{"title":"The effects of subsensory electrical noise stimulation on the reactive control of balance during support surface perturbations","authors":"Zahra Bassiri , Oluwasegun Akinniyi , Nathan Humphrey , Dario Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control.</div></div><div><h3>Research Questions</h3><div>To test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (<em>BSTh</em> and <em>FSTh</em>). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - <em>MOS</em>). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90 % of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TS and LS increased the <em>BSTh</em> by 31.5 % (p=0.002) and 16.4 % (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0 %, step length by 17.1 %, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7 % (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5 % and 3.5 % (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8 % and 4.5 %, respectively (p<0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The ability to respond effectively to balance perturbations is crucial for fall prevention. Subsensory electrical stimulation (SES) applied to the skin leads to improved proactive balance control but there is limited evidence on the SES effect on reactive balance control.
Research Questions
To test the efficiency of SES in improving reactive balance control against unpredictable support surface perturbations and to compare the effects of SES applied to the trunk and the lower legs.
Methods
Twenty-three young adults stood on a treadmill while recovering from 15 forward and 15 backward surface translations of increasing magnitude to determine the backward and forward stepping thresholds (BSTh and FSTh). Then, they recovered from three repetitions of forward and backward perturbations of fixed magnitude to determine the characteristic of the compensatory step (i.e., step time, step length, step delay and Margin of Stability - MOS). Each test was conducted with no stimulation (NS), leg stimulation (LS), or trunk stimulation (TS) equal to 90 % of the sensory threshold. Repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the main and interaction effects of stimulation and repetition.
Results
TS and LS increased the BSTh by 31.5 % (p=0.002) and 16.4 % (p=0.028), respectively, with greater effects of TS; (ii) during backward perturbations, TS reduced compensatory step time by 9.0 %, step length by 17.1 %, and MOS at compensatory heel strike by 17.7 % (p<0.016); and (iii) during forward perturbations, LS and TS reduced the step time by 4.5 % and 3.5 % (p<0.017), and increased the minimum MOS by 7.8 % and 4.5 %, respectively (p<0.048).
Significance
This is the first study that showed how the application of SES affects reactive balance control during support surface perturbations. TS was more effective than LS during backward perturbations. TS may be an effective strategy to enhance balance control during reactive postural tasks, thus potentially reducing fall risk.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.