首页 > 最新文献

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in spontaneously breathing patients: a low-cost strategy. 自主呼吸患者的潮气末二氧化碳监测:低成本策略。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105885
Hemanth Kumar Vr, Nandhini P, Sajin Philip Thomas
{"title":"End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in spontaneously breathing patients: a low-cost strategy.","authors":"Hemanth Kumar Vr, Nandhini P, Sajin Philip Thomas","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105885","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105885","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral nerve microanatomy: new insights into possible mechanisms for block success. 周围神经显微解剖学:对阻滞成功可能机制的新认识。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105721
Graeme A McLeod, Amy Sadler, Andre Boezaart, Xavier Sala-Blanch, Miguel Angel Reina

Postmortem histology and in vivo, animal-based ultra-high-definition microultrasound demonstrate a complex array of non-communicating adipose tissue compartments enclosed by fascia. Classic nerve block mechanisms and histology do not consider this tissue. Injected local anesthetic agents can occupy any of these adipose compartments, which may explain the significant differences in outcomes such as success rates, onset time, block density, duration of nerve block, and secondary continuous block failure. Furthermore, these adipose tissue compartments may influence injection pressures, making conclusions about needle tip location unreliable. This educational review will explain the neural anatomy associated with these fatty compartments in detail and suggest how they may affect block outcomes.

死后组织学和活体动物超高清微超声显示,筋膜包裹着一系列复杂的非交流脂肪组织区。传统的神经阻滞机制和组织学都没有考虑到这种组织。注射的局麻药可以占据这些脂肪组织区块中的任何一个,这可能是成功率、起始时间、阻滞密度、神经阻滞持续时间和继发性持续阻滞失败等结果存在显著差异的原因。此外,这些脂肪组织区可能会影响注射压力,从而使针尖位置的结论不可靠。本教育综述将详细解释与这些脂肪区相关的神经解剖学,并提出它们可能如何影响阻滞效果。
{"title":"Peripheral nerve microanatomy: new insights into possible mechanisms for block success.","authors":"Graeme A McLeod, Amy Sadler, Andre Boezaart, Xavier Sala-Blanch, Miguel Angel Reina","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postmortem histology and in vivo, animal-based ultra-high-definition microultrasound demonstrate a complex array of non-communicating adipose tissue compartments enclosed by fascia. Classic nerve block mechanisms and histology do not consider this tissue. Injected local anesthetic agents can occupy any of these adipose compartments, which may explain the significant differences in outcomes such as success rates, onset time, block density, duration of nerve block, and secondary continuous block failure. Furthermore, these adipose tissue compartments may influence injection pressures, making conclusions about needle tip location unreliable. This educational review will explain the neural anatomy associated with these fatty compartments in detail and suggest how they may affect block outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing modalities of opioid education in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized pilot trial. 比较对接受全膝关节置换术的患者进行阿片类药物教育的方式:随机试验。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105701
Miriam Sheetz, Angela Puglisi, Mark Trentalange, Julia Reichel, Brian Chalmers, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, Alexandra Sideris, Bradley H Lee

Background: Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience significant postoperative pain and routinely require opioids, yet they often lack knowledge regarding appropriate use and handling of these medications. Evidence suggests that educational interventions in various formats may help reinforce proper usage and improve postoperative pain control. The aim of this study is to compare the institution standard of care (webinar) with two novel educational interventions-one in-person and the other a video recording-that focus specifically on the use of opioids and pain control.

Methods: This prospective, randomized pilot study included 42 patients undergoing TKA. Patients were randomized into one of three groups: (1) webinar: 50 min virtual session standard of care at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), (2) in-person education, or (3) video education. The primary outcomes of this study were the number of opioid refill requests through postoperative day (POD) 30 and POD 60. The secondary outcomes evaluated Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME), surveys on medication usage and opioid knowledge, reported medication storage and disposal. We hypothesize that the novel educational interventions, presented either in-person or by video, will lead to a decrease in opioid refills within 60 days compared with current education delivered through virtual webinar.

Results: No significant differences were found among groups in the number of opioid refill requests, average NRS pain score, or OME consumption at any time point. Opioid refill requests ranged from 0% to 16.7% at POD 30 (Fisher's exact test, p=0.625) and from 0% to 8.3% at POD 60 (p=1.000). The median opioid refill request was zero requests per group from POD 21 to 60 (webinar 0 (0.0, 0.0), in-person 0 (0.0, 0.0), video 0 (0.0, 0.0), Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.381). Average NRS pain scores were 5 or below for all groups on POD 1, 7 and 14. By POD 7, all groups had an average daily intake OME of 14 or below.

Conclusions: Overall, patients in each group did well with postoperative pain management after TKA and had minimal opioid refill requests. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes of NRS pain scores or opioid usage among groups suggesting that educational interventions were similarly effective. As a pilot trial, study demonstrated successful recruitment and retention of participants, and important feedback was elicited from patients regarding education, as well. Of note, this was a pilot study and was likely underpowered to detect a difference.

Trial registration number: NCT05593341.

背景:接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者术后疼痛剧烈,通常需要使用阿片类药物,但他们往往缺乏正确使用和处理这些药物的知识。有证据表明,各种形式的教育干预可能有助于加强正确使用和改善术后疼痛控制。本研究的目的是将医疗机构的护理标准(网络研讨会)与两种新型教育干预措施进行比较,一种是面对面教育,另一种是视频录像,这两种干预措施特别关注阿片类药物的使用和疼痛控制:这项前瞻性随机试点研究包括 42 名接受 TKA 的患者。患者被随机分为三组:(1)网络研讨会:特殊外科医院(HSS)标准护理的 50 分钟虚拟课程;(2)面对面教育;或(3)视频教育。本研究的主要结果是术后第 30 天 (POD) 和第 60 天的阿片类药物补给申请数量。次要结果评估了数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分、以口服吗啡当量(OME)计的阿片类药物消耗量、药物使用和阿片类药物知识调查、药物储存和处置报告。我们假设,与目前通过虚拟网络研讨会提供的教育相比,通过面对面或视频方式提供的新型教育干预措施将在 60 天内减少阿片类药物的续用量:各组在任何时间点的阿片类药物续药申请数量、平均 NRS 疼痛评分或 OME 消耗量方面均无明显差异。在 POD 30(费雪精确检验,P=0.625)和 POD 60(P=1.000)时,阿片类药物续订申请的比例分别为 0% 至 16.7%(P=0.625)和 0% 至 8.3%(P=1.000)。从 POD 21 到 60,每组阿片类药物续药申请的中位数为 0(网络 0(0.0,0.0),面对面 0(0.0,0.0),视频 0(0.0,0.0),Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P=0.381)。在 POD 1、7 和 14,各组的平均 NRS 疼痛评分均为 5 或以下。到 POD 7,所有组的平均每日摄入 OME 均在 14 或以下:总体而言,各组患者在 TKA 术后疼痛控制方面均表现良好,阿片类药物续药申请量极少。各组患者的 NRS 疼痛评分或阿片类药物使用量在统计学上没有明显差异,这表明教育干预同样有效。作为一项试点试验,该研究成功招募并留住了参与者,并从患者那里获得了有关教育的重要反馈。值得注意的是,这只是一项试点研究,可能不足以检测出差异:NCT05593341.
{"title":"Comparing modalities of opioid education in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized pilot trial.","authors":"Miriam Sheetz, Angela Puglisi, Mark Trentalange, Julia Reichel, Brian Chalmers, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, Alexandra Sideris, Bradley H Lee","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience significant postoperative pain and routinely require opioids, yet they often lack knowledge regarding appropriate use and handling of these medications. Evidence suggests that educational interventions in various formats may help reinforce proper usage and improve postoperative pain control. The aim of this study is to compare the institution standard of care (webinar) with two novel educational interventions-one in-person and the other a video recording-that focus specifically on the use of opioids and pain control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized pilot study included 42 patients undergoing TKA. Patients were randomized into one of three groups: (1) webinar: 50 min virtual session standard of care at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), (2) in-person education, or (3) video education. The primary outcomes of this study were the number of opioid refill requests through postoperative day (POD) 30 and POD 60. The secondary outcomes evaluated Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME), surveys on medication usage and opioid knowledge, reported medication storage and disposal. We hypothesize that the novel educational interventions, presented either in-person or by video, will lead to a decrease in opioid refills within 60 days compared with current education delivered through virtual webinar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found among groups in the number of opioid refill requests, average NRS pain score, or OME consumption at any time point. Opioid refill requests ranged from 0% to 16.7% at POD 30 (Fisher's exact test, p=0.625) and from 0% to 8.3% at POD 60 (p=1.000). The median opioid refill request was zero requests per group from POD 21 to 60 (webinar 0 (0.0, 0.0), in-person 0 (0.0, 0.0), video 0 (0.0, 0.0), Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.381). Average NRS pain scores were 5 or below for all groups on POD 1, 7 and 14. By POD 7, all groups had an average daily intake OME of 14 or below.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, patients in each group did well with postoperative pain management after TKA and had minimal opioid refill requests. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes of NRS pain scores or opioid usage among groups suggesting that educational interventions were similarly effective. As a pilot trial, study demonstrated successful recruitment and retention of participants, and important feedback was elicited from patients regarding education, as well. Of note, this was a pilot study and was likely underpowered to detect a difference.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05593341.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolving Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine fellowship application process: a program director survey. 不断发展的区域麻醉学和急性疼痛医学研究金申请程序:项目主任调查。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105791
Michelle Lim, Christina L Jeng, Garrett W Burnett, Chang H Park

Background and objectives: Most Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine (RAAPM) fellowship programs transitioned to virtual interviews in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, the RAAPM fellowship match started in 2023 in order to make the application process more equitable. In this study, we surveyed RAAPM fellowship program directors (PDs) to determine how such major events of the early 2020s shaped the fellowship application process.

Methods: A 16-question survey was distributed to US RAAPM program directors. The survey aimed to assess whether PDs prefer the fellowship match over the previous rolling application format and to gauge PDs' confidence in using virtual interviews to evaluate applicants.

Results: 56 (71%) RAAPM program directors completed the survey. 79% of respondents participated in the inaugural match. 59% of PDs preferred the fellowship match over the rolling application format. The interview was rated the most important selection criterion. Of the 93% of PDs who switched to virtual interviews during the pandemic, only 4 PDs (7%) resumed in-person interviews in some capacity. Majority of PDs believed that virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews for assessing applicants; 48% of respondents preferred virtual interviews over in-person interviews.

Conclusions: Most RAAPM programs continued to conduct virtual interviews exclusively. Majority of program directors preferred the fellowship match. PDs ranked the interview as the most important selection factor. Most PDs thought virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews, but they remained divided on which format they prefer.

背景和目标:由于 COVID-19 大流行,大多数区域麻醉学和急性疼痛医学(RAAPM)研究金项目于 2020 年过渡到虚拟面试。然后,为了使申请过程更加公平,RAAPM 研究金匹配于 2023 年开始。在本研究中,我们对 RAAPM 研究金项目主任(PDs)进行了调查,以确定 2020 年代初的这些重大事件如何影响了研究金申请流程:我们向美国 RAAPM 项目主任发放了一份包含 16 个问题的调查问卷。调查旨在评估项目主任是否更喜欢研究金匹配,而不是以前的滚动申请形式,并衡量项目主任对使用虚拟面试评估申请人的信心:56位(71%)RAAPM项目主任完成了调查。79%的受访者参加了首次匹配。59%的项目主任更倾向于研究金匹配,而不是滚动申请形式。面试被评为最重要的选拔标准。在大流行期间改用虚拟面试的 93% 院长中,只有 4 名院长(7%)在某种程度上恢复了亲自面试。大多数专业人员认为,在评估申请人方面,虚拟面试并不比面对面面试差;48%的受访者更喜欢虚拟面试而不是面对面面试:大多数 RAAPM 项目继续完全采用虚拟面试。大多数项目主任更喜欢奖学金配对。项目主任将面试列为最重要的遴选因素。大多数项目主任认为虚拟面试并不逊色于面对面面试,但在他们更喜欢哪种面试形式上仍存在分歧。
{"title":"Evolving Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine fellowship application process: a program director survey.","authors":"Michelle Lim, Christina L Jeng, Garrett W Burnett, Chang H Park","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine (RAAPM) fellowship programs transitioned to virtual interviews in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, the RAAPM fellowship match started in 2023 in order to make the application process more equitable. In this study, we surveyed RAAPM fellowship program directors (PDs) to determine how such major events of the early 2020s shaped the fellowship application process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question survey was distributed to US RAAPM program directors. The survey aimed to assess whether PDs prefer the fellowship match over the previous rolling application format and to gauge PDs' confidence in using virtual interviews to evaluate applicants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 (71%) RAAPM program directors completed the survey. 79% of respondents participated in the inaugural match. 59% of PDs preferred the fellowship match over the rolling application format. The interview was rated the most important selection criterion. Of the 93% of PDs who switched to virtual interviews during the pandemic, only 4 PDs (7%) resumed in-person interviews in some capacity. Majority of PDs believed that virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews for assessing applicants; 48% of respondents preferred virtual interviews over in-person interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most RAAPM programs continued to conduct virtual interviews exclusively. Majority of program directors preferred the fellowship match. PDs ranked the interview as the most important selection factor. Most PDs thought virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews, but they remained divided on which format they prefer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to the letter by Yang. 答复杨先生的来信。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106019
Axel Semmelmann
{"title":"Reply to the letter by Yang.","authors":"Axel Semmelmann","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy with continuous neuraxial analgesia. 使用持续神经轴镇痛进行开胸手术的患者死亡率。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105983
Guanyu Yang
{"title":"Mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy with continuous neuraxial analgesia.","authors":"Guanyu Yang","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105983","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term explantation risk in patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion stimulation. 接受脊髓或背根神经节刺激治疗的慢性疼痛患者的长期切除风险。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105719
Kliment Gatzinsky, Beatrice Brink, Kristin Lilja Eyglóardóttir, Tobias Hallén

Objective: To investigate long-term explantation risks and causes for the explantation of neuromodulation devices for the treatment of chronic pain from different manufacturers.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients implanted with a system for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2022. Patient characteristics, explantation rates and causes for explantation were obtained by reviewing medical records.

Results: In total, 400 patients were included in the study. Including all manufacturers, the cumulative explantation risk for any reason was 17%, 23% and 38% at 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Explantation risk due to diminished pain relief at the same intervals was 10%, 14% and 23%. A subgroup comparison of 5-year explantation risk using Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the manufacturers. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, there was no difference in explantation risk for any reason, but for explantation due to diminished pain relief, a higher risk was noted for Medtronic (preferably older types of SCS devices) and DRG stimulation. No other predictive factor for explantation was found.

Conclusions: Although SCS and DRG stimulation are well-established and safe treatments for chronic pain, the long-term explantation risk remains high. The difference between manufacturers highlights the importance of technological evolution for improving therapy outcomes. Increased stringency in patient selection and follow-up strategies, as well as further development of device hardware and software technology for increased longevity, could possibly reduce long-term explantation risks.

目的调查不同制造商生产的用于治疗慢性疼痛的神经调控装置的长期更换风险和更换原因:这项回顾性分析包括2012年1月至2022年12月期间在瑞典萨赫格伦斯卡大学医院植入脊髓刺激(SCS)或背根神经节(DRG)刺激系统的患者。研究人员通过查阅病历获得了患者特征、切除率和切除原因:研究共纳入 400 名患者。包括所有制造商在内,3年、5年和10年后,因任何原因导致的累计置换风险分别为17%、23%和38%。在相同的时间间隔内,因疼痛缓解程度降低而导致的置换风险分别为 10%、14% 和 23%。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析法对 5 年拆卸风险进行分组比较后发现,不同制造商之间的差异并不显著。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中,任何原因导致的切除风险均无差异,但对于因疼痛缓解程度降低而导致的切除,美敦力(最好是较老类型的 SCS 装置)和 DRG 刺激的风险较高。未发现其他可预测手术切除的因素:结论:尽管 SCS 和 DRG 刺激是治疗慢性疼痛的行之有效的安全疗法,但长期拆机风险仍然很高。制造商之间的差异凸显了技术革新对改善治疗效果的重要性。提高患者选择和随访策略的严格程度,以及进一步开发设备硬件和软件技术以延长使用寿命,都有可能降低长期拆机风险。
{"title":"Long-term explantation risk in patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion stimulation.","authors":"Kliment Gatzinsky, Beatrice Brink, Kristin Lilja Eyglóardóttir, Tobias Hallén","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105719","DOIUrl":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate long-term explantation risks and causes for the explantation of neuromodulation devices for the treatment of chronic pain from different manufacturers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included patients implanted with a system for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2022. Patient characteristics, explantation rates and causes for explantation were obtained by reviewing medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 400 patients were included in the study. Including all manufacturers, the cumulative explantation risk for any reason was 17%, 23% and 38% at 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Explantation risk due to diminished pain relief at the same intervals was 10%, 14% and 23%. A subgroup comparison of 5-year explantation risk using Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the manufacturers. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, there was no difference in explantation risk for any reason, but for explantation due to diminished pain relief, a higher risk was noted for Medtronic (preferably older types of SCS devices) and DRG stimulation. No other predictive factor for explantation was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although SCS and DRG stimulation are well-established and safe treatments for chronic pain, the long-term explantation risk remains high. The difference between manufacturers highlights the importance of technological evolution for improving therapy outcomes. Increased stringency in patient selection and follow-up strategies, as well as further development of device hardware and software technology for increased longevity, could possibly reduce long-term explantation risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nationwide survey of intraoperative methadone administration for perioperative analgesia. 全国围术期镇痛术中美沙酮使用情况调查。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105881
Alina Razak, Ehab Al Bizri, Youssef Fardos, Jamie Lee Romeiser, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
{"title":"Nationwide survey of intraoperative methadone administration for perioperative analgesia.","authors":"Alina Razak, Ehab Al Bizri, Youssef Fardos, Jamie Lee Romeiser, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105881","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Posterior quadratus lumborum block versus intrathecal morphine analgesia after scheduled cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. 计划剖腹产后腰后肌阻滞与鞘内吗啡镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105454
Thomas Giral, Bernard Victor Delvaux, Davy Huynh, Bertrand Morel, Nabil Zanoun, Franck Ehooman, Thierry Garnier, Olivier Maupain

Background: During the postoperative period of elective cesarean section, intrathecal morphine is effective in the multimodal analgesic regimen, but can cause significant adverse effects. Bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block could be alternatively used. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of both strategies as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. 104 parturients were randomly selected to receive intrathecal morphine or posterior quadratus lumborum block during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was patient-controlled 24-hour cumulative intravenous morphine use. Secondary endpoints were 48-hour cumulative morphine use, static/dynamic pain scores, functional recovery (ObsQoR-11 questionnaire) and adverse effects.

Results: There was no statistical difference in the mean cumulative morphine dose at 24-hour between groups (posterior quadratus lumborum block group, 13.7 (97.5% CI 10.4 to 16.9) mg; intrathecal morphine group, 11.1 (97.5% CI 8.4 to 13.8) mg, p=0.111). Pain scores did not show any difference between groups, excepted at 6 hours for the pain at cough/movement in favor of the posterior quadratus lumborum block group (p=0.013). A better recovery quality was observed at 24 hours in the posterior quadratus lumborum block group (p=0.009). Pruritus was more frequent in intrathecal morphine group parturients (35% vs 2%) CONCLUSIONS: No difference in cumulative morphine dose at 24 hours was observed in posterior quadratus lumborum block group compared with intrathecal morphine group. Posterior quadratus lumborum block can be considered an alternative to intrathecal morphine in cesarean postoperative analgesia, especially in cases of intolerance to morphine.

Trial registration number: NCT04755712.

背景:在择期剖宫产术后,鞘内吗啡在多模式镇痛方案中是有效的,但会引起明显的不良反应。双侧腰后部阻滞可作为替代方法。本研究旨在比较这两种策略作为多模式镇痛方案一部分的有效性和安全性:这是一项前瞻性、随机、盲法对照研究。随机选取了104名产妇,让她们在脊髓麻醉下进行剖宫产手术时接受鞘内吗啡或腰后四肌阻滞。主要终点是由患者控制的 24 小时累积静脉注射吗啡用量。次要终点是48小时累积吗啡用量、静态/动态疼痛评分、功能恢复(ObsQoR-11问卷)和不良反应:各组 24 小时平均累积吗啡剂量无统计学差异(腰后区阻滞组,13.7(97.5% CI 10.4 至 16.9)毫克;鞘内吗啡组,11.1(97.5% CI 8.4 至 13.8)毫克,P=0.111)。疼痛评分在各组之间没有显示出任何差异,只有在6小时时,咳嗽/活动时的疼痛评分有利于后腰方肌阻滞组(P=0.013)。在 24 小时时,观察到腰后肌阻滞组的恢复质量更好(P=0.009)。鞘内吗啡组产妇瘙痒的发生率更高(35% 对 2% ):与鞘内吗啡组相比,腰后区阻滞组在 24 小时内的累积吗啡剂量没有差异。在剖宫产术后镇痛中,尤其是在对吗啡不耐受的情况下,腰后区阻滞可被视为鞘内吗啡的替代品:试验注册号:NCT04755712。
{"title":"Posterior quadratus lumborum block versus intrathecal morphine analgesia after scheduled cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.","authors":"Thomas Giral, Bernard Victor Delvaux, Davy Huynh, Bertrand Morel, Nabil Zanoun, Franck Ehooman, Thierry Garnier, Olivier Maupain","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the postoperative period of elective cesarean section, intrathecal morphine is effective in the multimodal analgesic regimen, but can cause significant adverse effects. Bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block could be alternatively used. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of both strategies as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. 104 parturients were randomly selected to receive intrathecal morphine or posterior quadratus lumborum block during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was patient-controlled 24-hour cumulative intravenous morphine use. Secondary endpoints were 48-hour cumulative morphine use, static/dynamic pain scores, functional recovery (ObsQoR-11 questionnaire) and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in the mean cumulative morphine dose at 24-hour between groups (posterior quadratus lumborum block group, 13.7 (97.5% CI 10.4 to 16.9) mg; intrathecal morphine group, 11.1 (97.5% CI 8.4 to 13.8) mg, p=0.111). Pain scores did not show any difference between groups, excepted at 6 hours for the pain at cough/movement in favor of the posterior quadratus lumborum block group (p=0.013). A better recovery quality was observed at 24 hours in the posterior quadratus lumborum block group (p=0.009). Pruritus was more frequent in intrathecal morphine group parturients (35% vs 2%) CONCLUSIONS: No difference in cumulative morphine dose at 24 hours was observed in posterior quadratus lumborum block group compared with intrathecal morphine group. Posterior quadratus lumborum block can be considered an alternative to intrathecal morphine in cesarean postoperative analgesia, especially in cases of intolerance to morphine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04755712.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current state of the pain medicine match: perspective and an eye to the future. 疼痛医学的现状:展望未来。
IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105770
Anuj Kailash Aggarwal, Meredith Barad, Nu Cindy Chai, Timothy Furnish, Puneet Mishra, Lynn Kohan, Susan Moeschler, Rajiv D Reddy, Bhavana Yalamuru

The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) for pain medicine fellowships marked its 10th anniversary in 2023, coinciding with growing discussions within the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD) regarding the program's future in the context of a recent decline of applicants into pain medicine. This letter explores the rationale behind reassessing the NRMP's utility for pain medicine, examining historical and current trends, and considering the implications of withdrawing from the match. Despite a recent decline in applicants and an increase in unfilled positions, the APPD advocates for continued participation in the match. The match ensures equitable and stable recruitment, preventing the chaotic pre-match environment of competitive, early offers. Data from similar specialties highlight the pitfalls of non-match systems, such as increased applicant pressure and reduced program visibility. The APPD supports maintaining the NRMP match while implementing reforms like preference signaling to address evolving challenges. The APPD aims to preserve the match's benefits and ensure a stable future for pain medicine fellowship recruitment.

疼痛医学国家住院医师配对计划(NRMP)将于 2023 年迎来其十周年纪念日,与此同时,疼痛项目主任协会(APPD)内部关于该计划在近期疼痛医学申请人数下降的背景下的未来的讨论也日益增多。这封信探讨了重新评估 NRMP 对疼痛医学的作用、研究历史和当前趋势以及考虑退出比赛的影响的理由。尽管最近申请者减少,未填补职位增加,APPD仍主张继续参与匹配。匹配确保了招聘的公平性和稳定性,避免了匹配前竞争激烈、提前录取的混乱环境。来自类似专业的数据凸显了非匹配系统的弊端,如申请人压力增大、项目知名度降低等。APPD支持保留NRMP匹配制度,同时实施优惠信号等改革措施,以应对不断变化的挑战。APPD的目标是维护匹配的好处,确保疼痛医学研究员招聘的稳定前景。
{"title":"Current state of the pain medicine match: perspective and an eye to the future.","authors":"Anuj Kailash Aggarwal, Meredith Barad, Nu Cindy Chai, Timothy Furnish, Puneet Mishra, Lynn Kohan, Susan Moeschler, Rajiv D Reddy, Bhavana Yalamuru","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105770","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) for pain medicine fellowships marked its 10th anniversary in 2023, coinciding with growing discussions within the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD) regarding the program's future in the context of a recent decline of applicants into pain medicine. This letter explores the rationale behind reassessing the NRMP's utility for pain medicine, examining historical and current trends, and considering the implications of withdrawing from the match. Despite a recent decline in applicants and an increase in unfilled positions, the APPD advocates for continued participation in the match. The match ensures equitable and stable recruitment, preventing the chaotic pre-match environment of competitive, early offers. Data from similar specialties highlight the pitfalls of non-match systems, such as increased applicant pressure and reduced program visibility. The APPD supports maintaining the NRMP match while implementing reforms like preference signaling to address evolving challenges. The APPD aims to preserve the match's benefits and ensure a stable future for pain medicine fellowship recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1