首页 > 最新文献

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. 轴突敏感性和阻滞动态
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105950
J A Wildsmith

The role of differential nerve block in the development of analgesia after erector spinae plane block has been questioned. While highly myelinated nerves are more sensitive to local anesthetics than unmyelinated ones in vitro, factors influencing drug diffusion, particularly pKa, are more relevant in the clinical setting. Bupivacaine (the drug most used for an 'analgesic' effect) has a relatively high pKa (8.1), and only 15% of it is present in the lipid permeant, unionized form at pH 7.4 so it will penetrate unmyelinated C fibers relatively easily, but the myelin sheaths around other fiber types are a significant barrier to drug diffusion. The greater sensitivity of myelinated axons to local anesthetic action will only be apparent if the drug can reach their membranes in significant concentrations. In the very dynamic situation pertaining to a local anesthetic injection (no matter the site), diffusion factors mean that the concentration of the drug around the axons is likely to be very low and may result in an effect on unmyelinated fibers only.

差异神经阻滞在直立肌脊柱平面阻滞后的镇痛发展中的作用一直受到质疑。虽然在体外,高度髓鞘化的神经比无髓鞘化的神经对局麻药更敏感,但在临床环境中,影响药物扩散的因素,尤其是 pKa,更为重要。布比卡因(最常用于 "镇痛 "效果的药物)的 pKa 值相对较高(8.1),在 pH 值为 7.4 的情况下,只有 15% 的布比卡因以脂质渗透、联合的形式存在,因此相对容易穿透无髓鞘的 C 纤维,但其他纤维类型周围的髓鞘是药物扩散的重要障碍。髓鞘轴突对局麻药作用的敏感性更高,这只有在药物能够以相当高的浓度到达轴突膜时才会显现出来。在注射局部麻醉剂(无论部位)的动态情况下,扩散因素意味着轴突周围的药物浓度可能很低,可能只对无髓鞘纤维产生作用。
{"title":"Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics.","authors":"J A Wildsmith","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of differential nerve block in the development of analgesia after erector spinae plane block has been questioned. While highly myelinated nerves are more sensitive to local anesthetics than unmyelinated ones in vitro, factors influencing drug diffusion, particularly pKa, are more relevant in the clinical setting. Bupivacaine (the drug most used for an 'analgesic' effect) has a relatively high pKa (8.1), and only 15% of it is present in the lipid permeant, unionized form at pH 7.4 so it will penetrate unmyelinated C fibers relatively easily, but the myelin sheaths around other fiber types are a significant barrier to drug diffusion. The greater sensitivity of myelinated axons to local anesthetic action will only be apparent if the drug can reach their membranes in significant concentrations. In the very dynamic situation pertaining to a local anesthetic injection (no matter the site), diffusion factors mean that the concentration of the drug around the axons is likely to be very low and may result in an effect on unmyelinated fibers only.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial. 关节内皮质类固醇注射与富血小板血浆治疗颈椎面源性疼痛:随机临床试验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105889
David J Allison, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Stephanie Muise, Steven Joseph, Alexandria Roa Agudelo, Arden Lawson, Nicole Billias, John Tran, Ashley Smith, Eldon Loh

Objective: The study's primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of cervical facetogenic pain. Secondary aims were to compare self-rated disability, pain self-efficacy, and the safety of the procedure between groups.

Methods: A single-site randomized double-blind controlled trial with 40 participants assigned to receive either leucocyte-poor, low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma injections or corticosteroid injection without local anesthetic into the cervical facet joint under fluoroscopy. Outcomes were collected via telephone at 1, 3, and 6 months to determine treatment effectiveness.

Results: Low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections had similar effects on cervical facetogenic pain intensity over a 6-month period post injection as demonstrated by a non-significant group-by-time interaction for Numeric Rating Scale scores (p>0.05). However, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in cervical facetogenic pain intensity 1 month post treatment compared with baseline (p=0.02), while the platelet-rich plasma group also demonstrated a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity at the same time point. There was a significant interaction at 1 month post intervention for pain self-efficacy (p=0.04), with the platelet-rich plasma injection group showing a larger increase in pain self-efficacy compared with the corticosteroid injection group. No significant interaction was observed for self-rated disability; however, significant reductions were shown at 3 and 6 months post treatment compared with baseline in both groups (p<0.01). No significant differences between groups were reported for adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported significantly less procedural pain (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Both platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections induced similar improvements in cervical facetogenic pain intensity (1 month post) and self-rated disability (3 and 6 months post). Pain self-efficacy demonstrated a significant interaction with platelet-rich plasma injection showing greater improvement 1 month post. Additionally, both treatments exhibited a similar low prevalence of adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported less procedural pain.

研究目的研究的主要目的是比较关节内注射富血小板血浆与注射皮质类固醇治疗颈椎面源性疼痛的效果。次要目标是比较两组患者的自评残疾程度、疼痛自我效能感和手术安全性:方法:这是一项单点随机双盲对照试验,40 名参与者被分配接受贫白细胞、低浓度富血小板血浆注射,或在透视下在颈椎面关节注射皮质类固醇(不含局麻药)。通过电话收集1、3和6个月的疗效,以确定治疗效果:结果:低浓度富血小板血浆注射和皮质类固醇注射对注射后 6 个月内颈椎面源性疼痛强度的影响相似,数值评定量表评分的组间时间交互作用不显著(P>0.05)。不过,与基线相比,两组治疗后 1 个月的颈椎面源性疼痛强度都有显著的统计学下降(p=0.02),而富血小板血浆组在同一时间点的疼痛强度也有显著的临床下降。干预后 1 个月,疼痛自我效能存在明显的交互作用(p=0.04),与皮质类固醇注射组相比,富血小板血浆注射组的疼痛自我效能提高幅度更大。在自评残疾方面,没有观察到明显的交互作用;不过,与基线相比,两组患者在治疗后3个月和6个月的自评残疾都有明显下降(p结论:富血小板血浆和皮质类固醇注射对颈椎面源性疼痛强度(治疗后 1 个月)和自评残疾程度(治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月)的改善效果相似。疼痛自我效能表现出显著的交互作用,注射富血小板血浆后 1 个月的改善程度更大。此外,两种治疗方法的不良反应发生率都很低;但接受富血小板血浆注射的患者在治疗过程中的疼痛感较轻。
{"title":"Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"David J Allison, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Stephanie Muise, Steven Joseph, Alexandria Roa Agudelo, Arden Lawson, Nicole Billias, John Tran, Ashley Smith, Eldon Loh","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105889","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study's primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of cervical facetogenic pain. Secondary aims were to compare self-rated disability, pain self-efficacy, and the safety of the procedure between groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-site randomized double-blind controlled trial with 40 participants assigned to receive either leucocyte-poor, low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma injections or corticosteroid injection without local anesthetic into the cervical facet joint under fluoroscopy. Outcomes were collected via telephone at 1, 3, and 6 months to determine treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections had similar effects on cervical facetogenic pain intensity over a 6-month period post injection as demonstrated by a non-significant group-by-time interaction for Numeric Rating Scale scores (p>0.05). However, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in cervical facetogenic pain intensity 1 month post treatment compared with baseline (p=0.02), while the platelet-rich plasma group also demonstrated a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity at the same time point. There was a significant interaction at 1 month post intervention for pain self-efficacy (p=0.04), with the platelet-rich plasma injection group showing a larger increase in pain self-efficacy compared with the corticosteroid injection group. No significant interaction was observed for self-rated disability; however, significant reductions were shown at 3 and 6 months post treatment compared with baseline in both groups (p<0.01). No significant differences between groups were reported for adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported significantly less procedural pain (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections induced similar improvements in cervical facetogenic pain intensity (1 month post) and self-rated disability (3 and 6 months post). Pain self-efficacy demonstrated a significant interaction with platelet-rich plasma injection showing greater improvement 1 month post. Additionally, both treatments exhibited a similar low prevalence of adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported less procedural pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy. 实验性疼痛性糖尿病多发性神经病长期常规脊髓刺激引起的痛觉系统结构变化。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105919
Thomas de Geus, Glenn Franken, Xander Zuidema, Jan van Zundert, Elbert A J Joosten

Background: Clinical studies suggest that long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation (LT-SCS) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is initially effective but may decline in efficacy over time. Preclinical studies indicate that LT-SCS alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity and enhances hind paw blood flow in PDPN rats, suggesting nociceptive system plasticity. This study hypothesized that LT-SCS induces peripheral hind paw small-fiber sprouting and reduces central protein expression of glial and P2X4 brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) pathway markers.

Methods: Diabetes was induced via Streptozotocin injection in 32 rats, with 16 developing PDPN and receiving a quadrupolar lead implant. LT-SCS was applied for 4 weeks, 12 hours per day. Pain behavior was assessed using the Von Frey test for mechanical hypersensitivity and the mechanical conflict avoidance system for motivational aspects of pain. Fiber sprouting was assessed via immunohistochemical analysis of nerve fibers in the hind paw skin. Protein expression in the spinal cord was assessed using western blotting.

Results: LT-SCS increased the baseline threshold of mechanical hypersensitivity in PDPN animals, consistent with previous findings, but showed no effects on motivational aspects of pain. Hind paw tissue analysis revealed significantly increased intraepidermal nerve fiber density of PGP9.5 fibers in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals. Protein analysis showed significantly decreased pro-BDNF expression in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals.

Conclusion: LT-SCS induces structural changes in both peripheral and central components of the nociceptive system in PDPN animals. These changes may contribute to observed behavioral modifications, elucidating mechanisms underlying LT-SCS efficacy in PDPN management.

背景:临床研究表明,长期常规脊髓刺激(LT-SCS)治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)最初有效,但随着时间的推移疗效可能会下降。临床前研究表明,LT-SCS 可减轻 PDPN 大鼠的机械过敏性并增强后爪血流量,这表明痛觉系统具有可塑性。本研究假设,LT-SCS 可诱导外周后爪小纤维发芽,并减少神经胶质和 P2X4 脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)通路标记物的中枢蛋白表达:通过注射链脲佐菌素诱导 32 只大鼠患糖尿病,其中 16 只出现 PDPN 并接受四极导联植入。LT-SCS应用4周,每天12小时。使用 Von Frey 试验评估大鼠的疼痛行为,以了解其机械过敏性;使用机械冲突回避系统评估大鼠的疼痛动机。通过对后爪皮肤的神经纤维进行免疫组化分析来评估纤维萌发情况。脊髓中的蛋白质表达采用 Western 印迹法进行评估:结果:LT-SCS提高了PDPN动物的机械过敏基线阈值,这与之前的研究结果一致,但对疼痛的动机方面没有影响。后爪组织分析显示,与Sham-SCS动物相比,LT-SCS动物表皮内PGP9.5纤维的神经纤维密度明显增加。蛋白质分析表明,与Sham-SCS动物相比,LT-SCS动物的pro-BDNF表达明显减少:结论:LT-SCS 可诱导 PDPN 动物痛觉系统的外周和中枢成分发生结构性变化。这些变化可能有助于观察到的行为改变,从而阐明 LT-SCS 在 PDPN 治疗中的疗效机制。
{"title":"Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy.","authors":"Thomas de Geus, Glenn Franken, Xander Zuidema, Jan van Zundert, Elbert A J Joosten","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical studies suggest that long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation (LT-SCS) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is initially effective but may decline in efficacy over time. Preclinical studies indicate that LT-SCS alleviates mechanical hypersensitivity and enhances hind paw blood flow in PDPN rats, suggesting nociceptive system plasticity. This study hypothesized that LT-SCS induces peripheral hind paw small-fiber sprouting and reduces central protein expression of glial and P2X4 brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) pathway markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diabetes was induced via Streptozotocin injection in 32 rats, with 16 developing PDPN and receiving a quadrupolar lead implant. LT-SCS was applied for 4 weeks, 12 hours per day. Pain behavior was assessed using the Von Frey test for mechanical hypersensitivity and the mechanical conflict avoidance system for motivational aspects of pain. Fiber sprouting was assessed via immunohistochemical analysis of nerve fibers in the hind paw skin. Protein expression in the spinal cord was assessed using western blotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LT-SCS increased the baseline threshold of mechanical hypersensitivity in PDPN animals, consistent with previous findings, but showed no effects on motivational aspects of pain. Hind paw tissue analysis revealed significantly increased intraepidermal nerve fiber density of PGP9.5 fibers in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals. Protein analysis showed significantly decreased pro-BDNF expression in LT-SCS animals compared with Sham-SCS animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LT-SCS induces structural changes in both peripheral and central components of the nociceptive system in PDPN animals. These changes may contribute to observed behavioral modifications, elucidating mechanisms underlying LT-SCS efficacy in PDPN management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. 微创结肠手术中的腹横肌平面阻滞:一项多中心三臂随机对照优劣临床试验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105712
Christopher Blom Salmonsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Jakob Kleif, Rasmus Krøijer, Lea Bruun, Martynas Mikalonis, Peter Dalsgaard, Karen Busk Hesseldal, Jon Emil Philip Olsson, Claus Anders Bertelsen

Background and objectives: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is the most widely used abdominal field block in colorectal surgery with a postoperative enhanced recovery pathway. We aimed to determine whether the laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) blocks provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. We separately investigated whether the laparoscopic-assisted technique was non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided technique in providing pain relief, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mg morphine dose equivalents.

Methods: 340 patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) US-TAP block, (2) laparoscopic-assisted TAP (L-TAP) block, or (3) placebo. Superiority and non-inferiority were tested for the primary outcome: 24-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes, including patient-reported quality of recovery, were included in the superiority analysis.

Results: 127 patients were included in each block group and 86 in the placebo group. The US-TAP block was no different from placebo at -1.4 mg morphine (97.5% CI -6.8 to 4.0 mg; p=0.55). The L-TAP block was superior to placebo at -5.9 mg morphine (97.5% CI -11.3 to -0.5 mg; p=0.01) and non-inferior to the US-TAP block at -4.5 mg morphine (98.75% CI -10.0 to 1.1 mg).

Conclusion: The L-TAP block was superior to placebo and non-inferior to the US-TAP block. However, neither met our predetermined estimate of the minimal clinically important difference of 10 mg morphine.

Trial registration number: NCT04311099.

背景和目的:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞是结直肠手术中应用最广泛的腹野阻滞,具有术后增强恢复的途径。我们的目的是确定腹腔镜辅助和超声引导下的 TAP(US-TAP)阻滞与安慰剂相比是否能更好地缓解疼痛。方法:340 名接受择期微创结肠手术的患者被随机分配到三组中的一组:(1)US-TAP 阻滞;(2)腹腔镜辅助 TAP(L-TAP)阻滞;或(3)安慰剂。对主要结果(术后 24 小时吗啡当量消耗量)进行了优劣检验。次要结果(包括患者报告的恢复质量)纳入优劣分析:每个阻滞组均有 127 名患者,安慰剂组有 86 名患者。US-TAP 阻滞与安慰剂相比,吗啡用量为-1.4 毫克(97.5% CI -6.8 至 4.0 毫克;P=0.55)。在吗啡浓度为-5.9毫克时,L-TAP阻滞优于安慰剂(97.5% CI -11.3 至 -0.5 毫克;p=0.01),在吗啡浓度为-4.5毫克时,L-TAP阻滞不劣于US-TAP阻滞(98.75% CI -10.0 至 1.1 毫克):结论:L-TAP阻滞优于安慰剂,非劣于US-TAP阻滞。结论:L-TAP阻滞优于安慰剂,不劣于US-TAP阻滞,但两者均未达到我们预先设定的10毫克吗啡最小临床重要差异:NCT04311099.
{"title":"Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial.","authors":"Christopher Blom Salmonsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Jakob Kleif, Rasmus Krøijer, Lea Bruun, Martynas Mikalonis, Peter Dalsgaard, Karen Busk Hesseldal, Jon Emil Philip Olsson, Claus Anders Bertelsen","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is the most widely used abdominal field block in colorectal surgery with a postoperative enhanced recovery pathway. We aimed to determine whether the laparoscopic-assisted and ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) blocks provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. We separately investigated whether the laparoscopic-assisted technique was non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided technique in providing pain relief, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 mg morphine dose equivalents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>340 patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) US-TAP block, (2) laparoscopic-assisted TAP (L-TAP) block, or (3) placebo. Superiority and non-inferiority were tested for the primary outcome: 24-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes, including patient-reported quality of recovery, were included in the superiority analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>127 patients were included in each block group and 86 in the placebo group. The US-TAP block was no different from placebo at -1.4 mg morphine (97.5% CI -6.8 to 4.0 mg; p=0.55). The L-TAP block was superior to placebo at -5.9 mg morphine (97.5% CI -11.3 to -0.5 mg; p=0.01) and non-inferior to the US-TAP block at -4.5 mg morphine (98.75% CI -10.0 to 1.1 mg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The L-TAP block was superior to placebo and non-inferior to the US-TAP block. However, neither met our predetermined estimate of the minimal clinically important difference of 10 mg morphine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04311099.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
KDM4A facilitates neuropathic pain and microglial M1 polarization by regulating BDNF in a rat model of brachial plexus avulsion. 在臂丛神经撕脱大鼠模型中,KDM4A通过调节BDNF促进神经性疼痛和小胶质细胞M1极化。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105801
Jinding Guo, Kaiming Gao, Xi Chen, Chengppeng Liao, Jing Rui, Yingjie Zhou, Jie Lao

Background: Many patients with brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) suffer from neuropathic pain, but the mechanism remains elusive. Modifications of histones, the proteins responsible for organizing DNA, may play an important role in neuropathic pain. Lysine demethylase 4A (KDM4A), an essential component of histone demethylase, can modify the function of chromatin and thus regulate the vital gene expressions. However, the mechanism by which KDM4A regulates neuropathic pain following BPA remains unclear.

Methods: The pain model was developed in adult rats that received BPA surgery. Western blot, ELISA, and reverse transcription-PCR were used to examine the protein and mRNA levels of targeted genes. Immunofluorescence studies were conducted to analyze their cellular distribution in the spinal cord. Pharmacological and genetic methods were used to modulate the expression of KDM4A. Co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation PCR were used to assess the binding potential between KDM4A and the promoter of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).

Results: KDM4A and BDNF levels were significantly upregulated in the ipsilateral spinal cord dorsal horn in the BPA group compared with the sham surgery group. Additionally, knockdown of KDM4A decreased BDNF expression and microgliosis and reduced neuropathic pain-like behaviors in BPA rats. Conversely, KDM4A overexpression increased BDNF expression and microgliosis and exacerbated neuropathic pain. BDNF inhibitors and activators also regulated the activation of spinal microglia and neuropathic pain. Importantly, we showed that KDM4A modulates BDNF expression by regulating the methylation of histone 3 lysine 9 and histone 3 lysine 36 in its promoter region.

Conclusion: Current findings suggest that the upregulation of KDM4A increases BDNF expression in the spinal cord in rats after BPA, contributing to microgliosis, neuroinflammation, and neuropathic pain.

背景:许多臂丛神经撕脱伤(BPA)患者都会出现神经病理性疼痛,但其机制仍然难以捉摸。组蛋白是负责组织 DNA 的蛋白质,其修饰可能在神经性疼痛中扮演重要角色。赖氨酸去甲基化酶 4A(KDM4A)是组蛋白去甲基化酶的重要组成部分,可以改变染色质的功能,从而调节重要基因的表达。然而,KDM4A调节双酚A引起的神经病理性疼痛的机制仍不清楚:方法:在接受过双酚 A 手术的成年大鼠中建立疼痛模型。Western印迹、ELISA和反转录-PCR用于检测目标基因的蛋白和mRNA水平。免疫荧光研究分析了目标基因在脊髓中的细胞分布。采用药理学和遗传学方法调节 KDM4A 的表达。共免疫沉淀和染色质免疫沉淀 PCR 被用来评估 KDM4A 与脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)启动子之间的结合潜力:结果:与假手术组相比,双酚A组同侧脊髓背角的KDM4A和BDNF水平明显上调。此外,敲除 KDM4A 会降低 BPA 大鼠的 BDNF 表达和微神经胶质细胞增生,并减少神经病理性疼痛样行为。相反,KDM4A的过表达会增加BDNF的表达和小神经胶质细胞的增生,并加剧神经病理性疼痛。BDNF 抑制剂和激活剂也能调节脊髓小胶质细胞的激活和神经病理性疼痛。重要的是,我们发现 KDM4A 通过调节 BDNF 启动子区域组蛋白 3 赖氨酸 9 和组蛋白 3 赖氨酸 36 的甲基化来调节 BDNF 的表达:目前的研究结果表明,KDM4A 的上调会增加双酚 A 后大鼠脊髓中 BDNF 的表达,从而导致小神经胶质细胞增多、神经炎症和神经病理性疼痛。
{"title":"KDM4A facilitates neuropathic pain and microglial M1 polarization by regulating BDNF in a rat model of brachial plexus avulsion.","authors":"Jinding Guo, Kaiming Gao, Xi Chen, Chengppeng Liao, Jing Rui, Yingjie Zhou, Jie Lao","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105801","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) suffer from neuropathic pain, but the mechanism remains elusive. Modifications of histones, the proteins responsible for organizing DNA, may play an important role in neuropathic pain. Lysine demethylase 4A (KDM4A), an essential component of histone demethylase, can modify the function of chromatin and thus regulate the vital gene expressions. However, the mechanism by which KDM4A regulates neuropathic pain following BPA remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pain model was developed in adult rats that received BPA surgery. Western blot, ELISA, and reverse transcription-PCR were used to examine the protein and mRNA levels of targeted genes. Immunofluorescence studies were conducted to analyze their cellular distribution in the spinal cord. Pharmacological and genetic methods were used to modulate the expression of KDM4A. Co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation PCR were used to assess the binding potential between KDM4A and the promoter of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KDM4A and BDNF levels were significantly upregulated in the ipsilateral spinal cord dorsal horn in the BPA group compared with the sham surgery group. Additionally, knockdown of KDM4A decreased BDNF expression and microgliosis and reduced neuropathic pain-like behaviors in BPA rats. Conversely, KDM4A overexpression increased BDNF expression and microgliosis and exacerbated neuropathic pain. BDNF inhibitors and activators also regulated the activation of spinal microglia and neuropathic pain. Importantly, we showed that KDM4A modulates BDNF expression by regulating the methylation of histone 3 lysine 9 and histone 3 lysine 36 in its promoter region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current findings suggest that the upregulation of KDM4A increases BDNF expression in the spinal cord in rats after BPA, contributing to microgliosis, neuroinflammation, and neuropathic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Skeletal muscle relaxant for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 治疗纤维肌痛的骨骼肌松弛剂:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105776
Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Lai Ning Lydia Lau, Pui Ming Lam, Hung Chak Ho, Stanley Sau Ching Wong

Background/importance: Fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain disorder that significantly impairs patient well-being. Evaluating the efficacy of muscle relaxants for treating fibromyalgia is crucial for improving patient care.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of muscle relaxants in patients with fibromyalgia.

Evidence review: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing skeletal muscle relaxants with placebo/active analgesics for fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) in pain scores. The risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Instrument for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Findings: 14 RCTs (1851 participants) were included. Muscle relaxants were associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in pain scores compared with placebo or active treatment (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI=-0.32 to -0.15, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-0.40 to -0.08), with no significant inconsistency (I2=0, 95% CI=0% to 50.79%) and a moderate Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating. Secondary outcomes showed small, but statistically significant improvements in depression, fatigue and sleep quality. Muscle relaxants were associated with increased incidence of overall adverse effects, fatigue, abnormal taste, and drug withdrawal due to adverse effects.

Conclusions: Moderate quality evidence showed that muscle relaxants were associated with a small reduction in pain intensity for patients with fibromyalgia.

背景/重要性:纤维肌痛是一种复杂的慢性疼痛疾病,严重损害患者的健康。评估肌肉松弛剂治疗纤维肌痛的疗效对于改善患者护理至关重要:本研究旨在评估肌肉松弛剂对纤维肌痛患者的镇痛效果:我们使用 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane Library 进行了全面的文献检索。该检索包括将骨骼肌松弛剂与治疗纤维肌痛的安慰剂/有效镇痛剂进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是疼痛强度,以疼痛评分的标准化平均差(SMD)来衡量。采用科克伦随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具对纳入的 RCT 进行了偏倚风险评估:共纳入了 14 项随机对照试验(1851 名参与者)。与安慰剂或积极治疗相比,肌肉松弛剂可使疼痛评分略有下降,但具有统计学意义(SMD=-0.24,95% CI=-0.32至-0.15,P2=0,95% CI=0%至50.79%),推荐、评估、发展和评价等级为中等。次要结果显示,抑郁、疲劳和睡眠质量的改善幅度较小,但具有统计学意义。肌肉松弛剂与总体不良反应、疲劳、味觉异常和因不良反应而停药的发生率增加有关:中度质量的证据显示,肌肉松弛剂与纤维肌痛患者疼痛强度的小幅降低有关。
{"title":"Skeletal muscle relaxant for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Lai Ning Lydia Lau, Pui Ming Lam, Hung Chak Ho, Stanley Sau Ching Wong","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105776","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain disorder that significantly impairs patient well-being. Evaluating the efficacy of muscle relaxants for treating fibromyalgia is crucial for improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of muscle relaxants in patients with fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing skeletal muscle relaxants with placebo/active analgesics for fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) in pain scores. The risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Instrument for Randomized Controlled Trials.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>14 RCTs (1851 participants) were included. Muscle relaxants were associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in pain scores compared with placebo or active treatment (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI=-0.32 to -0.15, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-0.40 to -0.08), with no significant inconsistency (I<sup>2</sup>=0, 95% CI=0% to 50.79%) and a moderate Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating. Secondary outcomes showed small, but statistically significant improvements in depression, fatigue and sleep quality. Muscle relaxants were associated with increased incidence of overall adverse effects, fatigue, abnormal taste, and drug withdrawal due to adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate quality evidence showed that muscle relaxants were associated with a small reduction in pain intensity for patients with fibromyalgia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dermatomal spread in lateral quadratus lumborum blocks versus transversus abdominus plane blocks after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. 腹腔镜结直肠手术后腰侧肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞的皮损扩散:随机临床试验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105488
Renuka M George, Julie R McSwain, Mamikon Gukasov, Dulaney A Wilson, Haley Nitchie, Sylvia H Wilson

Introduction: Postoperative pain after laparoscopic abdominal surgery remains complex. While lateral quadratus lumborum (QL) block and transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block are similar techniques, no studies have examined if one technique has greater dermatomal spread.

Methods: Laparoscopic colorectal surgical patients were randomized to lateral QL or TAP blocks. Dermatomal anesthetic spread, as measured by loss of sensation to temperature in the postanesthesia care unit, was the primary outcome. If a clear level of dermatomal anesthesia could not be defined, the block was categorized as "indeterminate." Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain scores, and opioid-related side effects.

Results: 153 patients completed the study (75 QL and 78 TAP). Mean (95% CI) number of dermatomes with loss of sensation to ice was greater in subjects randomized to QL (4.2 (3.7 to 4.8)) versus TAP (2.7 (2.2 to 3.2); p=0.0001), and the QL group was more likely to have loss of sensation above T8 (p=0.01) and T10 (p=0.02). Indeterminate block was more often noted with TAP blocks (p<0.0001). Opioid consumption at 24 hours, pain scores, and opioid-related side effects did not differ.

Discussion: Compared with TAP blocks, QL blocks had greater dermatomal anesthesia spread and lower rates of an indeterminate block. However, differences in pain and opioid consumption were not noted. The clinical importance of these findings should be investigated in future trials.

Trial registration number: NCT03490357.

引言腹腔镜腹部手术后的疼痛仍然很复杂。虽然腰方肌外侧(QL)阻滞和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞是类似的技术,但还没有研究表明其中一种技术是否会有更大的皮层扩散:方法:腹腔镜结直肠手术患者随机接受侧位 QL 或 TAP 阻滞。方法:腹腔镜结直肠手术患者随机接受侧位 QL 或 TAP 阻滞,麻醉后护理病房的温度感觉丧失是衡量皮下麻醉扩散的主要结果。如果不能明确界定皮区麻醉的程度,则将阻滞归类为 "不确定"。次要结果包括阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分和阿片类药物相关副作用:153 名患者完成了研究(75 名 QL 和 78 名 TAP)。随机接受 QL(4.2(3.7 至 4.8))与 TAP(2.7(2.2 至 3.2);P=0.0001)治疗的受试者中,对冰失去感觉的皮节的平均数量(95% CI)更多,QL 组更有可能在 T8(P=0.01)和 T10(P=0.02)以上失去感觉。TAP 阻滞更常出现不确定阻滞(p 讨论:与TAP阻滞相比,QL阻滞的皮下麻醉扩散范围更大,不确定阻滞的发生率更低。然而,疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗量并无差异。这些发现的临床重要性应在今后的试验中加以研究:试验注册号:NCT03490357。
{"title":"Dermatomal spread in lateral quadratus lumborum blocks versus transversus abdominus plane blocks after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Renuka M George, Julie R McSwain, Mamikon Gukasov, Dulaney A Wilson, Haley Nitchie, Sylvia H Wilson","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain after laparoscopic abdominal surgery remains complex. While lateral quadratus lumborum (QL) block and transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block are similar techniques, no studies have examined if one technique has greater dermatomal spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Laparoscopic colorectal surgical patients were randomized to lateral QL or TAP blocks. Dermatomal anesthetic spread, as measured by loss of sensation to temperature in the postanesthesia care unit, was the primary outcome. If a clear level of dermatomal anesthesia could not be defined, the block was categorized as \"indeterminate.\" Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, pain scores, and opioid-related side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>153 patients completed the study (75 QL and 78 TAP). Mean (95% CI) number of dermatomes with loss of sensation to ice was greater in subjects randomized to QL (4.2 (3.7 to 4.8)) versus TAP (2.7 (2.2 to 3.2); p=0.0001), and the QL group was more likely to have loss of sensation above T8 (p=0.01) and T10 (p=0.02). Indeterminate block was more often noted with TAP blocks (p<0.0001). Opioid consumption at 24 hours, pain scores, and opioid-related side effects did not differ.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared with TAP blocks, QL blocks had greater dermatomal anesthesia spread and lower rates of an indeterminate block. However, differences in pain and opioid consumption were not noted. The clinical importance of these findings should be investigated in future trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03490357.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Earlier preoperative percutaneous intercostal cryoanalgesia improves recovery after pectus excavatum surgery. 术前提早经皮肋间低温镇痛可改善乳突手术后的恢复。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105960
Stefano Mariconti, Alfio Bronco, Isabella Pellicioli, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Martina Cattaneo, Maurizio Cheli, Ezio Bonanomi

Background and aims: Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is associated with intense postoperative pain. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous intercostal cryoanalgesia according to the different timing of its preoperative application. Outcome variables included pain, drug consumption, time to mobilization, and hospital length of stay.

Methods: Retrospective data analyzed from a single pediatric institution, involving a series of consecutive patients who underwent pectus surgery. Group 1: 18 patients received thoracic epidural analgesia. Group 2: 11 patients underwent cryoanalgesia on the same day of surgery and epidural analgesia as a bridge to cryoanalgesia onset. Group 3: 13 patients underwent earlier preoperative intercostal cryoanalgesia with a median of 6 days (IQR 3-6) before surgery. All groups received rescue systemic analgesia.

Results: Pain scores were similar among groups. The incidence of severe pain decreased in Group 3 versus Group 1 (38% vs 78%) (p<0.05). Ropivacaine epidural cumulative dose (mg/kg) decreased in Group 2 versus Group 1: 16 (IQR 12-23) versus 27 (IQR 22-35) (p<0.01). Cumulative oral morphine equivalent dose (mg/kg) decreased among groups: 12 (IQR 9.3-17), 8 (IQR 4.2-12), and 0.2 (IQR 0.0-0.3) (p<0.001) for Groups 1-3, respectively. Length of stay (days) also decreased among Groups 1-3, respectively: 7 (IQR 6-7), 6 (IQR 5-7), and 4 (IQR 4-5) (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This exploratory observational study suggests that the timing of cryoanalgesia may play a crucial role in its efficacy, with earlier placement being associated with improvements in pain, opioid utilization, and length of stay.

背景和目的:乳房下垂的微创修复术与剧烈的术后疼痛有关。我们旨在根据术前应用经皮肋间低温镇痛的不同时机评估其效果。结果变量包括疼痛、药物消耗、活动时间和住院时间:方法:对一家儿科医疗机构的回顾性数据进行分析,涉及一系列连续接受肛门括约肌手术的患者。第一组:18 名患者接受了胸腔硬膜外镇痛。第二组:11 名患者在手术当天接受低温镇痛,硬膜外镇痛作为低温镇痛开始前的过渡。第 3 组:13 名患者在术前提前进行肋间低温镇痛,中位时间为术前 6 天(IQR 3-6)。所有组别均接受了系统性镇痛治疗:各组疼痛评分相似。结果:各组疼痛评分相似,第 3 组与第 1 组相比,剧烈疼痛的发生率有所下降(38% 对 78%)(p 结论:这一探索性观察研究表明,手术前 6 天(IQR 3-6)内行椎间孔镜镇痛是最有效的镇痛方法:这项探索性观察研究表明,低温镇痛的时机可能对其疗效起着至关重要的作用,较早实施低温镇痛可改善疼痛、阿片类药物的使用和住院时间。
{"title":"Earlier preoperative percutaneous intercostal cryoanalgesia improves recovery after pectus excavatum surgery.","authors":"Stefano Mariconti, Alfio Bronco, Isabella Pellicioli, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Martina Cattaneo, Maurizio Cheli, Ezio Bonanomi","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is associated with intense postoperative pain. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous intercostal cryoanalgesia according to the different timing of its preoperative application. Outcome variables included pain, drug consumption, time to mobilization, and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data analyzed from a single pediatric institution, involving a series of consecutive patients who underwent pectus surgery. Group 1: 18 patients received thoracic epidural analgesia. Group 2: 11 patients underwent cryoanalgesia on the same day of surgery and epidural analgesia as a bridge to cryoanalgesia onset. Group 3: 13 patients underwent earlier preoperative intercostal cryoanalgesia with a median of 6 days (IQR 3-6) before surgery. All groups received rescue systemic analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain scores were similar among groups. The incidence of severe pain decreased in Group 3 versus Group 1 (38% vs 78%) (p<0.05). Ropivacaine epidural cumulative dose (mg/kg) decreased in Group 2 versus Group 1: 16 (IQR 12-23) versus 27 (IQR 22-35) (p<0.01). Cumulative oral morphine equivalent dose (mg/kg) decreased among groups: 12 (IQR 9.3-17), 8 (IQR 4.2-12), and 0.2 (IQR 0.0-0.3) (p<0.001) for Groups 1-3, respectively. Length of stay (days) also decreased among Groups 1-3, respectively: 7 (IQR 6-7), 6 (IQR 5-7), and 4 (IQR 4-5) (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory observational study suggests that the timing of cryoanalgesia may play a crucial role in its efficacy, with earlier placement being associated with improvements in pain, opioid utilization, and length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Successful cutaneous sensory blockade following single-injection and double-injection techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: a randomized clinical trial. 超声引导下浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞的单次注射和两次注射技术的成功皮肤感觉阻滞:随机临床试验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105736
Artid Samerchua, Chalita Sroiwong, Panuwat Lapisatepun, Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, Wariya Sukhupragarn, Settapong Boonsri, Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol, Kittitorn Pansuan, Amarit Phothikun

Background: While superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks can improve analgesia after cardiac surgery, the optimal site and the number of injections remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single versus double injections of superficial parasternal blocks, hypothesizing that double injections would achieve superior cutaneous sensory blockade.

Methods: 70 cardiac patients undergoing median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive either single or double injections of superficial parasternal blocks bilaterally. Each patient received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL and dexamethasone 10 mg. The single-injection group received 20 mL/side at the third costal cartilage, while the double-injection group received 10 mL/injection at the second and fourth costal cartilages. The primary outcome was a successful block, defined as sensory loss in the T2-T6 dermatomes. Secondary outcomes included sensory block of T1, T7, and T8 dermatomes, block-related complications, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, and recovery quality.

Results: Double injections achieved an overall higher success rate compared with the single-injection technique (81% vs 51%, relative risk 1.6; 95% CI 1.2, 2.0; p<0.001). Additionally, higher blockade percentages were observed in dermatomes T1 (83% vs 59%, p=0.003), T7 (67% vs 46%, p=0.017), and T8 (61% vs 39%, p=0.011) with double injections. Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Compared with single injection, double injections of superficial parasternal blocks provided more reliable coverage of the T2-T6 dermatomes, crucial for median sternotomy. However, no differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamic effects or postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery.

Trial registration number: TCTR20230408004.

背景:虽然胸骨旁肋间浅层阻滞可改善心脏手术后的镇痛效果,但最佳注射部位和注射次数仍不确定。本研究旨在比较胸骨旁浅层阻滞单次注射与双次注射的疗效,假设双次注射可获得更佳的皮肤感觉阻滞效果。方法:70 名接受正中胸骨切开术的心脏病患者被随机分配到接受双侧胸骨旁浅层阻滞单次注射或双次注射。每名患者接受 40 mL 0.25% 布比卡因,内含 5 µg/mL 肾上腺素和 10 mg 地塞米松。单次注射组在第三肋软骨处每侧注射 20 毫升,而双次注射组在第二和第四肋软骨处每侧注射 10 毫升。主要结果是成功阻断,定义为 T2-T6 皮节感觉缺失。次要结果包括 T1、T7 和 T8 皮节的感觉阻滞、阻滞相关并发症、术中血流动力学、术后疼痛强度、阿片类药物用量和恢复质量:结果:与单次注射技术相比,双次注射的总体成功率更高(81% 对 51%,相对风险 1.6;95% CI 1.2,2.0;p 结论:与单次注射技术相比,双次注射的成功率更高(81% 对 51%,相对风险 1.6;95% CI 1.2,2.0;p):与单次注射相比,胸骨旁浅层阻滞的双次注射能更可靠地覆盖T2-T6皮节,这对胸骨正中切开术至关重要。然而,在心脏手术后的术中血流动力学效应或术后疼痛控制方面没有观察到差异:TTR20230408004.
{"title":"Successful cutaneous sensory blockade following single-injection and double-injection techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial parasternal intercostal plane block: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Artid Samerchua, Chalita Sroiwong, Panuwat Lapisatepun, Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, Wariya Sukhupragarn, Settapong Boonsri, Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol, Kittitorn Pansuan, Amarit Phothikun","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105736","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks can improve analgesia after cardiac surgery, the optimal site and the number of injections remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single versus double injections of superficial parasternal blocks, hypothesizing that double injections would achieve superior cutaneous sensory blockade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 cardiac patients undergoing median sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive either single or double injections of superficial parasternal blocks bilaterally. Each patient received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL and dexamethasone 10 mg. The single-injection group received 20 mL/side at the third costal cartilage, while the double-injection group received 10 mL/injection at the second and fourth costal cartilages. The primary outcome was a successful block, defined as sensory loss in the T2-T6 dermatomes. Secondary outcomes included sensory block of T1, T7, and T8 dermatomes, block-related complications, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, and recovery quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Double injections achieved an overall higher success rate compared with the single-injection technique (81% vs 51%, relative risk 1.6; 95% CI 1.2, 2.0; p<0.001). Additionally, higher blockade percentages were observed in dermatomes T1 (83% vs 59%, p=0.003), T7 (67% vs 46%, p=0.017), and T8 (61% vs 39%, p=0.011) with double injections. Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with single injection, double injections of superficial parasternal blocks provided more reliable coverage of the T2-T6 dermatomes, crucial for median sternotomy. However, no differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamic effects or postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>TCTR20230408004.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addition of dexamethasone to prolong peripheral nerve blocks: a ChatGPT-created narrative review. 添加地塞米松以延长外周神经阻滞时间:ChatGPT 创建的叙述性综述。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104646
Christopher L Wu, Brian Cho, Rodney Gabriel, Robert Hurley, Jiabin Liu, Edward R Mariano, Vineesh Mathur, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Michael Conrad Grant

Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence chatbot, produces detailed responses and human-like coherent answers, and has been used in the clinical and academic medicine. To evaluate its accuracy in regional anesthesia topics, we produced a ChatGPT review on the addition of dexamethasone to prolong peripheral nerve blocks. A group of experts in regional anesthesia and pain medicine were invited to help shape the topic to be studied, refine the questions entered in to the ChatGPT program, vet the manuscript for accuracy, and create a commentary on the article. Although ChatGPT produced an adequate summary of the topic for a general medical or lay audience, the review that were created appeared to be inadequate for a subspecialty audience as the expert authors. Major concerns raised by the authors included the poor search methodology, poor organization/lack of flow, inaccuracies/omissions of text or references, and lack of novelty. At this time, we do not believe ChatGPT is able to replace human experts and is extremely limited in providing original, creative solutions/ideas and interpreting data for a subspecialty medical review article.

人工智能聊天机器人 Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer(ChatGPT)能生成详细的回复和类似人类的连贯答案,已被用于临床和学术医学领域。为了评估其在区域麻醉主题方面的准确性,我们制作了一篇关于添加地塞米松以延长外周神经阻滞时间的 ChatGPT 评论。我们邀请了一组区域麻醉和疼痛医学专家帮助确定要研究的主题,完善输入 ChatGPT 程序的问题,审核稿件的准确性,并为文章撰写评论。虽然 ChatGPT 为普通医学或非专业受众提供了充分的主题摘要,但作为专家作者,所创建的评论似乎并不适合亚专业受众。作者提出的主要问题包括:检索方法不当、组织不力/缺乏流程、文本或参考文献不准确/遗漏以及缺乏新意。目前,我们认为 ChatGPT 无法取代人类专家,在为亚专科医学综述文章提供原创性、创造性解决方案/想法和解释数据方面也极为有限。
{"title":"Addition of dexamethasone to prolong peripheral nerve blocks: a ChatGPT-created narrative review.","authors":"Christopher L Wu, Brian Cho, Rodney Gabriel, Robert Hurley, Jiabin Liu, Edward R Mariano, Vineesh Mathur, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Michael Conrad Grant","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104646","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence chatbot, produces detailed responses and human-like coherent answers, and has been used in the clinical and academic medicine. To evaluate its accuracy in regional anesthesia topics, we produced a ChatGPT review on the addition of dexamethasone to prolong peripheral nerve blocks. A group of experts in regional anesthesia and pain medicine were invited to help shape the topic to be studied, refine the questions entered in to the ChatGPT program, vet the manuscript for accuracy, and create a commentary on the article. Although ChatGPT produced an adequate summary of the topic for a general medical or lay audience, the review that were created appeared to be inadequate for a subspecialty audience as the expert authors. Major concerns raised by the authors included the poor search methodology, poor organization/lack of flow, inaccuracies/omissions of text or references, and lack of novelty. At this time, we do not believe ChatGPT is able to replace human experts and is extremely limited in providing original, creative solutions/ideas and interpreting data for a subspecialty medical review article.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"777-781"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9602158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1