“This is not why we brought our children here!”: Tensions and challenges in responding to Adverse Childhood Experiences in African-background refugee families

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107101
Amani Kasherwa , Elizabeth Fernandez , Caroline Lenette
{"title":"“This is not why we brought our children here!”: Tensions and challenges in responding to Adverse Childhood Experiences in African-background refugee families","authors":"Amani Kasherwa ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Fernandez ,&nbsp;Caroline Lenette","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Refugee-background children face increased risks of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). However, their access to support services continues to pose significant challenges. A need exists to understand how families and child welfare services respond to ACEs to inform the design of culturally responsive interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Based on a broader qualitative study with parents and practitioners, this article shares the findings on the tensions and challenges of addressing ACEs in African-background refugee families in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The research employed a qualitative micro-ethnographic approach. The first author interviewed 12 parents and 12 clinical practitioners and conducted two focus group discussions with African community leaders: the first with six and the second with five participants. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three central themes reflected the tensions and challenges associated with responding to ACEs: reliance on informal support, the “messy” child protection services, and gaps in the child protection system. Parents responded to ACEs through various cultural and spiritual practices and by allocating most family resources to the needs of the children directly affected by ACEs. This came at the expense of resources available for the victim's siblings, who were also experiencing ACEs directly or vicariously. Professional responses were reactive, and the experiences taking place before resettlement were overlooked. Interactions between parents and child welfare services were particularly adversarial in the case of child removal from the family.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Refugee-background families face unique challenges in accessing services, but they also have capacities that can be harnessed in collaborative interventions addressing ACEs. Culturally responsive and trauma-informed support models may assist in improving interventions addressing ACEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Refugee-background children face increased risks of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). However, their access to support services continues to pose significant challenges. A need exists to understand how families and child welfare services respond to ACEs to inform the design of culturally responsive interventions.

Purpose

Based on a broader qualitative study with parents and practitioners, this article shares the findings on the tensions and challenges of addressing ACEs in African-background refugee families in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

Methodology

The research employed a qualitative micro-ethnographic approach. The first author interviewed 12 parents and 12 clinical practitioners and conducted two focus group discussions with African community leaders: the first with six and the second with five participants. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Three central themes reflected the tensions and challenges associated with responding to ACEs: reliance on informal support, the “messy” child protection services, and gaps in the child protection system. Parents responded to ACEs through various cultural and spiritual practices and by allocating most family resources to the needs of the children directly affected by ACEs. This came at the expense of resources available for the victim's siblings, who were also experiencing ACEs directly or vicariously. Professional responses were reactive, and the experiences taking place before resettlement were overlooked. Interactions between parents and child welfare services were particularly adversarial in the case of child removal from the family.

Conclusion

Refugee-background families face unique challenges in accessing services, but they also have capacities that can be harnessed in collaborative interventions addressing ACEs. Culturally responsive and trauma-informed support models may assist in improving interventions addressing ACEs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这不是我们带孩子来这里的原因!":非洲裔难民家庭在应对童年不良经历时面临的矛盾和挑战。
背景:有难民背景的儿童面临着更大的童年不良经历(ACEs)风险。然而,他们在获得支持服务方面仍然面临巨大挑战。目的:本文基于对家长和从业人员进行的一项更广泛的定性研究,分享了澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)非洲裔难民家庭在应对ACE时所面临的紧张局势和挑战:研究采用了微观人种学定性方法。第一作者采访了 12 位家长和 12 位临床从业人员,并与非洲社区领袖进行了两次焦点小组讨论:第一次有 6 位参与者,第二次有 5 位参与者。笔录采用反思性主题分析法进行分析:三个中心主题反映了与应对 ACE 相关的紧张关系和挑战:对非正式支持的依赖、"混乱的 "儿童保护服务以及儿童保护系统中的漏洞。家长们通过各种文化和精神习俗来应对 ACE,并将大部分家庭资源用于满足直接受 ACE 影响的儿童的需求。这就牺牲了为受害者兄弟姐妹提供的资源,因为他们也直接或间接地经历了 ACE。专业应对措施是被动的,在重新安置之前的经历被忽视了。在将儿童带离家庭的情况下,父母与儿童福利服务机构之间的互动尤其具有对抗性:难民背景家庭在获得服务方面面临着独特的挑战,但他们也有能力,可以在解决 ACE 的合作干预中加以利用。文化敏感性和创伤知情支持模式可能有助于改善针对 ACEs 的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Intracranial findings associated with low odds of retinal hemorrhage among children under 2 years of age at a single pediatric trauma center. Exposure to family violence and school violence among Palestinian high schoolers: The moderating effect of gender and school climate. Children exposed to sibling sexual abuse: Sociodemographic and trauma symptom differences. Attachment & biobehavioral catch-up participation & reunification in a family treatment court. How youth of color with mental disabilities are excluded from school: A DisCrit and logistic regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1