The standard assessment of global everyday activities is a valid and reliable scale to assess both physical and cognitive functionality in Turkish older adults.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2420252
Kubra Altunkalem Seydı, Burcu Akpınar Soylemez, Ozge Dokuzlar, Feyza Mutlay, Esra Ates Bulut, Ahmet Turan Isık
{"title":"The standard assessment of global everyday activities is a valid and reliable scale to assess both physical and cognitive functionality in Turkish older adults.","authors":"Kubra Altunkalem Seydı, Burcu Akpınar Soylemez, Ozge Dokuzlar, Feyza Mutlay, Esra Ates Bulut, Ahmet Turan Isık","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2420252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA) scale in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a cross-sectional, methodological design. The SAGEA scale was administered twice, with a two-week interval for test-retest reliability. The study examined correlations between the SAGEA and other functional measures including the Activities of Daily Living (BADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 307 community-dwelling older adults who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment at a university hospital. The average age of the participants was 74.93 years. SAGEA scores showed strong correlations with BADL (-.620), IADL (-.802), TUGT (.613), and MMSE (-.784). The Cronbach alpha for internal consistency was .79, and the test-retest reliability was high (r=.99, p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of SAGEA (TSAGEA) is a quick, reliable, and validated scale that can be easily used in clinical practice without additional training. It effectively assesses both physical and cognitive functionality in older adults, aiding in early intervention and disability prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2420252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA) scale in older adults.

Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional, methodological design. The SAGEA scale was administered twice, with a two-week interval for test-retest reliability. The study examined correlations between the SAGEA and other functional measures including the Activities of Daily Living (BADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Results: The participants were 307 community-dwelling older adults who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment at a university hospital. The average age of the participants was 74.93 years. SAGEA scores showed strong correlations with BADL (-.620), IADL (-.802), TUGT (.613), and MMSE (-.784). The Cronbach alpha for internal consistency was .79, and the test-retest reliability was high (r=.99, p<.001).

Conclusion: The Turkish version of SAGEA (TSAGEA) is a quick, reliable, and validated scale that can be easily used in clinical practice without additional training. It effectively assesses both physical and cognitive functionality in older adults, aiding in early intervention and disability prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球日常活动标准评估是一种有效可靠的量表,可用于评估土耳其老年人的身体和认知功能。
目的:本研究旨在评估土耳其版老年人全球日常活动标准评估量表(SAGEA)的可靠性和有效性:研究采用横断面方法设计。SAGEA 量表施测两次,间隔两周进行重测,以确定其可靠性。研究还考察了 SAGEA 与其他功能测量的相关性,包括日常生活活动(BADL)、日常生活工具性活动(IADL)、定时起立行走测试(TUGT)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE):参与者为 307 名居住在社区的老年人,他们在一家大学医院接受了全面的老年病学评估。参与者的平均年龄为 74.93 岁。SAGEA得分与BADL(-.620)、IADL(-.802)、TUGT(.613)和MMSE(-.784)有很强的相关性。内部一致性的 Cronbach alpha 为 0.79,测试-再测可靠性很高(r=.99,p 结论:土耳其版 SAGEA(TSAGEA)是一种快速、可靠且经过验证的量表,无需额外培训即可在临床实践中轻松使用。它能有效评估老年人的身体和认知功能,有助于早期干预和预防残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. Goal attainment in individual and group-based neuropsychological interventions for young adults with dyslexia in a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1