Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13380
Edward Chun Yin Lau, Yun-Hee Jeon, Sarah N Hilmer, Edwin C K Tan
{"title":"Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Edward Chun Yin Lau, Yun-Hee Jeon, Sarah N Hilmer, Edwin C K Tan","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the prevalence of and factors associated with medication use in people living with dementia in the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using baseline data from a randomised controlled trial known as the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Program (I-HARP) between 2018 and 2021 in Sydney, Australia. Participants included people with mild-moderate dementia and their carers. Medication use was classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, while potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were defined using 2019 Beer's Criteria and 2024 Australian list. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with use of medication classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 people with dementia and their carers were included. Of the people with dementia, 35% were using antidementia medication, 48% psychotropics, 76% PIMs and 65% polypharmacy (≥5 medications). Polypharmacy was associated with the use of psychotropics (adjusted OR [aOR]: 5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-13.39) and PIMs (aOR: 17.38, 95% CI: 5.12-59.02). Higher education level was associated with lower odds of psychotropic use (aOR: .33, 95% CI: .15-.76), and age over 80 years was associated with lower odds of antidementia medication use (aOR: .29; 95% CI: .12-.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of PIMs, psychotropics and polypharmacy were common in this sample of people with dementia living in the community. Associations were seen between participant characteristics and medication use. Future research should focus on reviewing PIMs and polypharmacy in people with dementia living in the community to assess the impact on health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the prevalence of and factors associated with medication use in people living with dementia in the community.

Methods: A cross-sectional study using baseline data from a randomised controlled trial known as the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Program (I-HARP) between 2018 and 2021 in Sydney, Australia. Participants included people with mild-moderate dementia and their carers. Medication use was classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, while potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were defined using 2019 Beer's Criteria and 2024 Australian list. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with use of medication classes.

Results: A total of 130 people with dementia and their carers were included. Of the people with dementia, 35% were using antidementia medication, 48% psychotropics, 76% PIMs and 65% polypharmacy (≥5 medications). Polypharmacy was associated with the use of psychotropics (adjusted OR [aOR]: 5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-13.39) and PIMs (aOR: 17.38, 95% CI: 5.12-59.02). Higher education level was associated with lower odds of psychotropic use (aOR: .33, 95% CI: .15-.76), and age over 80 years was associated with lower odds of antidementia medication use (aOR: .29; 95% CI: .12-.72).

Conclusions: The use of PIMs, psychotropics and polypharmacy were common in this sample of people with dementia living in the community. Associations were seen between participant characteristics and medication use. Future research should focus on reviewing PIMs and polypharmacy in people with dementia living in the community to assess the impact on health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区痴呆症患者的处方模式:一项横断面研究。
目的确定社区痴呆症患者用药的普遍程度和相关因素:这是一项横断面研究,使用的基线数据来自 2018 年至 2021 年期间在澳大利亚悉尼开展的一项名为 "跨学科家庭辅助康复计划"(I-HARP)的随机对照试验。参与者包括轻度-中度痴呆症患者及其照顾者。药物使用根据解剖学治疗化学代码进行分类,而潜在不适当药物(PIMs)则根据2019年比尔标准和2024年澳大利亚清单进行定义。采用逻辑回归模型确定与药物类别使用相关的因素:共纳入 130 名痴呆症患者及其照顾者。在痴呆症患者中,35%使用抗痴呆药物,48%使用精神药物,76%使用PIMs,65%使用多种药物(≥5种药物)。多重用药与精神药物(调整后 OR [aOR]:5.09,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.94-13.39)和 PIMs(aOR:17.38,95% 置信区间 [CI]:5.12-59.02)的使用有关。教育程度越高,使用精神药物的几率越低(aOR:.33,95% CI:.15-.76),年龄超过 80 岁,使用抗痴呆药物的几率越低(aOR:.29;95% CI:.12-.72):结论:在这一社区痴呆症患者样本中,PIMs、精神药物和多种药物的使用十分普遍。参与者的特征与药物使用之间存在关联。今后的研究应重点审查社区痴呆症患者的 PIMs 和多种药物使用情况,以评估其对健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prescribing patterns in people living with dementia in the community: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of falls and associated factors in older adults of the Torres Strait. Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment. Frailty in general medicine patients receiving geriatric medicine liaison services is predictive of adverse outcomes. Associations between dual-task walking and cognitive impairment in people attending a cognitive diagnostic clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1