The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670
E M Benjamin, A Peterson, L Schweitzer, S Calcasola, F Korn, P Lodato, J Bradley, C Hemmelgarn
{"title":"The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm.","authors":"E M Benjamin, A Peterson, L Schweitzer, S Calcasola, F Korn, P Lodato, J Bradley, C Hemmelgarn","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A change is slowly occurring in the ways healthcare responds to patients after they experience harm. The imperative to be transparent with patients and families has been accepted as a key element of high quality, safe and patient-centered healthcare. The language used to describe the experience of the people impacted by harm events is also evolving, recognizing that certain words can help or hinder the experience of patients affected by harm. The language describing these efforts is shifting from legal and institutional terminology to more inclusive terms recognizing broader groups impacted by harm. We describe the evolution of language regarding harm response and make recommendations for the future of the field. While our observations on language are specific to the terminology used in the United States, the concept of moving to more patient-centered language is universal. Other countries should make similar reviews to use more patient-centered language when discussing patient harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1513670"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A change is slowly occurring in the ways healthcare responds to patients after they experience harm. The imperative to be transparent with patients and families has been accepted as a key element of high quality, safe and patient-centered healthcare. The language used to describe the experience of the people impacted by harm events is also evolving, recognizing that certain words can help or hinder the experience of patients affected by harm. The language describing these efforts is shifting from legal and institutional terminology to more inclusive terms recognizing broader groups impacted by harm. We describe the evolution of language regarding harm response and make recommendations for the future of the field. While our observations on language are specific to the terminology used in the United States, the concept of moving to more patient-centered language is universal. Other countries should make similar reviews to use more patient-centered language when discussing patient harm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在患者受到伤害后,医疗保健应对患者的方式正在慢慢发生变化。对患者和家属保持透明已被视为高质量、安全和以患者为中心的医疗保健的关键要素。用于描述受伤害事件影响的人们的经历的语言也在不断演变,因为人们认识到某些词语可能会帮助或阻碍受伤害事件影响的患者的经历。描述这些工作的语言正在从法律和机构术语转变为更具包容性的术语,承认受到伤害影响的更广泛群体。我们描述了有关伤害应对的语言演变,并对该领域的未来提出了建议。虽然我们对语言的观察是针对美国使用的术语,但转向更以患者为中心的语言这一概念具有普遍性。其他国家也应进行类似的审查,在讨论患者伤害时使用更加以患者为中心的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient-reported outcome measures to deliver patient and family-centered care in pediatrics: the ball is now in our court. The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm. The impact of centralization on structural changes in healthcare: when it works. Approaches to implementing and financing primary health care in Kenya: a case of seven counties. Closing the mental health gap: transforming Pakistan's mental health landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1