally; its underlying mechanisms in the central fovea, where acuity is highest, remain de-bated. While low-level oculomotor factors are not thought to play a role in crowding, this study shows that they are key factors in defining foveal crowding. Here we investigate the influence of fixational behavior on foveal crowding and provide a comprehensive assessment of the magnitude and extent of this phenomenon (N=13 human participants, 4 males). Leveraging on a unique blend of tools for high-precision eyetracking and retinal stabilization, we show that removing the retinal motion introduced by oculomotor behavior with retinal stabilization, diminishes the negative effects of crowding. Ultimately, these results indicate that ocular drift contributes to foveal crowding re-sulting in the same pooling region being stimulated both by the target and nearby objects over the course of time, not just in space. The temporal aspect of this phenomenon is peculiar to crowding at this scale and indicates that the mechanisms contributing to foveal and extrafoveal crowding differ.<b>Significance Statement:</b> Foveated stimuli are often crowded. The effects of crowding have been extensively studied in the visual periphery and are thought to have a cortical origin. Nonetheless, foveal crowding mechanisms remain elusive. Here we show that acuity drops by two lines on a Snellen Chart when flankers surround a stimulus presented at the very center of gaze. Further, at this scale, crowding cannot be regarded as a purely cortical phenomenon. Because foveal neurons' receptive fields are the smallest, eye jitter during fixation introduces spatial uncertainty by sweeping target and surrounding distractors over the same cortical pooling region even during short fixation periods, exacerbating crowding effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0594-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crowding, the phenomenon of impaired visual discrimination due to nearby objects, has been extensively studied and linked to cortical mechanisms. Traditionally, crowding has been studied extrafoveally; its underlying mechanisms in the central fovea, where acuity is highest, remain de-bated. While low-level oculomotor factors are not thought to play a role in crowding, this study shows that they are key factors in defining foveal crowding. Here we investigate the influence of fixational behavior on foveal crowding and provide a comprehensive assessment of the magnitude and extent of this phenomenon (N=13 human participants, 4 males). Leveraging on a unique blend of tools for high-precision eyetracking and retinal stabilization, we show that removing the retinal motion introduced by oculomotor behavior with retinal stabilization, diminishes the negative effects of crowding. Ultimately, these results indicate that ocular drift contributes to foveal crowding re-sulting in the same pooling region being stimulated both by the target and nearby objects over the course of time, not just in space. The temporal aspect of this phenomenon is peculiar to crowding at this scale and indicates that the mechanisms contributing to foveal and extrafoveal crowding differ.Significance Statement: Foveated stimuli are often crowded. The effects of crowding have been extensively studied in the visual periphery and are thought to have a cortical origin. Nonetheless, foveal crowding mechanisms remain elusive. Here we show that acuity drops by two lines on a Snellen Chart when flankers surround a stimulus presented at the very center of gaze. Further, at this scale, crowding cannot be regarded as a purely cortical phenomenon. Because foveal neurons' receptive fields are the smallest, eye jitter during fixation introduces spatial uncertainty by sweeping target and surrounding distractors over the same cortical pooling region even during short fixation periods, exacerbating crowding effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼球运动对眼窝拥挤的影响
拥挤是由于附近物体导致视觉辨别能力受损的现象,这种现象已被广泛研究,并与大脑皮层机制有关。传统上,拥挤现象一直是在眼窝外进行研究的;其在视敏度最高的中央眼窝的潜在机制仍未被研究清楚。虽然低水平的眼球运动因素不被认为在拥挤中发挥作用,但本研究表明,它们是界定眼窝拥挤的关键因素。在此,我们研究了固定行为对眼窝拥挤的影响,并对这一现象的程度和范围进行了全面评估(13 名人类参与者,4 名男性)。利用高精度眼球跟踪和视网膜稳定的独特混合工具,我们表明,通过视网膜稳定消除眼球运动行为带来的视网膜运动,可以减少拥挤的负面影响。最终,这些结果表明,眼球漂移会导致眼窝拥挤,使同一集合区域在时间上而不仅仅是空间上同时受到目标和附近物体的刺激。这种现象的时间性是这种规模的拥挤现象所特有的,并表明造成眼窝和眼外拥挤的机制是不同的:有眼窝的刺激物往往是拥挤的。人们已经对视觉周边的拥挤效应进行了广泛研究,并认为其起源于大脑皮层。然而,眼窝拥挤机制仍然难以捉摸。在这里,我们展示了当侧翼物体围绕着一个呈现在注视中心的刺激物时,斯奈伦视力表上的敏锐度会下降两条线。此外,在这一范围内,拥挤不能被视为纯粹的皮质现象。由于眼窝神经元的感受野最小,因此即使在短暂的固定期间,眼球在固定过程中的抖动也会将目标物和周围的干扰物扫过同一皮层集合区域,从而引入空间不确定性,加剧拥挤效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response. Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Face-Specific Attention during Goal-Directed Visual Search. Monosynaptic Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Glutamate and GABA Co-transmitting Neurons. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field. Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1