The Life + Death Education Framework: Proposition of a 'Universal' Framework for Implementation.

Omega Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1177/00302228241295786
Huy Phan, Bing Ngu, Chao-Sheng Hsu, Si-Chi Chen
{"title":"The Life + Death Education Framework: Proposition of a 'Universal' Framework for Implementation.","authors":"Huy Phan, Bing Ngu, Chao-Sheng Hsu, Si-Chi Chen","doi":"10.1177/00302228241295786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Life</i> and <i>death education</i> is a distinct field of study that has potential life relevance for consideration (e.g., self-awareness and subsequent improvement of one's own health well-being). Existing research development, situating in different learning-sociocultural contexts, has provided consistent evidence that showcases the differing viewpoints of life functioning (e.g., what is the true meaning of life?) and the intricate nature of death and dying (e.g., a death ritual that closely associates with a particular cultural group). Some of the research studies undertaken indicate the effective use of 'philosophization' or the discourse of philosophical analysis, enabling individuals to philosophize, contemplate, and seek transpersonal understanding of the subject matters of life and death (e.g., can a state of 'spiritual transcendence' help to alleviate a person's fear of death?). Such discourse, interestingly, has offered some informative yields for enriching and meaningful life purposes - for example, the seeking to attain transpersonal understanding of life (e.g., what does a state of self-transcendence actually mean?) and/or transpersonal life experience may assist a senior citizen to cope with his mental health during a temporary health crisis. Our teaching and research interest of life and death education over the past decade has led us to consider one important line of inquiry for development: namely, the proposition of a 'universal' blueprint or framework of life and death education for curriculum development, teaching, and research purposes. We are cognizant of the fact that, to date, there is no clear consensus or agreement as to what one is expected (e.g., specific learning outcome) to teach students who wish to study and learn about life and death education. On this basis, the present theoretical article introduces a theoretical framework, termed as 'The Life + Death Education Framework' (e.g., for universities), to assist educators for their quality teaching and/or research inquiries of life and death education. We firmly believe that the Life + Death Education Framework can be universal and, in this case, apply to different learning-sociocultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228241295786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241295786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life and death education is a distinct field of study that has potential life relevance for consideration (e.g., self-awareness and subsequent improvement of one's own health well-being). Existing research development, situating in different learning-sociocultural contexts, has provided consistent evidence that showcases the differing viewpoints of life functioning (e.g., what is the true meaning of life?) and the intricate nature of death and dying (e.g., a death ritual that closely associates with a particular cultural group). Some of the research studies undertaken indicate the effective use of 'philosophization' or the discourse of philosophical analysis, enabling individuals to philosophize, contemplate, and seek transpersonal understanding of the subject matters of life and death (e.g., can a state of 'spiritual transcendence' help to alleviate a person's fear of death?). Such discourse, interestingly, has offered some informative yields for enriching and meaningful life purposes - for example, the seeking to attain transpersonal understanding of life (e.g., what does a state of self-transcendence actually mean?) and/or transpersonal life experience may assist a senior citizen to cope with his mental health during a temporary health crisis. Our teaching and research interest of life and death education over the past decade has led us to consider one important line of inquiry for development: namely, the proposition of a 'universal' blueprint or framework of life and death education for curriculum development, teaching, and research purposes. We are cognizant of the fact that, to date, there is no clear consensus or agreement as to what one is expected (e.g., specific learning outcome) to teach students who wish to study and learn about life and death education. On this basis, the present theoretical article introduces a theoretical framework, termed as 'The Life + Death Education Framework' (e.g., for universities), to assist educators for their quality teaching and/or research inquiries of life and death education. We firmly believe that the Life + Death Education Framework can be universal and, in this case, apply to different learning-sociocultural contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生死教育框架:提出 "通用 "实施框架。
生死教育是一个独特的研究领域,具有潜在的生命考量意义(例如,自我意识和随之而来的自身健康福祉的改善)。在不同的学习-社会-文化背景下,现有的研究发展提供了一致的证据,展示了生命功能的不同观点(例如,生命的真正意义是什么?)以及死亡和死亡的复杂性质(例如,与特定文化群体密切相关的死亡仪式)。一些研究表明,"哲学化 "或哲学分析话语的有效使用,使人们能够对生与死的主题进行哲学思考、沉思并寻求超个人的理解(例如,"精神超越 "的状态是否有助于减轻一个人对死亡的恐惧?)有趣的是,这些论述为丰富和有意义的生活提供了一些信息--例如,寻求对生命的超个人理解(例如,自我超越的状态究竟意味着什么?)和/或超个人的生活体验可能有助于老年人在暂时的健康危机中应对心理健康。过去十年来,我们对生死教育的教学和研究兴趣促使我们思考一个重要的发展方向:即为课程开发、教学和研究目的提出一个 "通用 "的生死教育蓝图或框架。我们认识到,迄今为止,对于希望研究和学习生死教育的学生应该学习什么(例如,具体的学习成果),还没有明确的共识或协议。在此基础上,本理论文章介绍了一个理论框架,称为 "生+死教育框架"(例如,针对大学),以帮助教育工作者进行高质量的生死教育教学和/或研究探索。我们坚信,"生+死教育框架 "具有普适性,可适用于不同的学习-社会-文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Young People's Experiences of Death Anxiety and Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic. The Power of Death Valence: A Revised Terror Management Process. 'Without Them, There Would Be Almost Nothing' - Experiences of Interacting With Volunteers in Everyday Life in Nursing Homes - Perspectives of Residents and Next of Kin. Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale. End-Of-Life Care From the Perspectives of Patients With Cancer and Their Nurses: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1