Participation With Compensation: Ethical Considerations for Research Payment Practices With People Who Are Incarcerated.

Kiran Rodrigues, Matthew Murphy, Helen E Jack, Justin Berk
{"title":"Participation With Compensation: Ethical Considerations for Research Payment Practices With People Who Are Incarcerated.","authors":"Kiran Rodrigues, Matthew Murphy, Helen E Jack, Justin Berk","doi":"10.1089/jchc.24.01.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The participation of incarcerated individuals in research is necessary to appropriately address the health disparities that affect them and to adapt and implement health services for the carceral setting. Incarceration significantly impacts health, leading to negative outcomes including accelerated aging and increased mortality, with these effects disproportionately impacting communities of color. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Human Research Protections outlines ethical approaches to compensating individuals who participate in research activities, yet lacks specific guidance for payment within carceral settings. Historical abuses in carceral research underscore the persistent need for robust protections for incarcerated research participants. Existing regulations offer some protection but inadequately address ethical payment practices. Substantial variability in payment policies across carceral systems and vague national guidelines pose ethical challenges in ensuring equitable treatment for incarcerated research participants. We outline the ethical concerns related to compensating incarcerated individuals for participating in research and present a framework of approaches to payment. We argue for payment parity between incarcerated and community research participants. More community-engaged research is needed to understand the perspectives of incarcerated individuals on ethical payment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"368-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.24.01.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The participation of incarcerated individuals in research is necessary to appropriately address the health disparities that affect them and to adapt and implement health services for the carceral setting. Incarceration significantly impacts health, leading to negative outcomes including accelerated aging and increased mortality, with these effects disproportionately impacting communities of color. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Human Research Protections outlines ethical approaches to compensating individuals who participate in research activities, yet lacks specific guidance for payment within carceral settings. Historical abuses in carceral research underscore the persistent need for robust protections for incarcerated research participants. Existing regulations offer some protection but inadequately address ethical payment practices. Substantial variability in payment policies across carceral systems and vague national guidelines pose ethical challenges in ensuring equitable treatment for incarcerated research participants. We outline the ethical concerns related to compensating incarcerated individuals for participating in research and present a framework of approaches to payment. We argue for payment parity between incarcerated and community research participants. More community-engaged research is needed to understand the perspectives of incarcerated individuals on ethical payment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有偿参与:对被监禁者进行研究付款做法的伦理考虑。
被监禁者有必要参与研究,以适当解决影响他们的健康差异问题,并针对监禁环境调整和实施健康服务。监禁严重影响健康,导致包括加速衰老和增加死亡率在内的负面结果,而这些影响对有色人种社区的影响尤为严重。美国卫生与公众服务部人类研究保护办公室(Office for Human Research Protections)概述了对参与研究活动的个人进行补偿的道德方法,但缺乏对在监禁环境中进行补偿的具体指导。囚禁研究中的历史性滥用强调了为被监禁的研究参与者提供有力保护的长期必要性。现有法规提供了一些保护,但对符合道德规范的付款行为却没有提供充分的指导。不同监狱系统的支付政策存在巨大差异,而国家指导方针又模糊不清,这给确保公平对待被监禁的研究参与者带来了伦理挑战。我们概述了与补偿参与研究的在押人员相关的伦理问题,并提出了一个付费方法框架。我们主张为被监禁者和社区研究参与者提供同等报酬。需要开展更多社区参与的研究,以了解被监禁者对伦理支付的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conducting Grief Support Groups in Prison: A Pragmatic Feasibility and Impact Study. Characterization of Dermatologic Disease and Challenges in Care of Incarcerated Patients. The Development, Delivery, Content, and Impact of Nutrition Education in Prisons: A Systematic Review. An Assessment of the Nutritional Profile of Foods Accessible to Incarcerated Males in Alabama. Resident Experiences at a Community Hospital Caring for Patients Who Are Incarcerated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1