Trends in the use of animals and non-animal methods over the last 20 years.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14573/altex.2410111
Katy Taylor
{"title":"Trends in the use of animals and non-animal methods over the last 20 years.","authors":"Katy Taylor","doi":"10.14573/altex.2410111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the importance of the animal testing issue, there has been little presentation in the scientific literature of the trends in animal use. This is crucial to resolve, particularly if we are to measure the impact of initiatives to reduce and replace animal experiments that were recently announced in Europe and the USA. For the first time, the number of animals used between 2002 and 2022 are presented for the EU, key animal-using countries in Europe (the UK, France and Germany), and North America (the USA and Canada). Animal testing is on a slow decrease in the EU, 11% in the last 20 years, but animal use in the UK, France and Germany is at similar levels as it was in 2002. Notably there has been a decrease in the production of genetically altered animals in the UK and a decrease in regulatory testing in the EU. Animal use in Canada has been steadily growing, and figures for the USA are still incomplete as laboratory-bred rodents and some other species are not counted. However, globally, the use of non-animal methods in biomedical research is increasing exponentially; this accelerated in the mid-2010s. The UK appears to be the leader in this field. The technological, regulatory, political and economic factors that might explain these trends are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":"41 4","pages":"503-524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2410111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of the animal testing issue, there has been little presentation in the scientific literature of the trends in animal use. This is crucial to resolve, particularly if we are to measure the impact of initiatives to reduce and replace animal experiments that were recently announced in Europe and the USA. For the first time, the number of animals used between 2002 and 2022 are presented for the EU, key animal-using countries in Europe (the UK, France and Germany), and North America (the USA and Canada). Animal testing is on a slow decrease in the EU, 11% in the last 20 years, but animal use in the UK, France and Germany is at similar levels as it was in 2002. Notably there has been a decrease in the production of genetically altered animals in the UK and a decrease in regulatory testing in the EU. Animal use in Canada has been steadily growing, and figures for the USA are still incomplete as laboratory-bred rodents and some other species are not counted. However, globally, the use of non-animal methods in biomedical research is increasing exponentially; this accelerated in the mid-2010s. The UK appears to be the leader in this field. The technological, regulatory, political and economic factors that might explain these trends are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去 20 年中使用动物和非动物方法的趋势。
尽管动物实验问题十分重要,但科学文献却很少介绍动物实验的使用趋势。解决这一问题至关重要,尤其是如果我们要衡量欧洲和美国最近宣布的减少和取代动物实验的倡议的影响。本报告首次列出了欧盟、欧洲主要动物使用国(英国、法国和德国)以及北美(美国和加拿大)在 2002 年至 2022 年期间的动物使用数量。在欧盟,动物试验正在缓慢减少,在过去 20 年中减少了 11%,但英国、法国和德国的动物使用量与 2002 年的水平相似。值得注意的是,英国转基因动物的生产有所减少,欧盟的监管测试也有所减少。加拿大的动物使用量一直在稳步增长,美国的数据仍不完整,因为实验室饲养的啮齿动物和其他一些物种没有计算在内。然而,在全球范围内,非动物方法在生物医学研究中的使用正呈指数级增长;这一趋势在 2010 年代中期加快。英国似乎是这一领域的领头羊。本文讨论了可能解释这些趋势的技术、监管、政治和经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
期刊最新文献
Systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency. Impact of gut permeability on estimation of oral bioavailability for chemicals in commerce and the environment. Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from succinct formal tests. The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project: Next generation chemical safety assessment based on human data. Characterization of the C17.2 cell line as testing system for endocrine disruption-induced developmental neurotoxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1