Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae137
Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh
{"title":"Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.","authors":"Elise Rivera, Lauren Arundell, Kate Parker, Jenny Veitch, Jo Salmon, Nicola D Ridgers, Anna Timperio, Shannon L Sahlqvist, Venurs H Y Loh","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined associations of park visitation with physical activity (PA), well-being, and social connectedness among 1089 participants during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In August 2020, adolescents and adults in Australia self-reported demographics, usual park visitation, frequency and duration of park visits, PA, well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel linear regression models examined associations of park visitation with well-being and social connectedness. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models examined associations between visitation and PA. Compared to not visiting a park, visitation was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24, 6.60) and days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39) per day and negatively associated with social connectedness (B = -3.75, 95% CI = -7.11, -0.39). Compared to visiting a park less than once/week, visiting once/week was positively associated with well-being (B = 3.90, 95% CI = 0.53, 7.21). Visiting more than once/week was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.21, 1.58) and 60 min (B = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.64) per day and with well-being (B = 4.19, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.49). Duration of park visits was positively associated with days/week performing PA for 30 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.13) and 60 min (B = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.17) per day. Our findings highlight the role of parks in positively influencing health-related outcomes and the 'dosage' of park use needed to attain health benefits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 期间,游览公园对澳大利亚人的体育活动、幸福感和社会联系的影响。
这项横断面研究考察了冠状病毒疾病 2019 年大流行期间 1089 名参与者游览公园与身体活动(PA)、幸福感和社会联系的关系。2020 年 8 月,澳大利亚的青少年和成年人自我报告了人口统计数据、通常游览的公园、游览公园的频率和持续时间、体育活动、幸福感和社会联系。多层次线性回归模型检验了公园游览与幸福感和社会联系的关系。多层次混合效应负二项式回归模型检验了游览与活动量之间的关系。与不游览公园相比,游览公园与幸福感(B = 3.92,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.24,6.60)和每天/周进行 30 分钟 PA 的天数(B = 1.24,95% 置信区间 = 1.11,1.39)呈正相关,与社会联系呈负相关(B = -3.75,95% 置信区间 = -7.11,-0.39)。与每周去公园少于一次相比,每周去公园一次与幸福感呈正相关(B = 3.90,95% CI = 0.53,7.21)。每周游览一次以上与每天进行 30 分钟(B = 1.37,95% CI = 1.21,1.58)和 60 分钟(B = 1.34,95% CI = 1.09,1.64)体育锻炼的天数/周数以及幸福感呈正相关(B = 4.19,95% CI = 0.90,7.49)。游览公园的持续时间与每天/周进行 30 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.04,1.13)和 60 分钟(B = 1.09,95% CI = 1.02,1.17)体育锻炼的天数呈正相关。我们的研究结果强调了公园在积极影响健康相关结果方面的作用,以及使用公园对健康有益所需的 "剂量"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
An umbrella review of barriers, facilitators, and interventions for children and youth with disabilities. Promoting self-determined Indigenous data governance in Canada: the Métis Health Research and Data Governance Principles. Trust is a verb: how to reimagine confidence in health systems. The changing context of Health in All Policies in Finland since the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion in Finland. Health-promoting housing policy in a changing climate: integrating affordability, security, and resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1