Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711
Sima Rafiei, Mahsa Honary, Barbara Mezes
{"title":"Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Sima Rafiei, Mahsa Honary, Barbara Mezes","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to understand the key barriers to successfully implementing Social Prescribing (SP) initiatives from different perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-depth process evaluation using a multi-method qualitative design was conducted. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 23) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD' <i>N</i> = 4). Twenty-three stakeholders took part in the study, including community support providers (<i>n</i> = 7), SP link workers (<i>n</i> = 6), service users (<i>n</i> = 6), NHS employees/referrals, and those who were involved in SP leadership and coordination (<i>n</i> = 4). MAXQDA Version 20.0 was used for management and data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eight themes representing challenges for a successful implementation of a SP programme. The themes included (i) financial issues and sustainability, (ii) human resources challenges, (iii) partnership working challenges, (iv) inadequate and inconsistent implementation, (v) information system challenges, (vi) referral system issues, (vii) training and knowledge gaps, and (viii) accessibility and privacy concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings provide insight for commissioners, providers, and link workers to guide the delivery of appropriate SP services by identifying a range of factors that hinder the successful implementation of the programme. Future policy, service development, and research should consider tackling these challenges and generating different ideas for potential solutions to address the root causes of problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1413711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to understand the key barriers to successfully implementing Social Prescribing (SP) initiatives from different perspectives.

Methods: An in-depth process evaluation using a multi-method qualitative design was conducted. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews (N = 23) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD' N = 4). Twenty-three stakeholders took part in the study, including community support providers (n = 7), SP link workers (n = 6), service users (n = 6), NHS employees/referrals, and those who were involved in SP leadership and coordination (n = 4). MAXQDA Version 20.0 was used for management and data analysis.

Results: We identified eight themes representing challenges for a successful implementation of a SP programme. The themes included (i) financial issues and sustainability, (ii) human resources challenges, (iii) partnership working challenges, (iv) inadequate and inconsistent implementation, (v) information system challenges, (vi) referral system issues, (vii) training and knowledge gaps, and (viii) accessibility and privacy concerns.

Conclusion: Study findings provide insight for commissioners, providers, and link workers to guide the delivery of appropriate SP services by identifying a range of factors that hinder the successful implementation of the programme. Future policy, service development, and research should consider tackling these challenges and generating different ideas for potential solutions to address the root causes of problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对应对英国实施社会处方挑战的看法。
研究目的本研究旨在从不同角度了解成功实施社会处方(SP)举措的主要障碍:方法:采用多种方法的定性设计进行了深入的过程评估。通过半结构式访谈(23 人)和焦点小组讨论(4 人)收集定性数据。23 名利益相关者参与了研究,包括社区支持提供者(n = 7)、SP 联络工作者(n = 6)、服务使用者(n = 6)、NHS 雇员/转介者以及参与 SP 领导和协调的人员(n = 4)。采用 MAXQDA 20.0 版进行管理和数据分析:我们确定了八个主题,它们代表了成功实施 SP 计划所面临的挑战。这些主题包括:(i) 财务问题和可持续性,(ii) 人力资源挑战,(iii) 伙伴合作挑战,(iv) 实施不充分和不一致,(v) 信息系统挑战,(vi) 转诊系统问题,(vii) 培训和知识差距,以及 (viii) 可及性和隐私问题:研究结果通过确定一系列阻碍计划成功实施的因素,为专员、服务提供者和联系工作者提供了指导适当提供 SP 服务的真知灼见。未来的政策、服务发展和研究应考虑应对这些挑战,并为潜在的解决方案提出不同的想法,以从根本上解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1