Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.

Abdur Jamil, Zaheer Qureshi, Rimsha Siddique, Faryal Altaf, Hamzah Akram
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Other Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdur Jamil, Zaheer Qureshi, Rimsha Siddique, Faryal Altaf, Hamzah Akram","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, both as monotherapy and in combination with other (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) TKIs, compared with other TKIs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for relevant studies from inception to February 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Eligible studies reported on the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib alone or in combination with other TKIs versus other TKIs for metastatic RCC. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Lenvatinib, especially in combination therapies, significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.54, P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P<0.001) compared with other TKIs. Quality of life analyses showed mixed results, with EQ-5D demonstrating significant improvement (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.90-1.53, P<0.001), while EORTC QLQ-C30 was not statistically significant. ORR analysis indicated a higher likelihood of achieving a complete or partial response with lenvatinib (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.15-2.93, P=0.00). The analysis of total AEs above grade 3 showed no significant difference between lenvatinib and other TKIs (OR: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.06, P=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lenvatinib significantly enhances survival outcomes in metastatic RCC patients compared with other TKIs. While associated with various adverse events, its safety profile is comparable to other TKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, both as monotherapy and in combination with other (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) TKIs, compared with other TKIs in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment.

Methods: We searched for relevant studies from inception to February 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Eligible studies reported on the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib alone or in combination with other TKIs versus other TKIs for metastatic RCC. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Lenvatinib, especially in combination therapies, significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.54, P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P<0.001) compared with other TKIs. Quality of life analyses showed mixed results, with EQ-5D demonstrating significant improvement (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.90-1.53, P<0.001), while EORTC QLQ-C30 was not statistically significant. ORR analysis indicated a higher likelihood of achieving a complete or partial response with lenvatinib (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.15-2.93, P=0.00). The analysis of total AEs above grade 3 showed no significant difference between lenvatinib and other TKIs (OR: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.06, P=0.26).

Conclusions: Lenvatinib significantly enhances survival outcomes in metastatic RCC patients compared with other TKIs. While associated with various adverse events, its safety profile is comparable to other TKIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦伐替尼与其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合治疗转移性肾细胞癌的有效性和安全性:一项Meta分析。
研究目的本荟萃分析评估了来伐替尼与其他TKIs相比,在转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗中作为单药或与其他TKIs(酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)联合治疗的有效性和安全性:我们使用 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 Scopus 检索了从开始到 2024 年 2 月的相关研究。符合条件的研究报告了来伐替尼单药或联合其他TKIs与其他TKIs治疗转移性RCC的有效性和安全性。主要结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结果包括客观反应率(ORR)、不良事件(AE)和健康相关生活质量(HRQOL):17项研究符合纳入标准。结果:17项研究符合纳入标准。伦伐替尼,尤其是联合疗法,可显著改善患者的生存期(HR:0.46,95% CI:0.38-0.54,PC结论:伦伐替尼可显著提高患者的生存期:与其他TKIs相比,伦伐替尼可明显改善转移性RCC患者的生存预后。虽然会出现各种不良反应,但其安全性与其他TKIs相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
期刊最新文献
Complications, Costs, and Health Care Resource Use with Tissue Biopsy Followed by Liquid Biopsy Versus Tissue Re-biopsy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer. Evaluating N-acetylcysteine as a Protective Agent Against Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy in Breast Cancer: A Triple-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Efficacy and Safety of BRCA-targeted Therapy (Polyadenosine Diphosphate-ribose Polymerase Inhibitors) in Treatment of BRCA-mutated Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Institution-level Patterns of Care for Early-stage Oropharynx Cancers in the United States. Efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1