MRI genicular nerve mapping: a novel approach to sagittal genicular nerve localization.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105981
Terence Hillery, Hannah Hill, Emily Imka, David Di Lorenzo, Gustaf van Acker, Chong Kim
{"title":"MRI genicular nerve mapping: a novel approach to sagittal genicular nerve localization.","authors":"Terence Hillery, Hannah Hill, Emily Imka, David Di Lorenzo, Gustaf van Acker, Chong Kim","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Chronic knee pain, including postarthroplasty knee pain, is a major cause of morbidity. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve branches is a treatment option. The literature to date has demonstrated and recommended consistent rhizotomy targets in the coronal and axial position of the three primary genicular nerve branches (superomedial genicular nerve, superolateral genicular nerve, inferomedial genicular nerve). The debate on genicular nerve positions focuses on the anterior-posterior courses of the nerve branches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sagittal positions of the three primary genicular neurovascular bundles were measured in 28 consecutive knee MRI and described relative to the total anterior-posterior depth of the bony cortex. Standard radiofrequency capture radius at the classic rhizotomy targets sites was compared with identified nerve position to report proportion of observed nerves within the capture radius.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The genicular neurovascular bundles were found further posterior than classic landmark targets. Proportion of visualized nerve branches captured by classic rhizotomy target radius varied by genicular nerve branch.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports updated guidance on genicular rhizotomy targets. Nerve localization studies using MRI data may be a promising avenue in future nerve localization research pertinent to rhizotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Chronic knee pain, including postarthroplasty knee pain, is a major cause of morbidity. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve branches is a treatment option. The literature to date has demonstrated and recommended consistent rhizotomy targets in the coronal and axial position of the three primary genicular nerve branches (superomedial genicular nerve, superolateral genicular nerve, inferomedial genicular nerve). The debate on genicular nerve positions focuses on the anterior-posterior courses of the nerve branches.

Methods: The sagittal positions of the three primary genicular neurovascular bundles were measured in 28 consecutive knee MRI and described relative to the total anterior-posterior depth of the bony cortex. Standard radiofrequency capture radius at the classic rhizotomy targets sites was compared with identified nerve position to report proportion of observed nerves within the capture radius.

Results: The genicular neurovascular bundles were found further posterior than classic landmark targets. Proportion of visualized nerve branches captured by classic rhizotomy target radius varied by genicular nerve branch.

Conclusions: This study supports updated guidance on genicular rhizotomy targets. Nerve localization studies using MRI data may be a promising avenue in future nerve localization research pertinent to rhizotomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像膝状神经映射:矢状膝状神经定位的新方法。
背景和目的:慢性膝关节疼痛,包括关节置换术后膝关节疼痛,是发病率的主要原因。射频消融膝神经分支是一种治疗方法。迄今为止的文献已证明并推荐了三个主要膝神经分支(上内侧膝神经、上外侧膝神经、下内侧膝神经)冠状位和轴向位的一致根切目标。关于膝状神经位置的争论主要集中在神经分支的前后走向上:方法:在 28 例连续膝关节 MRI 中测量了三个主要膝状神经血管束的矢状面位置,并描述了相对于骨皮质前后总深度的位置。将经典根切术目标部位的标准射频捕获半径与确定的神经位置进行比较,以报告捕获半径内观察到的神经比例:结果:发现的膝状神经血管束比经典地标目标更靠后。经典根状切除术目标半径所捕获的可视神经分支比例因根神经分支而异:本研究支持对根状茎切除术目标的最新指导。使用磁共振成像数据进行神经定位研究可能是未来根切术相关神经定位研究的一个有前途的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Recurrent intrathecal catheter-tip granuloma formation on a replaced system delivering low dose/concentration fentanyl and bupivacaine: a case report. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic postamputation pain requiring analgesia or nerve interventions: a population-based study in East Asia. Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 12-month results from the COMFORT-randomized controlled trial. Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1