Trends in Antimicrobial Consumption in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Costa Rica from 2017 to 2021: A Comparative Analysis of Defined Daily Doses per 100 Bed Days and per 100 Discharges.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13100939
Cristina Fernández-Barrantes, Allan Ramos-Esquivel, Luis Esteban Hernández-Soto, Manuel Ramírez-Cardoce, Luis David Garro-Zamora, Jose Castro Cordero, Santiago Grau
{"title":"Trends in Antimicrobial Consumption in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Costa Rica from 2017 to 2021: A Comparative Analysis of Defined Daily Doses per 100 Bed Days and per 100 Discharges.","authors":"Cristina Fernández-Barrantes, Allan Ramos-Esquivel, Luis Esteban Hernández-Soto, Manuel Ramírez-Cardoce, Luis David Garro-Zamora, Jose Castro Cordero, Santiago Grau","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13100939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Antimicrobial consumption (AMC) data in Latin America are scarce and usually spread out across different sources used to make AMC calculations, making it difficult to both standardize and compare regions through similar time frames. The main objective was to analyze AMC trends in Social Security tertiary care hospitals in Costa Rica in the period spanning January 2017 to December 2021, using both the defined daily dose (DDD)/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective observational study of antimicrobial consumption. Global consumption trends were calculated and expressed as DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges. Trends in antimicrobial consumption were analyzed using a simple linear regression model to determine potential differences in antimicrobial usage throughout the study's duration. <b>Results</b>: A statistically significant increase in the consumption expressed in DDD/100 discharges was observed in the following groups: carbapenems, 7.6% (trend: 64.68, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 12.6% (trend: 16.45, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), quinolones 9.4% (trend: 36.80, <i>p</i> = 0.02), vancomycin 2.0% (trend: 16.30, <i>p</i> = 0.03), echinocandins: 6.0% (trend: 15.17, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and azole antifungals: 12.10% (trend: 102.05, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, a statistically significant increase of 10.30% in the consumption of azole antifungals expressed in DDD/100 bed days was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.0008). In contrast, a statistically significant decrease in consumption, expressed in DDD/100 discharges, was identified for cephalosporins -6.0% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and macrolides -16.5% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Macrolides also showed a downward trend in consumption, as expressed in DDD/100 bed days (-14.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). According to World Health Organization (WHO) access, watch and reserve (AWaRe) classification trend analysis, only the reserve group showed a statistically significant upward change of 9.2% (<i>p</i> = 0.016). <b>Conclusions</b>: This five-year analysis demonstrated trends over time in overall antimicrobial consumption measured in DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharge rates that correlate. In general, for all antimicrobials, after the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), a downward trend is reported; in contrast, during the COVID-19 pandemic the AMC shows a general upward trend. The comparison between DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges allows for complementary comparisons to be made regarding antimicrobial exposure in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial consumption (AMC) data in Latin America are scarce and usually spread out across different sources used to make AMC calculations, making it difficult to both standardize and compare regions through similar time frames. The main objective was to analyze AMC trends in Social Security tertiary care hospitals in Costa Rica in the period spanning January 2017 to December 2021, using both the defined daily dose (DDD)/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of antimicrobial consumption. Global consumption trends were calculated and expressed as DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges. Trends in antimicrobial consumption were analyzed using a simple linear regression model to determine potential differences in antimicrobial usage throughout the study's duration. Results: A statistically significant increase in the consumption expressed in DDD/100 discharges was observed in the following groups: carbapenems, 7.6% (trend: 64.68, p < 0.0001), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 12.6% (trend: 16.45, p < 0.0001), quinolones 9.4% (trend: 36.80, p = 0.02), vancomycin 2.0% (trend: 16.30, p = 0.03), echinocandins: 6.0% (trend: 15.17, p = 0.01) and azole antifungals: 12.10% (trend: 102.05, p < 0.0001). Additionally, a statistically significant increase of 10.30% in the consumption of azole antifungals expressed in DDD/100 bed days was observed (p = 0.0008). In contrast, a statistically significant decrease in consumption, expressed in DDD/100 discharges, was identified for cephalosporins -6.0% (p < 0.0001) and macrolides -16.5% (p < 0.0001). Macrolides also showed a downward trend in consumption, as expressed in DDD/100 bed days (-14.3%, p < 0.0001). According to World Health Organization (WHO) access, watch and reserve (AWaRe) classification trend analysis, only the reserve group showed a statistically significant upward change of 9.2% (p = 0.016). Conclusions: This five-year analysis demonstrated trends over time in overall antimicrobial consumption measured in DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharge rates that correlate. In general, for all antimicrobials, after the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), a downward trend is reported; in contrast, during the COVID-19 pandemic the AMC shows a general upward trend. The comparison between DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges allows for complementary comparisons to be made regarding antimicrobial exposure in a clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥斯达黎加三级医院 2017 年至 2021 年抗菌药物消耗趋势:每 100 个住院日和每 100 个出院病人的抗菌药物定义日剂量比较分析》(A Comparative Analysis of Defined Daily Doses per 100 Bed Days and per 100 Discharges)。
背景:拉丁美洲的抗菌药物消耗量(AMC)数据很少,而且通常分散在用于计算AMC的不同来源中,因此很难通过类似的时间框架对各地区进行标准化和比较。研究的主要目的是分析哥斯达黎加社会保障三级医院在 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的抗菌药物使用趋势,使用的方法包括定义的日剂量(DDD)/100 个住院日和日剂量/100 次出院。方法:这是一项关于抗菌药物消耗量的回顾性观察研究。研究计算了全球抗菌药物的消耗趋势,并以定义日剂量/100个住院日和定义日剂量/100次出院来表示。使用简单线性回归模型对抗菌药物消耗趋势进行分析,以确定整个研究期间抗菌药物使用量的潜在差异。研究结果以 DDD/100 出院次数表示的抗菌药物消耗量在以下组别中出现了统计学意义上的明显增长:碳青霉烯类,7.6%(趋势:64.68,p < 0.0001);三甲双胍-磺胺甲噁唑:12.6%(趋势:16.45,p < 0.0001)、喹诺酮类 9.4%(趋势:36.80,p = 0.02)、万古霉素 2.0%(趋势:16.30,p = 0.03)、棘白菌素类 6.0%(趋势:15.17,p = 0.01)和唑类抗真菌药 12.10%(趋势:102.05,p < 0.0001)。此外,以 DDD/100 床日表示的唑类抗真菌药物消耗量在统计上显著增加了 10.30%(p = 0.0008)。相比之下,头孢菌素和大环内酯类药物的用量(以DDD/100出院天数表示)则出现了统计学意义上的大幅下降,分别为-6.0%(p < 0.0001)和-16.5%(p < 0.0001)。大环内酯类药物的用量也呈下降趋势,以DDD/100床日表示(-14.3%,p < 0.0001)。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的使用、观察和储备(AWaRe)分类趋势分析,只有储备组出现了 9.2% 的显著上升变化(p = 0.016)。结论:这项为期五年的分析表明,以DDD/100床日和DDD/100出院率计算的抗菌药物总消耗量随时间变化的趋势是相关的。一般来说,在实施抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)后,所有抗菌药物的使用量都呈下降趋势;相比之下,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,AMC 显示出总体上升趋势。通过比较 DDD/100 床日和 DDD/100 出院人次,可以对临床环境中的抗菌药物暴露情况进行补充比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
The Synergy of Machine Learning and Epidemiology in Addressing Carbapenem Resistance: A Comprehensive Review. Resilience of Loin Meat Microbiota and of Resistance Genes to a Chlortetracycline Treatment in Weaned Piglets. Gut Microbiota and New Microbiome-Targeted Drugs for Clostridioides difficile Infections. Combinations of Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. and Terminalia chebula Retz. Extracts with Selected Antibiotics Against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: Bioactivity and Phytochemistry. Isatin Bis-Imidathiazole Hybrids Identified as FtsZ Inhibitors with On-Target Activity Against Staphylococcus aureus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1