Jordan H Chamberlin, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, James Hamill, Ismail M Kabakus, Kevin P Horn, Jim O'Doherty, Saeed Elojeimy
{"title":"Clinical Pilot of a Deep Learning Elastic Registration Algorithm to Improve Misregistration Artifact and Image Quality on Routine Oncologic PET/CT.","authors":"Jordan H Chamberlin, Joshua Schaefferkoetter, James Hamill, Ismail M Kabakus, Kevin P Horn, Jim O'Doherty, Saeed Elojeimy","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 10 <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean <sup>18</sup>F-FDG quality rating=3.5-3.8 for DL vs 3.2-3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE quality rating= 3.2-3.4 for DL vs 2.1-3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUV<sub>mean</sub> for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE were 5.3 ± 4.9 and 8.2 ± 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [<sup>18</sup>F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [<sup>64</sup>Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5, P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Misregistration artifacts between the PET and attenuation correction CT (CTAC) exams can degrade image quality and cause diagnostic errors. Deep learning (DL)-warped elastic registration methods have been proposed to improve misregistration errors.
Materials and methods: 30 patients undergoing routine oncologic examination (20 18F-FDG PET/CT and 10 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT) were retrospectively identified and compared using unmodified CTAC, and a DL-augmented spatial transformation CT attenuation map. Primary endpoints included differences in subjective image quality and standardized uptake values (SUV). Exams were randomized to reduce reader bias, and three radiologists rated image quality across six anatomic sites using a modified Likert scale. Measures of local bias and lesion SUV were also quantitatively evaluated.
Results: The DL attenuation correction methods were associated with higher image quality and reduced misregistration artifacts (Mean 18F-FDG quality rating=3.5-3.8 for DL vs 3.2-3.5 for standard reconstruction (STD); Mean 64Cu-DOTATATE quality rating= 3.2-3.4 for DL vs 2.1-3.3; P < 0.05 for STD, for all except 64Cu-DOTATATE inferior spleen). Percent change in superior liver SUVmean for 18F-FDG and 64Cu-DOTATATE were 5.3 ± 4.9 and 8.2 ± 4.1%, respectively. Measures of signal-to-noise ratio were significantly improved for the DL over STD (Hepatopulmonary index (HPI) [18F-FDG] = 4.5 ± 1.2 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001; HPI [64Cu-DOTATATE] = 16.4 ± 16.9 vs 12.5 ± 5.5, P = 0.039).
Conclusion: Deep learning elastic registration for CT attenuation correction maps on routine oncology PET/CT decreases misregistration artifacts, with a greater impact on PET scans with longer acquisition times.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.